On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:55:20 -0500, Harry
wrote:

Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Gun owners and the NRA may not be on same page

Hard to know who to root for and who to hiss when you run across a
stand-off between notorious Republican strategist Frank Luntz and the
scare-mongering behemoth otherwise known as the National Rifle
Association.

This round, let's listen to Luntz:

Mr. Luntz queried 832 gun owners, including 401 card-carrying N.R.A.
members, in a survey commissioned by Mayors Against Illegal Guns, the
alliance of hundreds of executives seeking stronger gun laws. In flat
rebuttal of N.R.A. propaganda, the findings showed that 69 percent of
N.R.A. members supported closing the notorious gun-show loophole that
invites laissez-faire arms dealing outside registration requirements.

Even more members, 82 percent, favored banning gun purchases to
suspects on terrorist watch lists who are now free to arm. And 69
percent disagreed with Congressionally imposed rules against sharing
federal gun-trace information with state and local police agencies.

So ... a majority of gun owners want the gun-show loophole closed,
favor restrictions on banned gun purchases and think it's a good idea
to have gun information shared between agencies. Makes you wonder how
reasonable their views would be if they weren't being pumped up by
propaganda and warned to lock and load every election by the rich gun
lobby.

Posted by SusanG at Kos.
A reasonable person might assume that the NRA is owned & run by the gun
manufacturers.
Any responsible gun owner shouldn't object to stringent regulations to
keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, unstable or violent people
etc.


Dammit Don. Are you trying to disarm me?



Yes...you & the entire Dopey Army...... for the sake of American children
everywhere.



I believe while you were away, flajim revealed himself (by accident) as
one of the ID spoofers. He was caught, then he went into denial.

Apparently at the same time, his wife left him for...a cucumber.

I heard it was the fruits and vegetable manager at the local
supermarket.

"Harry" wrote in message
news
Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Gun owners and the NRA may not be on same page

Hard to know who to root for and who to hiss when you run across a
stand-off between notorious Republican strategist Frank Luntz and the
scare-mongering behemoth otherwise known as the National Rifle
Association.

This round, let's listen to Luntz:

Mr. Luntz queried 832 gun owners, including 401 card-carrying N.R.A.
members, in a survey commissioned by Mayors Against Illegal Guns, the
alliance of hundreds of executives seeking stronger gun laws. In flat
rebuttal of N.R.A. propaganda, the findings showed that 69 percent of
N.R.A. members supported closing the notorious gun-show loophole that
invites laissez-faire arms dealing outside registration requirements.

Even more members, 82 percent, favored banning gun purchases to
suspects on terrorist watch lists who are now free to arm. And 69
percent disagreed with Congressionally imposed rules against sharing
federal gun-trace information with state and local police agencies.

So ... a majority of gun owners want the gun-show loophole closed,
favor restrictions on banned gun purchases and think it's a good idea
to have gun information shared between agencies. Makes you wonder how
reasonable their views would be if they weren't being pumped up by
propaganda and warned to lock and load every election by the rich gun
lobby.

Posted by SusanG at Kos.
A reasonable person might assume that the NRA is owned & run by the gun
manufacturers.
Any responsible gun owner shouldn't object to stringent regulations to
keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, unstable or violent people
etc.


Dammit Don. Are you trying to disarm me?



Yes...you & the entire Dopey Army...... for the sake of American children
everywhere.

I believe while you were away, flajim revealed himself (by accident) as
one of the ID spoofers. He was caught, then he went into denial.

Apparently at the same time, his wife left him for...a cucumber.


There was no doubt that he was one of the cheap imitations.
The other one (ones) could be Looneytunes, Jackoff, Ditzy Dan....or even
Waylon Smithers.
Do you think The Freak is still fooled by them?

Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
news
Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Gun owners and the NRA may not be on same page

Hard to know who to root for and who to hiss when you run across a
stand-off between notorious Republican strategist Frank Luntz and the
scare-mongering behemoth otherwise known as the National Rifle
Association.

This round, let's listen to Luntz:

Mr. Luntz queried 832 gun owners, including 401 card-carrying N.R.A.
members, in a survey commissioned by Mayors Against Illegal Guns, the
alliance of hundreds of executives seeking stronger gun laws. In flat
rebuttal of N.R.A. propaganda, the findings showed that 69 percent of
N.R.A. members supported closing the notorious gun-show loophole that
invites laissez-faire arms dealing outside registration requirements.

