On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:56:26 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 23, 1:26*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:01:45 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:



On Dec 23, 10:23*am, Jack wrote:
On Dec 23, 11:07*am, Not_Now wrote:

In article f753f5e8-00cb-4857-bbc5-f952210d0068
@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 23, 9:50*am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 23, 9:43*am, John H wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8

I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting
such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as
racist as I am.

Oh well.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

Gotta ask. Do you REALLY believe all of that bull****?

Gotta ask. *Do you think before the knee jerks?

Taking a look around the internet, it appears that this is for real.
After all, the incumbents (typically the Fisrt Lady) choose artists to
make the ornaments, and in a past year Laura Bush chose a very liberal
artist as one of the contributers. *That artist included one that had
the phrase "Impeach Bush" on it, which Mrs. Bush did not display.

There's no reason to think these aren't real. *Just another in a
series of misteps and gaffes by the current inhabitants. *Mao in the
White House.

Nope, not real. You'll see in just a very short time.

So far, even the liberal blogs aren't claiming it's false, they are
just whining that it doesn't matter and Breitbart / Fox is picking on
them. *Supposedly the WH has even issued a response saying they were
unaware of these particular ornaments.

Oh well. I'm sure you'll be posting the link to the definitive
evidence that this didn't happen, when that's available.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why didn't they just go to Walmart or costco and buy 'em like
everybody else?

Well, they had famous personalities, like Hedda Lettuce, designing
them.

http://heddalettuce.com/index.php?paged=2



GAG! That's GROSS!

Tell 'Bama, don't tell me!
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Dec 23, 2:02*pm, Gene wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:43:30 -0500, John H
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8

I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting
such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as
racist as I am.

Oh well.

Is common sense dead in America?

Where was the righteous indignation when the Bush administration
prohibited religious themes on ornaments?

There was certainly no indignation from the left back then... I'm sure
Bush was trying to be
sensitive to the foaming-at-the-mouth "no nativity scene" idiots. If
there had been religious
ornaments allowed, the WH would have been under siege from every group
imaginable. CNN, MSNBC,
CBS, ABC, etc. camped outside the gates.

But Mao? Common sense is dead.

Speaking of Mao, I hope everyone here sent the ACLU a Christmas card,
preferably one which showed the reason for the season.

We sent one with a beautiful Nativity scene thereon, knowing they'll
probably frame it.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Dec 23, 3:28*pm, Gene wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

There was certainly no indignation from the left back then..

...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who
now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously
unbelievable....



But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian
Right Wingnuts" in your mind? Any thinking, compassionate, free
person should have an issue with him, no?

Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported
as fact..... and believed without question by so many.....

...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to
be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right
Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT.....

In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments
(isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but
some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore....

Common sense is dead....

Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the
story.

Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected?
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:10:29 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Dec 23, 5:42*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message

...
On Dec 23, 1:16 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Loogypicker" wrote in message

...
On Dec 23, 9:43 am, John H wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8

I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting
such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as
racist as I am.

Oh well.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H
Gotta ask. Do you REALLY believe all of that bull****?

Sure he does...

http://www.therightperspective.org/2...ally-on-the-ob...

--
Nom=de=Plume
I wanted to see how long I could string Jack and John on about
this......

They really, really wanted to believe it was true.

Sorry....

Pssst... check your link. Theyt've already admitted they were wrong,
their attempt to debunk the story is false. The picture are indeed
from the correct type of tree. So it seemingly remains true. Oops,
so embarrassing... for you.

She and Loogy will be apologizing soon.

In the meantime.....crickets?
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

On Dec 23, 7:09*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:10:29 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:





On Dec 23, 5:42*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message

....
On Dec 23, 1:16 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Loogypicker" wrote in message

...
On Dec 23, 9:43 am, John H wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8

I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting
such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as
racist as I am.

Oh well.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H
Gotta ask. Do you REALLY believe all of that bull****?

Sure he does...

http://www.therightperspective.org/2...ally-on-the-ob....

--
Nom=de=Plume
I wanted to see how long I could string Jack and John on about
this......

They really, really wanted to believe it was true.

Sorry....

Pssst... check your link. *Theyt've already admitted they were wrong,
their attempt to debunk the story is false. *The picture are indeed
from the correct type of tree. *So it seemingly remains true. *Oops,
so embarrassing... for you.

She and Loogy will be apologizing soon.

In the meantime.....crickets?

But they were slapping each other on their collective backs just a
little while ago...

Funny how they scatter like roaches when the light of truth hits them.

On 12/23/09 7:27 PM, Jack wrote:
On Dec 23, 7:09 pm, John wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:10:29 -0800 (PST),
wrote:





On Dec 23, 5:42 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Dec 23, 1:16 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Dec 23, 9:43 am, John wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8

I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting
such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as
racist as I am.

