"H the K" wrote in message
news
Canuck57 wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:33:56 -0400, Infamous John
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:28:02 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:45:00 -0600, "Canuck57" wrote:

"Guru of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009...dle-class.html

I wonder if he's discussed this with BO?

Probably not - after all, BO promised tax relief for 95% of all
Americans.

It's not like BO would...um...lie - right?

Right?
Liberals-dims promise a lot, then appolgise later.
Yes, I recall them promising no nation building during the campaign of
1999. Or was that George Bush?

Don't think he ever apologized...
WTF does Bush have to do with the fiasco being put upon us now?

Hey Loogy! Can you explain the 'Bush Rationale'?
Jerkoff, I wasn't the one who made the blanket statement that liberal
dems make campaign promises and then apologize later.

Infamous John? Is that what they call your for your 20+ handicap?

Well, Obama has no excuses, lib-dim senate, lib-dim congress and he is a
dim-witt that shoots his mouth off with lots of promises and no results.
Bush had a dim congress if I recall correctly, they like printing and
creating debt.

Looks like Obama is taking this to a whole new level. Lib-dims are now
setting new records for government debt and inflation creating money
creation. This will prevent any real recovery of the middle class.

One good thing, there will be fewer boats on the lakes due to wealth
robbing lib-dimwit economics.


Obama is a dimwit? And that places you where on the intelligence scale?
Somewhat below pond scum?

Yep. Obama is a dimwit. He could have become a great president but BO
(Bailout Obama) and promises are all that he will be known for in 5 or 10
years. OK, being black another. But his economics are centered on wealthy
and statism, not the betterment of the middle class. And it is the middle
class that makes US great, not the banks, or rich holding GM paper.

He is investing in dead rotten turkeys.

Obama has committed to not raise the income taxes of those earning less
than a certain amount. He has also stated he will raise the taxes of those
earning more.

I hear his lips move, but I see different in legislation and Obama's
spending habits. It used to be called a liar when you did that. What is
the new politically correct acronym for this these days? I still think liar
and deceitful are appropriate.

My gripe about that: he won't raise the taxes on the wealthy enough.

Have Obama define in an un*******ised and precise way in law what wealthy
really means. To greedy cash starved government the definition is going to
be the same as yours.

Canada added a tax bracket some 25 years ago that taxed just the top
percentage or two. Today you only need to earn 10% above average to make
that rate. Over time it will be a screw turn on the middle class as 1%
become 5% becomes 10% becomes 40% etc.

It even drives medical costs higher. Tax a rich dentist more, he will just
jack up the rates to get the same or more net. Either that or live with
rotten teeth. In fact, many costs in society will behave just like that
removing America from the economically viable places to live.

Americans have it so damned good, Obama supporters for the most part I bet
are much less traveled than non-Obama supporters. For if so, they would
realize more people benefit much more from an American economic model than a
UK or Canadian one. I am one of those rare birds that has lived in all
three. And the US is under attack from within.

I just hope your average voter pulls his head out of their arses before 2010
and 2012. I would hate to see our good neighbor get sucked into statism and
taxation slavery.

Only the lazy, weak minded and poorly educated could possible support
statism and health care the Obama way.

H the K wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:33:56 -0400, Infamous John
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:28:02 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:45:00 -0600, "Canuck57" wrote:

"Guru of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009...dle-class.html


I wonder if he's discussed this with BO?

Probably not - after all, BO promised tax relief for 95% of all
Americans.

It's not like BO would...um...lie - right?

Right?
Liberals-dims promise a lot, then appolgise later.
Yes, I recall them promising no nation building during the campaign of
1999. Or was that George Bush?

Don't think he ever apologized...
WTF does Bush have to do with the fiasco being put upon us now?

Hey Loogy! Can you explain the 'Bush Rationale'?
Jerkoff, I wasn't the one who made the blanket statement that liberal
dems make campaign promises and then apologize later.

Infamous John? Is that what they call your for your 20+ handicap?

Well, Obama has no excuses, lib-dim senate, lib-dim congress and he is
a dim-witt that shoots his mouth off with lots of promises and no
results. Bush had a dim congress if I recall correctly, they like
printing and creating debt.

Looks like Obama is taking this to a whole new level. Lib-dims are
now setting new records for government debt and inflation creating
money creation. This will prevent any real recovery of the middle class.

One good thing, there will be fewer boats on the lakes due to wealth
robbing lib-dimwit economics.



Obama is a dimwit? And that places you where on the intelligence scale?
Somewhat below pond scum?

Obama has committed to not raise the income taxes of those earning less
than a certain amount. He has also stated he will raise the taxes of
those earning more.

