"John H." wrote in message
...
Sure is easy for you to morph from nuclear power to city's poor. Another
tactic to distract from the facts?

The 'morphing' was from problem solving to problem solving. I think
maybe you exercised the scissors again.


You can't seem to stay focused. We were talking about nukes and previously
clunkers, then you attempted a strawman argument about inner-city poor.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"John H." wrote in message
...
The real solution is to stop eating so much meat. That would have an
immediate and positive effect. The other things take years.

LOL, but I don't think you meant that as a joke.The liberal 'that
takes years' excuse has been in use for years. It's getting old.


Certainly no joke. Cows and such make up the bulk of the greenhouse gas
problem. Besides, the conditions that they are raised in are horrible. Who
would want to eat a cow after visiting a traditional stockyard? Someone once
said that it's better for the environment to eat a veggie burger in a Hummer
than a burger in a Prius.

Do you believe that putting a significant number of new nuke plants online
is going to happen in less than a decade?

Not that moving people from eating so much meat is fast process either, but
the benefits are much greater and not just for oil consumption.

--
Nom=de=Plume

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 23:40:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Hate to break it to you, but most of the usable parts of the clunkers were
salvaged before the shredding. There was some loss to the secondary car
sales market, since they were removed from the mix.


Not around here. Whole cars were shredded and loaded into hopper cars
destined for China.


In that case, they threw out stuff that they didn't need to do according to
the regs.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:45:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
Sure is easy for you to morph from nuclear power to city's poor. Another
tactic to distract from the facts?

The 'morphing' was from problem solving to problem solving. I think
maybe you exercised the scissors again.


You can't seem to stay focused. We were talking about nukes and previously
clunkers, then you attempted a strawman argument about inner-city poor.

Watch...
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:45:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
Sure is easy for you to morph from nuclear power to city's poor. Another
tactic to distract from the facts?

The 'morphing' was from problem solving to problem solving. I think
maybe you exercised the scissors again.


You can't seem to stay focused. We were talking about nukes and previously
clunkers, then you attempted a strawman argument about inner-city poor.

Watch...


Careful. That's too close to witch. I might be offended, given I'm a
liberal.

--
Nom=de=Plume

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:37:26 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
Reject away. You attempted to justify 'Bama's acts by comparing him to
Bush. The failed economy is easily laid at the door of Chris and
Barney. But...


So, now you're blaming Frank and Dodd? I thought is was Obama's fault.

Pot, kettle, black.

You just foolishly laid it at Bush's door.

When you say Frank, Dodd, and Obama and then Pot, kettle, black, I
think you're being racist.

Harry will get you for a lot less than that!


I accurately laid it at Bush's door. Believe what you want! You and your
friends here seem to think that racism is funny or can be dismissed as such.
Comments like this are, unfortunately, typical of those who would rather
create fear and mistrust vs. have an intelligent discussion of the important
issues.

Liberals have been crying racist any time 'Bama gets criticized.
You've just joined the crowd.

Racist, my ass.

Really. It's a bunch of bull****, but it does seem to kindle flames,
just as it is meant to do... When are minority Americans going to
figure out the only folks that seem to see race in everything is the Dem
leadership... It's just another deflection...

--
Wafa free since 2009

In article ,
says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
Having trouble spelling? It's "O"bama. There's much more accountability
in the more recent bailouts.

Maybe he's starting to catch on. Let's "hope" so. I still think he's
throwing gobs of money into the air and "hopes" it lands in the right
places. "Change" is a comin. Lets "hope" it doesn't trample us all when it
does.


What should catch on? Racist language and implication? That ship has sailed,
unfortunately.

You snuck the word racist in. Good for you. Harry and Jessie Jackson
would be sooooooo proud.

"Racist" huh? Guess the big guns are out now. When the dems pull that
argument out, it's pretty much over... But if we point out racist quotes
from dems, it's because "Bush" ****ed up.. snerk

--
Wafa free since 2009

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:26:37 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
.. .
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
"Waste" implys that bama can account for the money he so frivolously
throws around. Most of the bailout money just vaporized into thin air.
Does anyone know where all that automaker bailout money? Even more
difficult to trace is the financial industry bailout. I wonder if those
executives ever got their bonuses. The clunker program hasn't done so
well either. Mis management of the program has left the dealers holding
the empty bag. Hopefully they will eventually get paid.


Hate to tell you, but the first bank bailout happened during Bush's
administration. Are you going to blame the president for that too?

Why didn't bama learn from Bushes mistake and demand some accountability
instead of making the same mistake again?


Having trouble spelling? It's "O"bama. There's much more accountability in
the more recent bailouts.

Why, cause Biden told you, or was it Letterman??


We don't want to get confused with Hosanna and Obama, so 'Bama is a
good way to go.



--
Wafa free since 2009

No. The point is that Obama's administration has put into place a lot more
accountability.

ROTFLOL.... Right, accountability!? That's funny...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
It's not a complete solution or even a good partial solution. It takes
years to build power plants, and there's always the spent fuel problem.
Every day you delay the building of nuclear plants is another day the
citizens of the USA are sending money overseas for energy or burning coal
and oil.

True enough.

When are you going to get serious about the actual problems.
When are you going to stop talking about the problem and start taking
action.

The real solution is to stop eating so much meat. That would have an
immediate and positive effect. The other things take years.

It will cost you three or four times as much in energy to replace the
animal protein with plant protein.