Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#91
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 23, 3:01*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 2:59 PM, Tosk wrote: In article2ef106b5-d7e9-4828-b17c-a81867c40438 @l33g2000vbi.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 23, 2:35 pm, H the *wrote: On 10/23/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote: * *wrote in message ... * *wrote in message ... In , says... * *wrote in message l-september.org... In , says... * *wrote in message news ![]() On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:21:19 -0400, H the K * *wrote: On 10/22/09 8:12 PM, Tosk wrote: In , says... "John * * wrote in message news ![]() On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:53:34 -0700, wrote: Senator Al makes the whole room split their guts!!! Damn its great to have a comedian in the Senate... Only a liberal could make such a statement. Here he is again... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M84Q6...eature=related What an ignorant ****... Yes, you are. The Freak is calling Franken an ignorant ****. Franken has more synapses in the dead skin cells under his fingernails... Franken is a pretty smart guy. He's probably one of the smartest if not the smartest senator, of course, that's not saying much.... puleeeeaaseeee. He was and is a joke... Kinda' like calling the pending censorship doctrine, the "fairness" doctrine... Puleeasee.. He's smarter than both of us put together... umm... well, he's smarter. Ohhhh... back to the "fairness" doctrine? Did you run out of rants about healthcare reform being bad for Americans? They voted on the censorship doctrine today, with no debate, and behind closed doors just like Obama swore during the campaign, he wouldn't do... In that case, why are you able to post? -- Nom=de=Plume ~~ Snerk ~~ In a minute he'll be accusing you of hiding under a desk The funny thing is, it's the little **** Scott Ingersoll and his equally idiotic buddy, "Loogy," who are doing the hiding.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'll be seeing you this spring, Harry. Pffftt. Everybody here has been watching the pink army hide for years, not like they are fooling anybody.. Ohhhh. Is loogy planning to break into my house?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, dumb ass. Where did I ever say such a thing? What a scared fat pussy boy you are! |
#92
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 26, 10:29*am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 23, 3:01*pm, H the K wrote: On 10/23/09 2:59 PM, Tosk wrote: In article2ef106b5-d7e9-4828-b17c-a81867c40438 @l33g2000vbi.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 23, 2:35 pm, H the *wrote: On 10/23/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote: * *wrote in message ... * *wrote in message ... In , says... * *wrote in message l-september.org... In , says... * *wrote in message news ![]() On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:21:19 -0400, H the K * *wrote: On 10/22/09 8:12 PM, Tosk wrote: In , says... "John * * wrote in message news ![]() On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:53:34 -0700, wrote: Senator Al makes the whole room split their guts!!! Damn its great to have a comedian in the Senate... Only a liberal could make such a statement. Here he is again... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M84Q6...eature=related What an ignorant ****... Yes, you are. The Freak is calling Franken an ignorant ****. Franken has more synapses in the dead skin cells under his fingernails... Franken is a pretty smart guy. He's probably one of the smartest if not the smartest senator, of course, that's not saying much.... puleeeeaaseeee. He was and is a joke... Kinda' like calling the pending censorship doctrine, the "fairness" doctrine... Puleeasee.. He's smarter than both of us put together... umm... well, he's smarter. Ohhhh... back to the "fairness" doctrine? Did you run out of rants about healthcare reform being bad for Americans? They voted on the censorship doctrine today, with no debate, and behind closed doors just like Obama swore during the campaign, he wouldn't do... In that case, why are you able to post? -- Nom=de=Plume ~~ Snerk ~~ In a minute he'll be accusing you of hiding under a desk The funny thing is, it's the little **** Scott Ingersoll and his equally idiotic buddy, "Loogy," who are doing the hiding.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'll be seeing you this spring, Harry. Pffftt. Everybody here has been watching the pink army hide for years, not like they are fooling anybody.. Ohhhh. Is loogy planning to break into my house?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, dumb ass. Where did I ever say such a thing? What a scared fat pussy boy you are! He is getting scared now.. Bet he won't come to the door. Although I have considered taking him out of my filters so I can watch him cry and shake waiting for you and "that other guy" to find him... |
#93
