Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thunder wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:03:53 -0400, Lu Powell wrote: Now, what's the party line in light of this from Bloomerg? I don't know what the party line is, but, IMO, Obama better start playing hardball or his Presidency is going to become a wasted one. His bi- partisan efforts have failed. The Republicans aren't playing. It's time for him to control his party, and start ramming legislation down the Party of No's throat. To allow a small minority to control this debate is a major mistake. From what I've heard, the republicans weren't invited to play. It's good to see that O's "ram it down the throats" tactic is meeting resistance. |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:23:14 -0400, JustWait wrote:
So maybe anti-trust legislation, Tort reform should be the basis for a "rework", not taking it over and running it into the ground... The reason for the success of the capitalist system, is competition. So, I don't have any problems with strong anti-trust legislation. Tort reform is another matter. I could see setting a threshold before allowing a lawsuit, but if some incompetent doctor botches an operation, making me a paraplegic, or worse, dead, I want the ability to sue. My family will need to be provided for. I don't understand people wanting to give up their rights, to protect incompetence. |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:28:20 -0400, J i m wrote:
From what I've heard, the republicans weren't invited to play. It's good to see that O's "ram it down the throats" tactic is meeting resistance. Well, regardless of Obama's successes or failures, the Republicans aren't coming back. Demographics will tell you that. Until Republicans become an inclusive party, they are in the wilderness, where they belong. |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:25:22 -0400, JustWait wrote:
Yeah, dozens of amendments, all squashed.. Biparitzan my ass... Just because he says it doesn't mean it's true. The dems are not allowing the repubs a say, they won and they keep reminding us of that.. Bipartizan? snerk how rediculous... They weren't all squashed. Isakson's "death panel" made it in. ;-) |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:39:46 -0400, JustWait wrote:
Nobody here wants to give up that right, just want to get it back to reality so doctors can be doctors again... Well, what kind of tort reform are you talking about? The only tort reform I ever hear about is capping damage awards. If doctors have a bitch about malpractice insurance, they should take it up with their insurance providers, because, frankly, there are quite a few doctors that shouldn't be practicing medicine. |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:58:13 -0400, JustWait wrote:
So, now you don't support the end of life panels??? Sounds like all you really care about is squashing the competition and forcing your party views on everybody.. So, are you like Harry and Al Gore, just think you are smarter so we should all just shut up and pay up??? No, actually, I think end of life counseling is a good idea, voluntary of course. Living wills are prudent, and put the decisions in the hands of the individual, where they belong, not in the hands of grieving loved ones, who under the emotional stress of the moment, have enough on their plate. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
~~ snerk ~~ | General | |||
Snerk | General | |||
~~ snerk ~~ | General | |||
SNERK | General | |||
~~snerk~~ | General |