Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Family got me a set of Dr. WHO DVDs in the hopes I'd watch TV. It
works. Kinda addicting although silly. Each episode is just long enough to not lose my interest, and no damn commercials. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 30, 11:16*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Family got me a set of Dr. WHO DVDs in the hopes I'd watch TV. *It works. *Kinda addicting although silly. *Each episode is just long enough to not lose my interest, and no damn commercials. Liberals are like Daleks (but a lot less competent), every time you try to be nice to em they turn on you. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:31:45 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Jul 30, 11:16*pm, Frogwatch wrote: Family got me a set of Dr. WHO DVDs in the hopes I'd watch TV. *It works. *Kinda addicting although silly. *Each episode is just long enough to not lose my interest, and no damn commercials. Liberals are like Daleks (but a lot less competent), every time you try to be nice to em they turn on you. Is this the Dr. Who that aired on PBS back in the '80's? -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 30, 11:46*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:31:45 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jul 30, 11:16*pm, Frogwatch wrote: Family got me a set of Dr. WHO DVDs in the hopes I'd watch TV. *It works. *Kinda addicting although silly. *Each episode is just long enough to not lose my interest, and no damn commercials. Liberals are like Daleks (but a lot less competent), every time you try to be nice to em they turn on you. Is this the Dr. Who that aired on PBS back in the '80's? -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service * * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access New episodes, better Special FX, new actors, not bad for a weekly show. Most of em are not that good but one called "Blink" blew me away. No violence, no real monsters but truly bizarre. I gotta give credit to the writer of that one. Afterwards, I just sat there and thought "Whoa, that was really weird".. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:16:47 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Family got me a set of Dr. WHO DVDs in the hopes I'd watch TV. It works. Kinda addicting although silly. Each episode is just long enough to not lose my interest, and no damn commercials. Which series - the first of the "new" Davies written/directed with Ecclestone or the second set with Tennant which was a combination of Davies and Moffet writing and directing? Series One with Chris Ecclestone (Dr. Who) and Bille Piper (Rose Tyler) is a good place to start - most of those are great episodes. It really gets rolling in Series Two with David Tennant (Dr. Who) and Piper. Series Three really gets starts off with a really good couple of episodes, a few so-so episodes and ends with a bang - Martha Jones (Freema Agyeman) as his Companion starts off slow, but she gets the idea about four episodes in and becomes one of the better companions. The best though is Series Four with Catherine Tate as Companion Donna Noble - there isn't a lousy episode in the bunch. I really like what they did with the Cybermen and Daleks - they made them understandable for non-Who viewers and filled in a lot of the back story of Dr. Who. The one thing I didn't like was including The Master - that requires a lot of backstory detail and according to the new Who fan reviews, they didn't quite understand the role that The Master played in Dr. Who's universe as last of the Time Lords. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:53:00 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Jul 30, 11:46*pm, wrote: On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:31:45 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jul 30, 11:16*pm, Frogwatch wrote: Family got me a set of Dr. WHO DVDs in the hopes I'd watch TV. *It works. *Kinda addicting although silly. *Each episode is just long enough to not lose my interest, and no damn commercials. Liberals are like Daleks (but a lot less competent), every time you try to be nice to em they turn on you. Is this the Dr. Who that aired on PBS back in the '80's? -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service * * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access New episodes, better Special FX, new actors, not bad for a weekly show. Most of em are not that good but one called "Blink" blew me away. No violence, no real monsters but truly bizarre. I gotta give credit to the writer of that one. Afterwards, I just sat there and thought "Whoa, that was really weird".. "Blink" was very well received and won a number of awards. It was written by Stephen Moffat and directed Hettie MacDonald both of whom are high regarded BBC contributers. It was one of the episodes that I watched twice back-to-back - there's a lot going on in that episode and you don't catch everything at first viewing. There two episodes in Series Four - "Forest of The Dead" and "Silence in The Library" that are very similar - "Forest of The Dead" is another award winner. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 30, 11:56*pm, Yogi of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:16:47 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Family got me a set of Dr. WHO DVDs in the hopes I'd watch TV. *It works. *Kinda addicting although silly. *Each episode is just long enough to not lose my interest, and no damn commercials. Which series - the first of the "new" Davies written/directed with Ecclestone or the second set with Tennant which was a combination of Davies and Moffet writing and directing? Series One with Chris Ecclestone (Dr. Who) and Bille Piper (Rose Tyler) is a good place to start - most of those are great episodes. It really gets rolling in Series Two with David Tennant (Dr. Who) and Piper. *Series Three really gets starts off with a really good couple of episodes, a few so-so episodes and ends with a bang - Martha Jones (Freema Agyeman) as his Companion starts off slow, but she gets the idea about four episodes in and becomes one of the better companions. The best though is Series Four with Catherine Tate as Companion Donna Noble - there isn't a lousy episode in the bunch. I really like what they did with the Cybermen and Daleks - they made them understandable for non-Who viewers and filled in a lot of the back story of Dr. Who. *The one thing I didn't like was including The Master - that requires a lot of backstory detail and according to the new Who fan reviews, they didn't quite understand the role that The Master played in Dr. Who's universe as last of the Time Lords. This is series three with Martha. I watch one episode every few days. Will probably buy series 4 too. They are just long enough to avoid my short attention span. Most are just silly but "Blink" with the weeping angels was exceptional and truly strange. Last I saw of Dr Who was in the early 80s but saw "Blink" on an overseas flight and was amazed and came home talking about it so the kids got the series for me from Amazon. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... On Jul 30, 11:56 pm, Yogi of Woodstock wrote: On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:16:47 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Family got me a set of Dr. WHO DVDs in the hopes I'd watch TV. It works. Kinda addicting although silly. Each episode is just long enough to not lose my interest, and no damn commercials. Which series - the first of the "new" Davies written/directed with Ecclestone or the second set with Tennant which was a combination of Davies and Moffet writing and directing? Series One with Chris Ecclestone (Dr. Who) and Bille Piper (Rose Tyler) is a good place to start - most of those are great episodes. It really gets rolling in Series Two with David Tennant (Dr. Who) and Piper. Series Three really gets starts off with a really good couple of episodes, a few so-so episodes and ends with a bang - Martha Jones (Freema Agyeman) as his Companion starts off slow, but she gets the idea about four episodes in and becomes one of the better companions. The best though is Series Four with Catherine Tate as Companion Donna Noble - there isn't a lousy episode in the bunch. I really like what they did with the Cybermen and Daleks - they made them understandable for non-Who viewers and filled in a lot of the back story of Dr. Who. The one thing I didn't like was including The Master - that requires a lot of backstory detail and according to the new Who fan reviews, they didn't quite understand the role that The Master played in Dr. Who's universe as last of the Time Lords. This is series three with Martha. I watch one episode every few days. Will probably buy series 4 too. They are just long enough to avoid my short attention span. Most are just silly but "Blink" with the weeping angels was exceptional and truly strange. Last I saw of Dr Who was in the early 80s but saw "Blink" on an overseas flight and was amazed and came home talking about it so the kids got the series for me from Amazon. There are cheaper places. One advertises Series 1-4 22 DVDs for $70. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frogwatch wrote:
Liberals are like Daleks (but a lot less competent), If you are trying to be the ranking moron here, you're succeeding, and with more success than you've had as an inventor or businessman lately, eh? -- Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws, and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them, *unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If that is your position in life, then anything goes. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|