Oh, Canada
 

On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.

What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?

Oh, Canada
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.

What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?


Huh?

Oh, Canada
 

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.

Are we talking about someone beating a child? No. But, nice diversion from
the fact that you won't be nor have you given birth.

As I said, you have no business telling a woman what to do.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Oh, Canada
 

Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.
Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.
I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.
There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.

Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".
--

John H

Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.


She probably subscribes to the notion that it's OK to eat her offspring
if it doesn't come out of the oven in perfect condition. I suppose
that's more humane than O'Bama's plan to let the newborn starve to death
if not perfect at birth.

Oh, Canada
 

Bill McKee wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.
Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.
I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.
There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.

Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".
--

John H

Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.
What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?


Huh?


This dummy is beginning to talk like Donnie.

Oh, Canada
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.
Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.
I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.
There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.

Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".
--

John H

Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.
What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?


Huh?
This dummy is beginning to talk like Donnie.

I'm highly insulted that you'd compare me to Kalif Swill.
I'm a virtual teetotaler compared to him.

Oh, Canada
 

Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.
Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.
I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.
There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.

Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".
--

John H
Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.
What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?

Huh?
This dummy is beginning to talk like Donnie.

I'm highly insulted that you'd compare me to Kalif Swill.
I'm a virtual teetotaler compared to him.


I was comparing you to JPS. Is that better?

Oh, Canada
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan
that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private
clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals
were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis
for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.
Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions
are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory
to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.
I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content
with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them
to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.
There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a
while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.

Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were
conceived, they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".
--

John H
Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no
business in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.
What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?

Huh?
This dummy is beginning to talk like Donnie.

I'm highly insulted that you'd compare me to Kalif Swill.
I'm a virtual teetotaler compared to him.
I was comparing you to JPS. Is that better?

You'd better ask JPS. I'm sure you meant to insult him in your crude
awkward way.

Oh, Canada
 

Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan
that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private
clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals
were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis
for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.
Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions
are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory
to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.
I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content
with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them
to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.
There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a
while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.

Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were
conceived, they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".
--

John H
Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no
business in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.
What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?
Huh?
This dummy is beginning to talk like Donnie.
I'm highly insulted that you'd compare me to Kalif Swill.
I'm a virtual teetotaler compared to him.
I was comparing you to JPS. Is that better?

You'd better ask JPS. I'm sure you meant to insult him in your crude
awkward way.


You're right, dummy.

Oh, Canada
 

On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.
--

John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill