jps wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:06:37 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:33:57 -0800, Frogwatch wrote:


OK. lets look at this. Several precincts reported zero votes for
Hoffman but checking after his concession revealed he had numerous votes
in them. Sure sounds suspicious to me. The reported totals on election
night on which he based his concession turned out to be wildly wrong,
seems kinda suspicious to me. ACORN has been involved in vote fraud all
across the USA so ti seems like a reasonable conjecture considering the
circumstances.
Only one problem, ACORN wasn't in NY 23. You also overlook the fact that
besides ACORN, Hoffman has blamed the unions, the Democrats, and even a
computer virus for his loss, everything except the voters who preferred a
Democrat for the first time in 150 years.

This resonates with the birther movement. Acorn is another made up
excuse for sore losers to blame some fantasy bogeyman. They're not
the only ones with workers who try to falsify voter registrations to
get paid.

What's important to know is that they don't result in fraudulent
votes. How this gets stretched from dregs trying to make a few
dishonest dollars to voter fraud is a disingenuous fabrication.

Everyone who promotes it knows it's bull****. Whomever believes them
is a fool or purposefully ignorant.

Very interesting comments. Will you please cite factual corroborating
testimony.