Poor timmy...he cant get his point across here and win. He now cums to
the aid (s) of the FAGGOT PRINCE, SCOTTY INGERSOLL.

Will he be the first to poke the ole' lady, ****face? Nawwwww.

How many weekends will he spend with your Daughter in the tent?
None....she only likes "daddy the FAGGOT"

Will he help you fix your run-down hillbilly porch?

How many others are lined-up for the FAGGOTS "ole' lady"
already...hmmmmmmm lets see

1. Top Bass Dog (or Douchebag, or rimmer )
2. John Adolf Herring (a stupid, "educated" man)
3. Tiny timmy (who's doing DOUBLE-duty, he'll get thirds, AND fourths)
...........................wow, the list is growing. Better REALLY
grease up the "ole' lady" for the night of nights.

Poor timmy now also has to join in the cross-polution of another NG,
for the sake of the COCKSUCKER, SCOTTY
INGERSOLL.

Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.

There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:46:13 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.

There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.

At this point, it would seem that the whole campaign shows signs of
serious emotional and mental instability. It's wasted energy.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:08:50 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:46:13 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.

There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.

At this point, it would seem that the whole campaign shows signs of
serious emotional and mental instability. It's wasted energy.

Stay out of this - I'm going to see just how stupid he is.

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:33:23 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:08:50 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:46:13 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.

There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.

At this point, it would seem that the whole campaign shows signs of
serious emotional and mental instability. It's wasted energy.

Stay out of this - I'm going to see just how stupid he is.

Mine was just an observation, Tom ( though unsolicited). I have no
plan on getting involved in all of this. (And I don't have that kind
of time in my life, anyway.)

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Oct 21, 2:46*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.

There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.

Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats
don't phase me, Tom.

On Oct 21, 5:50*pm, Scott Dickson wrote:
On Oct 21, 2:46*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.

There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.

Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats
don't phase me, Tom.

Perhaps when the authorities with proper jourisdiction knock on your
door, Dickster, that will "phase" you. When you disappear here, we
will know that you have received the knock on the door.

All the best, Dickster.

Yours always,
GC Boater

On Oct 21, 9:05*pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Oct 21, 5:50*pm, Scott Dickson wrote:



On Oct 21, 2:46*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.

There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.

Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats
don't phase me, Tom.

Perhaps when the authorities with proper jourisdiction knock on your
door, Dickster, that will "phase" you. *When you disappear here, we
will know that you have received the knock on the door.

All the best, Dickster.

Yours always,
GC Boater

That's a laugh. There have been no "definate " threats of any kind.
Better study some law. I've beaten Lawyers in Court. You just have to
have the correct "ammo".
You're very vain, and naive.

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.

There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.

Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats
don't phase me, Tom.

It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.

There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.

Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats
don't phase me, Tom.

It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.

I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the
bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...