| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#21
posted to rec.boats,rec.motorcycles,misc.education,sci.econ,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
Jews Trying To Squash Wagner Opera In Los Angeles
Calif Bill wrote
Rod Speed wrote Turby wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Datesfat Chicks wrote Rod Speed wrote I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable involuntary medical experiments during that era have essentially been excluded. No it hasnt. http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New England Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the Journal's editor, Doctor Arnold Relman.15 Relman's refusal to publish Nazi data along with Pozos' comments was understandable given the source of the Nazi data and the way it was obtained. Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that hasnt been excluded. My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet searcher-- is that consensus of the medical community was to exclude it. You're wrong. I didn't even know it was available. Corse it is. I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me know where I'm wrong. Basically it hasnt been excluded. The question of the "exclusion" of the music No one is proposing that. Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly equivalent to exclusion in spirit. Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either. The medical data is available. Correct. Hard to find, Nope. and is extremely frowned upon to use or quote. Wrong. Probably enough to derail a career. Clearly hasnt derailed Pozos' Which pretty much excludes it use. Like hell it does. I don't have a horse in this race either way, but you're pretty loose with those laconic answers. You get to like that or lump it. Do you have any evidence to back up your assertions? Yep, Pozos hasnt had his career derailed and anyone with even half a clue can find the medical data being discussed. Or can you expand on those answers to convince someone with an open mind who doesn't just take "wrong" as a fact? You aint worth the trouble, because you dont have anything even remotely resembling anything like an open mind except in the sense that there is nothing viable between your ears. Pozoz may just not give a crap. And clearly those who have published him havent either. But being formerly in the Bioengineering field before retiring, I saw the hoops first hand. Just because some fools operate that way, doesnt mean that everyone does. |
|
#22
posted to rec.boats,rec.motorcycles,misc.education,sci.econ,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jews Trying To Squash Wagner Opera In Los Angeles
"Rod Speed" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Turby wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Datesfat Chicks wrote Rod Speed wrote I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable involuntary medical experiments during that era have essentially been excluded. No it hasnt. http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New England Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the Journal's editor, Doctor Arnold Relman.15 Relman's refusal to publish Nazi data along with Pozos' comments was understandable given the source of the Nazi data and the way it was obtained. Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that hasnt been excluded. My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet searcher-- is that consensus of the medical community was to exclude it. You're wrong. I didn't even know it was available. Corse it is. I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me know where I'm wrong. Basically it hasnt been excluded. The question of the "exclusion" of the music No one is proposing that. Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly equivalent to exclusion in spirit. Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either. The medical data is available. Correct. Hard to find, Nope. and is extremely frowned upon to use or quote. Wrong. Probably enough to derail a career. Clearly hasnt derailed Pozos' Which pretty much excludes it use. Like hell it does. I don't have a horse in this race either way, but you're pretty loose with those laconic answers. You get to like that or lump it. Do you have any evidence to back up your assertions? Yep, Pozos hasnt had his career derailed and anyone with even half a clue can find the medical data being discussed. Or can you expand on those answers to convince someone with an open mind who doesn't just take "wrong" as a fact? You aint worth the trouble, because you dont have anything even remotely resembling anything like an open mind except in the sense that there is nothing viable between your ears. Pozoz may just not give a crap. And clearly those who have published him havent either. But being formerly in the Bioengineering field before retiring, I saw the hoops first hand. Just because some fools operate that way, doesnt mean that everyone does. And what is your expertise in the medical field? |
|
#23
posted to rec.boats,rec.motorcycles,misc.education,sci.econ,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jews Trying To Squash Wagner Opera In Los Angeles
Calif Bill wrote
Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Turby wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Datesfat Chicks wrote Rod Speed wrote I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable involuntary medical experiments during that era have essentially been excluded. No it hasnt. http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New England Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the Journal's editor, Doctor Arnold Relman.15 Relman's refusal to publish Nazi data along with Pozos' comments was understandable given the source of the Nazi data and the way it was obtained. Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that hasnt been excluded. My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet searcher-- is that consensus of the medical community was to exclude it. You're wrong. I didn't even know it was available. Corse it is. I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me know where I'm wrong. Basically it hasnt been excluded. The question of the "exclusion" of the music No one is proposing that. Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly equivalent to exclusion in spirit. Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either. The medical data is available. Correct. Hard to find, Nope. and is extremely frowned upon to use or quote. Wrong. Probably enough to derail a career. Clearly hasnt derailed Pozos' Which pretty much excludes it use. Like hell it does. I don't have a horse in this race either way, but you're pretty loose with those laconic answers. You get to like that or lump it. Do you have any evidence to back up your assertions? Yep, Pozos hasnt had his career derailed and anyone with even half a clue can find the medical data being discussed. Or can you expand on those answers to convince someone with an open mind who doesn't just take "wrong" as a fact? You aint worth the trouble, because you dont have anything even remotely resembling anything like an open mind except in the sense that there is nothing viable between your ears. Pozoz may just not give a crap. And clearly those who have published him havent either. But being formerly in the Bioengineering field before retiring, I saw the hoops first hand. Just because some fools operate that way, doesnt mean that everyone does. And what is your expertise in the medical field? Dont need any. Just need to see that Pozos has done fine, in spite of your claim. He aint alone either. It makes absolutely no sense to just waste those lives ruined by the activitys of the nazis. |
|
#24
posted to rec.boats,rec.motorcycles,misc.education,sci.econ,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jews Trying To Squash Wagner Opera In Los Angeles
In article m,
says... "Turby" wrote thought about whether data found by evil Nazi methods is acceptable or censored. I don't think it really matters to me. .... When I consider it ... suppose some evil scientist(s) used inhuman methods to discover say, a simple cure for cancer and AIDS - a benign pill one could take and be cancer and AIDS free for life. Should that info be supressed because of the way it was discovered?? No, it should be suppressed because it would interfere with the cash being pulled in by Big Pharma (who want AIDS to be common, chronic, and needing expensive meds for life.) It would also interfere with the money and egos at various AIDS focused organisations. -- Want Privacy? http://www.MinistryOfPrivacy.com/ |
|
#25
posted to rec.boats,rec.motorcycles,misc.education,sci.econ,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jews Trying To Squash Wagner Opera In Los Angeles
"Rod Speed" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Turby wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Datesfat Chicks wrote Rod Speed wrote I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable involuntary medical experiments during that era have essentially been excluded. No it hasnt. http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New England Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the Journal's editor, Doctor Arnold Relman.15 Relman's refusal to publish Nazi data along with Pozos' comments was understandable given the source of the Nazi data and the way it was obtained. Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that hasnt been excluded. My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet searcher-- is that consensus of the medical community was to exclude it. You're wrong. I didn't even know it was available. Corse it is. I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me know where I'm wrong. Basically it hasnt been excluded. The question of the "exclusion" of the music No one is proposing that. Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly equivalent to exclusion in spirit. Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either. The medical data is available. Correct. Hard to find, Nope. and is extremely frowned upon to use or quote. Wrong. Probably enough to derail a career. Clearly hasnt derailed Pozos' Which pretty much excludes it use. Like hell it does. I don't have a horse in this race either way, but you're pretty loose with those laconic answers. You get to like that or lump it. Do you have any evidence to back up your assertions? Yep, Pozos hasnt had his career derailed and anyone with even half a clue can find the medical data being discussed. Or can you expand on those answers to convince someone with an open mind who doesn't just take "wrong" as a fact? You aint worth the trouble, because you dont have anything even remotely resembling anything like an open mind except in the sense that there is nothing viable between your ears. Pozoz may just not give a crap. And clearly those who have published him havent either. But being formerly in the Bioengineering field before retiring, I saw the hoops first hand. Just because some fools operate that way, doesnt mean that everyone does. And what is your expertise in the medical field? Dont need any. Just need to see that Pozos has done fine, in spite of your claim. He aint alone either. It makes absolutely no sense to just waste those lives ruined by the activitys of the nazis. So no expertise, and bad vocabulary. Fits a dummy. |
|
#26
posted to rec.boats,rec.motorcycles,misc.education,sci.econ,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jews Trying To Squash Wagner Opera In Los Angeles
Calif Bill wrote
Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Turby wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Datesfat Chicks wrote Rod Speed wrote I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable involuntary medical experiments during that era have essentially been excluded. No it hasnt. http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New England Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the Journal's editor, Doctor Arnold Relman.15 Relman's refusal to publish Nazi data along with Pozos' comments was understandable given the source of the Nazi data and the way it was obtained. Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that hasnt been excluded. My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet searcher-- is that consensus of the medical community was to exclude it. You're wrong. I didn't even know it was available. Corse it is. I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me know where I'm wrong. Basically it hasnt been excluded. The question of the "exclusion" of the music No one is proposing that. Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly equivalent to exclusion in spirit. Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either. The medical data is available. Correct. Hard to find, Nope. and is extremely frowned upon to use or quote. Wrong. Probably enough to derail a career. Clearly hasnt derailed Pozos' Which pretty much excludes it use. Like hell it does. I don't have a horse in this race either way, but you're pretty loose with those laconic answers. You get to like that or lump it. Do you have any evidence to back up your assertions? Yep, Pozos hasnt had his career derailed and anyone with even half a clue can find the medical data being discussed. Or can you expand on those answers to convince someone with an open mind who doesn't just take "wrong" as a fact? You aint worth the trouble, because you dont have anything even remotely resembling anything like an open mind except in the sense that there is nothing viable between your ears. Pozoz may just not give a crap. And clearly those who have published him havent either. But being formerly in the Bioengineering field before retiring, I saw the hoops first hand. Just because some fools operate that way, doesnt mean that everyone does. And what is your expertise in the medical field? Dont need any. Just need to see that Pozos has done fine, in spite of your claim. He aint alone either. It makes absolutely no sense to just waste those lives ruined by the activitys of the nazis. So no expertise, You're lying now. and bad vocabulary. Yours is nothing to write home about, you pathetic excuse for a lying bull**** artist. Fits a dummy. Leave you for dead, ****wit. |
