On Dec 21, 10:31*am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 21, 9:08*am, Jack wrote:



On Dec 20, 11:56*pm, Canuck57 wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:49:27 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
"This is the problem with politicians trying to create a market for
something that the free market otherwise doesn't value," Schulz said.
"An emissions trading market is an artificially, politically-created
market...."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...s-cap-trade-re...

Huh - how about that...
Obama and congress mad-off with my money....

You must be very angry.
If you are not, I am sure if you send a cheque to GM for $1500 or so they
will cash it.

I'm sure you can't actually be seriously making that argument!

I thought it might be a good investment to send Canuck the 1500 so he
can go get his head examined but that'd be a waste. *He's got access
to free health care.

Free? *You are freaking kidding. *Government has justified steady tax
increases for 40 years on the health care theme. *Giving Canada the
highest taxed juristicions in North America! *Don't trust my word for
it. *Plug your numbers into this and find out:

http://www.fraserinstitute.org/tools/Default.htm

Or, go to the Canadian government tax site and download a T4 Tax forms,
they are only 4 pages as we can't deduct much. No need to calculate
interest on the mortage here. *Keep in mind if you use the T4 method it
does not include the hidden taxes of GST, PST, HST, room taxes,
restaurant taxes, utility taxes and booze/cig/gas/electric/heat/import
and taxes you never heard of. *If you take your wife out for a meal,
some provinces are 25% tax and that is before the tip.

And after you look at the numbers know that health care in Canada is
rationed, and bed shortages all over. *They don't have to compete. *One
service provider and no alternatives. *If you work and pay taxes you get
better service because they will ask that question when getting regional
health care authority to schedule you. *Managed like sheep. *Get sick,
don't produce for the government they will put you on a rediculasly long
waiting list.

Americans should riot over this issue, this is a government ploy for
more revenue and herd management of the American people. 90% of you will
have lower health care service levels, for the 10% of freeloaders and
government skiming.

All of you universal government health care freaks need to read this
carefully and repeatedly. *Here's your real world feedback from one of
the places you hold up as a shining example of what you want the US to
become.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Who in hell told you that our system is modeled after Canada's?

What in hell made you think that? I certainly never said it was. I
did say that's what some people want it to become. Big difference, ya
know. Learn to read for content.

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:25:51 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:10:08 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
"This is the problem with politicians trying to create a market for
something that the free market otherwise doesn't value," Schulz said.
"An emissions trading market is an artificially, politically-created
market...."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...%20Politics%29

Huh - how about that...
Obama and congress mad-off with my money....

You must be very angry.
If you are not, I am sure if you send a cheque to GM for $1500 or so
they will cash it.

I'm a Chevy guy myself, so I thank one and all for their support.

--Vic

... so I thank one and all for their forced support in assumign GMs debt.

Fixed it.

That probably doesn't work unless you drive a Chevy.

--Vic

On Dec 21, 2:20*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 20, 10:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message

....
On Dec 20, 6:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

I'm sure you can't actually be seriously making that argument!

--
Nom=de=Plume
"I'm-sure-you-can't-actually-be-seriously-making-that-argument!"

No, D'Plume. I would never call you average.

And, I mistakenly assumed you had a brain...

--
Nom=de=Plume
No you didn't. And there is your mistake.

So, I was right. You don't have a brain! Thanks for the confirmation.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Not one that a person of your superiour intellect would recognise.

On Dec 20, 12:59*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
messagenews:6sasi5pjqadv4h28019s4oomeegs5st3uh@4ax .com...



On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:16:44 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Dec 19, 9:44 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
"This is the problem with politicians trying to create a market for
something that the free market otherwise doesn't value," Schulz said.
"An emissions trading market is an artificially, politically-created
market...."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...s-cap-trade-re....

Huh - how about that...

It's amazing how your side can cherry pick people's thoughts and
present just that as fact and expect everyone to eat it up. I know
that many on the right will, afterall, they'll take some lie that
Hannity or Rush tells them and run with it as the truth too.

I have come to know you on a personal level over the past few months -
you're a good guy - a little weird, but then again, most of us are on
some way.

But this kind of reply bothers me. *"Cherry pick"? *It's not "cherry"
picking at all - it's a fact. *Fraud is rampant - something that I've
been pointing out for years. *This isn't "cherry" picking - it's
governments actively creating a market that is basically unregulated
and uncontrollable and, frankly, unsupported unless you count
government money backing the concept.

Wake up man - this is all about economic control and the ones who play
along get to play. *It's the Robber Baron economy all over again.

No, fraud is not "rampant." Fraud exists in most programs.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Then, D'Plume. You think that fraud can be measured? Tell us, how
much fraud must be in each programme to be classified as "rampant?

We rely on your vastly advantageous and expedient knowledge.

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 20, 12:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
messagenews:6sasi5pjqadv4h28019s4oomeegs5st3uh@4ax .com...



