'Bama has found a new way to help him stay on his Messianic Throne.

http://tinyurl.com/yjktpzs

If the messenger seems biased, go read the message for yourself.

http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf

"Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM
before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a
competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level
under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review
these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system
principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated
decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior
Executives at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. "

Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive'
appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there?
--

John H

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf

"Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM
before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a
competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level
under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review
these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system
principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated
decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives
at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. "

Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive'
appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there?

Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career"
when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside,
that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply.

The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by
statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence.
That memo continues that process.

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf

"Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM
before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a
competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level
under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review
these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system
principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated
decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives
at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. "

Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive'
appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there?

Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career"
when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside,
that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply.

The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by
statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence.
That memo continues that process.


John's quite adept at trying to make everything in the world that is bad
or wrong look like the current administration's fault.

--
WAFA the newsgroup liar free!

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf

"Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM
before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a
competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level
under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review
these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system
principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated
decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives
at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. "

Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive'
appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there?

Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career"
when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside,
that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply.

The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by
statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence.
That memo continues that process.


John's quite adept at trying to make everything in the world that is bad
or wrong look like the current administration's fault.

Bugger, you are an idiot. The integrity and ethics of the guy leading
the organization will have great bearing on the makeup of the people
hired into the organization.

All you have to do is learn how to read a resume and how to conduct an
interview and you can hire mini-me's all day every day.

And, in the federal government you soon learn how to promote people out
of your organization. So, the ones who don't fit your mold are easily
pushed out of your organization.

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf

"Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM
before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a
competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level
under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review
these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system
principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated
decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives
at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. "

Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive'
appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there?

Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career"
when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside,
that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply.

The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by
statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence.
That memo continues that process.


John's quite adept at trying to make everything in the world that is bad
or wrong look like the current administration's fault.

Bugger, you are an idiot. The integrity and ethics of the guy leading
the organization will have great bearing on the makeup of the people
hired into the organization.

All you have to do is learn how to read a resume and how to conduct an
interview and you can hire mini-me's all day every day.

And, in the federal government you soon learn how to promote people out
of your organization. So, the ones who don't fit your mold are easily
pushed out of your organization.

And how does this translate into *it's Obama's fault?

--
WAFA the newsgroup liar free!

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:42:42 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf

"Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM
before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a
competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level
under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review
these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system
principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated
decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives
at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. "

Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive'
appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there?

Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career"
when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside,
that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply.

The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by
statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence.
That memo continues that process.

Right!
--

John H

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:23:30 -0500, NowNow wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf

"Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM
before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a
competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level
under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review
these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system
principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated
decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives
at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. "

Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive'
appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there?

Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career"
when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside,
that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply.

The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by
statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence.
That memo continues that process.


John's quite adept at trying to make everything in the world that is bad
or wrong look like the current administration's fault.

"Quite adept"

Thanks, Loog. I like it.

Besides, anything wrong with the government - it's decisions,
operations, or policies *is* the current administration's fault.

What, would you blame Bush?
--

John H

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:08:44 -0500, NowNow wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf

"Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM
before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a
competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level
under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review
these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system
principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated
decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives
at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. "

Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive'
appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there?

Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career"
when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside,
that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply.

The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by
statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence.
That memo continues that process.


John's quite adept at trying to make everything in the world that is bad
or wrong look like the current administration's fault.

Bugger, you are an idiot. The integrity and ethics of the guy leading
the organization will have great bearing on the makeup of the people
hired into the organization.

All you have to do is learn how to read a resume and how to conduct an
interview and you can hire mini-me's all day every day.

And, in the federal government you soon learn how to promote people out
of your organization. So, the ones who don't fit your mold are easily
pushed out of your organization.

And how does this translate into *it's Obama's fault?

Under whose administration was this new 'unbiased' policy instituted?

What a silly question.
--

John H

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:56:17 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf

"Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM
before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a
competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level
under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review
these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system
principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated
decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives
at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. "

Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive'
appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there?

Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career"
when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside,
that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply.

The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by
statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence.
That memo continues that process.


John's quite adept at trying to make everything in the world that is bad
or wrong look like the current administration's fault.

Bugger, you are an idiot. The integrity and ethics of the guy leading
the organization will have great bearing on the makeup of the people
hired into the organization.

And you voted for Bush... twice?