Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #91   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,222
Default Franken!!!

On Oct 23, 3:01*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 2:59 PM, Tosk wrote:





In article2ef106b5-d7e9-4828-b17c-a81867c40438
@l33g2000vbi.googlegroups.com, says...


On Oct 23, 2:35 pm, H the *wrote:
On 10/23/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote:


* *wrote in message
...
* *wrote in message
...
In ,
says...


* *wrote in message
l-september.org...
In ,
says...


* *wrote in message
newsgv1e5daol0mtq4tvk427egoc99h2r4269@4 ax.com...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:21:19 -0400, H the K
* *wrote:


On 10/22/09 8:12 PM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...


"John * * wrote in message
newshi1e556035gm39m55nal9rf5m9oqln7 ...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:53:34 -0700,
wrote:


Senator Al makes the whole room split their guts!!!


Damn its great to have a comedian in the Senate...


Only a liberal could make such a statement.


Here he is again...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M84Q6...eature=related


What an ignorant ****...


Yes, you are.


The Freak is calling Franken an ignorant ****.


Franken has more synapses in the dead skin cells under his
fingernails...


Franken is a pretty smart guy. He's probably one of the smartest if
not
the
smartest senator, of course, that's not saying much....


puleeeeaaseeee. He was and is a joke... Kinda' like calling the
pending
censorship doctrine, the "fairness" doctrine...


Puleeasee.. He's smarter than both of us put together... umm... well,
he's
smarter.


Ohhhh... back to the "fairness" doctrine? Did you run out of rants about
healthcare reform being bad for Americans?


They voted on the censorship doctrine today, with no debate, and behind
closed doors just like Obama swore during the campaign, he wouldn't
do...


In that case, why are you able to post?


--
Nom=de=Plume


~~ Snerk ~~
In a minute he'll be accusing you of hiding under a desk


The funny thing is, it's the little **** Scott Ingersoll and his equally
idiotic buddy, "Loogy," who are doing the hiding.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


I'll be seeing you this spring, Harry.


Pffftt. Everybody here has been watching the pink army hide for years,
not like they are fooling anybody..


Ohhhh. Is loogy planning to break into my house?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Hey, dumb ass. Where did I ever say such a thing? What a scared fat
pussy boy you are!
  #92   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 905
Default Franken!!!

On Oct 26, 10:29*am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 23, 3:01*pm, H the K wrote:



On 10/23/09 2:59 PM, Tosk wrote:


In article2ef106b5-d7e9-4828-b17c-a81867c40438
@l33g2000vbi.googlegroups.com, says...


On Oct 23, 2:35 pm, H the *wrote:
On 10/23/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote:


* *wrote in message
...
* *wrote in message
...
In ,
says...


* *wrote in message
l-september.org...
In ,
says...


* *wrote in message
newsgv1e5daol0mtq4tvk427egoc99h2r4269@4 ax.com...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:21:19 -0400, H the K
* *wrote:


On 10/22/09 8:12 PM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...


"John * * wrote in message
newshi1e556035gm39m55nal9rf5m9oqln7 ...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:53:34 -0700,
wrote:


Senator Al makes the whole room split their guts!!!


Damn its great to have a comedian in the Senate...


Only a liberal could make such a statement.


Here he is again...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M84Q6...eature=related


What an ignorant ****...


Yes, you are.


The Freak is calling Franken an ignorant ****.


Franken has more synapses in the dead skin cells under his
fingernails...


Franken is a pretty smart guy. He's probably one of the smartest if
not
the
smartest senator, of course, that's not saying much....


puleeeeaaseeee. He was and is a joke... Kinda' like calling the
pending
censorship doctrine, the "fairness" doctrine...


Puleeasee.. He's smarter than both of us put together... umm... well,
he's
smarter.


Ohhhh... back to the "fairness" doctrine? Did you run out of rants about
healthcare reform being bad for Americans?


They voted on the censorship doctrine today, with no debate, and behind
closed doors just like Obama swore during the campaign, he wouldn't
do...


In that case, why are you able to post?


--
Nom=de=Plume


~~ Snerk ~~
In a minute he'll be accusing you of hiding under a desk


The funny thing is, it's the little **** Scott Ingersoll and his equally
idiotic buddy, "Loogy," who are doing the hiding.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


I'll be seeing you this spring, Harry.


Pffftt. Everybody here has been watching the pink army hide for years,
not like they are fooling anybody..


Ohhhh. Is loogy planning to break into my house?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Hey, dumb ass. Where did I ever say such a thing? What a scared fat
pussy boy you are!


He is getting scared now.. Bet he won't come to the door. Although I
have considered taking him out of my filters so I can watch him cry
and shake waiting for you and "that other guy" to find him...
  #93   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,764
Default Franken!!!

On 10/26/09 10:32 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Oct 26, 10:29 am, wrote:
On Oct 23, 3:01 pm, H the wrote:



On 10/23/09 2:59 PM, Tosk wrote:


In article2ef106b5-d7e9-4828-b17c-a81867c40438
@l33g2000vbi.googlegroups.com, says...


On Oct 23, 2:35 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/23/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote:


wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
In ,
says...


wrote in message
...
In ,
says...


wrote in message
news On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:21:19 -0400, H the K
wrote:


On 10/22/09 8:12 PM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...


"John wrote in message
news On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:53:34 -0700,
wrote:


Senator Al makes the whole room split their guts!!!


Damn its great to have a comedian in the Senate...


Only a liberal could make such a statement.


Here he is again...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M84Q6...eature=related


What an ignorant ****...


Yes, you are.


The Freak is calling Franken an ignorant ****.


Franken has more synapses in the dead skin cells under his
fingernails...


Franken is a pretty smart guy. He's probably one of the smartest if
not
the
smartest senator, of course, that's not saying much....


puleeeeaaseeee. He was and is a joke... Kinda' like calling the
pending
censorship doctrine, the "fairness" doctrine...


Puleeasee.. He's smarter than both of us put together... umm... well,
he's
smarter.


Ohhhh... back to the "fairness" doctrine? Did you run out of rants about
healthcare reform being bad for Americans?


They voted on the censorship doctrine today, with no debate, and behind
closed doors just like Obama swore during the campaign, he wouldn't
do...


In that case, why are you able to post?


--
Nom=de=Plume


~~ Snerk ~~
In a minute he'll be accusing you of hiding under a desk


The funny thing is, it's the little **** Scott Ingersoll and his equally
idiotic buddy, "Loogy," who are doing the hiding.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


I'll be seeing you this spring, Harry.


Pffftt. Everybody here has been watching the pink army hide for years,
not like they are fooling anybody..


Ohhhh. Is loogy planning to break into my house?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Hey, dumb ass. Where did I ever say such a thing? What a scared fat
pussy boy you are!


He is getting scared now.. Bet he won't come to the door. Although I
have considered taking him out of my filters so I can watch him cry
and shake waiting for you and "that other guy" to find him...



Scared? Of you or your pants-wetting moron butt buddy Loogy?

Another funny.

What happens when I open the door? Do you or loogy "bust" in? If you do,
you'll be dropped in your tracks.
  #94   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Franken!!!

wrote in message
news
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:36:50 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:41:48 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:53:02 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:31:23 -0500,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:19:19 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:35:13 -0500,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:23:01 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:04:26 -0500,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:47:45 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:36:10 -0500,
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:33:42 -0700, jps
wrote:

snipped

That woman looked like she was experiencing the onset of an anal
outburst.

I love Al and I love Alan Grayson. What's with Dems named Al?

I love Al Gore too, apart from how he runs campaigns.


How is it possible for a person to "love" any politician? (It
seems
to be a sickening fetish similar to necrophilia.)

Love doesn't exist on your end of the political spectrum, unless
you
count money.

You consider that a reasonable declaration? On a primal, nascent
level, I suspect that you don't really know what "love" is. You
and
most others in this NG don't display "love" in any sense of the
word.

What do you find wrong with it? Even "compassionate conservatives"
send fellow citizens to war based on known false information.

The only love the conservative movement displays is tough love, as
in
"pull yourself up by your bootstraps cause there ain't nobody who
gives a **** once you're born."

I'm sure there's so much love to spread around on Sundays and then
Monday it's back to screwing others for your own.

Didn't you say you were in the insurance business?

I'm in the IT business, too. I also volunteer to help special-needs
persons - this, without compensation, reward, or to assauge any
speculated, deep-seated feelings of guilt. I have and do assist
persons that most other people would avoid by walking on the other
side of the street. (Do you do the same?) I'll return to a question
I have asked of you before, which you failed to answer in any
reasonable manner. Who are you to judge another? (And I'll wager
that I'm compensated annually less than you are. I'll also wager
that
my income stream is less than yours.)