On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:16:44 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Dec 19, 9:44 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
"This is the problem with politicians trying to create a market for
something that the free market otherwise doesn't value," Schulz said.
"An emissions trading market is an artificially, politically-created
market...."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...s-cap-trade-re...

Huh - how about that...

It's amazing how your side can cherry pick people's thoughts and
present just that as fact and expect everyone to eat it up. I know
that many on the right will, afterall, they'll take some lie that
Hannity or Rush tells them and run with it as the truth too.

I have come to know you on a personal level over the past few months -
you're a good guy - a little weird, but then again, most of us are on
some way.

But this kind of reply bothers me. "Cherry pick"? It's not "cherry"
picking at all - it's a fact. Fraud is rampant - something that I've
been pointing out for years. This isn't "cherry" picking - it's
governments actively creating a market that is basically unregulated
and uncontrollable and, frankly, unsupported unless you count
government money backing the concept.

Wake up man - this is all about economic control and the ones who play
along get to play. It's the Robber Baron economy all over again.

No, fraud is not "rampant." Fraud exists in most programs.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Then, D'Plume. You think that fraud can be measured? Tell us, how
much fraud must be in each programme to be classified as "rampant?

We rely on your vastly advantageous and expedient knowledge.


Instead of being a little sh*t, why don't you try being polite for once.

Of course, fraud can be measured. It's measured all the time.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 21, 2:20 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 20, 10:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 20, 6:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

I'm sure you can't actually be seriously making that argument!

--
Nom=de=Plume
"I'm-sure-you-can't-actually-be-seriously-making-that-argument!"

No, D'Plume. I would never call you average.

And, I mistakenly assumed you had a brain...

--
Nom=de=Plume
No you didn't. And there is your mistake.

So, I was right. You don't have a brain! Thanks for the confirmation.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Not one that a person of your superiour intellect would recognise.


What a little boy you are...

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Dec 21, 5:50*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 21, 2:20 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message

....
On Dec 20, 10:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message

....
On Dec 20, 6:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

I'm sure you can't actually be seriously making that argument!

--
Nom=de=Plume
"I'm-sure-you-can't-actually-be-seriously-making-that-argument!"

No, D'Plume. I would never call you average.

And, I mistakenly assumed you had a brain...

--
Nom=de=Plume
No you didn't. And there is your mistake.

So, I was right. You don't have a brain! Thanks for the confirmation.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Not one that a person of your superiour intellect would recognise.

What a little boy you are...

--
Nom=de=Plume

I see you've been peeking while I'm in the shower again.

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 21, 5:50 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 21, 2:20 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 20, 10:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 20, 6:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

I'm sure you can't actually be seriously making that argument!

--
Nom=de=Plume
"I'm-sure-you-can't-actually-be-seriously-making-that-argument!"

No, D'Plume. I would never call you average.

And, I mistakenly assumed you had a brain...

--
Nom=de=Plume
No you didn't. And there is your mistake.

So, I was right. You don't have a brain! Thanks for the confirmation.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Not one that a person of your superiour intellect would recognise.

What a little boy you are...

--
Nom=de=Plume

I see you've been peeking while I'm in the shower again.


Yeah, and there wasn't much to see there.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Dec 21, 7:59*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 21, 5:50 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message

....
On Dec 21, 2:20 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message

....
On Dec 20, 10:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 20, 6:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

I'm sure you can't actually be seriously making that argument!

--
Nom=de=Plume
"I'm-sure-you-can't-actually-be-seriously-making-that-argument!"

No, D'Plume. I would never call you average.

And, I mistakenly assumed you had a brain...

--
Nom=de=Plume
No you didn't. And there is your mistake.

So, I was right. You don't have a brain! Thanks for the confirmation.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Not one that a person of your superiour intellect would recognise.

What a little boy you are...

--
Nom=de=Plume
I see you've been peeking while I'm in the shower again.

Yeah, and there wasn't much to see there.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But you couldn't resist looking anyhow, eh? I'd wager that your like a
moth to a flame, if i were in the shower now, you'd be peeking around
the corner.

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 21, 7:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 21, 5:50 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 21, 2:20 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 20, 10:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 20, 6:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

I'm sure you can't actually be seriously making that argument!

--
Nom=de=Plume
"I'm-sure-you-can't-actually-be-seriously-making-that-argument!"

No, D'Plume. I would never call you average.

And, I mistakenly assumed you had a brain...

--
Nom=de=Plume
No you didn't. And there is your mistake.

So, I was right. You don't have a brain! Thanks for the confirmation.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Not one that a person of your superiour intellect would recognise.

What a little boy you are...

--
Nom=de=Plume
I see you've been peeking while I'm in the shower again.

Yeah, and there wasn't much to see there.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But you couldn't resist looking anyhow, eh? I'd wager that your like a
moth to a flame, if i were in the shower now, you'd be peeking around
the corner.


I would likely throw up if I saw anything, but I probably wouldn't see
anything.

--
Nom=de=Plume