| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For the children's sake...
http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...y.aspx?ref=rss
NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board. That ought to help save lives! |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the children's sake...
In article b9c6b372-c019-4fe4-910a-445f57676f74
@y32g2000prd.googlegroups.com, says... http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...y.aspx?ref=rss NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board. That ought to help save lives! Why do you s'pose they didn't just make it a felony to drive with any passenger in the car? Just sayin'... |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the children's sake...
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:44:43 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...y.aspx?ref=rss NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board. That ought to help save lives! George Orwell just wasn't too far off... -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the children's sake...
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:06:42 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:01:16 -0600, wrote: On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:44:43 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...y.aspx?ref=rss NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board. That ought to help save lives! George Orwell just wasn't too far off... Not that you asked, but my opinion is that anybody driving DUI with a passenger should be prosecuted as a felon. I realize that many share that view, and it may be a consensus view. I don't. IMHO, persons who injure another out of their own irresponsible actions should be subject to equitable and severe penalties meted out by the justice system. I think that legislated behavioral controls are Orwellian and rob the individual of his or her personal autonomy. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the children's sake...
wrote in message
... On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:44:43 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...y.aspx?ref=rss NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board. That ought to help save lives! George Orwell just wasn't too far off... -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access You object to having a legal requirement to drive sober?? -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the children's sake...
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ... On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:01:16 -0600, wrote: On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:44:43 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...y.aspx?ref=rss NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board. That ought to help save lives! George Orwell just wasn't too far off... Not that you asked, but my opinion is that anybody driving DUI with a passenger should be prosecuted as a felon. I tend to agree, but I think the distinction is that a child can't legally make a decision to avoid getting in the car, where an adult can. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the children's sake...
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:18:45 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:44:43 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...y.aspx?ref=rss NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board. That ought to help save lives! George Orwell just wasn't too far off... -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access You object to having a legal requirement to drive sober?? Yes. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the children's sake...
Tim wrote:
http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...y.aspx?ref=rss NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board. That ought to help save lives! This is what happened to Britain. That is the piling on of laws and restrictions to the point that their charter or Constitution is worthless. We have been witness to the change from about 1950 to now. It seemed less apparent here but we are spiraling the same way. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the children's sake...
wrote in message
news  On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:06:42 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:01:16 -0600, wrote: On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:44:43 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...y.aspx?ref=rss NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board. That ought to help save lives! George Orwell just wasn't too far off... Not that you asked, but my opinion is that anybody driving DUI with a passenger should be prosecuted as a felon. I realize that many share that view, and it may be a consensus view. I don't. IMHO, persons who injure another out of their own irresponsible actions should be subject to equitable and severe penalties meted out by the justice system. I think that legislated behavioral controls are Orwellian and rob the individual of his or her personal autonomy. Ummm... laws are not a form of behavioral control? -- Nom=de=Plume |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Please, for the sake of the country, keep Obama safe | General | |||
| To Our Children's Children's Children, On the Threshold of aNightmare | General | |||
| Go Vote for the sake of pinks everywhere | General | |||
| SAILING for @%^&^&**&^ sake | ASA | |||
| Agreement in Maine Will Remove Dams for Salmon's Sake | General | |||
Linear Mode