My gripe about that: he won't raise the taxes on the wealthy enough.

Obama has made no real commitments re. taxes, dummy. Haven't you been
paying attention?

"H the K" wrote in message
news
Canuck57 wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:33:56 -0400, Infamous John
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:28:02 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:45:00 -0600, "Canuck57" wrote:

"Guru of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009...dle-class.html

I wonder if he's discussed this with BO?

Probably not - after all, BO promised tax relief for 95% of all
Americans.

It's not like BO would...um...lie - right?

Right?
Liberals-dims promise a lot, then appolgise later.
Yes, I recall them promising no nation building during the campaign of
1999. Or was that George Bush?

Don't think he ever apologized...
WTF does Bush have to do with the fiasco being put upon us now?

Hey Loogy! Can you explain the 'Bush Rationale'?
Jerkoff, I wasn't the one who made the blanket statement that liberal
dems make campaign promises and then apologize later.

Infamous John? Is that what they call your for your 20+ handicap?

Well, Obama has no excuses, lib-dim senate, lib-dim congress and he is a
dim-witt that shoots his mouth off with lots of promises and no results.
Bush had a dim congress if I recall correctly, they like printing and
creating debt.

Looks like Obama is taking this to a whole new level. Lib-dims are now
setting new records for government debt and inflation creating money
creation. This will prevent any real recovery of the middle class.

One good thing, there will be fewer boats on the lakes due to wealth
robbing lib-dimwit economics.


Obama is a dimwit? And that places you where on the intelligence scale?
Somewhat below pond scum?

Obama has committed to not raise the income taxes of those earning less
than a certain amount. He has also stated he will raise the taxes of those
earning more.

My gripe about that: he won't raise the taxes on the wealthy enough.

If you believe that commitment, what will be your rationale when he signs a
tax bill on the middle class (by his definition, anyone making less than
$250,000)? That Bush made him do it?

When he does, will you promise to stop posting political commentary, on this
and other forums, never to return? If he does not during his first term,
I'll do the same.

Now, just how much faith do you have in your chosen one?

Lu Powell wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
news
Canuck57 wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:33:56 -0400, Infamous John
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:28:02 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:45:00 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote:

"Guru of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009...dle-class.html


I wonder if he's discussed this with BO?

Probably not - after all, BO promised tax relief for 95% of all
Americans.

It's not like BO would...um...lie - right?

Right?
Liberals-dims promise a lot, then appolgise later.
Yes, I recall them promising no nation building during the
campaign of
1999. Or was that George Bush?

Don't think he ever apologized...
WTF does Bush have to do with the fiasco being put upon us now?

Hey Loogy! Can you explain the 'Bush Rationale'?
Jerkoff, I wasn't the one who made the blanket statement that liberal
dems make campaign promises and then apologize later.

Infamous John? Is that what they call your for your 20+ handicap?

Well, Obama has no excuses, lib-dim senate, lib-dim congress and he
is a dim-witt that shoots his mouth off with lots of promises and no
results. Bush had a dim congress if I recall correctly, they like
printing and creating debt.

Looks like Obama is taking this to a whole new level. Lib-dims are
now setting new records for government debt and inflation creating
money creation. This will prevent any real recovery of the middle
class.

One good thing, there will be fewer boats on the lakes due to wealth
robbing lib-dimwit economics.


Obama is a dimwit? And that places you where on the intelligence
scale? Somewhat below pond scum?

Obama has committed to not raise the income taxes of those earning
less than a certain amount. He has also stated he will raise the taxes
of those earning more.

My gripe about that: he won't raise the taxes on the wealthy enough.

If you believe that commitment, what will be your rationale when he
signs a tax bill on the middle class (by his definition, anyone making
less than $250,000)? That Bush made him do it?

When he does, will you promise to stop posting political commentary, on
this and other forums, never to return? If he does not during his first
term, I'll do the same.

Now, just how much faith do you have in your chosen one?



I don't believe Obama will raise income taxes for those in category he
promised.

As for your offer, I don't give a **** whether you post here or not or,
for that matter, whether you live or die.

"H the K" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
news
Canuck57 wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:33:56 -0400, Infamous John
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:28:02 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:45:00 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote:

"Guru of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009...dle-class.html

I wonder if he's discussed this with BO?

Probably not - after all, BO promised tax relief for 95% of all
Americans.

It's not like BO would...um...lie - right?

Right?
Liberals-dims promise a lot, then appolgise later.
Yes, I recall them promising no nation building during the campaign
of
1999. Or was that George Bush?

