"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.


I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what
you are... a jerk.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.
--

John H


Speed??
You're the one who rides an 'old mans motorbike'.

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.


I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what
you are... a jerk.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I still can't fathom how he rose up to his alleged army rank.
Can you imagine what the rest of the 'career soldiers' were like. Makes me
shudder.

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.


I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what
you are... a jerk.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I still can't fathom how he rose up to his alleged army rank.
Can you imagine what the rest of the 'career soldiers' were like. Makes
me shudder.

The Peter Principle?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700,
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.


I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what
you are... a jerk.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I still can't fathom how he rose up to his alleged army rank.
Can you imagine what the rest of the 'career soldiers' were like. Makes me
shudder.



My bet is there is a hell of a lot you "can't fathom", Bonnie.

Rob

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:04:37 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.


I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what
you are... a jerk.

No ****. I think it's about time you plonked that asshole. The
anti-name caller who berates people who don't agree with his politics.
You've been more than kind and patient with him, as suggested
previsouly.

Thanks for revealing him as the asshole we knew was hiding behind the
"you called me a name and made me wet my pants" excuse.

An old, unpolished turd.

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:15:47 -0500, Rob wrote:

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700,
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.


I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what
you are... a jerk.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I still can't fathom how he rose up to his alleged army rank.
Can you imagine what the rest of the 'career soldiers' were like. Makes me
shudder.



My bet is there is a hell of a lot you "can't fathom", Bonnie.

Rob

DK can't help but rear his ugly head, even as a sock puppet.

On 11/13/09 12:57 AM, I am Tosk wrote:

Bet there is a lot that makes him shudder though. He is like the one who
is being ignored, spends his live hiding under his desk while we all
live our lives...

Today was very cool, me and The Mouse riding together, me on the new (to
me) KX 125. Awesome bike, got it pinned in fourth after setting the
suspension up the last couple of days. The thing flies well, but The
Mouse blows by me anyway. The track pro came by today just to mention
how he is so impressed with the work she did this year and how she was
"on the pipe" all afternoon... Just for the whiney babies here, I will
add that I took her out of school early (last period study hall) for
"Physical Therapy"snerk Works every time. BTW she aced the crunches
in gym class today, she is getting to be quite the beast! She could drop
haawey or Bonnie with one shot...



Wow. The track pro is impressed. Well, that ought to serve her well
while she prepares for the adult world, eh? And you took her out of
school on a lie?

Oh, unlike your family, we don't get in fights with little girls, bozo.





--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to
*communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among
the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster. As always, have a nice,
simple-minded day.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:04:37 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.


Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a
bewildered ass?

You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing.

She's more Donnie's speed.


I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what
you are... a jerk.

No ****. I think it's about time you plonked that asshole. The
anti-name caller who berates people who don't agree with his politics.
You've been more than kind and patient with him, as suggested
previsouly.

Thanks for revealing him as the asshole we knew was hiding behind the
"you called me a name and made me wet my pants" excuse.

An old, unpolished turd.


It's a rare thing when I do that, but I'll take it under advisement.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it
a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange idea.

Are we talking about someone beating a child? No. But, nice diversion from
the fact that you won't be nor have you given birth.

As I said, you have no business telling a woman what to do.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I guess I can not tell her to stop beating her kids. As I have no business
telling a women what to do with her life or her property. That about it?