Good for you!!!

Weren't we talking about love and party affiliation?

Are you a compassionate conservative and did you support GW Bush's
pre-emptive war of choice?

What percentage of the folks who "avoid" your friends do you suppose
are Republicans? I'd expect it to be larger by at least the weight of
a six pack or two.

How much "love" do you have, jps? Do you volunteer your time for the
unfortunate, the dispossessed, the disaffected, the pariah of our
society? Or do you defer to "government" to do your lovin' for ya?
Let's see the love, dude!

Changing the subject. I'd be pleased to discuss my efforts towards
the benefits of mankind but you haven't favored me with any real
answers yet.

So why should I invest in your inquiry when you haven't invested in
mine?

This is how it normally goes with you.

I think a review of who first toke the path less relevant would yeild
a contrary result. What is apparent to the sensible reader is that
your declarations are far removed from reality, are not representative
of the truth, and that by design. You are a propagandist and you are
a minor one at that. You're traipsing around with your basket of
radical blubs in remote newsgroups, far from the big-lights that the
more notorious radicals, such as Michael Moore, enjoy.


I'm sure your family understands you.


"toke the path"? I was bleary-eyed last night. I would recommend
that you avoid reading C.S. Lewis' "The Abolition of Man" if you have
problems comprehending what I write. Then again, I suspect that if
you or HK were able to comprehend "The Abolition of Man," any acerbic
and witty rebuttal that either of you issued against it would fall as
short as all of your other lackluster "blurbs."



I don't recall reading this CS Lewis book, but I really enjoyed the space
trilogy, and I most enjoyed (and remember) Out of the Silent Planet
(apologies to Harry... it's just a coincidence).

EM

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #95   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 881
Default Franken!!!

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:30:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

snipped for the salvation of bandwidth

I'm in the IT business, too. I also volunteer to help special-needs
persons - this, without compensation, reward, or to assauge any
speculated, deep-seated feelings of guilt. I have and do assist
persons that most other people would avoid by walking on the other
side of the street. (Do you do the same?) I'll return to a question
I have asked of you before, which you failed to answer in any
reasonable manner. Who are you to judge another? (And I'll wager
that I'm compensated annually less than you are. I'll also wager
that
my income stream is less than yours.)

Good for you!!!

Weren't we talking about love and party affiliation?

Are you a compassionate conservative and did you support GW Bush's
pre-emptive war of choice?

What percentage of the folks who "avoid" your friends do you suppose
are Republicans? I'd expect it to be larger by at least the weight of
a six pack or two.

How much "love" do you have, jps? Do you volunteer your time for the
unfortunate, the dispossessed, the disaffected, the pariah of our
society? Or do you defer to "government" to do your lovin' for ya?
Let's see the love, dude!

Changing the subject. I'd be pleased to discuss my efforts towards
the benefits of mankind but you haven't favored me with any real
answers yet.

So why should I invest in your inquiry when you haven't invested in
mine?

This is how it normally goes with you.

I think a review of who first toke the path less relevant would yeild
a contrary result. What is apparent to the sensible reader is that
your declarations are far removed from reality, are not representative
of the truth, and that by design. You are a propagandist and you are
a minor one at that. You're traipsing around with your basket of
radical blubs in remote newsgroups, far from the big-lights that the
more notorious radicals, such as Michael Moore, enjoy.

I'm sure your family understands you.


"toke the path"? I was bleary-eyed last night. I would recommend
that you avoid reading C.S. Lewis' "The Abolition of Man" if you have
problems comprehending what I write. Then again, I suspect that if
you or HK were able to comprehend "The Abolition of Man," any acerbic
and witty rebuttal that either of you issued against it would fall as
short as all of your other lackluster "blurbs."



I don't recall reading this CS Lewis book, but I really enjoyed the space
trilogy, and I most enjoyed (and remember) Out of the Silent Planet
(apologies to Harry... it's just a coincidence).

