Just John wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:04:25 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 16, 6:39 pm, Just John
wrote:
...may have been erroneous. My bad. Seems like I may have overstated
the results of the stimulus, or at least a few news sources seem to
think so.

http://tinyurl.com/y9ekn9x

or

http://www.examiner.com/x-2988-San-D...er~y2009m11d13...

"The AP review found some counts were more than 10 times as high as
the actual number of jobs.."

Whoopsy.
--

John H
John, perhaps you don't know this, but his name is Obama.

I know. I was just trying some of the tactics you liberals used a few
years back. I'm sure you never did anything like that, but I always
excuse you when I'm referring to liberals in general.

Besides, since you've got me filtered now, you shouldn't be seeing it
first hand, like you just did.

Talk about Harryisms!

Besides, 'Bama is much easier to type than PLObama. See what I mean.
Finding that 'O' is sometimes a real bitch.

I might try to do better, but you'll never know 'cause you've filtered
me like Harry did.

I'll try again. Name calling is not a valid argument.

You don't understand that you are filtered for a reason, do you?