|
#27
posted to rec.boats,rec.motorcycles,misc.education,sci.econ,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jews Trying To Squash Wagner Opera In Los Angeles
"Rod Speed" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Turby wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Datesfat Chicks wrote Rod Speed wrote I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable involuntary medical experiments during that era have essentially been excluded. No it hasnt. http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New England Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the Journal's editor, Doctor Arnold Relman.15 Relman's refusal to publish Nazi data along with Pozos' comments was understandable given the source of the Nazi data and the way it was obtained. Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that hasnt been excluded. My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet searcher-- is that consensus of the medical community was to exclude it. You're wrong. I didn't even know it was available. Corse it is. I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me know where I'm wrong. Basically it hasnt been excluded. The question of the "exclusion" of the music No one is proposing that. Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly equivalent to exclusion in spirit. Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either. The medical data is available. Correct. Hard to find, Nope. and is extremely frowned upon to use or quote. Wrong. Probably enough to derail a career. Clearly hasnt derailed Pozos' Which pretty much excludes it use. Like hell it does. I don't have a horse in this race either way, but you're pretty loose with those laconic answers. You get to like that or lump it. Do you have any evidence to back up your assertions? Yep, Pozos hasnt had his career derailed and anyone with even half a clue can find the medical data being discussed. Or can you expand on those answers to convince someone with an open mind who doesn't just take "wrong" as a fact? You aint worth the trouble, because you dont have anything even remotely resembling anything like an open mind except in the sense that there is nothing viable between your ears. Pozoz may just not give a crap. And clearly those who have published him havent either. But being formerly in the Bioengineering field before retiring, I saw the hoops first hand. Just because some fools operate that way, doesnt mean that everyone does. And what is your expertise in the medical field? Dont need any. Just need to see that Pozos has done fine, in spite of your claim. He aint alone either. It makes absolutely no sense to just waste those lives ruined by the activitys of the nazis. So no expertise, You're lying now. and bad vocabulary. Yours is nothing to write home about, you pathetic excuse for a lying bull**** artist. Fits a dummy. Leave you for dead, ****wit. And the dummy resorts to foul language. Another point in his idiocy. |
|
#28
posted to rec.boats,rec.motorcycles,misc.education,sci.econ,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jews Trying To Squash Wagner Opera In Los Angeles
Calif Bill wrote
Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Turby wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Datesfat Chicks wrote Rod Speed wrote I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable involuntary medical experiments during that era have essentially been excluded. No it hasnt. http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New England Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the Journal's editor, Doctor Arnold Relman.15 Relman's refusal to publish Nazi data along with Pozos' comments was understandable given the source of the Nazi data and the way it was obtained. Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that hasnt been excluded. My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet searcher-- is that consensus of the medical community was to exclude it. You're wrong. I didn't even know it was available. Corse it is. I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me know where I'm wrong. Basically it hasnt been excluded. The question of the "exclusion" of the music No one is proposing that. Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly equivalent to exclusion in spirit. Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either. The medical data is available. Correct. Hard to find, Nope. and is extremely frowned upon to use or quote. Wrong. Probably enough to derail a career. Clearly hasnt derailed Pozos' Which pretty much excludes it use. Like hell it does. I don't have a horse in this race either way, but you're pretty loose with those laconic answers. You get to like that or lump it. Do you have any evidence to back up your assertions? Yep, Pozos hasnt had his career derailed and anyone with even half a clue can find the medical data being discussed. Or can you expand on those answers to convince someone with an open mind who doesn't just take "wrong" as a fact? You aint worth the trouble, because you dont have anything even remotely resembling anything like an open mind except in the sense that there is nothing viable between your ears. Pozoz may just not give a crap. And clearly those who have published him havent either. But being formerly in the Bioengineering field before retiring, I saw the hoops first hand. Just because some fools operate that way, doesnt mean that everyone does. And what is your expertise in the medical field? Dont need any. Just need to see that Pozos has done fine, in spite of your claim. He aint alone either. It makes absolutely no sense to just waste those lives ruined by the activitys of the nazis. So no expertise, You're lying now. and bad vocabulary. Yours is nothing to write home about, you pathetic excuse for a lying bull**** artist. Fits a dummy. Leave you for dead, ****wit. And the dummy resorts to foul language. The ****wit trots out that pathetically hoary old line when its got done like a ****ing dinner, over and over again. |
