Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#91
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John H" wrote in message
news ![]() On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:20:56 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Are we talking about someone beating a child? No. But, nice diversion from the fact that you won't be nor have you given birth. As I said, you have no business telling a woman what to do. -- Nom=de=Plume I guess I can not tell her to stop beating her kids. As I have no business telling a women what to do with her life or her property. That about it? You do realize that although you're getting a charge out of making the plum look like a dip****, you're also making us wade through her vacuous comments. For which I'm grateful. Keep up the good work Bill!! -- Nom=de=Plume |
#93
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Are we talking about someone beating a child? No. But, nice diversion from the fact that you won't be nor have you given birth. As I said, you have no business telling a woman what to do. -- Nom=de=Plume I guess I can not tell her to stop beating her kids. As I have no business telling a women what to do with her life or her property. That about it? We're talking about legal abortion, not beating people. Why don't you think about it. When you're done, elect some politicians that'll get more "conservative" judges appointed to the Supreme Court. Oh wait, that was tried (almost succeeded), and now we have a president who represents the majority of Americans. Sorry bubb.. I know it's lonely out in the wilderness... -- Nom=de=Plume Obama is supposed to represent all of us. Seems as if he is only representing Wall Steet and his handlers, Really? How's that? Did he say that somewhere? Only representing Wall Street? How about me? I'm not a Wall Streeter nor a handler. -- Nom=de=Plume Is he really representing you? Do your used clothes customers have more money because of Obama policies? Do they have jobs because of Obama's policies? |
#94
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Are we talking about someone beating a child? No. But, nice diversion from the fact that you won't be nor have you given birth. As I said, you have no business telling a woman what to do. -- Nom=de=Plume I guess I can not tell her to stop beating her kids. As I have no business telling a women what to do with her life or her property. That about it? We're talking about legal abortion, not beating people. Why don't you think about it. When you're done, elect some politicians that'll get more "conservative" judges appointed to the Supreme Court. Oh wait, that was tried (almost succeeded), and now we have a president who represents the majority of Americans. Sorry bubb.. I know it's lonely out in the wilderness... -- Nom=de=Plume Obama is supposed to represent all of us. Seems as if he is only representing Wall Steet and his handlers, Really? How's that? Did he say that somewhere? Only representing Wall Street? How about me? I'm not a Wall Streeter nor a handler. -- Nom=de=Plume Is he really representing you? Do your used clothes customers have more money because of Obama policies? Do they have jobs because of Obama's policies? I don't know. I haven't polled them. My business is doing fine. Thanks for asking. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#95
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#96
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:45:49 -0500, H the K
wrote: On 11/13/09 6:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... Today was very cool, me and The Mouse riding together, me on the new (to me) KX 125. Awesome bike, got it pinned in fourth after setting the suspension up the last couple of days. The thing flies well, but The Mouse blows by me anyway. The track pro came by today just to mention how he is so impressed with the work she did this year and how she was "on the pipe" all afternoon... Just for the whiney babies here, I will add that I took her out of school early (last period study hall) for "Physical Therapy"snerk Works every time. BTW she aced the crunches in gym class today, she is getting to be quite the beast! She could drop haawey or Bonnie with one shot... Great to hear. She'd probably love the rain and cold we're having down here. 'Tis fit for neither man nor beast. Actually, she loves the rain. In racehorse terms she is what you would call a "mudder", kicks ass racing in the rain, all the other girls kind of back off, but we work in the wet clay all season, so she is used to it... Rowdy Mouse Racing, hello mudder, hello fodder ![]() I've seen your racers putt-putting over that track. Girls' beach volleyball looks more strenuous. Much easier on the eyes. |
#97
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jps wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:15:47 -0500, wrote: Don White wrote: wrote in message ... "John wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: wrote in message ... "John wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a bewildered ass? You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing. She's more Donnie's speed. I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what you are... a jerk. -- Nom=de=Plume I still can't fathom how he rose up to his alleged army rank. Can you imagine what the rest of the 'career soldiers' were like. Makes me shudder. My bet is there is a hell of a lot you "can't fathom", Bonnie. Rob DK can't help but rear his ugly head, even as a sock puppet. Are you Bonnie's keeper? Rob |
#98
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:04:37 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: wrote in message ... "John wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a bewildered ass? You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing. She's more Donnie's speed. I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what you are... a jerk. No ****. I think it's about time you plonked that asshole. The anti-name caller who berates people who don't agree with his politics. You've been more than kind and patient with him, as suggested previsouly. Thanks for revealing him as the asshole we knew was hiding behind the "you called me a name and made me wet my pants" excuse. An old, unpolished turd. It's a rare thing when I do that, but I'll take it under advisement. Bad advice. Rob |
#99
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob wrote:
jps wrote: On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:15:47 -0500, wrote: Don White wrote: wrote in message ... "John wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: wrote in message ... "John wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a bewildered ass? You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing. She's more Donnie's speed. I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what you are... a jerk. -- Nom=de=Plume I still can't fathom how he rose up to his alleged army rank. Can you imagine what the rest of the 'career soldiers' were like. Makes me shudder. My bet is there is a hell of a lot you "can't fathom", Bonnie. Rob DK can't help but rear his ugly head, even as a sock puppet. Are you Bonnie's keeper? Rob Not unless Krausie subbed out the job. |
#100
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rob" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:04:37 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: wrote in message ... "John wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a bewildered ass? You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing. She's more Donnie's speed. I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what you are... a jerk. No ****. I think it's about time you plonked that asshole. The anti-name caller who berates people who don't agree with his politics. You've been more than kind and patient with him, as suggested previsouly. Thanks for revealing him as the asshole we knew was hiding behind the "you called me a name and made me wet my pants" excuse. An old, unpolished turd. It's a rare thing when I do that, but I'll take it under advisement. Bad advice. Rob Taking it under advisement? Why's that? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oh, Canada | Cruising | |||
Oh Canada!? | ASA | |||
Ohhhh Canada Ohhh Canada | ASA | |||
Meanwhile in Canada... | General |