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/26/09 10:32 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Oct 26, 10:29 am, wrote: On Oct 23, 3:01 pm, H the wrote: On 10/23/09 2:59 PM, Tosk wrote: In article2ef106b5-d7e9-4828-b17c-a81867c40438 @l33g2000vbi.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 23, 2:35 pm, H the wrote: On 10/23/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote: wrote in message ... wrote in message ... In , says... wrote in message ... In , says... wrote in message news ![]() wrote: On 10/22/09 8:12 PM, Tosk wrote: In , says... "John wrote in message news ![]() wrote: Senator Al makes the whole room split their guts!!! Damn its great to have a comedian in the Senate... Only a liberal could make such a statement. Here he is again... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M84Q6...eature=related What an ignorant ****... Yes, you are. The Freak is calling Franken an ignorant ****. Franken has more synapses in the dead skin cells under his fingernails... Franken is a pretty smart guy. He's probably one of the smartest if not the smartest senator, of course, that's not saying much.... puleeeeaaseeee. He was and is a joke... Kinda' like calling the pending censorship doctrine, the "fairness" doctrine... Puleeasee.. He's smarter than both of us put together... umm... well, he's smarter. Ohhhh... back to the "fairness" doctrine? Did you run out of rants about healthcare reform being bad for Americans? They voted on the censorship doctrine today, with no debate, and behind closed doors just like Obama swore during the campaign, he wouldn't do... In that case, why are you able to post? -- Nom=de=Plume ~~ Snerk ~~ In a minute he'll be accusing you of hiding under a desk The funny thing is, it's the little **** Scott Ingersoll and his equally idiotic buddy, "Loogy," who are doing the hiding.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'll be seeing you this spring, Harry. Pffftt. Everybody here has been watching the pink army hide for years, not like they are fooling anybody.. Ohhhh. Is loogy planning to break into my house?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, dumb ass. Where did I ever say such a thing? What a scared fat pussy boy you are! He is getting scared now.. Bet he won't come to the door. Although I have considered taking him out of my filters so I can watch him cry and shake waiting for you and "that other guy" to find him... Scared? Of you or your pants-wetting moron butt buddy Loogy? Another funny. What happens when I open the door? Do you or loogy "bust" in? If you do, you'll be dropped in your tracks. |
#95
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:30:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: snipped for the salvation of bandwidth I'm in the IT business, too. I also volunteer to help special-needs persons - this, without compensation, reward, or to assauge any speculated, deep-seated feelings of guilt. I have and do assist persons that most other people would avoid by walking on the other side of the street. (Do you do the same?) I'll return to a question I have asked of you before, which you failed to answer in any reasonable manner. Who are you to judge another? (And I'll wager that I'm compensated annually less than you are. I'll also wager that my income stream is less than yours.) Good for you!!! Weren't we talking about love and party affiliation? Are you a compassionate conservative and did you support GW Bush's pre-emptive war of choice? What percentage of the folks who "avoid" your friends do you suppose are Republicans? I'd expect it to be larger by at least the weight of a six pack or two. How much "love" do you have, jps? Do you volunteer your time for the unfortunate, the dispossessed, the disaffected, the pariah of our society? Or do you defer to "government" to do your lovin' for ya? Let's see the love, dude! Changing the subject. I'd be pleased to discuss my efforts towards the benefits of mankind but you haven't favored me with any real answers yet. So why should I invest in your inquiry when you haven't invested in mine? This is how it normally goes with you. I think a review of who first toke the path less relevant would yeild a contrary result. What is apparent to the sensible reader is that your declarations are far removed from reality, are not representative of the truth, and that by design. You are a propagandist and you are a minor one at that. You're traipsing around with your basket of radical blubs in remote newsgroups, far from the big-lights that the more notorious radicals, such as Michael Moore, enjoy. I'm sure your family understands you. "toke the path"? I was bleary-eyed last night. I would recommend that you avoid reading C.S. Lewis' "The Abolition of Man" if you have problems comprehending what I write. Then again, I suspect that if you or HK were able to comprehend "The Abolition of Man," any acerbic and witty rebuttal that either of you issued against it would fall as short as all of your other lackluster "blurbs." I don't recall reading this CS Lewis book, but I really enjoyed the space trilogy, and I most enjoyed (and remember) Out of the Silent Planet (apologies to Harry... it's just a coincidence). EM It's more of a philosophical work, em. I haven't read much of C.S. Lewis fiction (one Narnia novel and "The Screwtape Letters," an epistolary). I've read more of his religious and philosophical works, the most difficult to negotiate being "The Abolition of Man," and the most poignant being, imo, "The Problem of Pain." The man was an estimable apologist. And I may be being a bit brutal in this opinion; but, I doubt that either JPS or H the K possess the prowess or acumen to fully absorb it, considering their respectively unremarkable intellectual demonstrations in this NG. That's why the most you'll see from either in a criticism of his work is a "pithy" blurb. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#96