EM


It's more of a philosophical work, em. I haven't read much of C.S.
Lewis fiction (one Narnia novel and "The Screwtape Letters," an
epistolary). I've read more of his religious and philosophical works,
the most difficult to negotiate being "The Abolition of Man," and the
most poignant being, imo, "The Problem of Pain." The man was an
estimable apologist. And I may be being a bit brutal in this opinion;
but, I doubt that either JPS or H the K possess the prowess or acumen
to fully absorb it, considering their respectively unremarkable
intellectual demonstrations in this NG. That's why the most you'll
see from either in a criticism of his work is a "pithy" blurb.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access


  #96   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 881
Default Franken!!!

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:01:53 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:30:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

snipped for the salvation of bandwidth

I'm in the IT business, too. I also volunteer to help special-needs
persons - this, without compensation, reward, or to assauge any
speculated, deep-seated feelings of guilt. I have and do assist
persons that most other people would avoid by walking on the other
side of the street. (Do you do the same?) I'll return to a question
I have asked of you before, which you failed to answer in any
reasonable manner. Who are you to judge another? (And I'll wager
that I'm compensated annually less than you are. I'll also wager
that
my income stream is less than yours.)

Good for you!!!

Weren't we talking about love and party affiliation?

Are you a compassionate conservative and did you support GW Bush's
pre-emptive war of choice?

What percentage of the folks who "avoid" your friends do you suppose
are Republicans? I'd expect it to be larger by at least the weight of
a six pack or two.

How much "love" do you have, jps? Do you volunteer your time for the
unfortunate, the dispossessed, the disaffected, the pariah of our
society? Or do you defer to "government" to do your lovin' for ya?
Let's see the love, dude!

Changing the subject. I'd be pleased to discuss my efforts towards
the benefits of mankind but you haven't favored me with any real
answers yet.

So why should I invest in your inquiry when you haven't invested in
mine?

This is how it normally goes with you.

I think a review of who first toke the path less relevant would yeild
a contrary result. What is apparent to the sensible reader is that
your declarations are far removed from reality, are not representative
of the truth, and that by design. You are a propagandist and you are
a minor one at that. You're traipsing around with your basket of
radical blubs in remote newsgroups, far from the big-lights that the
more notorious radicals, such as Michael Moore, enjoy.

I'm sure your family understands you.

"toke the path"? I was bleary-eyed last night. I would recommend
that you avoid reading C.S. Lewis' "The Abolition of Man" if you have
problems comprehending what I write. Then again, I suspect that if
you or HK were able to comprehend "The Abolition of Man," any acerbic
and witty rebuttal that either of you issued against it would fall as
short as all of your other lackluster "blurbs."



I don't recall reading this CS Lewis book, but I really enjoyed the space
trilogy, and I most enjoyed (and remember) Out of the Silent Planet
(apologies to Harry... it's just a coincidence).

EM


It's more of a philosophical work, em. I haven't read much of C.S.
Lewis fiction (one Narnia novel and "The Screwtape Letters," an
epistolary). I've read more of his religious and philosophical works,
the most difficult to negotiate being "The Abolition of Man," and the
most poignant being, imo, "The Problem of Pain." The man was an
estimable apologist. And I may be being a bit brutal in this opinion;
but, I doubt that either JPS or H the K possess the prowess or acumen
to fully absorb it, considering their respectively unremarkable
intellectual demonstrations in this NG. That's why the most you'll
see from either in a criticism of his work is a "pithy" blurb.


I had wanted to add, too, Em, that "The Problem of Pain" is a bit of
an exercise in theodicy. It's worth a read, even for those that don't
subscribe to any faith in particular.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
  #97   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Franken!!!

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:09:26 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:01:53 -0500,
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:30:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

snipped for the salvation of bandwidth

I'm in the IT business, too. I also volunteer to help special-needs
persons - this, without compensation, reward, or to assauge any
speculated, deep-seated feelings of guilt. I have and do assist
persons that most other people would avoid by walking on the other
side of the street. (Do you do the same?) I'll return to a question
I have asked of you before, which you failed to answer in any
reasonable manner. Who are you to judge another? (And I'll wager
that I'm compensated annually less than you are. I'll also wager
that
my income stream is less than yours.)

Good for you!!!

Weren't we talking about love and party affiliation?

Are you a compassionate conservative and did you support GW Bush's
pre-emptive war of choice?

What percentage of the folks who "avoid" your friends do you suppose
are Republicans? I'd expect it to be larger by at least the weight of
a six pack or two.

