Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 21
Default Holy ****

Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:36:05 -0500, Rob wrote:

jps wrote:
ABC News is reporting that U.S. agencies were aware months ago that
Fort Hood shooting suspect Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan sought to contact
people associated with al Qaida, according two American officials
familiar with the case. "It is not known whether the intelligence
agencies informed the Army that one of its officers was seeking to
connect with suspected al Qaeda figures, the officials said," ABC
writes.
There goes that Peace Prize...

Rob

What exactly are you saying "Rob?"


He doesn't say anything of substance.
Just another clown drooling all over our boating newsgroup.


Ahhh. Music to my ears. "our boating newsgroup". Wish it were so.
  #22   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 183
Default Holy ****

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:07:09 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:42*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

...





jps wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:52:51 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
*wrote:


*wrote in message
...


ABC News is reporting that U.S. agencies were aware months ago that
Fort Hood shooting suspect Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan sought to contact
people associated with al Qaida, according two American officials
familiar with the case. "It is not known whether the intelligence
agencies informed the Army that one of its officers was seeking to
connect with suspected al Qaeda figures, the officials said," ABC
writes.


I thought this problem was addressed when the DHS was created .. years
ago... the siloing of information. If it's true, heads should roll. They
knew about him, did nothing, and they were going to deploy him???


Seems clear that whomever was in possession of that info didn't pass
it along to the Army. *If the Army knew, that's a whole other kettle
of fish.


Or a government cover-up.


Rob


Yeah, there are always consipracy theories. They rarely hold up to scrutiny.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Man, the unhinged right wingers here are no doubt wringing their hands
trying to figure out a way to blame this on Obama! "Rob" appears to be
giving it a try!


Loogy, as Commander in Chief, the President, 'Bama, is most assuredly
responsible, just as Bush was responsible for Abu Ghraib.


  #23   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Holy ****

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Nov 9, 10:42 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

...





jps wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:52:51 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
...


ABC News is reporting that U.S. agencies were aware months ago that
Fort Hood shooting suspect Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan sought to contact
people associated with al Qaida, according two American officials
familiar with the case. "It is not known whether the intelligence
agencies informed the Army that one of its officers was seeking to
connect with suspected al Qaeda figures, the officials said," ABC
writes.


I thought this problem was addressed when the DHS was created .. years
ago... the siloing of information. If it's true, heads should roll.
They
knew about him, did nothing, and they were going to deploy him???


Seems clear that whomever was in possession of that info didn't pass
it along to the Army. If the Army knew, that's a whole other kettle
of fish.


Or a government cover-up.


Rob


Yeah, there are always consipracy theories. They rarely hold up to
scrutiny.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Man, the unhinged right wingers here are no doubt wringing their hands
trying to figure out a way to blame this on Obama! "Rob" appears to be
giving it a try!



Woman. Rush is giving it a shot, apparently.
--
Nom=de=Plume


  #24   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Holy ****

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Nov 10, 12:45 pm, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article e212c9c8-1087-4d38-a24e-
, says...





On Nov 9, 10:42 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message


...


jps wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:52:51 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
...


ABC News is reporting that U.S. agencies were aware months ago
that
Fort Hood shooting suspect Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan sought to
contact
people associated with al Qaida, according two American officials
familiar with the case. "It is not known whether the intelligence
agencies informed the Army that one of its officers was seeking
to
connect with suspected al Qaeda figures, the officials said," ABC
writes.


I thought this problem was addressed when the DHS was created ..
years
ago... the siloing of information. If it's true, heads should
roll. They
knew about him, did nothing, and they were going to deploy him???


Seems clear that whomever was in possession of that info didn't
pass
it along to the Army. If the Army knew, that's a whole other kettle
of fish.


Or a government cover-up.


Rob


Yeah, there are always consipracy theories. They rarely hold up to
scrutiny.


--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Man, the unhinged right wingers here are no doubt wringing their hands
trying to figure out a way to blame this on Obama! "Rob" appears to be
giving it a try!


See my earlier posts, hope I get credit for those... I wonder how long
it will take the far lefties here to blame it on Bush.. Oh wait, they
already did with the comments about DHS. Harryism all the way...


DHS is under Obama appointee Napolitano who thinks returning vets are
terrorists. Obama doesnt think terrorism exists, only "human caused
disasters". Because DHS under Napolitano was not interested in
Islamic terrorists, it never got any attention. Now, let us review:
Who appointed Napolitano? Who did Napolitano think was dangerous?
Who de-emphasized Islamic Terrorism...... So, who is at fault here?


Reply: Total rant. You need to calm down.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #26   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,921
Default Holy ****

In article e212c9c8-1087-4d38-a24e-
, says...

On Nov 9, 10:42*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

...





jps wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:52:51 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
*wrote:


*wrote in message
...


ABC News is reporting that U.S. agencies were aware months ago that
Fort Hood shooting suspect Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan sought to contact
people associated with al Qaida, according two American officials
familiar with the case. "It is not known whether the intelligence
agencies informed the Army that one of its officers was seeking to
connect with suspected al Qaeda figures, the officials said," ABC
writes.