|
#29
posted to rec.boats,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jews Trying To Squash Wagner Opera In Los Angeles
Rod Speed wrote:
Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Turby wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Datesfat Chicks wrote Rod Speed wrote I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable involuntary medical experiments during that era have essentially been excluded. No it hasnt. http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New England Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the Journal's editor, Doctor Arnold Relman.15 Relman's refusal to publish Nazi data along with Pozos' comments was understandable given the source of the Nazi data and the way it was obtained. Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that hasnt been excluded. My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet searcher-- is that consensus of the medical community was to exclude it. You're wrong. I didn't even know it was available. Corse it is. I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me know where I'm wrong. Basically it hasnt been excluded. The question of the "exclusion" of the music No one is proposing that. Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly equivalent to exclusion in spirit. Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either. The medical data is available. Correct. Hard to find, Nope. and is extremely frowned upon to use or quote. Wrong. Probably enough to derail a career. Clearly hasnt derailed Pozos' Which pretty much excludes it use. Like hell it does. I don't have a horse in this race either way, but you're pretty loose with those laconic answers. You get to like that or lump it. Do you have any evidence to back up your assertions? Yep, Pozos hasnt had his career derailed and anyone with even half a clue can find the medical data being discussed. Or can you expand on those answers to convince someone with an open mind who doesn't just take "wrong" as a fact? You aint worth the trouble, because you dont have anything even remotely resembling anything like an open mind except in the sense that there is nothing viable between your ears. Pozoz may just not give a crap. And clearly those who have published him havent either. But being formerly in the Bioengineering field before retiring, I saw the hoops first hand. Just because some fools operate that way, doesnt mean that everyone does. And what is your expertise in the medical field? Dont need any. Just need to see that Pozos has done fine, in spite of your claim. He aint alone either. It makes absolutely no sense to just waste those lives ruined by the activitys of the nazis. So no expertise, You're lying now. and bad vocabulary. Yours is nothing to write home about, you pathetic excuse for a lying bull**** artist. Fits a dummy. Leave you for dead, ****wit. And the dummy resorts to foul language. The ****wit trots out that pathetically hoary old line when its got done like a ****ing dinner, over and over again. plonk. |
|
#30
posted to rec.boats,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jews Trying To Squash Wagner Opera In Los Angeles
NotNow wrote:
Rod Speed wrote: Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Turby wrote Rod Speed wrote Calif Bill wrote Rod Speed wrote Datesfat Chicks wrote Rod Speed wrote I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable involuntary medical experiments during that era have essentially been excluded. No it hasnt. http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New England Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the Journal's editor, Doctor Arnold Relman.15 Relman's refusal to publish Nazi data along with Pozos' comments was understandable given the source of the Nazi data and the way it was obtained. Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that hasnt been excluded. My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet searcher-- is that consensus of the medical community was to exclude it. You're wrong. I didn't even know it was available. Corse it is. I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me know where I'm wrong. Basically it hasnt been excluded. The question of the "exclusion" of the music No one is proposing that. Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly equivalent to exclusion in spirit. Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either. The medical data is available. Correct. Hard to find, Nope. and is extremely frowned upon to use or quote. Wrong. Probably enough to derail a career. Clearly hasnt derailed Pozos' Which pretty much excludes it use. Like hell it does. I don't have a horse in this race either way, but you're pretty loose with those laconic answers. You get to like that or lump it. Do you have any evidence to back up your assertions? Yep, Pozos hasnt had his career derailed and anyone with even half a clue can find the medical data being discussed. Or can you expand on those answers to convince someone with an open mind who doesn't just take "wrong" as a fact? You aint worth the trouble, because you dont have anything even remotely resembling anything like an open mind except in the sense that there is nothing viable between your ears. Pozoz may just not give a crap. And clearly those who have published him havent either. But being formerly in the Bioengineering field before retiring, I saw the hoops first hand. Just because some fools operate that way, doesnt mean that everyone does. And what is your expertise in the medical field? Dont need any. Just need to see that Pozos has done fine, in spite of your claim. He aint alone either. It makes absolutely no sense to just waste those lives ruined by the activitys of the nazis. So no expertise, You're lying now. and bad vocabulary. Yours is nothing to write home about, you pathetic excuse for a lying bull**** artist. Fits a dummy. Leave you for dead, ****wit. And the dummy resorts to foul language. The ****wit trots out that pathetically hoary old line when its got done like a ****ing dinner, over and over again. plonk. No one gives a flying red **** what clowns like you do or do not read, child. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| My kind of opera... | General | |||
| The Internet Opera? | ASA | |||
| wagner hydraulic steering | General | |||
| ASA Opera - Is this real???? | ASA | |||
| My Opera - It's all about... | ASA | |||
Linear Mode