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#97
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:09:26 -0500, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:01:53 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:30:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: snipped for the salvation of bandwidth I'm in the IT business, too. I also volunteer to help special-needs persons - this, without compensation, reward, or to assauge any speculated, deep-seated feelings of guilt. I have and do assist persons that most other people would avoid by walking on the other side of the street. (Do you do the same?) I'll return to a question I have asked of you before, which you failed to answer in any reasonable manner. Who are you to judge another? (And I'll wager that I'm compensated annually less than you are. I'll also wager that my income stream is less than yours.) Good for you!!! Weren't we talking about love and party affiliation? Are you a compassionate conservative and did you support GW Bush's pre-emptive war of choice? What percentage of the folks who "avoid" your friends do you suppose are Republicans? I'd expect it to be larger by at least the weight of a six pack or two. How much "love" do you have, jps? Do you volunteer your time for the unfortunate, the dispossessed, the disaffected, the pariah of our society? Or do you defer to "government" to do your lovin' for ya? Let's see the love, dude! Changing the subject. I'd be pleased to discuss my efforts towards the benefits of mankind but you haven't favored me with any real answers yet. So why should I invest in your inquiry when you haven't invested in mine? This is how it normally goes with you. I think a review of who first toke the path less relevant would yeild a contrary result. What is apparent to the sensible reader is that your declarations are far removed from reality, are not representative of the truth, and that by design. You are a propagandist and you are a minor one at that. You're traipsing around with your basket of radical blubs in remote newsgroups, far from the big-lights that the more notorious radicals, such as Michael Moore, enjoy. I'm sure your family understands you. "toke the path"? I was bleary-eyed last night. I would recommend that you avoid reading C.S. Lewis' "The Abolition of Man" if you have problems comprehending what I write. Then again, I suspect that if you or HK were able to comprehend "The Abolition of Man," any acerbic and witty rebuttal that either of you issued against it would fall as short as all of your other lackluster "blurbs." I don't recall reading this CS Lewis book, but I really enjoyed the space trilogy, and I most enjoyed (and remember) Out of the Silent Planet (apologies to Harry... it's just a coincidence). EM It's more of a philosophical work, em. I haven't read much of C.S. Lewis fiction (one Narnia novel and "The Screwtape Letters," an epistolary). I've read more of his religious and philosophical works, the most difficult to negotiate being "The Abolition of Man," and the most poignant being, imo, "The Problem of Pain." The man was an estimable apologist. And I may be being a bit brutal in this opinion; but, I doubt that either JPS or H the K possess the prowess or acumen to fully absorb it, considering their respectively unremarkable intellectual demonstrations in this NG. That's why the most you'll see from either in a criticism of his work is a "pithy" blurb. I had wanted to add, too, Em, that "The Problem of Pain" is a bit of an exercise in theodicy. It's worth a read, even for those that don't subscribe to any faith in particular. Harry was right when he said overwrought. You need to get over yourself. You're exactly like a young jazz musician who knows how to play a lot of notes but hasn't yet discovered it's the spaces that count. Until then, I expect we'll be seeing more missives from the Ponderosa. Maybe you should ask Hoss to help you pull the stick out. And I'm not talking about the one in your eye. |
#98
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 26, 10:48*am, H the K wrote:
On 10/26/09 10:32 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Oct 26, 10:29 am, *wrote: On Oct 23, 3:01 pm, H the *wrote: On 10/23/09 2:59 PM, Tosk wrote: In article2ef106b5-d7e9-4828-b17c-a81867c40438 @l33g2000vbi.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 23, 2:35 pm, H the * *wrote: On 10/23/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote: * * *wrote in message ... * * *wrote in message l-september.org... In , says... * * *wrote in message rnal-september.org... In , says... * * *wrote in message news ![]() On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:21:19 -0400, H the K * * *wrote: On 10/22/09 8:12 PM, Tosk wrote: In , says... "John * * * wrote in message news ![]() On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:53:34 -0700, wrote: Senator Al makes the whole room split their guts!!! Damn its great to have a comedian in the Senate... Only a liberal could make such a statement. Here he is again... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M84Q6...eature=related What an ignorant ****... Yes, you are. The Freak is calling Franken an ignorant ****. Franken has more synapses in the dead skin cells under his fingernails... Franken is a pretty smart guy. He's probably one of the smartest if not the smartest senator, of course, that's not saying much.... puleeeeaaseeee. He was and is a joke... Kinda' like calling the pending censorship doctrine, the "fairness" doctrine... Puleeasee.. He's smarter than both of us put together... umm.... well, he's smarter. Ohhhh... back to the "fairness" doctrine? Did you run out of rants about healthcare reform being bad for Americans? They voted on the censorship doctrine today, with no debate, and behind closed doors just like Obama swore during the campaign, he wouldn't do... In that case, why are you able to post? -- Nom=de=Plume ~~ Snerk ~~ In a minute he'll be accusing you of hiding under a desk The funny thing is, it's the little **** Scott Ingersoll and his equally idiotic buddy, "Loogy," who are doing the hiding.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'll be seeing you this spring, Harry. Pffftt. Everybody here has been watching the pink army hide for years, not like they are fooling anybody.. Ohhhh. Is loogy planning to break into my house?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, dumb ass. Where did I ever say such a thing? What a scared fat pussy boy you are! He is getting scared now.. Bet he won't come to the door. Although I have considered taking him out of my filters so I can watch him cry and shake waiting for you and "that other guy" to find him... Scared? Of you or your pants-wetting moron butt buddy Loogy? Another funny. What happens when I open the door? Do you or loogy "bust" in? If you do, you'll be dropped in your tracks.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - We'll see this spring fat boy! "Bust in"? Are you admitting that when I show up at your door that you'll chicken out? I can't WAIT to report to every single person here just how you act when I show up!! |
#99
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:01:53 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:30:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: snipped for the salvation of bandwidth I'm in the IT business, too. I also volunteer to help special-needs persons - this, without compensation, reward, or to assauge any speculated, deep-seated feelings of guilt. I have and do assist persons that most other people would avoid by walking on the other side of the street. (Do you do the same?) I'll return to a question I have asked of you before, which you failed to answer in any reasonable manner. Who are you to judge another? (And I'll wager that I'm compensated annually less than you are. I'll also wager that my income stream is less than yours.) Good for you!!! Weren't we talking about love and party affiliation? Are you a compassionate conservative and did you support GW Bush's pre-emptive war of choice? What percentage of the folks who "avoid" your friends do you suppose are Republicans? I'd expect it to be larger by at least the weight of a six pack or two. How much "love" do you have, jps? Do you volunteer your time for the unfortunate, the dispossessed, the disaffected, the pariah of our society? Or do you defer to "government" to do your lovin' for ya? Let's see the love, dude! Changing the subject. I'd be pleased to discuss my efforts towards the benefits of mankind but you haven't favored me with any real answers yet. So why should I invest in your inquiry when you haven't invested in mine? This is how it normally goes with you. I think a review of who first toke the path less relevant would yeild a contrary result. What is apparent to the sensible reader is that your declarations are far removed from reality, are not representative of the truth, and that by design. You are a propagandist and you are a minor one at that. You're traipsing around with your basket of radical blubs in remote newsgroups, far from the big-lights that the more notorious radicals, such as Michael Moore, enjoy. I'm sure your family understands you. "toke the path"? I was bleary-eyed last night. I would recommend that you avoid reading C.S. Lewis' "The Abolition of Man" if you have problems comprehending what I write. Then again, I suspect that if you or HK were able to comprehend "The Abolition of Man," any acerbic and witty rebuttal that either of you issued against it would fall as short as all of your other lackluster "blurbs." I don't recall reading this CS Lewis book, but I really enjoyed the space trilogy, and I most enjoyed (and remember) Out of the Silent Planet (apologies to Harry... it's just a coincidence). EM It's more of a philosophical work, em. I haven't read much of C.S. Lewis fiction (one Narnia novel and "The Screwtape Letters," an epistolary). I've read more of his religious and philosophical works, the most difficult to negotiate being "The Abolition of Man," and the most poignant being, imo, "The Problem of Pain." The man was an estimable apologist. And I may be being a bit brutal in this opinion; but, I doubt that either JPS or H the K possess the prowess or acumen to fully absorb it, considering their respectively unremarkable intellectual demonstrations in this NG. That's why the most you'll see from either in a criticism of his work is a "pithy" blurb. I had wanted to add, too, Em, that "The Problem of Pain" is a bit of an exercise in theodicy. It's worth a read, even for those that don't subscribe to any faith in particular. Sometimes, I don't mind a pithy response. ![]() I can understand God's goodness in the face of many things (all things I suppose), but I don't subscribe to the notion of evil (this puts me at odds with lots of religious people of course). I guess I've struggled with this for a long while, but I've concluded that there doesn't have to be the duality of good and evil for good to exist. Bad certainly exists, but I don't believe in evil. Even bad people can be do good in select circumstances. Certainly, the reverse is true. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#100