Don't think he ever apologized...
WTF does Bush have to do with the fiasco being put upon us now?

Hey Loogy! Can you explain the 'Bush Rationale'?
Jerkoff, I wasn't the one who made the blanket statement that liberal
dems make campaign promises and then apologize later.

Infamous John? Is that what they call your for your 20+ handicap?

Well, Obama has no excuses, lib-dim senate, lib-dim congress and he is
a dim-witt that shoots his mouth off with lots of promises and no
results. Bush had a dim congress if I recall correctly, they like
printing and creating debt.

Looks like Obama is taking this to a whole new level. Lib-dims are now
setting new records for government debt and inflation creating money
creation. This will prevent any real recovery of the middle class.

One good thing, there will be fewer boats on the lakes due to wealth
robbing lib-dimwit economics.


Obama is a dimwit? And that places you where on the intelligence scale?
Somewhat below pond scum?

Obama has committed to not raise the income taxes of those earning less
than a certain amount. He has also stated he will raise the taxes of
those earning more.

My gripe about that: he won't raise the taxes on the wealthy enough.

If you believe that commitment, what will be your rationale when he signs
a tax bill on the middle class (by his definition, anyone making less
than $250,000)? That Bush made him do it?

When he does, will you promise to stop posting political commentary, on
this and other forums, never to return? If he does not during his first
term, I'll do the same.

Now, just how much faith do you have in your chosen one?



I don't believe Obama will raise income taxes for those in category he
promised.

As for your offer, I don't give a **** whether you post here or not or,
for that matter, whether you live or die.

You just showed how much faith you have in your chosen one. NONE. You are
such a blowhard hypocrite. WAFA.

Lu Powell wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
news Canuck57 wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:33:56 -0400, Infamous John
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:28:02 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:45:00 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote:

"Guru of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009...dle-class.html


I wonder if he's discussed this with BO?

Probably not - after all, BO promised tax relief for 95% of all
Americans.

It's not like BO would...um...lie - right?

Right?
Liberals-dims promise a lot, then appolgise later.
Yes, I recall them promising no nation building during the
campaign of
1999. Or was that George Bush?

Don't think he ever apologized...
WTF does Bush have to do with the fiasco being put upon us now?

Hey Loogy! Can you explain the 'Bush Rationale'?
Jerkoff, I wasn't the one who made the blanket statement that liberal
dems make campaign promises and then apologize later.

Infamous John? Is that what they call your for your 20+ handicap?

Well, Obama has no excuses, lib-dim senate, lib-dim congress and he
is a dim-witt that shoots his mouth off with lots of promises and
no results. Bush had a dim congress if I recall correctly, they
like printing and creating debt.

Looks like Obama is taking this to a whole new level. Lib-dims are
now setting new records for government debt and inflation creating
money creation. This will prevent any real recovery of the middle
class.

One good thing, there will be fewer boats on the lakes due to
wealth robbing lib-dimwit economics.


Obama is a dimwit? And that places you where on the intelligence
scale? Somewhat below pond scum?

Obama has committed to not raise the income taxes of those earning
less than a certain amount. He has also stated he will raise the
taxes of those earning more.

My gripe about that: he won't raise the taxes on the wealthy enough.

If you believe that commitment, what will be your rationale when he
signs a tax bill on the middle class (by his definition, anyone
making less than $250,000)? That Bush made him do it?

When he does, will you promise to stop posting political commentary,
on this and other forums, never to return? If he does not during his
first term, I'll do the same.

Now, just how much faith do you have in your chosen one?



I don't believe Obama will raise income taxes for those in category he
promised.

As for your offer, I don't give a **** whether you post here or not
or, for that matter, whether you live or die.

You just showed how much faith you have in your chosen one. NONE. You
are such a blowhard hypocrite. WAFA.



My "faith" in Obama has nothing to do with your presence here,
****-for-brains. You just don't get it, do you? It should be patently
clear...I don't care whether righties like you live or die. It would
make no difference to me if you dropped dead tomorrow. Or a week from
now. Or 10 years from now.

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
Lu Powell wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
news Canuck57 wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:33:56 -0400, Infamous John
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:28:02 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:45:00 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote:

"Guru of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009...dle-class.html

I wonder if he's discussed this with BO?

Probably not - after all, BO promised tax relief for 95% of all
Americans.

It's not like BO would...um...lie - right?

Right?
Liberals-dims promise a lot, then appolgise later.
Yes, I recall them promising no nation building during the
campaign of
1999. Or was that George Bush?

Don't think he ever apologized...
WTF does Bush have to do with the fiasco being put upon us now?

