On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.

There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.

Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats
don't phase me, Tom.

It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.

I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the
bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...

Funny how these things work out. :)

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.
I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the
bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...

Funny how these things work out. :)



Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash.

"HK" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.
I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the
bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...

Funny how these things work out. :)



Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash.


It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..

On Oct 22, 10:06*am, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...



Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was
a one-off. *And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. *Frankly, I don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good
people to your little diatribes. *You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. *If others want to take action, all it takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. *Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.

There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.

Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats
don't phase me, Tom.

It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.

I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the
bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...

Funny how these things work out. :)

Only out of respect for the rest of you...

Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.
I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the
bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...
Funny how these things work out. :)


Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash.


It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..


I thought boats was the topic. Why do we need combatants to discuss boats?

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and
your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your
threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that
was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I
don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have
to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in
good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it
takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my
fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.
I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of
the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...
Funny how these things work out. :)


Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash.


It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones
and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..


I thought boats was the topic. Why do we need combatants to discuss boats?

In a perfect world, where we could banish the likes of you and the other
agitators, maybe boats could be discussed in a civil manner.

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:21:56 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:

Stopped over here at Google a couple of times in the last few days and
see that you and Harry are prancing around chasing my posts and
picking fights from under your desks, nothing changes... You have no
moral ground, now get back to spell checking and mis-spelling words
all in the same post dummy...

Dude - you just got through with one ****ing contest - why do you want
to continue another?

Do what you do in real life - you don't get along with somebody, just
ignore them and move on.

Does wonders for the psyche. :)

Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and
your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your
threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that
was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I
don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have
to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in
good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it
takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my
fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.
I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of
the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...
Funny how these things work out. :)

Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash.

It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones
and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..


I thought boats was the topic. Why do we need combatants to discuss boats?

In a perfect world, where we could banish the likes of you and the other
agitators, maybe boats could be discussed in a civil manner.


You are Krauses little lapdog. He says something rude and you start
yapping away in agreement like a good little puppy.

In a perfect world, Krause would be put away and you would be put up for
adoption.

On Oct 22, 11:09*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:21:56 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"

wrote:
Stopped over here at Google a couple of times in the last few days and
see that you and Harry are prancing around chasing my posts and
picking fights from under your desks, nothing changes... You have no
moral ground, now get back to spell checking and mis-spelling words
all in the same post dummy...

Dude - you just got through with one ****ing contest - why do you want
to continue another?

Do what you do in real life - you don't get along with somebody, just
ignore them and move on.

Does wonders for the psyche. *:)

Well, I happended to be on a machine where I access with Google and
see your buddie Donnie chasing me around the floor like a cat toy.
Seems I have been leaving Donnie alone for quite a while since no one
really repost his tripe past my filters, but apparently, he is still
taking pot shots and has been right along... Just sayin'... Either
way, I will be back on gravity soon enough...