Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 672
Default Anybody remember...

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...

A little early though.

Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?

Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!


Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..



I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and over, that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.


lol

Then why didn't 'Bama bring them home?

Never mind.

Are you saying your eyes are pink?


Obama took pandering to a whole new level leading up to the election.
Sometimes saying two completely different things in one day. To bad the
minority media chose to ignore it. Health care, bailouts, and Government
motors are all just a warm up for Cap and Tax...

Bend over, change is coming.
  #12   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Anybody remember...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...

A little early though.

Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?

Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!


Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..



I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and over, that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.


lol

Then why didn't 'Bama bring them home?

Never mind.

Are you saying your eyes are pink?



I guess you missed the news. I'm sure it won't be on Fox.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #13   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Anybody remember...

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...

A little early though.

Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?

Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan
and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare
reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!


Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..


I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and over,
that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.


lol

Then why didn't 'Bama bring them home?

Never mind.

Are you saying your eyes are pink?


Obama took pandering to a whole new level leading up to the election.
Sometimes saying two completely different things in one day. To bad the
minority media chose to ignore it. Health care, bailouts, and Government
motors are all just a warm up for Cap and Tax...



Please cite specifics... nah, don't bother, you can't.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #14   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 902
Default Anybody remember...

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:39:50 -0400, Tosk wrote:


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan and
not forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare
reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!



Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.


I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..


Nothing for nothing, but whatever he decides, it won't be of any import
until next spring. As you know, winter weather pretty much shuts down
Afghanistan. If Obama does decide to send more troops, they won't be
needed until the weather moderates in the spring.
  #15   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Jim Jim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2009
Posts: 483
Default Anybody remember...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...
A little early though.
Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?
Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.

Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan
and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare
reform?
LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!

Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.
I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and over,
that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.
lol

Then why didn't 'Bama bring them home?

Never mind.

Are you saying your eyes are pink?

Obama took pandering to a whole new level leading up to the election.
Sometimes saying two completely different things in one day. To bad the
minority media chose to ignore it. Health care, bailouts, and Government
motors are all just a warm up for Cap and Tax...



Please cite specifics... nah, don't bother, you can't.

He doesn't need to. It's all going to play out before your little pink
eyes. Be patient.


  #16   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Anybody remember...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...
A little early though.
Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?
Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.

Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan
and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare
reform?
LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!

Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.
I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the
right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and over,
that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.
lol

Then why didn't 'Bama bring them home?

Never mind.

Are you saying your eyes are pink?
Obama took pandering to a whole new level leading up to the election.
Sometimes saying two completely different things in one day. To bad the
minority media chose to ignore it. Health care, bailouts, and Government
motors are all just a warm up for Cap and Tax...



Please cite specifics... nah, don't bother, you can't.

He doesn't need to. It's all going to play out before your little pink
eyes. Be patient.



You really are a pill aren't you. Where's the "pink eyes" thing coming from?
Is this a fantasy of yours?

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #17   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 576
Default Anybody remember...

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:26:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
. ..
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...
A little early though.
Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?
Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.

Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan
and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare
reform?
LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!

Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.
I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the
right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and over,
that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.
lol

Then why didn't 'Bama bring them home?

Never mind.

Are you saying your eyes are pink?
Obama took pandering to a whole new level leading up to the election.
Sometimes saying two completely different things in one day. To bad the
minority media chose to ignore it. Health care, bailouts, and Government
motors are all just a warm up for Cap and Tax...


Please cite specifics... nah, don't bother, you can't.

He doesn't need to. It's all going to play out before your little pink
eyes. Be patient.



You really are a pill aren't you. Where's the "pink eyes" thing coming from?
Is this a fantasy of yours?


While emulating you, I asked if you were saying you had pink eyes. I
suppose you must have been, as your silence indicated agreement.
  #18   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Anybody remember...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:26:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
.. .
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...
A little early though.
Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?
Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.

Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan
and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare
reform?
LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!

Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.
I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the
right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and
over,
that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.
lol

Then why didn't 'Bama bring them home?

Never mind.

Are you saying your eyes are pink?
Obama took pandering to a whole new level leading up to the election.
Sometimes saying two completely different things in one day. To bad
the
minority media chose to ignore it. Health care, bailouts, and
Government
motors are all just a warm up for Cap and Tax...


Please cite specifics... nah, don't bother, you can't.

He doesn't need to. It's all going to play out before your little pink
eyes. Be patient.



You really are a pill aren't you. Where's the "pink eyes" thing coming
from?
Is this a fantasy of yours?


While emulating you, I asked if you were saying you had pink eyes. I
suppose you must have been, as your silence indicated agreement.



Like I said, you and Jim are true pills. I never saw any question about my
eyes, and even if I did, I'm under no obligation to answer.

You're just playing the same game of attempting to belittle someone. It's
not going to work.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #19   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Anybody remember...

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:15:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:26:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
. ..
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...
A little early though.
Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?
Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.

Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan
and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare
reform?
LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!

Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.
I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the
right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and
over,
that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.
lol

Then why didn't 'Bama bring them home?

Never mind.

Are you saying your eyes are pink?
Obama took pandering to a whole new level leading up to the election.
Sometimes saying two completely different things in one day. To bad
the
minority media chose to ignore it. Health care, bailouts, and
Government
motors are all just a warm up for Cap and Tax...


Please cite specifics... nah, don't bother, you can't.

He doesn't need to. It's all going to play out before your little pink
eyes. Be patient.


You really are a pill aren't you. Where's the "pink eyes" thing coming
from?
Is this a fantasy of yours?


While emulating you, I asked if you were saying you had pink eyes. I
suppose you must have been, as your silence indicated agreement.



Like I said, you and Jim are true pills. I never saw any question about my
eyes, and even if I did, I'm under no obligation to answer.

You're just playing the same game of attempting to belittle someone. It's
not going to work.


Imagine the job he's done on his wife and kids.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
John can't remember houses, Cindy can't remember sisters. Tim General 6 August 23rd 08 01:06 PM
Anybody here remember... Short Wave Sportfishing General 5 December 1st 07 05:58 AM
Remember Them! Thom Stewart ASA 13 May 28th 07 06:56 PM
Guys, remember spontoon boy. Remember Burnt Njall. Oci-One Kanubi General 11 April 1st 07 02:15 AM
remember when........ Scotty ASA 20 January 29th 06 11:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017