Hey Loogy! Can you explain the 'Bush Rationale'?
Jerkoff, I wasn't the one who made the blanket statement that
liberal
dems make campaign promises and then apologize later.

Infamous John? Is that what they call your for your 20+ handicap?

Well, Obama has no excuses, lib-dim senate, lib-dim congress and he
is a dim-witt that shoots his mouth off with lots of promises and no
results. Bush had a dim congress if I recall correctly, they like
printing and creating debt.

Looks like Obama is taking this to a whole new level. Lib-dims are
now setting new records for government debt and inflation creating
money creation. This will prevent any real recovery of the middle
class.

One good thing, there will be fewer boats on the lakes due to wealth
robbing lib-dimwit economics.


Obama is a dimwit? And that places you where on the intelligence
scale? Somewhat below pond scum?

Obama has committed to not raise the income taxes of those earning
less than a certain amount. He has also stated he will raise the taxes
of those earning more.

My gripe about that: he won't raise the taxes on the wealthy enough.

If you believe that commitment, what will be your rationale when he
signs a tax bill on the middle class (by his definition, anyone making
less than $250,000)? That Bush made him do it?

When he does, will you promise to stop posting political commentary, on
this and other forums, never to return? If he does not during his first
term, I'll do the same.

Now, just how much faith do you have in your chosen one?



I don't believe Obama will raise income taxes for those in category he
promised.

As for your offer, I don't give a **** whether you post here or not or,
for that matter, whether you live or die.

You just showed how much faith you have in your chosen one. NONE. You are
such a blowhard hypocrite. WAFA.



My "faith" in Obama has nothing to do with your presence here,
****-for-brains. You just don't get it, do you? It should be patently
clear...I don't care whether righties like you live or die. It would make
no difference to me if you dropped dead tomorrow. Or a week from now. Or
10 years from now.


If you don't care what I think or say, let alone live or die, why are you
investing so much energy in responding? Hypocrite.

"Methinks thou doth protest too much..."

Lu Powell wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
Lu Powell wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
news Canuck57 wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:33:56 -0400, Infamous John
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:28:02 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:45:00 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote:

"Guru of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009...dle-class.html


I wonder if he's discussed this with BO?

Probably not - after all, BO promised tax relief for 95% of all
Americans.

It's not like BO would...um...lie - right?

Right?
Liberals-dims promise a lot, then appolgise later.
Yes, I recall them promising no nation building during the
campaign of
1999. Or was that George Bush?

Don't think he ever apologized...
WTF does Bush have to do with the fiasco being put upon us now?

Hey Loogy! Can you explain the 'Bush Rationale'?
Jerkoff, I wasn't the one who made the blanket statement that
liberal
dems make campaign promises and then apologize later.

Infamous John? Is that what they call your for your 20+ handicap?

Well, Obama has no excuses, lib-dim senate, lib-dim congress and
he is a dim-witt that shoots his mouth off with lots of promises
and no results. Bush had a dim congress if I recall correctly,
they like printing and creating debt.

Looks like Obama is taking this to a whole new level. Lib-dims
are now setting new records for government debt and inflation
creating money creation. This will prevent any real recovery of
the middle class.

One good thing, there will be fewer boats on the lakes due to
wealth robbing lib-dimwit economics.


Obama is a dimwit? And that places you where on the intelligence
scale? Somewhat below pond scum?

Obama has committed to not raise the income taxes of those earning
less than a certain amount. He has also stated he will raise the
taxes of those earning more.

My gripe about that: he won't raise the taxes on the wealthy enough.

If you believe that commitment, what will be your rationale when he
signs a tax bill on the middle class (by his definition, anyone
making less than $250,000)? That Bush made him do it?

When he does, will you promise to stop posting political
commentary, on this and other forums, never to return? If he does
not during his first term, I'll do the same.

Now, just how much faith do you have in your chosen one?



I don't believe Obama will raise income taxes for those in category
he promised.

As for your offer, I don't give a **** whether you post here or not
or, for that matter, whether you live or die.

You just showed how much faith you have in your chosen one. NONE. You
are such a blowhard hypocrite. WAFA.



My "faith" in Obama has nothing to do with your presence here,
****-for-brains. You just don't get it, do you? It should be patently
clear...I don't care whether righties like you live or die. It would
make no difference to me if you dropped dead tomorrow. Or a week from
now. Or 10 years from now.


If you don't care what I think or say, let alone live or die, why are
you investing so much energy in responding? Hypocrite.

"Methinks thou doth protest too much..."


Perhaps writing a few sentences requires *you* to invest energy. Don't
judge my writing abilities by your inabilities.

