Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Friedman of the NYT, in his frustration that Obama has not been
able to totally destroy the US economy in only 8 months penned an editorial disclosing the kind of system him and his ilk truly favor: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/op...er=rss&emc=rss Yes, you do read it right, fascism. Liberals are proposing Chinese style crony capitalism, ie, fascism. Consider that Friedmans wife's family was worth over $4 billion in 2007, you will see that he is part of the elite who would run things. Of course, we need all of these unelected czars to make policy because they do not answer to the great unwashed masses. Everyhting Obama has done takes us closer to Friedmans type of Chavez/Chinese fascism, state ownership of major manufacturing and the most minute aspect of your lives being controlled by the unelected health czar. I wonder if Friedman's partners in this effort to fascize the USA intend this to be an editorial to see how the public responds or as a means to familiarize us with the idea so it does not seem so shocking. I've always thought many liberals were actually fascists but to see it put so openly is still shocking. Will we have our own Tianeman Square? Frogwatch |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Katie Ohara" wrote in message
... Thomas Friedman of the NYT, in his frustration that Obama has not been able to totally destroy the US economy in only 8 months penned an editorial disclosing the kind of system him and his ilk truly favor: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/op...er=rss&emc=rss Yes, you do read it right, fascism. Liberals are proposing Chinese style crony capitalism, ie, fascism. Consider that Friedmans wife's family was worth over $4 billion in 2007, you will see that he is part of the elite who would run things. Of course, we need all of these unelected czars to make policy because they do not answer to the great unwashed masses. Everyhting Obama has done takes us closer to Friedmans type of Chavez/Chinese fascism, state ownership of major manufacturing and the most minute aspect of your lives being controlled by the unelected health czar. I wonder if Friedman's partners in this effort to fascize the USA intend this to be an editorial to see how the public responds or as a means to familiarize us with the idea so it does not seem so shocking. I've always thought many liberals were actually fascists but to see it put so openly is still shocking. Will we have our own Tianeman Square? Frogwatch So, Obama is a failure... lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Katie Ohara" wrote in message ... Thomas Friedman of the NYT, in his frustration that Obama has not been able to totally destroy the US economy in only 8 months penned an editorial disclosing the kind of system him and his ilk truly favor: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/op...er=rss&emc=rss Yes, you do read it right, fascism. Liberals are proposing Chinese style crony capitalism, ie, fascism. Consider that Friedmans wife's family was worth over $4 billion in 2007, you will see that he is part of the elite who would run things. Of course, we need all of these unelected czars to make policy because they do not answer to the great unwashed masses. Everyhting Obama has done takes us closer to Friedmans type of Chavez/Chinese fascism, state ownership of major manufacturing and the most minute aspect of your lives being controlled by the unelected health czar. I wonder if Friedman's partners in this effort to fascize the USA intend this to be an editorial to see how the public responds or as a means to familiarize us with the idea so it does not seem so shocking. I've always thought many liberals were actually fascists but to see it put so openly is still shocking. Will we have our own Tianeman Square? Frogwatch So, Obama is a failure... lol The mostly white republicans lost last fall's elections to a black man. The mostly white republicans are ****ed. Perhaps if they hadn't spent the last eight years screwing over the country, they might have done better in the elections...if they had had a candidate whose running mate was an intellectual cipher. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "H the K" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: "Katie Ohara" wrote in message ... Thomas Friedman of the NYT, in his frustration that Obama has not been able to totally destroy the US economy in only 8 months penned an editorial disclosing the kind of system him and his ilk truly favor: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/op...er=rss&emc=rss Yes, you do read it right, fascism. Liberals are proposing Chinese style crony capitalism, ie, fascism. Consider that Friedmans wife's family was worth over $4 billion in 2007, you will see that he is part of the elite who would run things. Of course, we need all of these unelected czars to make policy because they do not answer to the great unwashed masses. Everyhting Obama has done takes us closer to Friedmans type of Chavez/Chinese fascism, state ownership of major manufacturing and the most minute aspect of your lives being controlled by the unelected health czar. I wonder if Friedman's partners in this effort to fascize the USA intend this to be an editorial to see how the public responds or as a means to familiarize us with the idea so it does not seem so shocking. I've always thought many liberals were actually fascists but to see it put so openly is still shocking. Will we have our own Tianeman Square? Frogwatch So, Obama is a failure... lol The mostly white republicans lost last fall's elections to a black man. The mostly white republicans are ****ed. Perhaps if they hadn't spent the last eight years screwing over the country, they might have done better in the elections...if they had had a candidate whose running mate was an intellectual cipher. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All If they had run a decent candidate, the running mate would not matter. And after the previous 4 years, no Republican was going to win. They won after 4, but screwed the pooch big time. And it seems the Dem's did not pay attention, as they are exceeding the screw ups of the last 4 years in the first 100 days. They should not look at guaranteed control of Congress in another year, or the Executive branch in 3. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