Even more members, 82 percent, favored banning gun purchases to
suspects on terrorist watch lists who are now free to arm. And 69
percent disagreed with Congressionally imposed rules against sharing
federal gun-trace information with state and local police agencies.

So ... a majority of gun owners want the gun-show loophole closed,
favor restrictions on banned gun purchases and think it's a good idea
to have gun information shared between agencies. Makes you wonder how
reasonable their views would be if they weren't being pumped up by
propaganda and warned to lock and load every election by the rich gun
lobby.

Posted by SusanG at Kos.
A reasonable person might assume that the NRA is owned & run by the gun
manufacturers.
Any responsible gun owner shouldn't object to stringent regulations to
keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, unstable or violent people
etc.


Dammit Don. Are you trying to disarm me?


Yes...you & the entire Dopey Army...... for the sake of American children
everywhere.
I believe while you were away, flajim revealed himself (by accident) as
one of the ID spoofers. He was caught, then he went into denial.

Apparently at the same time, his wife left him for...a cucumber.


There was no doubt that he was one of the cheap imitations.
The other one (ones) could be Looneytunes, Jackoff, Ditzy Dan....or even
Waylon Smithers.
Do you think The Freak is still fooled by them?



Of course...anyone or anything could fool snotty scotty.

On 03/01/2010 9:13 AM, Harry wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Gun owners and the NRA may not be on same page

Hard to know who to root for and who to hiss when you run across a
stand-off between notorious Republican strategist Frank Luntz and the
scare-mongering behemoth otherwise known as the National Rifle
Association.

This round, let's listen to Luntz:

Mr. Luntz queried 832 gun owners, including 401 card-carrying N.R.A.
members, in a survey commissioned by Mayors Against Illegal Guns, the
alliance of hundreds of executives seeking stronger gun laws. In flat
rebuttal of N.R.A. propaganda, the findings showed that 69 percent of
N.R.A. members supported closing the notorious gun-show loophole that
invites laissez-faire arms dealing outside registration requirements.

Even more members, 82 percent, favored banning gun purchases to
suspects on terrorist watch lists who are now free to arm. And 69
percent disagreed with Congressionally imposed rules against sharing
federal gun-trace information with state and local police agencies.

So ... a majority of gun owners want the gun-show loophole closed,
favor restrictions on banned gun purchases and think it's a good idea
to have gun information shared between agencies. Makes you wonder how
reasonable their views would be if they weren't being pumped up by
propaganda and warned to lock and load every election by the rich gun
lobby.

Posted by SusanG at Kos.
A reasonable person might assume that the NRA is owned & run by the
gun manufacturers.
Any responsible gun owner shouldn't object to stringent regulations
to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, unstable or violent
people etc.


We have fairly stringent regs in Maryland. We have the federal
"instant check," of course, but we also have a state police check and
a 10-day waiting period for the purchase of handguns. It should also
apply to long guns, but it doesn't.

All this is made moot, though, by the fact that anyone, even someone
from out of state, can buy rifles and pistols at gun shows in
Virginia without any checks, thanks to the so-called gun show
loophole. And anyone includes retards like JustHate and psychos like
Froggy.


That is darn scary...... the whole USA should be under Federal Gun
Laws.... no cherry picking for the most lax laws.


Not likely to happen in a country where gun nutzis put their firearms
ahead of anything else in their lives, including the welfare of their
families.

I once read an article that 41% or so of the deaths from firearms in the
home were accidental.

Does that mean 59% protected life and property?

And if government can't take guns away from the criminals, why take them
away from honest people? Does not mak sense unless you want the herd of
people to be passive to abuse.

Canuck57 wrote:
On 03/01/2010 9:13 AM, Harry wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Gun owners and the NRA may not be on same page

Hard to know who to root for and who to hiss when you run across a
stand-off between notorious Republican strategist Frank Luntz and the
scare-mongering behemoth otherwise known as the National Rifle
Association.

This round, let's listen to Luntz:

Mr. Luntz queried 832 gun owners, including 401 card-carrying N.R.A.
members, in a survey commissioned by Mayors Against Illegal Guns, the
alliance of hundreds of executives seeking stronger gun laws. In flat
rebuttal of N.R.A. propaganda, the findings showed that 69 percent of
N.R.A. members supported closing the notorious gun-show loophole that
invites laissez-faire arms dealing outside registration requirements.

