On Oct 31, 9:08*am, Tosk wrote:
In article fad3bbe0-efda-408b-ae21-b95834900d94@
37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...







On Oct 31, 8:48*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
The scariest story told this Halloween - the most terrifying words
screeched - came from the master of environmental horror himself, our
favorite environmental collapse gasbag himself Al "Bloody" Gore. *

Get it - Bloody? Gore? *Halloween?

Er...anyway....

"If the North Pole were to melt it could increase sea levels by 67
metres, Gore said, speaking in the heart of an oil-rich region not
known for its regard for the environment."

http://business.maktoob.com/20090000...limate_change_....

220 feet? *Damn - that's up 20 meters from his last "projection".

Hasn't he ever heard of displacement? Hello - ice floats? *The Arctic
is a ocean? *Hello - anybody home?

Heh - even better...he's still addicted to the global warming/fierce
hurricane scenario - which oddly, is becoming subject to real science
nad exposed as the bull**** it is.

http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/

Yes, we all know, just because there is pile after pile of scientific
data proving otherwise, Rush and other republicans have told you
global warming isn't happening.

Why do you keep making up sound bytes? The study had nothing to do with
any politician, it is a scientific study from the University of Florida?
You know Loogie, it's ok to get informed and change your mind. When I am
wrong here I admit it, like with the Cheney thing. Why can't you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Here, maybe YOU need to be informed:
From Scientific American:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...of-global-warm
Nope, probably not good enough because you didn't get it from a
talking head like Rush.

Oh, but wait, there's MORE
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...icle516033.ece

And more

http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_13678483

I could go on forever. I know, now you'll find a political shill of a
scientist who'll agree with Hannity.

In article d87b6373-6395-42bd-91aa-
, says...

On Oct 31, 9:08*am, Tosk wrote:
In article fad3bbe0-efda-408b-ae21-b95834900d94@
37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...







On Oct 31, 8:48*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
The scariest story told this Halloween - the most terrifying words
screeched - came from the master of environmental horror himself, our
favorite environmental collapse gasbag himself Al "Bloody" Gore. *

Get it - Bloody? Gore? *Halloween?

Er...anyway....

"If the North Pole were to melt it could increase sea levels by 67
metres, Gore said, speaking in the heart of an oil-rich region not
known for its regard for the environment."

http://business.maktoob.com/20090000...limate_change_...

220 feet? *Damn - that's up 20 meters from his last "projection".

Hasn't he ever heard of displacement? Hello - ice floats? *The Arctic
is a ocean? *Hello - anybody home?

Heh - even better...he's still addicted to the global warming/fierce
hurricane scenario - which oddly, is becoming subject to real science
nad exposed as the bull**** it is.

http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/

Yes, we all know, just because there is pile after pile of scientific
data proving otherwise, Rush and other republicans have told you
global warming isn't happening.

Why do you keep making up sound bytes? The study had nothing to do with
any politician, it is a scientific study from the University of Florida?
You know Loogie, it's ok to get informed and change your mind. When I am
wrong here I admit it, like with the Cheney thing. Why can't you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Here, maybe YOU need to be informed:
From Scientific American:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...of-global-warm
Nope, probably not good enough because you didn't get it from a
talking head like Rush.

Oh, but wait, there's MORE
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...icle516033.ece

And more

http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_13678483

I could go on forever. I know, now you'll find a political shill of a
scientist who'll agree with Hannity.

As long as you keep insisting that the only two people who disagree with
you are Rush, Hannity, and those who listen to them (which I don't), I
have to conclude that you are just name calling. I am done with it...

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:48:52 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

"If the North Pole were to melt it could increase sea levels by 67
metres, Gore said, speaking in the heart of an oil-rich region not
known for its regard for the environment."

Were it so, you could fill a glass with ice water and watch the water
level rise as the ice melts. Drinks do not overflow when left alone to
melt, even if they are brim full and mostly ice. Ice shrinks as it
melts. When glacier ice falls into the ocean the level rises, so it
cannot cause a further rise as it melt.

