"Gould 0738" wrote in message


...The only thing I though he had going for him was a higher IQ than Bush.

Based on what? GWB is a terrible public speaker who has a substantially
better academic success record than AG, and now has added to his already
fairly lengthy record as a chief executive -- a resume area wherein AG's
record is embarrassingly bare. AG is a comfortable extemporaneous speaker
who addresses all audiences as if they were second-grade half-wits. All
he's ever done is check the polls and change his clothes. I don't think
we'll run into either one at the next Mensa meeting, but I'd bet that W
would be closer to the door.

JG

On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 01:36:37 GMT, "John Gaquin"
wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message

There also is some conjecture Bush knew 9-11 was coming,


Not among those with more than a two-digit IQ.


Did you hear the one about the altar boy and the candlestick?
Ooops, sorry.

noah

"del cecchi" wrote in message news:CCv8b.293

Mensa meetings were boring.....

"...i-n-g-s..."? With an "s"? What on God's earth prompted you to go back
a second time? ;-)


JG

On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 03:40:04 GMT, "John Gaquin"
wrote:


"del cecchi" wrote in message news:CCv8b.293

Mensa meetings were boring.....

"...i-n-g-s..."? With an "s"? What on God's earth prompted you to go back
a second time? ;-)


JG


....musta been God's altar boys.
Why the hell are you using that nic?

....nevermind, I know.
noah

"bb" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 01:14:27 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


The majority of the Left Wing Trash posts do blame GMB for causing 9/11
(look at Harry's Post above).

Harry's not the majority of liberal thinkers. Anything you can post
to prove your assertion that the majority of lefties blame GWB for
9/11?

You are not paying attention to your sides claims.


the economy, even though it was dying before the election and AGores
actions
started a huge slide.

I'm just dying to hear, what did Al Gore do to start the slide? I'd
especially love to hear you explain how Mr. Gore controls Mr.
Greenspan.

The election debacle upset the market greatly. Where AL tried to get the
rules changed after election and all the law suits, put a huge, make that a
HUGE, amount of uncertainty and turmoil in to the markets. Accelerated the
slide that was already starting. Big grease on the skids. No one in the
elected government controls Greenspan. Which may be somewhat bad for us. A
lot of the problems were caused by his policies!!! When the market
overheated shades of 1928 and an IPO with a Website is selling for $300
million, he should have jumped on the margin rates. Not say publicly the
market is overheated (or words to that effect).


Sure sign of failure.

As opposed to what? Bush's sucess?


Even bigger failure. I do not approve of all of GWB's moves, but we would
have had more terror attacks in the US under Al. He would of shot a bunch
of cruise missiles into the Middle East and would have destroyed Al Quaida
as much as Clinton's missile shots did.

bb

"noah" wrote in message

... Why the hell are you using that nic?

????????

John,
I think noah has your name confused with the convicted pedophile priest who
was killed in prison.
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"noah" wrote in message

... Why the hell are you using that nic?

????????

"bb" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 05:14:59 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

The majority of the Left Wing Trash posts do blame GMB for causing
9/11
(look at Harry's Post above).

Harry's not the majority of liberal thinkers. Anything you can post
to prove your assertion that the majority of lefties blame GWB for
9/11?

You are not paying attention to your sides claims.

This wasn't about "my side's claims". It was about your assertion
that the majority of liberals blame GBW. You made the claim, I just
asked for something to back it up. Easy to make blanket assertions,
hard to back them up, eh?

The election debacle upset the market greatly. Where AL tried to get the
rules changed after election and all the law suits, put a huge, make that
a
HUGE, amount of uncertainty and turmoil in to the markets.

And it's all Al's fault? No problems with the teams of lawyers the
Bush's clan already had it Florida to contest the results? No
problems with the election fraud by the brother of the candidate, who
happened to be the governor of Florida at the time? Interesting that
you find it so easy to place all the blame on Mr. Gore.

Accelerated the
slide that was already starting. Big grease on the skids. No one in the
elected government controls Greenspan. Which may be somewhat bad for us.
A
lot of the problems were caused by his policies!!! When the market
overheated shades of 1928 and an IPO with a Website is selling for $300
million, he should have jumped on the margin rates. Not say publicly the
market is overheated (or words to that effect).

Even so, you placed the blame for the markets slide on Mr. Gore?

Even bigger failure. I do not approve of all of GWB's moves, but we
would
have had more terror attacks in the US under Al.
He would of shot a bunch
of cruise missiles into the Middle East and would have destroyed Al
Quaida
as much as Clinton's missile shots did.


There is absolutely nothing you could do to provide any basis for the
above claim. Mindless, partisan, blathering.

bb



More, much more basis than claiming Jeb Bush for election fraud. Was the
local election boards job to check out the names. The Democrat controlled
boards did not do their job. They had plenty of time. As to teams of
lawers, was smart as they probably knew that the Democratic party was going
to protest the election if it appeared they were losing. They contacted and
led witnesses as early as 3 pm during the election. The ballot was designed
and approved by both parties.
Mindless, partisan, blathering describes you totally!
Bill

Subject: Seems to me......
From: "Jim -"

Duh, my point exactly. So why place the blame on GBW unless you can
definitively state
what things Al Gore would have done differently.


Duh, that is just a stupid statement.

For all we know things would have been much worse under his *leadership*.

Duh, for all we know they could be better.
Duh, we'll never know.
Duh, it doesn't really matter because we have to deal with what is, not with
what may have been.


Capt. Bill

On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 20:27:59 GMT, "John Gaquin"
wrote:

Ah... thanks, Bill. Easy error, I suppose, if you don't read carefully.

JG


My apologies, John. I misread your name, and I was wrong.
noah