Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #91   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Oh, Canada

"John H" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:20:56 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it
a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no
business
in my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange idea.

Are we talking about someone beating a child? No. But, nice diversion
from
the fact that you won't be nor have you given birth.

As I said, you have no business telling a woman what to do.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I guess I can not tell her to stop beating her kids. As I have no
business
telling a women what to do with her life or her property. That about it?


You do realize that although you're getting a charge out of making the
plum look like a dip****, you're also making us wade through her
vacuous comments.



For which I'm grateful. Keep up the good work Bill!!

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #92   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,921
Default Oh, Canada

In article ,
says...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no
business in my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange idea.

Are we talking about someone beating a child? No. But, nice diversion
from the fact that you won't be nor have you given birth.

As I said, you have no business telling a woman what to do.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I guess I can not tell her to stop beating her kids. As I have no
business telling a women what to do with her life or her property. That
about it?


We're talking about legal abortion, not beating people. Why don't you
think about it. When you're done, elect some politicians that'll get more
"conservative" judges appointed to the Supreme Court. Oh wait, that was
tried (almost succeeded), and now we have a president who represents the
majority of Americans.

Sorry bubb.. I know it's lonely out in the wilderness...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Obama is supposed to represent all of us. Seems as if he is only
representing Wall Steet and his handlers,


Don't forget the Unions and "friendly" news orgs...
  #93   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,197
Default Oh, Canada


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan
that would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private
clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals
were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis
for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions
are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory
to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content
with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them
to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a
while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no
business in my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange idea.

Are we talking about someone beating a child? No. But, nice diversion
from the fact that you won't be nor have you given birth.

As I said, you have no business telling a woman what to do.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I guess I can not tell her to stop beating her kids. As I have no
business telling a women what to do with her life or her property.
That about it?

We're talking about legal abortion, not beating people. Why don't you
think about it. When you're done, elect some politicians that'll get
more "conservative" judges appointed to the Supreme Court. Oh wait, that
was tried (almost succeeded), and now we have a president who represents
the majority of Americans.

Sorry bubb.. I know it's lonely out in the wilderness...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Obama is supposed to represent all of us. Seems as if he is only
representing Wall Steet and his handlers,


Really? How's that? Did he say that somewhere? Only representing Wall
Street? How about me? I'm not a Wall Streeter nor a handler.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Is he really representing you? Do your used clothes customers have more
money because of Obama policies? Do they have jobs because of Obama's
policies?


  #94   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Oh, Canada

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan
that would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in
other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private
clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals
were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis
for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions
are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory
to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have
to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content
with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them
to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a
while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were
conceived, they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life.
Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You
have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange idea.

Are we talking about someone beating a child? No. But, nice diversion
from the fact that you won't be nor have you given birth.

As I said, you have no business telling a woman what to do.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I guess I can not tell her to stop beating her kids. As I have no
business telling a women what to do with her life or her property.
That about it?

We're talking about legal abortion, not beating people. Why don't you
think about it. When you're done, elect some politicians that'll get
more "conservative" judges appointed to the Supreme Court. Oh wait,
that was tried (almost succeeded), and now we have a president who
represents the majority of Americans.

Sorry bubb.. I know it's lonely out in the wilderness...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Obama is supposed to represent all of us. Seems as if he is only
representing Wall Steet and his handlers,


Really? How's that? Did he say that somewhere? Only representing Wall
Street? How about me? I'm not a Wall Streeter nor a handler.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Is he really representing you? Do your used clothes customers have more
money because of Obama policies? Do they have jobs because of Obama's
policies?


I don't know. I haven't polled them. My business is doing fine. Thanks for
asking.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #97   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Rob Rob is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 14
Default Oh, Canada

jps wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:15:47 -0500, wrote:

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700,
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.


I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what
you are... a jerk.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I still can't fathom how he rose up to his alleged army rank.
Can you imagine what the rest of the 'career soldiers' were like. Makes me
shudder.



My bet is there is a hell of a lot you "can't fathom", Bonnie.

Rob


DK can't help but rear his ugly head, even as a sock puppet.


Are you Bonnie's keeper?

Rob
  #98   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Rob Rob is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 14
Default Oh, Canada

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:04:37 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700,
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.


I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what
you are... a jerk.


No ****. I think it's about time you plonked that asshole. The
anti-name caller who berates people who don't agree with his politics.
You've been more than kind and patient with him, as suggested
previsouly.

Thanks for revealing him as the asshole we knew was hiding behind the
"you called me a name and made me wet my pants" excuse.

An old, unpolished turd.



It's a rare thing when I do that, but I'll take it under advisement.


Bad advice.

Rob
  #99   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Jim Jim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 99
Default Oh, Canada

Rob wrote:
jps wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:15:47 -0500, wrote:

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700,
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800,
wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health
plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in
other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF


The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private
clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals
were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal
basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All
abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and
discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those
done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should
have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't
have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite
content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape
them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like
sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a
while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were
conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life.
Isn't it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no
business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.


I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look
like what
you are... a jerk.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I still can't fathom how he rose up to his alleged army rank.
Can you imagine what the rest of the 'career soldiers' were like.
Makes me
shudder.



My bet is there is a hell of a lot you "can't fathom", Bonnie.

Rob


DK can't help but rear his ugly head, even as a sock puppet.


Are you Bonnie's keeper?

Rob

Not unless Krausie subbed out the job.
  #100   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Oh, Canada

"Rob" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:04:37 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700,
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan
that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private
clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals
were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis
for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions
are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory
to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content
with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them
to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a
while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were
conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no
business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.


I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like
what
you are... a jerk.

No ****. I think it's about time you plonked that asshole. The
anti-name caller who berates people who don't agree with his politics.
You've been more than kind and patient with him, as suggested
previsouly.

Thanks for revealing him as the asshole we knew was hiding behind the
"you called me a name and made me wet my pants" excuse.

An old, unpolished turd.



It's a rare thing when I do that, but I'll take it under advisement.


Bad advice.

Rob



Taking it under advisement? Why's that?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oh, Canada Roger Long Cruising 22 March 18th 07 11:53 PM
Oh Canada!? Bob Crantz ASA 10 February 24th 06 08:17 PM
Ohhhh Canada Ohhh Canada Joe ASA 5 January 26th 06 12:40 AM
Meanwhile in Canada... [email protected] General 0 December 24th 05 07:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017