How much "love" do you have, jps? Do you volunteer your time for the
unfortunate, the dispossessed, the disaffected, the pariah of our
society? Or do you defer to "government" to do your lovin' for ya?
Let's see the love, dude!

Changing the subject. I'd be pleased to discuss my efforts towards
the benefits of mankind but you haven't favored me with any real
answers yet.

So why should I invest in your inquiry when you haven't invested in
mine?

This is how it normally goes with you.

I think a review of who first toke the path less relevant would yeild
a contrary result. What is apparent to the sensible reader is that
your declarations are far removed from reality, are not representative
of the truth, and that by design. You are a propagandist and you are
a minor one at that. You're traipsing around with your basket of
radical blubs in remote newsgroups, far from the big-lights that the
more notorious radicals, such as Michael Moore, enjoy.

I'm sure your family understands you.

"toke the path"? I was bleary-eyed last night. I would recommend
that you avoid reading C.S. Lewis' "The Abolition of Man" if you have
problems comprehending what I write. Then again, I suspect that if
you or HK were able to comprehend "The Abolition of Man," any acerbic
and witty rebuttal that either of you issued against it would fall as
short as all of your other lackluster "blurbs."


I don't recall reading this CS Lewis book, but I really enjoyed the space
trilogy, and I most enjoyed (and remember) Out of the Silent Planet
(apologies to Harry... it's just a coincidence).

EM


It's more of a philosophical work, em. I haven't read much of C.S.
Lewis fiction (one Narnia novel and "The Screwtape Letters," an
epistolary). I've read more of his religious and philosophical works,
the most difficult to negotiate being "The Abolition of Man," and the
most poignant being, imo, "The Problem of Pain." The man was an
estimable apologist. And I may be being a bit brutal in this opinion;
but, I doubt that either JPS or H the K possess the prowess or acumen
to fully absorb it, considering their respectively unremarkable
intellectual demonstrations in this NG. That's why the most you'll
see from either in a criticism of his work is a "pithy" blurb.


I had wanted to add, too, Em, that "The Problem of Pain" is a bit of
an exercise in theodicy. It's worth a read, even for those that don't
subscribe to any faith in particular.


Harry was right when he said overwrought. You need to get over
yourself. You're exactly like a young jazz musician who knows how to
play a lot of notes but hasn't yet discovered it's the spaces that
count.

Until then, I expect we'll be seeing more missives from the Ponderosa.

Maybe you should ask Hoss to help you pull the stick out. And I'm not
talking about the one in your eye.
  #98   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,222
Default Franken!!!

On Oct 26, 10:48*am, H the K wrote:
On 10/26/09 10:32 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:





On Oct 26, 10:29 am, *wrote:
On Oct 23, 3:01 pm, H the *wrote:


On 10/23/09 2:59 PM, Tosk wrote:


In article2ef106b5-d7e9-4828-b17c-a81867c40438
@l33g2000vbi.googlegroups.com, says...


On Oct 23, 2:35 pm, H the * *wrote:
On 10/23/09 8:00 AM, Don White wrote:


* * *wrote in message
...
* * *wrote in message
l-september.org...
In ,
says...


* * *wrote in message
rnal-september.org...
In ,
says...


* * *wrote in message
newsgv1e5daol0mtq4tvk427egoc99h2r426 ...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:21:19 -0400, H the K
* * *wrote:


On 10/22/09 8:12 PM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...


"John * * * wrote in message
newshi1e556035gm39m55nal9rf5m9oq ...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:53:34 -0700,
wrote:


Senator Al makes the whole room split their guts!!!


Damn its great to have a comedian in the Senate...


Only a liberal could make such a statement.


Here he is again...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M84Q6...eature=related


What an ignorant ****...


Yes, you are.


The Freak is calling Franken an ignorant ****.


Franken has more synapses in the dead skin cells under his
fingernails...


Franken is a pretty smart guy. He's probably one of the smartest if
not
the
smartest senator, of course, that's not saying much....


puleeeeaaseeee. He was and is a joke... Kinda' like calling the
pending
censorship doctrine, the "fairness" doctrine...


Puleeasee.. He's smarter than both of us put together... umm.... well,
he's
smarter.


Ohhhh... back to the "fairness" doctrine? Did you run out of rants about
healthcare reform being bad for Americans?


They voted on the censorship doctrine today, with no debate, and behind
closed doors just like Obama swore during the campaign, he wouldn't
do...


