Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#82
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... I bet the force of the up, unexpected and all in a tenth of a second was probably more painful and possibly destructive as the drawn out force, and bracing on the way down... Bingo. |
#83
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "NowNow" wrote in message ... In article , says... "NowNow" wrote in message ... In article , says... "NowNow" wrote in message ... In article , says... ----- Original Message ----- From: "NowNow" Are you really that friggin' stupid? Again, show me your math. The forces are equal, dip****. The "variables" would be such things as did he land exactly like he took off? If you take a known weight, such as a piece of concrete of X dimension and Y weight, put a load cell between it and the cushion and launch it to Z height. Get the reading. Now, take the same Y weight, drop it from the same Z height with the load cell on the cushion. What will the results be and why? -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! A bullet is shot straight up into the air. Is the force the bullet leaves the barrel with the same as the force it hits the ground with? You obviously don't know what in hell your talking about. This conversation is over until you provide the math to back it up. Reason, the bullet is shot so far the it reaches terminal velocity on it's return. Do you REALLY think that's the case with a 150# man at three feet???? -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! Last hint for you- The man experienced more force for a shorter length of time when he left the couch and less force for a longer time when he returned to the couch. Capish? Again, show the math. Capish? You really are an idiot, aren't you? Quite the contrary. I love math. I do this for a living! -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! What is the impulse on the body with dropping the dude and launching the dude? Too many unknown variables, but it's safe to say the man experienced higher forces on the way up than on the way down. Uh, no. -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! |
#84
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#85
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... In article , says... "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... I bet the force of the up, unexpected and all in a tenth of a second was probably more painful and possibly destructive as the drawn out force, and bracing on the way down... Bingo. Sometimes Engineers get caught up in the math and forget "real world experience". That's why God created "technitions"... Somebody has to make the dream work IRL aka, the "non-virtual world". It is what it is. I can prove it with math. Can you prove it with speculation and innuendos? -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! |
#86
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "NowNow" wrote in message ... In article , says... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "NowNow" wrote in message ... In article , says... "NowNow" wrote in message ... In article , says... "NowNow" wrote in message ... In article , says... ----- Original Message ----- From: "NowNow" Are you really that friggin' stupid? Again, show me your math. The forces are equal, dip****. The "variables" would be such things as did he land exactly like he took off? If you take a known weight, such as a piece of concrete of X dimension and Y weight, put a load cell between it and the cushion and launch it to Z height. Get the reading. Now, take the same Y weight, drop it from the same Z height with the load cell on the cushion. What will the results be and why? -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! A bullet is shot straight up into the air. Is the force the bullet leaves the barrel with the same as the force it hits the ground with? You obviously don't know what in hell your talking about. This conversation is over until you provide the math to back it up. Reason, the bullet is shot so far the it reaches terminal velocity on it's return. Do you REALLY think that's the case with a 150# man at three feet???? -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! Last hint for you- The man experienced more force for a shorter length of time when he left the couch and less force for a longer time when he returned to the couch. Capish? Again, show the math. Capish? You really are an idiot, aren't you? Quite the contrary. I love math. I do this for a living! -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! What is the impulse on the body with dropping the dude and launching the dude? Too many unknown variables, but it's safe to say the man experienced higher forces on the way up than on the way down. Uh, no. -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! He got them on the way up in a heck of a lot shorter time. |
#87
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "NowNow" wrote in message ... In article , says... In article , says... "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... I bet the force of the up, unexpected and all in a tenth of a second was probably more painful and possibly destructive as the drawn out force, and bracing on the way down... Bingo. Sometimes Engineers get caught up in the math and forget "real world experience". That's why God created "technitions"... Somebody has to make the dream work IRL aka, the "non-virtual world". It is what it is. I can prove it with math. Can you prove it with speculation and innuendos? -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! Prove it. While your at it, show where the forces on a bullet fired straight up in to the air are the same as it hits the ground. |
#88
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "NowNow" wrote in message ... In article , says... "NowNow" wrote in message ... In article , says... "NowNow" wrote in message ... In article , says... ----- Original Message ----- From: "NowNow" Are you really that friggin' stupid? Again, show me your math. The forces are equal, dip****. The "variables" would be such things as did he land exactly like he took off? If you take a known weight, such as a piece of concrete of X dimension and Y weight, put a load cell between it and the cushion and launch it to Z height. Get the reading. Now, take the same Y weight, drop it from the same Z height with the load cell on the cushion. What will the results be and why? -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! A bullet is shot straight up into the air. Is the force the bullet leaves the barrel with the same as the force it hits the ground with? You obviously don't know what in hell your talking about. This conversation is over until you provide the math to back it up. Reason, the bullet is shot so far the it reaches terminal velocity on it's return. Do you REALLY think that's the case with a 150# man at three feet???? -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! Last hint for you- The man experienced more force for a shorter length of time when he left the couch and less force for a longer time when he returned to the couch. Capish? Again, show the math. Capish? You really are an idiot, aren't you? Quite the contrary. I love math. I do this for a living! -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! What is the impulse on the body with dropping the dude and launching the dude? Too many unknown variables, but it's safe to say the man experienced higher forces on the way up than on the way down. Well, I think the issue here is semantics again. Mathmatically, the force of up and down might be the same, but in the real world, I bet the force of the up, unexpected and all in a tenth of a second was probably more painful and possibly destructive as the drawn out force, and bracing on the way down... |
#89
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#90
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:10:10 -0800, I am Tosk
wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... I bet the force of the up, unexpected and all in a tenth of a second was probably more painful and possibly destructive as the drawn out force, and bracing on the way down... Bingo. Mathematically show me. It's not a math question. Let me ask you a question. Which do you think would cause more damage to your lower back. Falling straight down in a sitting position onto a floor with your body straight up and feet straight out, no arms or legs to break the fall, hitting with a straight spine, or hitting from the same height, half sideways with your hands and feet hitting first to break the fall. Remember, I am asking specifically, which fall would do more damage to the lower back??? Either way, to prove this mathematically, you would need constants. In this case you would expect the body and spine and breaking forces were exactly in the same position, this is called a "standard" right. Standards or whatever you call them are necessary for solid math, there is not constant as to the position at launch and landing here. So, you keep telling me you can show me the math, so, show me.. I can't believe you guys are still arguing this. Just think about the 'criminal' argument. The 'rightness' or 'wrongness' makes no difference to Loogy. When Loogy gets the balls to do the same thing, then I'll give his bull**** some credit. Arguing with him is like Bill's continous arguing with the plum. A waste of time, unless you just have a desire to feel superior. -- John H "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Churchill |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|