On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:57:14 -0500, "H the K (I post with a Mac)"
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:26:00 -0500, "H the K (I post with a Mac)"
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:22:09 -0500, "H the K (I post with a Mac)"
wrote:

wrote:

I wouldn't have introduced your inanity if I were backpedaling. In a
fit of intellectual duplicity you tried to turn a spelling error into
an example of 'unforgivable' ignorance by another, a duplicity which
in itself was pure pap.
- -

As I've stated, you're a gasbag. You're just proving it all over again.
You're uninformed.


snerk
Whatever you say, "Reggie"

And this is going to dilute the fact that you are a lesser intellect
hoping to make others look diminutive compared to you?



snerk

Lesser? Compared to who? You? Now that's a laugh, "reggie"!

At first glance, I thought you may have actually understood what I
wrote. You have not disappointed me, though. I'll quote it again for
you convenience;

"And this is going to dilute the fact that you are a lesser intellect
hoping to make *others* look diminutive compared to you?"

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:57:14 -0500, "H the K (I post with a Mac)"
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:26:00 -0500, "H the K (I post with a Mac)"
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:22:09 -0500, "H the K (I post with a Mac)"
wrote:

wrote:

I wouldn't have introduced your inanity if I were backpedaling. In a
fit of intellectual duplicity you tried to turn a spelling error into
an example of 'unforgivable' ignorance by another, a duplicity which
in itself was pure pap.
- -

As I've stated, you're a gasbag. You're just proving it all over again.
You're uninformed.

snerk
Whatever you say, "Reggie"
And this is going to dilute the fact that you are a lesser intellect
hoping to make others look diminutive compared to you?


snerk
Lesser? Compared to who? You? Now that's a laugh, "reggie"!

At first glance, I thought you may have actually understood what I
wrote. You have not disappointed me, though. I'll quote it again for
you convenience;

"And this is going to dilute the fact that you are a lesser intellect
hoping to make *others* look diminutive compared to you?"



Whatever, "windbag reggie."

On Dec 5, 12:04*pm, wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:57:14 -0500, "H the K (I post with a Mac)"



wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:26:00 -0500, "H the K (I post with a Mac)"
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:22:09 -0500, "H the K (I post with a Mac)"
wrote:

wrote:

I wouldn't have introduced your inanity if I were backpedaling. *In a
fit of intellectual duplicity you tried to turn a spelling error into
an example of 'unforgivable' ignorance by another, a duplicity which
in itself was pure pap. *
- -

As I've stated, you're a gasbag. You're just proving it all over again.
You're uninformed.

snerk
Whatever you say, "Reggie"

And this is going to dilute the fact that you are a lesser intellect
hoping to make others look diminutive compared to you?

snerk

Lesser? Compared to who? You? Now that's a laugh, "reggie"!

At first glance, I thought you may have actually understood what I
wrote. *You have not disappointed me, though. *I'll quote it again for
you convenience;

"And this is going to dilute the fact that you are a lesser intellect
hoping to make *others* look diminutive compared to you?"

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Nice grammer, reggie.

John H wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:15:23 -0500, wrote:



What the hell does this have to do with Don?

Rob

Nothing. Harry wanted everyone to think of Don yesterday, so he coined
the thread title.

That makes sense.

Rob

On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:24:10 -0500, Rob wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:15:23 -0500, wrote:



What the hell does this have to do with Don?

Rob

Nothing. Harry wanted everyone to think of Don yesterday, so he coined
the thread title.

That makes sense.

Rob

Well, who do you think of when you see the thread title?
--

John H

"John H" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:24:10 -0500, Rob wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:15:23 -0500, wrote:



What the hell does this have to do with Don?

Rob

Nothing. Harry wanted everyone to think of Don yesterday, so he coined
the thread title.

That makes sense.

Rob

Well, who do you think of when you see the thread title?
--

John H

mmmm.......... could be any one of your motley recruits.
You've 'trained' them well!

Don White wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:24:10 -0500, Rob wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:15:23 -0500, wrote:



What the hell does this have to do with Don?

Rob

Nothing. Harry wanted everyone to think of Don yesterday, so he coined
the thread title.

That makes sense.

Rob
Well, who do you think of when you see the thread title?
--

John H

mmmm.......... could be any one of your motley recruits.
You've 'trained' them well!




Herring is all the proof anyone needs that the U.S. Army has room in its
ranks for worthless morons.

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:24:10 -0500, Rob wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:15:23 -0500, wrote:



What the hell does this have to do with Don?

Rob

Nothing. Harry wanted everyone to think of Don yesterday, so he coined
the thread title.

That makes sense.

Rob

Well, who do you think of when you see the thread title?
--

John H

mmmm.......... could be any one of your motley recruits.
You've 'trained' them well!

I was thinking Rush would be a perfect fit, esp. now that he's lost weight.

--
Nom=de=Plume