Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 23:43:46 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:31:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: I originally typed "Obama" but I didn't want to keep slamming a guy who is basically a puppet for the people who put him in office. You notice he has backed off of all of his "change" rhetoric since his Jimmy Carter moment (roughly defined as the day he realized the president is largely a ceremonial office) Gore has their ear and is the high priest in the carbon tax crusade. That cult has taken over the left. How do you come to the conclusion that Obama is a puppet? The majority of Americans put him in office and by a wide margin in the electoral college. Every president since Nixon was a puppet of the monied people who put him in office. It is getting worse each cycle. Well, in that sense ok. Nobody comes up with a billion dollars without owing a lot of allegiance to a lot of rich people. You also have party pressures. That is what knocked down all of Carter's lofty goals. I only bring him up as an example of an "outside the beltway" guy who came to town promising to change the way government worked. He was ground up and reduced to a gray paste in 3 months, much like Mr Obama. The jury is still out with Obama. I hope it won't happen. We need it not to happen. I guess it's got to be someone's fault, so Gore is it Gore is the spiritual leader of the carbon tax cult, no more, no less. In that regard he is the democratic equivalent of Jerry Falwell or Rick Warren who also were not government officials but had a lot of influence on Bush's policies and controlled a lot of votes. I'm unconvinced by either those groups... carbon tax vs. cap and trade. I should read more about it. We probably don't have much to argue about ;-) I'm sure we can find something! lol I stopped being a Republican about a year into the GHWB administration but I still can't be a Democrat. I stopped in high school. I really place the decline of America as starting about 1989-1990 and going steadily downhill since then. It started a bit before that... pre-1961: http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst3...ts/indust.html That was when we started looting our corporations in the name of increasing quarterly profit numbers. They were selling off capital assets, shipping the jobs offshore and calling it profit. By the mid 90s they had sold about everything there was to sell and they started this "money out of thin air" mumbo jumbo with financial instruments that grew in price but didn't actually build any value. The commodities modernization act of 2000, I spoke of earlier, really opened the door for abuse and it was unanimously passed by both houses with the endorsement of the White House. Only 4 congressmen opposed, it led by my hero, Ron Paul. Well, we don't have much to argue about. Ron Paul is a wacko, but at least a nice one. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#82
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... To bribe the voters. Obama knows his policies are not working and political support is dicipating, so he bribes those he can with our money. Or should I say our credit-debt? He knows this because most economists think otherwise. Ok. Obama is destined to be the biggest debt increase of any government leader in the history of the world. It will takes decades, perhaps generations to recover from. Or, the economy will recover as it's on track to do. We'll move forward with infrastructure improvements, job losses will slow and eventually recover, we'll create a more stable long-term viable economic base. Or, the sky is falling, the sky is falling. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#83
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:23:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "BAR" wrote in message m... I agree. We certainly have the brains. We absolutely need to address the global implications of China's plants. Doing something by ourselves (talking greenhouse gases) isn't the ultimate solution. It needs to be a global effort. We have (and will have more) influence around the world. We need to use our influence and power for good. Our "power" is diminishing rapidly. The country is broke and nearly broken. The first thing we need to do is to repeal the all of the entitlements at the federal level and tell those who receive them that they are going to have to take on for the team again. Yeah, screw the poor created by the mis-notion of free market capitalism. What would Jesus do? Are you into mocking Christianity like so many of the other liberals here? -- John H "Vote for a Democrat, it's easier than working!" |
#84
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#86
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JohnH" wrote in message
... On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:23:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message om... I agree. We certainly have the brains. We absolutely need to address the global implications of China's plants. Doing something by ourselves (talking greenhouse gases) isn't the ultimate solution. It needs to be a global effort. We have (and will have more) influence around the world. We need to use our influence and power for good. Our "power" is diminishing rapidly. The country is broke and nearly broken. The first thing we need to do is to repeal the all of the entitlements at the federal level and tell those who receive them that they are going to have to take on for the team again. Yeah, screw the poor created by the mis-notion of free market capitalism. What would Jesus do? Are you into mocking Christianity like so many of the other liberals here? Why would you think I'm mocking something that I grew up with and still hold dear? You know nothing about me. I think you're grasping at straws. How dare you question my faith. Answer my question. What would Jesus do... support free market capitalism that was and is responsible for disenfranchising the poor or would He support the poor? -- Nom=de=Plume |
#87
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"H the K" wrote in message
m... Yeah, screw the poor created by the mis-notion of free market capitalism. What would Jesus do? Are you into mocking Christianity like so many of the other liberals here? They are an intolerant party aren't they? Jesus was cool. Christianity, not so much. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All This was exactly my point. John and Mr. Wait attacked me for my faith and have refused to address the issue I raised. Talk about intolerance and hateful attitudes.... -- Nom=de=Plume |
#88
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nom=de=plume wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:23:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... I agree. We certainly have the brains. We absolutely need to address the global implications of China's plants. Doing something by ourselves (talking greenhouse gases) isn't the ultimate solution. It needs to be a global effort. We have (and will have more) influence around the world. We need to use our influence and power for good. Our "power" is diminishing rapidly. The country is broke and nearly broken. The first thing we need to do is to repeal the all of the entitlements at the federal level and tell those who receive them that they are going to have to take on for the team again. Yeah, screw the poor created by the mis-notion of free market capitalism. What would Jesus do? Are you into mocking Christianity like so many of the other liberals here? Why would you think I'm mocking something that I grew up with and still hold dear? You know nothing about me. I think you're grasping at straws. How dare you question my faith. Answer my question. What would Jesus do... support free market capitalism that was and is responsible for disenfranchising the poor or would He support the poor? Hate-filled herring claims to a catholic. If so, he's worthy of excommunication. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
#89
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:17:41 -0400, H the K
wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:23:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... I agree. We certainly have the brains. We absolutely need to address the global implications of China's plants. Doing something by ourselves (talking greenhouse gases) isn't the ultimate solution. It needs to be a global effort. We have (and will have more) influence around the world. We need to use our influence and power for good. Our "power" is diminishing rapidly. The country is broke and nearly broken. The first thing we need to do is to repeal the all of the entitlements at the federal level and tell those who receive them that they are going to have to take on for the team again. Yeah, screw the poor created by the mis-notion of free market capitalism. What would Jesus do? Are you into mocking Christianity like so many of the other liberals here? Why would you think I'm mocking something that I grew up with and still hold dear? You know nothing about me. I think you're grasping at straws. How dare you question my faith. Answer my question. What would Jesus do... support free market capitalism that was and is responsible for disenfranchising the poor or would He support the poor? Hate-filled herring claims to a catholic. If so, he's worthy of excommunication. Maybe he's purchased some indulgences from the Church. That could explain his morally bankrupt ideologies. |
#90
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JohnH" wrote in message
... Are you into mocking Christianity like so many of the other liberals here? Why would you think I'm mocking something that I grew up with and still hold dear? You know nothing about me. I think you're grasping at straws. How dare you question my faith. Answer my question. What would Jesus do... support free market capitalism that was and is responsible for disenfranchising the poor or would He support the poor? You and Harry seem to get your jollies attempting to ridicule the religious beliefs of others. Why, I don't know. It surely can't be conducive to good serenity, and I doubt it earns either of you much respect, except from the other, of course. Ummm... John, you just got done trying to ridicule my faith: Are you into mocking Christianity like so many of the other liberals here? I don't think that's appropriate no matter who does it. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A true clunker | General | |||
Do the math | ASA |