Oh well.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H
Gotta ask. Do you REALLY believe all of that bull****?

Sure he does...

http://www.therightperspective.org/2...ally-on-the-ob...

--
Nom=de=Plume
I wanted to see how long I could string Jack and John on about
this......

They really, really wanted to believe it was true.

Sorry....

Pssst... check your link. Theyt've already admitted they were wrong,
their attempt to debunk the story is false. The picture are indeed
from the correct type of tree. So it seemingly remains true. Oops,
so embarrassing... for you.

She and Loogy will be apologizing soon.

In the meantime.....crickets?

But they were slapping each other on their collective backs just a
little while ago...

Funny how they scatter like roaches when the light of truth hits them.



The light of truth? If you google this on google news, all that comes up
are right-wing blog and bull**** sites. Of course, that's where you
republic-morons get most of your news.

Got any enterprise reporting from a legitimate news site? ****, you
don't even know what the term enterprise reporting means.

On Dec 23, 7:08*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene





wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Dec 23, 3:28 pm, Gene wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

There was certainly no indignation from the left back then..

...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who
now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously
unbelievable....

But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian
Right Wingnuts" in your mind? *Any thinking, compassionate, free
person should have an issue with him, no?

Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported
as fact..... and believed without question by so many.....

...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to
be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right
Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT.....

In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments
(isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but
some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore....

Common sense is dead....

Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the
story.

Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected?

You mean this?

"FOX FIVE NEWS COVERED ME AND MY BALL!
Hello gentle Americans. Fox Five News has commented on me and my ball
that is handing (sic) on the White House Xmas tree. Who would of
thought I would have the most famous ball in the nation! Here is the
link to the video on youtube:"

So Hedda admits it. This is some funny stuff!! The NG idiots were
claiming all day it was just a bunch of Christian wingnuts, just to
find out that they are the ones looking like idiots! You just can't
make this stuff up. Or, I guess a liberal can. ;-

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Dec 23, 5:42 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message

...
On Dec 23, 1:16 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Loogypicker" wrote in message

...
On Dec 23, 9:43 am, John H wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8

I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting
such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as
racist as I am.

Oh well.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H
Gotta ask. Do you REALLY believe all of that bull****?

Sure he does...

http://www.therightperspective.org/2...ally-on-the-ob...

--
Nom=de=Plume
I wanted to see how long I could string Jack and John on about
this......

They really, really wanted to believe it was true.

Sorry....

Pssst... check your link. Theyt've already admitted they were wrong,
their attempt to debunk the story is false. The picture are indeed
from the correct type of tree. So it seemingly remains true. Oops,
so embarrassing... for you.


Pssst... check your brain at the door? It's highly important to you to trash
Obama since he's president and doesn't look like you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

In article ,
om says...

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:10:29 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Dec 23, 5:42*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message

...
On Dec 23, 1:16 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Loogypicker" wrote in message

...
On Dec 23, 9:43 am, John H wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8

I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting
such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as
racist as I am.

Oh well.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H
Gotta ask. Do you REALLY believe all of that bull****?

Sure he does...

http://www.therightperspective.org/2...ally-on-the-ob...

--
Nom=de=Plume
I wanted to see how long I could string Jack and John on about
this......

They really, really wanted to believe it was true.

Sorry....

Pssst... check your link. Theyt've already admitted they were wrong,
their attempt to debunk the story is false. The picture are indeed
from the correct type of tree. So it seemingly remains true. Oops,
so embarrassing... for you.

She and Loogy will be apologizing soon.

In the meantime.....crickets?

Won't happen, it's a one sided thing with them...

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:04:51 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:08:20 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Dec 23, 3:28*pm, Gene wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

There was certainly no indignation from the left back then..

...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who
now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously
unbelievable....



But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian
Right Wingnuts" in your mind? Any thinking, compassionate, free
person should have an issue with him, no?

Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported
as fact..... and believed without question by so many.....

...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to
be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right
Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT.....

In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments
(isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but
some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore....

Common sense is dead....

Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the
story.

Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected?

I did....

"It was there in the silence that it hit me; yes one of my balls is
hanging in the White House. When I looked at the photo of the ball, it
was not my signature green color...."
http://heddalettuce.com/?p=2250

Oh Gene, I expected much better of you. For some reason, you clipped
the rest of Hedda's post. Here, I'll put it up for you:

"Not only was my ball hanging in the White House, my blue ball is
hanging in the White House.

I may never get equal rights, I may never be blond and pencil thin, I
may never see Lady Gaga in concert this winter at Madison Square
Garden (I could not get a ticket) but one of my balls is hanging in
the White House with my name for all to see. Just for today that feels
a bit better than me having the right to marry.

Stay fresh,

http://tinyurl.com/yczq6rg


Gosh, I'd expect that from Harry, but not from you.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H