Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don White" wrote in message ... "Jim" wrote in message ... Bill McKee wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored? Huh? This dummy is beginning to talk like Donnie. I'm highly insulted that you'd compare me to Kalif Swill. I'm a virtual teetotaler compared to him. How much alcohol have you consumed this month. You need to slow down your consumption as you can not afford to lose any more brain cells. |
#63
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:29:33 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:04:37 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a bewildered ass? You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing. She's more Donnie's speed. I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what you are... a jerk. No ****. I think it's about time you plonked that asshole. The anti-name caller who berates people who don't agree with his politics. You've been more than kind and patient with him, as suggested previsouly. Thanks for revealing him as the asshole we knew was hiding behind the "you called me a name and made me wet my pants" excuse. An old, unpolished turd. It's a rare thing when I do that, but I'll take it under advisement. Life is too short to argue with assholes who cannot find common ground in any exchange. He can't bring himself to meet anyone halfway if he perceives them to be "on the other side." Certainly not true of all here but Herring is a lost cause. Not even a glimmer of hope. McKee is drifting closer to same but surprises me once in a great while. |
#64
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Are we talking about someone beating a child? No. But, nice diversion from the fact that you won't be nor have you given birth. As I said, you have no business telling a woman what to do. -- Nom=de=Plume I guess I can not tell her to stop beating her kids. As I have no business telling a women what to do with her life or her property. That about it? We're talking about legal abortion, not beating people. Why don't you think about it. When you're done, elect some politicians that'll get more "conservative" judges appointed to the Supreme Court. Oh wait, that was tried (almost succeeded), and now we have a president who represents the majority of Americans. Sorry bubb.. I know it's lonely out in the wilderness... -- Nom=de=Plume |
#65
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jps" wrote in message
... On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:29:33 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:04:37 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a bewildered ass? You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing. She's more Donnie's speed. I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what you are... a jerk. No ****. I think it's about time you plonked that asshole. The anti-name caller who berates people who don't agree with his politics. You've been more than kind and patient with him, as suggested previsouly. Thanks for revealing him as the asshole we knew was hiding behind the "you called me a name and made me wet my pants" excuse. An old, unpolished turd. It's a rare thing when I do that, but I'll take it under advisement. Life is too short to argue with assholes who cannot find common ground in any exchange. He can't bring himself to meet anyone halfway if he perceives them to be "on the other side." Certainly not true of all here but Herring is a lost cause. Not even a glimmer of hope. McKee is drifting closer to same but surprises me once in a great while. I am continually shocked by some people's lack of civility. This seems to be a right wing trend. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#66
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:08:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:29:33 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:04:37 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a bewildered ass? You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing. She's more Donnie's speed. I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what you are... a jerk. No ****. I think it's about time you plonked that asshole. The anti-name caller who berates people who don't agree with his politics. You've been more than kind and patient with him, as suggested previsouly. Thanks for revealing him as the asshole we knew was hiding behind the "you called me a name and made me wet my pants" excuse. An old, unpolished turd. It's a rare thing when I do that, but I'll take it under advisement. Life is too short to argue with assholes who cannot find common ground in any exchange. He can't bring himself to meet anyone halfway if he perceives them to be "on the other side." Certainly not true of all here but Herring is a lost cause. Not even a glimmer of hope. McKee is drifting closer to same but surprises me once in a great while. I am continually shocked by some people's lack of civility. This seems to be a right wing trend. I'll admit to being less than civil with people who can't be civil themselves. I don't have a lot of patience for dickheads. |
#67
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Are we talking about someone beating a child? No. But, nice diversion from the fact that you won't be nor have you given birth. As I said, you have no business telling a woman what to do. -- Nom=de=Plume I guess I can not tell her to stop beating her kids. As I have no business telling a women what to do with her life or her property. That about it? How can you discuss anything with that loony tune? |
#68
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill McKee wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Jim" wrote in message ... Bill McKee wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored? Huh? This dummy is beginning to talk like Donnie. I'm highly insulted that you'd compare me to Kalif Swill. I'm a virtual teetotaler compared to him. How much alcohol have you consumed this month. You need to slow down your consumption as you can not afford to lose any more brain cells. You might be better off asking him about his daily consumption. He might have enough fingers and toes to count up a days worth. |
#69
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/13/09 3:08 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:29:33 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:04:37 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: wrote in message ... "John wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a bewildered ass? You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing. She's more Donnie's speed. I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what you are... a jerk. No ****. I think it's about time you plonked that asshole. The anti-name caller who berates people who don't agree with his politics. You've been more than kind and patient with him, as suggested previsouly. Thanks for revealing him as the asshole we knew was hiding behind the "you called me a name and made me wet my pants" excuse. An old, unpolished turd. It's a rare thing when I do that, but I'll take it under advisement. Life is too short to argue with assholes who cannot find common ground in any exchange. He can't bring himself to meet anyone halfway if he perceives them to be "on the other side." Certainly not true of all here but Herring is a lost cause. Not even a glimmer of hope. McKee is drifting closer to same but surprises me once in a great while. I am continually shocked by some people's lack of civility. This seems to be a right wing trend. If you were really ignorant, ill-informed, stupidly conservative, the mother of five, and someone who quit her job as governor of alaska, herring and the rest of the right-wing assholes here would be trying to kiss your butt...figuratively, of course...getting that close to a woman makes them nervous. If any of them actually have children, they were conceived in absentia or via immaculate deception. Herring may be the worst of that bunch, but he has plenty of competition on the right here. -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
#70
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
H the K wrote:
On 11/13/09 3:08 AM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:29:33 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:04:37 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: wrote in message ... "John wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for "health" reasons." Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay for them. I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor. Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that they will have the child. There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense. Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...". -- John H Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my or any woman's business. Butt out. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange idea. Bill, haven't you yet gotten tired of making the plum look like a bewildered ass? You're definitely taking advantage of the poor thing. She's more Donnie's speed. I promise that you're looking pretty tired from making you look like what you are... a jerk. No ****. I think it's about time you plonked that asshole. The anti-name caller who berates people who don't agree with his politics. You've been more than kind and patient with him, as suggested previsouly. Thanks for revealing him as the asshole we knew was hiding behind the "you called me a name and made me wet my pants" excuse. An old, unpolished turd. It's a rare thing when I do that, but I'll take it under advisement. Life is too short to argue with assholes who cannot find common ground in any exchange. He can't bring himself to meet anyone halfway if he perceives them to be "on the other side." Certainly not true of all here but Herring is a lost cause. Not even a glimmer of hope. McKee is drifting closer to same but surprises me once in a great while. I am continually shocked by some people's lack of civility. This seems to be a right wing trend. If you were really ignorant, ill-informed, stupidly conservative, the mother of five, and someone who quit her job as governor of alaska, herring and the rest of the right-wing assholes here would be trying to kiss your butt...figuratively, of course...getting that close to a woman makes them nervous. If any of them actually have children, they were conceived in absentia or via immaculate deception. Herring may be the worst of that bunch, but he has plenty of competition on the right here. This seems like a lack of civility on the left. Oh, wait. It doesn't count when it's from the left. Sorry. Carry on. Johnson |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oh, Canada | Cruising | |||
Oh Canada!? | ASA | |||
Ohhhh Canada Ohhh Canada | ASA | |||
Meanwhile in Canada... | General |