"Jim" wrote

I thought boats was the topic. Why do we need combatants to discuss boats?

You musta not been at some of the boat launches I've been to. ;-)

Steve

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.
I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the
bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...

Funny how these things work out. :)



Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash.


It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..


How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you
to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know.

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:37:07 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:


"Jim" wrote

I thought boats was the topic. Why do we need combatants to discuss boats?

You musta not been at some of the boat launches I've been to. ;-)

Steve


LOL!

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and
your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your
threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that
was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I
don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have
to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in
good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it
takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my
fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.
I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of
the
bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...

Funny how these things work out. :)



Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash.


It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones
and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..


How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you
to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know.

So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members?

Don White wrote:


It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones
and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..

How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you
to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know.

So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members?

I have been lurking, but I noticed you have been high fiving some idiot
(HK) who accuses someone having sex with their preteen daughter. You
seem to have extremely selective standards. I don't know who is worse
HK or you for making him your best buddy.

Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and
your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your
threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that
was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I
don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have
to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in
good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it
takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my
fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.
I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of
the
bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...
Funny how these things work out. :)


Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash.

It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones
and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..

How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you
to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know.

So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members?


John is suggesting that all trashing stop. I should think that would
make you happy.

Enter Name Here wrote:
Don White wrote:


It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved
ones and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of
non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..

How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you
to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know.

So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members?

I have been lurking, but I noticed you have been high fiving some idiot
(HK) who accuses someone having sex with their preteen daughter. You
seem to have extremely selective standards. I don't know who is worse
HK or you for making him your best buddy.

Welcome aboard noobie.

"Enter Name Here" "Enter Email Here" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:


It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones
and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of
non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..

How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you
to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know.

So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members?

I have been lurking, but I noticed you have been high fiving some idiot
(HK) who accuses someone having sex with their preteen daughter. You
seem to have extremely selective standards. I don't know who is worse HK
or you for making him your best buddy.


Ok...which one of the Dopey Army irregulars are you?

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and
your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your
threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that
was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I
don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense
he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have
to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in
good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not -
I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it
takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software
and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my
fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an
"apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.
I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of
the
bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...
Funny how these things work out. :)


Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash.

It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones
and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of
non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..

How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you
to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know.

So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members?
John is suggesting that all trashing stop. I should think that would make
you happy.

It would...if he means what he says....therefore I'm watching him.
We shall see, time will tell, the proof of the pudding is in the eating of
it.
Get the message?

Don White wrote:
"Enter Name Here" "Enter Email Here" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:

It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones
and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of
non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..

How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you
to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know.
So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members?
I have been lurking, but I noticed you have been high fiving some idiot
(HK) who accuses someone having sex with their preteen daughter. You
seem to have extremely selective standards. I don't know who is worse HK
or you for making him your best buddy.


Ok...which one of the Dopey Army irregulars are you?


So why do you endorse someone talking about incest with their preteen
daughter, but say family members should be off limits? Or do you
believe only a low life would do that?