I thought this problem was addressed when the DHS was created .. years
ago... the siloing of information. If it's true, heads should roll. They
knew about him, did nothing, and they were going to deploy him???


Seems clear that whomever was in possession of that info didn't pass
it along to the Army. *If the Army knew, that's a whole other kettle
of fish.


Or a government cover-up.


Rob


Yeah, there are always consipracy theories. They rarely hold up to scrutiny.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Man, the unhinged right wingers here are no doubt wringing their hands
trying to figure out a way to blame this on Obama! "Rob" appears to be
giving it a try!


See my earlier posts, hope I get credit for those... I wonder how long
it will take the far lefties here to blame it on Bush.. Oh wait, they
already did with the comments about DHS. Harryism all the way...
  #27   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Holy ****

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:53:34 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Nov 10, 12:45*pm, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article e212c9c8-1087-4d38-a24e-
, says...





On Nov 9, 10:42*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message


...


jps wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:52:51 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
*wrote:


*wrote in message
...


ABC News is reporting that U.S. agencies were aware months ago that
Fort Hood shooting suspect Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan sought to contact
people associated with al Qaida, according two American officials
familiar with the case. "It is not known whether the intelligence
agencies informed the Army that one of its officers was seeking to
connect with suspected al Qaeda figures, the officials said," ABC
writes.


I thought this problem was addressed when the DHS was created .. years
ago... the siloing of information. If it's true, heads should roll. They
knew about him, did nothing, and they were going to deploy him???


Seems clear that whomever was in possession of that info didn't pass
it along to the Army. *If the Army knew, that's a whole other kettle
of fish.


Or a government cover-up.


Rob


Yeah, there are always consipracy theories. They rarely hold up to scrutiny.


--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Man, the unhinged right wingers here are no doubt wringing their hands
trying to figure out a way to blame this on Obama! "Rob" appears to be
giving it a try!


See my earlier posts, hope I get credit for those... I wonder how long
it will take the far lefties here to blame it on Bush.. Oh wait, they
already did with the comments about DHS. Harryism all the way...


DHS is under Obama appointee Napolitano who thinks returning vets are
terrorists. Obama doesnt think terrorism exists, only "human caused
disasters". Because DHS under Napolitano was not interested in
Islamic terrorists, it never got any attention. Now, let us review:
Who appointed Napolitano? Who did Napolitano think was dangerous?
Who de-emphasized Islamic Terrorism...... So, who is at fault here?


Dildowatch, they were aware of this guy a year ago. Do you remember
who was president all the way back when? Can you please review the
chain of command in place at that point?

That's when all the priorities and suspicions were properly aligned,
right?
  #28   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,997
Default Holy ****


"H the K" wrote in message
m...
On 11/10/09 10:09 AM, Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:36:05 -0500, wrote:

jps wrote:

ABC News is reporting that U.S. agencies were aware months ago that
Fort Hood shooting suspect Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan sought to contact
people associated with al Qaida, according two American officials
familiar with the case. "It is not known whether the intelligence
agencies informed the Army that one of its officers was seeking to
connect with suspected al Qaeda figures, the officials said," ABC
writes.

There goes that Peace Prize...

Rob

What exactly are you saying "Rob?"


He doesn't say anything of substance.
Just another clown drooling all over our boating newsgroup.




Isn't there a limit on right-wing droolers?



You mean..like a 'bag limit'?
If only there was a 'season' on the droolers aka Dopey Army irregulars.


  #29   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 621
Default Holy ****

On 11/10/09 5:01 PM, Don White wrote:
"H the wrote in message
m...
On 11/10/09 10:09 AM, Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:36:05 -0500, wrote:

jps wrote:

ABC News is reporting that U.S. agencies were aware months ago that
Fort Hood shooting suspect Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan sought to contact
people associated with al Qaida, according two American officials
familiar with the case. "It is not known whether the intelligence
agencies informed the Army that one of its officers was seeking to
connect with suspected al Qaeda figures, the officials said," ABC
writes.

There goes that Peace Prize...

Rob

What exactly are you saying "Rob?"

He doesn't say anything of substance.
Just another clown drooling all over our boating newsgroup.




Isn't there a limit on right-wing droolers?



You mean..like a 'bag limit'?
If only there was a 'season' on the droolers aka Dopey Army irregulars.




Exactly...a bag limit.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to
*communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among
the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster. As always, have a nice,
simple-minded day.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shit happens. Lil' John General 31 July 22nd 09 02:56 AM
Holy shit... [email protected] General 12 May 7th 09 02:30 AM
Holy shit! John H.[_5_] General 115 September 18th 08 05:37 AM
HOLY SHIT! Joe ASA 0 November 9th 05 04:41 AM
Bob = Cat SHIT SkitchNYC ASA 3 July 19th 03 11:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017