H the K wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: "Katie Ohara" wrote in message ... Thomas Friedman of the NYT, in his frustration that Obama has not been able to totally destroy the US economy in only 8 months penned an editorial disclosing the kind of system him and his ilk truly favor: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/op...er=rss&emc=rss Yes, you do read it right, fascism. Liberals are proposing Chinese style crony capitalism, ie, fascism. Consider that Friedmans wife's family was worth over $4 billion in 2007, you will see that he is part of the elite who would run things. Of course, we need all of these unelected czars to make policy because they do not answer to the great unwashed masses. Everyhting Obama has done takes us closer to Friedmans type of Chavez/Chinese fascism, state ownership of major manufacturing and the most minute aspect of your lives being controlled by the unelected health czar. I wonder if Friedman's partners in this effort to fascize the USA intend this to be an editorial to see how the public responds or as a means to familiarize us with the idea so it does not seem so shocking. I've always thought many liberals were actually fascists but to see it put so openly is still shocking. Will we have our own Tianeman Square? Frogwatch So, Obama is a failure... lol The mostly white republicans lost last fall's elections to a black man. The mostly white republicans are ****ed. Perhaps if they hadn't spent the last eight years screwing over the country, they might have done better in the elections...if they had had a candidate whose running mate was an intellectual cipher. Half black, WAFA. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Katie Ohara" wrote in message ... Thomas Friedman of the NYT, in his frustration that Obama has not been able to totally destroy the US economy in only 8 months penned an editorial disclosing the kind of system him and his ilk truly favor: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/op...er=rss&emc=rss Yes, you do read it right, fascism. Liberals are proposing Chinese style crony capitalism, ie, fascism. Consider that Friedmans wife's family was worth over $4 billion in 2007, you will see that he is part of the elite who would run things. Of course, we need all of these unelected czars to make policy because they do not answer to the great unwashed masses. Everyhting Obama has done takes us closer to Friedmans type of Chavez/Chinese fascism, state ownership of major manufacturing and the most minute aspect of your lives being controlled by the unelected health czar. I wonder if Friedman's partners in this effort to fascize the USA intend this to be an editorial to see how the public responds or as a means to familiarize us with the idea so it does not seem so shocking. I've always thought many liberals were actually fascists but to see it put so openly is still shocking. Will we have our own Tianeman Square? Frogwatch So, Obama is a failure... lol Yes. He wasted his presidency by letting Nancy and Harry take over. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 9, 9:01*pm, D 2 wrote:
H the K wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "Katie Ohara" wrote in message .... Thomas Friedman of the NYT, in his frustration that Obama has not been able to totally destroy the US economy in only 8 months penned an editorial disclosing the kind of system him and his ilk truly favor: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/op...ml?_r=1&partne... Yes, you do read it right, fascism. *Liberals are proposing Chinese style crony capitalism, ie, fascism. *Consider that Friedmans wife's family was worth over $4 billion in 2007, you will see that he is part of the elite who would run things. *Of course, we need all of these unelected czars to make policy because they do not answer to the great unwashed masses. Everyhting Obama has done takes us closer to Friedmans type of Chavez/Chinese fascism, state ownership of major manufacturing and the most minute aspect of your lives being controlled by the unelected health czar. I wonder if Friedman's partners in this effort to fascize the USA intend this to be an editorial to see how the public responds or as a means to familiarize us with the idea so it does not seem so shocking.. I've always thought many liberals were actually fascists but to see it put so openly is still shocking. Will we have our own Tianeman Square? Frogwatch So, Obama is a failure... lol The mostly white republicans lost last fall's elections to a black man. The mostly white republicans are ****ed. Perhaps if they hadn't spent the last eight years screwing over the country, they might have done better in the elections...if they had had a candidate whose running mate was an intellectual cipher. Half black, WAFA. In the next six months a Dem congressman will call for Obama's impeachment for "incompetence". We should all hope Obama stays till January 2013,Otherwise Biden becomes pres and although that would end liberalism forever, it would be bad for the country to have a moron in office. Of course, if somehow both Obama and Biden were removed then we would have Pelosi. SO, we have to wait till after the inauguration of the new results of the 2010 election till we get rid of Obama and Biden.......somehow |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frogwatch wrote:
In the next six months a Dem congressman will call for Obama's impeachment for "incompetence". You are crazy. There is no other explanation. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m... If they had run a decent candidate, the running mate would not matter. And after the previous 4 years, no Republican was going to win. They won after 4, but screwed the pooch big time. And it seems the Dem's did not pay attention, as they are exceeding the screw ups of the last 4 years in the first 100 days. They should not look at guaranteed control of Congress in another year, or the Executive branch in 3. There are never any guarantees... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another gorgeous day on the Potomac | General | |||
Great day on the Potomac | General | |||
Cruise up the Potomac | Cruising | |||
Star kayaker Adam van Koeverden to carry flag in Beijing for Canada | General | |||
Star kayaker Adam van Koeverden to carry flag in Beijing for Canada | General |