Casady

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:48:52 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

"If the North Pole were to melt it could increase sea levels by 67
metres, Gore said, speaking in the heart of an oil-rich region not
known for its regard for the environment."

Were it so, you could fill a glass with ice water and watch the water
level rise as the ice melts. Drinks do not overflow when left alone to
melt, even if they are brim full and mostly ice. Ice shrinks as it
melts. When glacier ice falls into the ocean the level rises, so it
cannot cause a further rise as it melt.

Casady

That is a fact, and further proof that at least Al Gore lied. But you
couldn't have tried that experiment yourself and I doubt Hannity or Rush
did, so how the hell can you possibly come to that conclusion? You my
friend are obviously a liar! snerk

That is the problem most folks have with Global Taxing, so many of the
so called "facts" have been fudged, you just have to sit back and say,
why?

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:48:52 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

The scariest story told this Halloween - the most terrifying words
screeched - came from the master of environmental horror himself, our
favorite environmental collapse gasbag himself Al "Bloody" Gore.

Get it - Bloody? Gore? Halloween?

Er...anyway....

"If the North Pole were to melt it could increase sea levels by 67
metres, Gore said, speaking in the heart of an oil-rich region not known
for its regard for the environment."

http://business.maktoob.com/20090000389134/
Gore_beats_climate_change_drum_in_Dubai/Article.htm

220 feet? Damn - that's up 20 meters from his last "projection".

Hasn't he ever heard of displacement? Hello - ice floats? The Arctic is
a ocean? Hello - anybody home?

There's a difference between ice shelves and ice sheets. Ice shelves
float, and their melting would have a negligible impact on sea levels.
However, ice sheets, such as those that cover Greenland and Antarctica,
if they were to *totally* melt, would raise sea-levels @80 meters,
according to USGS.

http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs2-00/


Heh - even better...he's still addicted to the global warming/fierce
hurricane scenario - which oddly, is becoming subject to real science
nad exposed as the bull**** it is.

http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/

On 10/31/09 11:53 AM, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:48:52 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

The scariest story told this Halloween - the most terrifying words
screeched - came from the master of environmental horror himself, our
favorite environmental collapse gasbag himself Al "Bloody" Gore.

Get it - Bloody? Gore? Halloween?

Er...anyway....

"If the North Pole were to melt it could increase sea levels by 67
metres, Gore said, speaking in the heart of an oil-rich region not known
for its regard for the environment."

http://business.maktoob.com/20090000389134/
Gore_beats_climate_change_drum_in_Dubai/Article.htm

220 feet? Damn - that's up 20 meters from his last "projection".

Hasn't he ever heard of displacement? Hello - ice floats? The Arctic is
a ocean? Hello - anybody home?

There's a difference between ice shelves and ice sheets. Ice shelves
float, and their melting would have a negligible impact on sea levels.
However, ice sheets, such as those that cover Greenland and Antarctica,
if they were to *totally* melt, would raise sea-levels @80 meters,
according to USGS.

http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs2-00/


Stop confusing SW "Scientist" Tom. He'll have to make another call to
JustHate a Scotty for fact mystification.

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:53:04 -0500, thunder
wrote:

There's a difference between ice shelves and ice sheets. Ice shelves
float, and their melting would have a negligible impact on sea levels.
However, ice sheets, such as those that cover Greenland and Antarctica,
if they were to *totally* melt, would raise sea-levels @80 meters,
according to USGS.

Understood.

He's talking about floating ice.

And we don't have to worry about Antarctica - it's ice sheet is
growing.

As is part of Greenland's.

Sorry - we're not going to be swimming tomorow.

In article ,
says...


And we don't have to worry about Antarctica - it's ice sheet is
growing.

As is part of Greenland's.

Sorry - we're not going to be swimming tomorow.

Tom, you are not supposed to point that out, it doesn't count!