In that case, why are you able to post?


--
Nom=de=Plume


~~ Snerk ~~
In a minute he'll be accusing you of hiding under a desk


The funny thing is, it's the little **** Scott Ingersoll and his equally
idiotic buddy, "Loogy," who are doing the hiding.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


I'll be seeing you this spring, Harry.


Pffftt. Everybody here has been watching the pink army hide for years,
not like they are fooling anybody..


Ohhhh. Is loogy planning to break into my house?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Hey, dumb ass. Where did I ever say such a thing? What a scared fat
pussy boy you are!


He is getting scared now.. Bet he won't come to the door. Although I
have considered taking him out of my filters so I can watch him cry
and shake waiting for you and "that other guy" to find him...


Scared? Of you or your pants-wetting moron butt buddy Loogy?

Another funny.

What happens when I open the door? Do you or loogy "bust" in? If you do,
you'll be dropped in your tracks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


We'll see this spring fat boy! "Bust in"? Are you admitting that when
I show up at your door that you'll chicken out? I can't WAIT to report
to every single person here just how you act when I show up!!
  #99   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Franken!!!

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:01:53 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:30:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

snipped for the salvation of bandwidth

I'm in the IT business, too. I also volunteer to help
special-needs
persons - this, without compensation, reward, or to assauge any
speculated, deep-seated feelings of guilt. I have and do assist
persons that most other people would avoid by walking on the other
side of the street. (Do you do the same?) I'll return to a
question
I have asked of you before, which you failed to answer in any
reasonable manner. Who are you to judge another? (And I'll wager
that I'm compensated annually less than you are. I'll also wager
that
my income stream is less than yours.)

Good for you!!!

Weren't we talking about love and party affiliation?

Are you a compassionate conservative and did you support GW Bush's
pre-emptive war of choice?

What percentage of the folks who "avoid" your friends do you
suppose
are Republicans? I'd expect it to be larger by at least the weight
of
a six pack or two.

How much "love" do you have, jps? Do you volunteer your time for
the
unfortunate, the dispossessed, the disaffected, the pariah of our
society? Or do you defer to "government" to do your lovin' for ya?
Let's see the love, dude!

Changing the subject. I'd be pleased to discuss my efforts towards
the benefits of mankind but you haven't favored me with any real
answers yet.

So why should I invest in your inquiry when you haven't invested in
mine?

This is how it normally goes with you.

I think a review of who first toke the path less relevant would yeild
a contrary result. What is apparent to the sensible reader is that
your declarations are far removed from reality, are not representative
of the truth, and that by design. You are a propagandist and you are
a minor one at that. You're traipsing around with your basket of
radical blubs in remote newsgroups, far from the big-lights that the
more notorious radicals, such as Michael Moore, enjoy.

I'm sure your family understands you.

"toke the path"? I was bleary-eyed last night. I would recommend
that you avoid reading C.S. Lewis' "The Abolition of Man" if you have
problems comprehending what I write. Then again, I suspect that if
you or HK were able to comprehend "The Abolition of Man," any acerbic
and witty rebuttal that either of you issued against it would fall as
short as all of your other lackluster "blurbs."


I don't recall reading this CS Lewis book, but I really enjoyed the space
trilogy, and I most enjoyed (and remember) Out of the Silent Planet
(apologies to Harry... it's just a coincidence).

EM


It's more of a philosophical work, em. I haven't read much of C.S.
Lewis fiction (one Narnia novel and "The Screwtape Letters," an
epistolary). I've read more of his religious and philosophical works,
the most difficult to negotiate being "The Abolition of Man," and the
most poignant being, imo, "The Problem of Pain." The man was an
estimable apologist. And I may be being a bit brutal in this opinion;
but, I doubt that either JPS or H the K possess the prowess or acumen
to fully absorb it, considering their respectively unremarkable
intellectual demonstrations in this NG. That's why the most you'll
see from either in a criticism of his work is a "pithy" blurb.


I had wanted to add, too, Em, that "The Problem of Pain" is a bit of
an exercise in theodicy. It's worth a read, even for those that don't
subscribe to any faith in particular.



Sometimes, I don't mind a pithy response.

