Thanks for the concerns, Mike.

Harry wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:21:04 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 30, 12:44 am, jps wrote:

I
was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to
check on you.

The same reason you use rec.boats to post your anti-gun articles and
curse republicans. Because you want to.

I do it to broadcast to as many as are willing to listen and consider.
I don't consider you or your friend J among those who'd keep an open
mind. There are intelligent beings who'll engage in a debate, but
unfortunately, they're few and far between. Probably no less frequent
than folks that are willing to convert to whatever it is you practice
in church and elsewhere.

Do you post your thanks to Snotty in order to broadcast your message?


If I wanted to debate guns, I'd go to a gun group.


We all know you come here to drop snotty comments. There's no other
reason for your presence here, eh, quacker?

I am curious, would anyone think my response here was a snotty comment?

Tim wrote:
thanks for the Call, John. it's appreciated.

What about me? What about my call?

Harry wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:21:04 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 30, 12:44 am, jps wrote:

I
was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to
check on you.

The same reason you use rec.boats to post your anti-gun articles and
curse republicans. Because you want to.

I do it to broadcast to as many as are willing to listen and consider.
I don't consider you or your friend J among those who'd keep an open
mind. There are intelligent beings who'll engage in a debate, but
unfortunately, they're few and far between. Probably no less frequent
than folks that are willing to convert to whatever it is you practice
in church and elsewhere.

Do you post your thanks to Snotty in order to broadcast your message?


If I wanted to debate guns, I'd go to a gun group.


We all know you come here to drop snotty comments. There's no other
reason for your presence here, eh, quacker?


My comments no where come close to reaching the level of "snot" as yours.

jps wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:21:04 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 30, 12:44 am, jps wrote:

I
was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to
check on you.

The same reason you use rec.boats to post your anti-gun articles and
curse republicans. Because you want to.

I do it to broadcast to as many as are willing to listen and consider.
I don't consider you or your friend J among those who'd keep an open
mind. There are intelligent beings who'll engage in a debate, but
unfortunately, they're few and far between. Probably no less frequent
than folks that are willing to convert to whatever it is you practice
in church and elsewhere.

Do you post your thanks to Snotty in order to broadcast your message?
i've been thinking. You clearly don't share my love and reverence for
guns. What say you and i have a little chat about guns on rec.boats. i
guarantee such a discussion will increase your readership. Regurgitating
news clips as you currently are doing only shows how stupid you really
are. Debate me and i'll prove it.

H The worlds greatest.

--

I get so upset by these spoofers, that I think I am going to make more
crossposts between rec.boats and numerous unrelated newsgroups, because
at least that is not detrimental to rec.boats. This group needs some
new blood, and that is always a good way to get some new posters who
enjoy boating as much as i do.

I am Tosk wrote:


Please Tim, get a filter Anyway, it was great following up with you
last night from about 5 to 5:45 pm, while flying down route 9 I'm
tellin' you, I have been there before and know how you feel. It's up to
you now, as my neighbor used to say, "how you gonna' act"? Glad to hear
everything came out all right so far I will keep you well posted, I am
cleaning the basement today, maybe I will put up some progress
pictures



Now we find out when and how long the phone conversations are?

Christ.

Good talking with you today capn, Francis.

I appreciate your comments and concerns.

On Dec 30, 10:29*am, Tim wrote:
Good talking with you today capn, Francis.

I appreciate your comments and concerns.

Actually, I think I got the timing wrong, I will check my phone.
Either way, I can attach the "tracking code" from Fedex as I was
riding in a FedEx Truck at the time, wrapped in a small box... Got
some cupons for Christmas and wanted to save some gas

JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Dec 30, 10:29 am, Tim wrote:
Good talking with you today capn, Francis.

I appreciate your comments and concerns.

Actually, I think I got the timing wrong, I will check my phone.
Either way, I can attach the "tracking code" from Fedex as I was
riding in a FedEx Truck at the time, wrapped in a small box... Got
some cupons for Christmas and wanted to save some gas


You boys just got telephones, right? New to your area?

On Dec 29, 11:02*pm, Tim wrote:
On Dec 29, 4:17*pm, Tom Francis
wrote:



On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:25:48 -0500, Gene

wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:19:17 -0500, Tom Francis
wrote:

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

just thought I'd pop in here a moment to say I'm doing much better
today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning.

Thanks for checking on me.

Your dong is doing much better?

Well, that is - um...er....interesting.

Somebody got a Christmas present!

A fake dong? One without the requisite ding?

Oh, I see my typing error has caused confusion. I have corrected it on
this return post.

Questions and explanations *on the dockside

ooooooooh...the new "double-secret" posting area where there is still
no talk of Boats, just personal garbage.