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
Lu Powell wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
Lu Powell wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
news Canuck57 wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:33:56 -0400, Infamous John
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:28:02 -0700, jps
wrote:

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:45:00 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote:

"Guru of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009...dle-class.html

I wonder if he's discussed this with BO?

Probably not - after all, BO promised tax relief for 95% of
all
Americans.

It's not like BO would...um...lie - right?

Right?
Liberals-dims promise a lot, then appolgise later.
Yes, I recall them promising no nation building during the
campaign of
1999. Or was that George Bush?

Don't think he ever apologized...
WTF does Bush have to do with the fiasco being put upon us now?

Hey Loogy! Can you explain the 'Bush Rationale'?
Jerkoff, I wasn't the one who made the blanket statement that
liberal
dems make campaign promises and then apologize later.

Infamous John? Is that what they call your for your 20+ handicap?

Well, Obama has no excuses, lib-dim senate, lib-dim congress and he
is a dim-witt that shoots his mouth off with lots of promises and
no results. Bush had a dim congress if I recall correctly, they
like printing and creating debt.

Looks like Obama is taking this to a whole new level. Lib-dims are
now setting new records for government debt and inflation creating
money creation. This will prevent any real recovery of the middle
class.

One good thing, there will be fewer boats on the lakes due to
wealth robbing lib-dimwit economics.


Obama is a dimwit? And that places you where on the intelligence
scale? Somewhat below pond scum?

Obama has committed to not raise the income taxes of those earning
less than a certain amount. He has also stated he will raise the
taxes of those earning more.

My gripe about that: he won't raise the taxes on the wealthy enough.

If you believe that commitment, what will be your rationale when he
signs a tax bill on the middle class (by his definition, anyone
making less than $250,000)? That Bush made him do it?

When he does, will you promise to stop posting political commentary,
on this and other forums, never to return? If he does not during his
first term, I'll do the same.

Now, just how much faith do you have in your chosen one?



I don't believe Obama will raise income taxes for those in category he
promised.

As for your offer, I don't give a **** whether you post here or not
or, for that matter, whether you live or die.

You just showed how much faith you have in your chosen one. NONE. You
are such a blowhard hypocrite. WAFA.



My "faith" in Obama has nothing to do with your presence here,
****-for-brains. You just don't get it, do you? It should be patently
clear...I don't care whether righties like you live or die. It would
make no difference to me if you dropped dead tomorrow. Or a week from
now. Or 10 years from now.


If you don't care what I think or say, let alone live or die, why are you
investing so much energy in responding? Hypocrite.

"Methinks thou doth protest too much..."


Perhaps writing a few sentences requires *you* to invest energy. Don't
judge my writing abilities by your inabilities.

Whatever. Good day sweet cheeks.

H the K wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:33:56 -0400, Infamous John
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:28:02 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:45:00 -0600, "Canuck57" wrote:

"Guru of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009...dle-class.html


I wonder if he's discussed this with BO?

Probably not - after all, BO promised tax relief for 95% of all
Americans.

It's not like BO would...um...lie - right?

Right?
Liberals-dims promise a lot, then appolgise later.
Yes, I recall them promising no nation building during the campaign of
1999. Or was that George Bush?

Don't think he ever apologized...
WTF does Bush have to do with the fiasco being put upon us now?

Hey Loogy! Can you explain the 'Bush Rationale'?
Jerkoff, I wasn't the one who made the blanket statement that liberal
dems make campaign promises and then apologize later.

Infamous John? Is that what they call your for your 20+ handicap?

Well, Obama has no excuses, lib-dim senate, lib-dim congress and he is
a dim-witt that shoots his mouth off with lots of promises and no
results. Bush had a dim congress if I recall correctly, they like
printing and creating debt.

Looks like Obama is taking this to a whole new level. Lib-dims are
now setting new records for government debt and inflation creating
money creation. This will prevent any real recovery of the middle class.

One good thing, there will be fewer boats on the lakes due to wealth
robbing lib-dimwit economics.



Obama is a dimwit? And that places you where on the intelligence scale?
Somewhat below pond scum?

Obama has committed to not raise the income taxes of those earning less
than a certain amount. He has also stated he will raise the taxes of
those earning more.

My gripe about that: he won't raise the taxes on the wealthy enough.

He also promised to give the American people five days after congress
approved a piece of legislation for reviewing it before he signed it.
He is pushing things through congress so fast that even congress by
their own testimony are not reading these trillion dollar expenditures.

There are many things he promised various groups that they will never
get like free new cars, free homes, free food, etc. All which I heard
supports say he promised.