I can understand God's goodness in the face of many things (all things I
suppose), but I don't subscribe to the notion of evil (this puts me at odds
with lots of religious people of course). I guess I've struggled with this
for a long while, but I've concluded that there doesn't have to be the
duality of good and evil for good to exist. Bad certainly exists, but I
don't believe in evil. Even bad people can be do good in select
circumstances. Certainly, the reverse is true.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #100   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 881
Default Franken!!!

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:28:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:01:53 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:30:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

snipped for the salvation of bandwidth

I'm in the IT business, too. I also volunteer to help
special-needs
persons - this, without compensation, reward, or to assauge any
speculated, deep-seated feelings of guilt. I have and do assist
persons that most other people would avoid by walking on the other
side of the street. (Do you do the same?) I'll return to a
question
I have asked of you before, which you failed to answer in any
reasonable manner. Who are you to judge another? (And I'll wager
that I'm compensated annually less than you are. I'll also wager
that
my income stream is less than yours.)

Good for you!!!

Weren't we talking about love and party affiliation?

Are you a compassionate conservative and did you support GW Bush's
pre-emptive war of choice?

What percentage of the folks who "avoid" your friends do you
suppose
are Republicans? I'd expect it to be larger by at least the weight
of
a six pack or two.

How much "love" do you have, jps? Do you volunteer your time for
the
unfortunate, the dispossessed, the disaffected, the pariah of our
society? Or do you defer to "government" to do your lovin' for ya?
Let's see the love, dude!

Changing the subject. I'd be pleased to discuss my efforts towards
the benefits of mankind but you haven't favored me with any real
answers yet.

So why should I invest in your inquiry when you haven't invested in
mine?

This is how it normally goes with you.

I think a review of who first toke the path less relevant would yeild
a contrary result. What is apparent to the sensible reader is that
your declarations are far removed from reality, are not representative
of the truth, and that by design. You are a propagandist and you are
a minor one at that. You're traipsing around with your basket of
radical blubs in remote newsgroups, far from the big-lights that the
more notorious radicals, such as Michael Moore, enjoy.

I'm sure your family understands you.

"toke the path"? I was bleary-eyed last night. I would recommend
that you avoid reading C.S. Lewis' "The Abolition of Man" if you have
problems comprehending what I write. Then again, I suspect that if
you or HK were able to comprehend "The Abolition of Man," any acerbic
and witty rebuttal that either of you issued against it would fall as
short as all of your other lackluster "blurbs."


I don't recall reading this CS Lewis book, but I really enjoyed the space
trilogy, and I most enjoyed (and remember) Out of the Silent Planet
(apologies to Harry... it's just a coincidence).

EM

It's more of a philosophical work, em. I haven't read much of C.S.
Lewis fiction (one Narnia novel and "The Screwtape Letters," an
epistolary). I've read more of his religious and philosophical works,
the most difficult to negotiate being "The Abolition of Man," and the
most poignant being, imo, "The Problem of Pain." The man was an
estimable apologist. And I may be being a bit brutal in this opinion;
but, I doubt that either JPS or H the K possess the prowess or acumen
to fully absorb it, considering their respectively unremarkable
intellectual demonstrations in this NG. That's why the most you'll
see from either in a criticism of his work is a "pithy" blurb.


I had wanted to add, too, Em, that "The Problem of Pain" is a bit of
an exercise in theodicy. It's worth a read, even for those that don't
subscribe to any faith in particular.



Sometimes, I don't mind a pithy response.

Actually, I don't either . It's just that some comments feign
'pith' when there is little there to show for it.

I can understand God's goodness in the face of many things (all things I
suppose), but I don't subscribe to the notion of evil (this puts me at odds
with lots of religious people of course). I guess I've struggled with this
for a long while, but I've concluded that there doesn't have to be the
duality of good and evil for good to exist. Bad certainly exists, but I
don't believe in evil. Even bad people can be do good in select
circumstances. Certainly, the reverse is true.


At least you've invested some thought in the issue. That's more than
many others do. I think that when the discussion comes up, the terms
need to be clearly defined. It can be asserted that 'good' has no
meaning if there isn't 'evil.' The one is defined in some part by the
other. I wish I had finished G. E. Moore's "Principia Ethica." I had
started it last winter, and I put it down in the middle of his
defining "good." Maybe I'll be able to finish it when I retire, if I
ever get that far :)

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Senator Franken!!! jps General 4 June 30th 09 09:54 PM
Pawlenty to certify Franken if court rules for him HK General 9 June 29th 09 07:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017