On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:35:18 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"BAR" wrote in message
m...
It's not a complete solution or even a good partial solution. It takes
years to build power plants, and there's always the spent fuel problem.

Every day you delay the building of nuclear plants is another day the
citizens of the USA are sending money overseas for energy or burning coal
and oil.

True enough.


When are you going to get serious about the actual problems.

When are you going to stop talking about the problem and start taking
action.

The real solution is to stop eating so much meat. That would have an
immediate and positive effect. The other things take years.

LOL, but I don't think you meant that as a joke.The liberal 'that
takes years' excuse has been in use for years. It's getting old.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:37:26 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
Reject away. You attempted to justify 'Bama's acts by comparing him to
Bush. The failed economy is easily laid at the door of Chris and
Barney. But...


So, now you're blaming Frank and Dodd? I thought is was Obama's fault.

Pot, kettle, black.

You just foolishly laid it at Bush's door.

When you say Frank, Dodd, and Obama and then Pot, kettle, black, I
think you're being racist.

Harry will get you for a lot less than that!


I accurately laid it at Bush's door. Believe what you want! You and your
friends here seem to think that racism is funny or can be dismissed as such.
Comments like this are, unfortunately, typical of those who would rather
create fear and mistrust vs. have an intelligent discussion of the important
issues.

Liberals have been crying racist any time 'Bama gets criticized.
You've just joined the crowd.

Racist, my ass.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
Having trouble spelling? It's "O"bama. There's much more accountability
in the more recent bailouts.

Maybe he's starting to catch on. Let's "hope" so. I still think he's
throwing gobs of money into the air and "hopes" it lands in the right
places. "Change" is a comin. Lets "hope" it doesn't trample us all when it
does.


What should catch on? Racist language and implication? That ship has sailed,
unfortunately.

You snuck the word racist in. Good for you. Harry and Jessie Jackson
would be sooooooo proud.

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:33:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
You missed the main point. It's been shown to have worked, and it's
continuing to help.

Snipping is a dishonest Krause trick. Cute, but dishonest.

No, it's to save space. You continually attack people rather than have an
honest discusion. I did nothing dishonest, and I'm not Krause . don't even
know him.


"Waste" implys that bama can account for the money he so frivolously
throws around. Most of the bailout money just vaporized into thin air.

That was the point.

No. The point is that Obama's administration has put into place a lot more
accountability. If you don't see that, then this discussion is pointless.
You're contantly attacking people vs. ideas. That's dishonest and not at all
cute.

Space costs nothing. We're not renting by the square foot.

You may not consider it dishonest, but I do.

I agree that this discussion is pointless.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

"John H." wrote in message
...
No, it's to save space. You continually attack people rather than have an
honest discusion. I did nothing dishonest, and I'm not Krause . don't even
know him.


"Waste" implys that bama can account for the money he so frivolously
throws around. Most of the bailout money just vaporized into thin air.

That was the point.

No. The point is that Obama's administration has put into place a lot more
accountability. If you don't see that, then this discussion is pointless.
You're contantly attacking people vs. ideas. That's dishonest and not at
all
cute.

Space costs nothing. We're not renting by the square foot.

So, I'm supposed to keep all the header stuff, all the diatribe bs from
either side just because you say so? I don't think so. Feel free to not
respond when I do my best to narrow the focus.

You may not consider it dishonest, but I do.

It's an accepted practice on Usenet to strain out all the bs and keep the
discussion focused. I don't really care if you don't like it. Perhaps you'd
like to call me something truly nasty if it'll make you feel better.


--
Nom=de=Plume

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
Having trouble spelling? It's "O"bama. There's much more accountability
in the more recent bailouts.

Maybe he's starting to catch on. Let's "hope" so. I still think he's
throwing gobs of money into the air and "hopes" it lands in the right
places. "Change" is a comin. Lets "hope" it doesn't trample us all when
it does.


What should catch on? Racist language and implication? That ship has
sailed, unfortunately.

You snuck the word racist in. Good for you. Harry and Jessie Jackson would
be sooooooo proud.


So, you think it's ok for people to use racially charged language to make a
point. I didn't "sneak" in anything. If I was going to that, I would have
said

"Raysist"

--
Nom=de=Plume

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:33:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Hate to tell you, but the first bank bailout happened during Bush's
administration. Are you going to blame the president for that too?

... and the bank deregulation that allowed it happened on Clinton's
watch with virtually unanimous congressional support (4 nay votes in
the house, 2 D, 2 R, 100% support in the senate)
There is plenty of blame to go around.


I agree! But, there are some that only want to blame Obama or Bush. Instead
of blame, how about looking at the facts, what happened, and how to fix it?
Nahhh... too straightforward.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"John H." wrote in message
...
I accurately laid it at Bush's door. Believe what you want! You and your
friends here seem to think that racism is funny or can be dismissed as
such.
Comments like this are, unfortunately, typical of those who would rather
create fear and mistrust vs. have an intelligent discussion of the
important
issues.

Liberals have been crying racist any time 'Bama gets criticized.
You've just joined the crowd.

I've done nothing of the like. I have no problem, as I've said many times,
in blaming whomever deserves it. Please show otherwise.


Racist, my ass.

I sincerely doubt this, but it's an amusing image.

--
Nom=de=Plume

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 09:09:08 -0400, Gene
wrote:

Nuclear energy sucks.

It is dirty, dangerous, and expensive. I pay 30% more for the
electricity running through this laptop sitting while I'm sitting on
this couch, than I do at my other home which is served by a coal
plant.

That will not be true when Gore gets his cap and tax bill and your
coal plant will pay double or triple for the coal.


Al Gore is president? No wait, he's in Congress. No... I know. I know. He's
on the Supreme Court!

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
Perhaps you'd
like to call me something truly nasty if it'll make you feel better.


JPS would be happy to accommodate you. And if he fails to live up to his
reputation, There's always Krausie.