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:28:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:01:53 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:30:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: snipped for the salvation of bandwidth I'm in the IT business, too. I also volunteer to help special-needs persons - this, without compensation, reward, or to assauge any speculated, deep-seated feelings of guilt. I have and do assist persons that most other people would avoid by walking on the other side of the street. (Do you do the same?) I'll return to a question I have asked of you before, which you failed to answer in any reasonable manner. Who are you to judge another? (And I'll wager that I'm compensated annually less than you are. I'll also wager that my income stream is less than yours.) Good for you!!! Weren't we talking about love and party affiliation? Are you a compassionate conservative and did you support GW Bush's pre-emptive war of choice? What percentage of the folks who "avoid" your friends do you suppose are Republicans? I'd expect it to be larger by at least the weight of a six pack or two. How much "love" do you have, jps? Do you volunteer your time for the unfortunate, the dispossessed, the disaffected, the pariah of our society? Or do you defer to "government" to do your lovin' for ya? Let's see the love, dude! Changing the subject. I'd be pleased to discuss my efforts towards the benefits of mankind but you haven't favored me with any real answers yet. So why should I invest in your inquiry when you haven't invested in mine? This is how it normally goes with you. I think a review of who first toke the path less relevant would yeild a contrary result. What is apparent to the sensible reader is that your declarations are far removed from reality, are not representative of the truth, and that by design. You are a propagandist and you are a minor one at that. You're traipsing around with your basket of radical blubs in remote newsgroups, far from the big-lights that the more notorious radicals, such as Michael Moore, enjoy. I'm sure your family understands you. "toke the path"? I was bleary-eyed last night. I would recommend that you avoid reading C.S. Lewis' "The Abolition of Man" if you have problems comprehending what I write. Then again, I suspect that if you or HK were able to comprehend "The Abolition of Man," any acerbic and witty rebuttal that either of you issued against it would fall as short as all of your other lackluster "blurbs." I don't recall reading this CS Lewis book, but I really enjoyed the space trilogy, and I most enjoyed (and remember) Out of the Silent Planet (apologies to Harry... it's just a coincidence). EM It's more of a philosophical work, em. I haven't read much of C.S. Lewis fiction (one Narnia novel and "The Screwtape Letters," an epistolary). I've read more of his religious and philosophical works, the most difficult to negotiate being "The Abolition of Man," and the most poignant being, imo, "The Problem of Pain." The man was an estimable apologist. And I may be being a bit brutal in this opinion; but, I doubt that either JPS or H the K possess the prowess or acumen to fully absorb it, considering their respectively unremarkable intellectual demonstrations in this NG. That's why the most you'll see from either in a criticism of his work is a "pithy" blurb. I had wanted to add, too, Em, that "The Problem of Pain" is a bit of an exercise in theodicy. It's worth a read, even for those that don't subscribe to any faith in particular. Sometimes, I don't mind a pithy response. ![]() Actually, I don't either ![]() 'pith' when there is little there to show for it. I can understand God's goodness in the face of many things (all things I suppose), but I don't subscribe to the notion of evil (this puts me at odds with lots of religious people of course). I guess I've struggled with this for a long while, but I've concluded that there doesn't have to be the duality of good and evil for good to exist. Bad certainly exists, but I don't believe in evil. Even bad people can be do good in select circumstances. Certainly, the reverse is true. At least you've invested some thought in the issue. That's more than many others do. I think that when the discussion comes up, the terms need to be clearly defined. It can be asserted that 'good' has no meaning if there isn't 'evil.' The one is defined in some part by the other. I wish I had finished G. E. Moore's "Principia Ethica." I had started it last winter, and I put it down in the middle of his defining "good." Maybe I'll be able to finish it when I retire, if I ever get that far :) -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Senator Franken!!! | General | |||
Pawlenty to certify Franken if court rules for him | General |