Even more members, 82 percent, favored banning gun purchases to
suspects on terrorist watch lists who are now free to arm. And 69
percent disagreed with Congressionally imposed rules against sharing
federal gun-trace information with state and local police agencies.

So ... a majority of gun owners want the gun-show loophole closed,
favor restrictions on banned gun purchases and think it's a good idea
to have gun information shared between agencies. Makes you wonder how
reasonable their views would be if they weren't being pumped up by
propaganda and warned to lock and load every election by the rich gun
lobby.

Posted by SusanG at Kos.
A reasonable person might assume that the NRA is owned & run by the
gun manufacturers.
Any responsible gun owner shouldn't object to stringent regulations
to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, unstable or violent
people etc.


We have fairly stringent regs in Maryland. We have the federal
"instant check," of course, but we also have a state police check and
a 10-day waiting period for the purchase of handguns. It should also
apply to long guns, but it doesn't.

All this is made moot, though, by the fact that anyone, even someone
from out of state, can buy rifles and pistols at gun shows in
Virginia without any checks, thanks to the so-called gun show
loophole. And anyone includes retards like JustHate and psychos like
Froggy.


That is darn scary...... the whole USA should be under Federal Gun
Laws.... no cherry picking for the most lax laws.


Not likely to happen in a country where gun nutzis put their firearms
ahead of anything else in their lives, including the welfare of their
families.

I once read an article that 41% or so of the deaths from firearms in the
home were accidental.

Does that mean 59% protected life and property?

It probably means most of the rest were murders.

On 03/01/2010 2:30 PM, Harry wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 03/01/2010 9:13 AM, Harry wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Gun owners and the NRA may not be on same page

Hard to know who to root for and who to hiss when you run across a
stand-off between notorious Republican strategist Frank Luntz and
the
scare-mongering behemoth otherwise known as the National Rifle
Association.

This round, let's listen to Luntz:

Mr. Luntz queried 832 gun owners, including 401 card-carrying N.R.A.
members, in a survey commissioned by Mayors Against Illegal Guns,
the
alliance of hundreds of executives seeking stronger gun laws. In
flat
rebuttal of N.R.A. propaganda, the findings showed that 69
percent of
N.R.A. members supported closing the notorious gun-show loophole
that
invites laissez-faire arms dealing outside registration
requirements.

Even more members, 82 percent, favored banning gun purchases to
suspects on terrorist watch lists who are now free to arm. And 69
percent disagreed with Congressionally imposed rules against sharing
federal gun-trace information with state and local police agencies.

So ... a majority of gun owners want the gun-show loophole closed,
favor restrictions on banned gun purchases and think it's a good
idea
to have gun information shared between agencies. Makes you wonder
how
reasonable their views would be if they weren't being pumped up by
propaganda and warned to lock and load every election by the rich
gun
lobby.

Posted by SusanG at Kos.
A reasonable person might assume that the NRA is owned & run by the
gun manufacturers.
Any responsible gun owner shouldn't object to stringent regulations
to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, unstable or violent
people etc.


We have fairly stringent regs in Maryland. We have the federal
"instant check," of course, but we also have a state police check and
a 10-day waiting period for the purchase of handguns. It should also
apply to long guns, but it doesn't.

All this is made moot, though, by the fact that anyone, even someone
from out of state, can buy rifles and pistols at gun shows in
Virginia without any checks, thanks to the so-called gun show
loophole. And anyone includes retards like JustHate and psychos like
Froggy.


That is darn scary...... the whole USA should be under Federal Gun
Laws.... no cherry picking for the most lax laws.


Not likely to happen in a country where gun nutzis put their firearms
ahead of anything else in their lives, including the welfare of their
families.

I once read an article that 41% or so of the deaths from firearms in
the home were accidental.

Does that mean 59% protected life and property?

It probably means most of the rest were murders.

Who gives a damn if a house thief, rapist, murder maniac, child
molester, bar fighter, mafia, drug dealer/pusher, peeping toms, purse
snatchers or terrorist dies?

In fact, think of how much it saves society in legal and incarseration
costs and no repeat offenses? Maybe make it legal to shoot those in the
act of a violent and wilful crime!

Since most misuses of guns is criminal, and many are criminal killing
criminal, I want to know how many innocents get saved by having and not
having guns before supporting no guns. If not having guns for honest
people is because of drug killing drive by killing of a dope dealer,
wrong reason.

I will support removing guns from honest people when it can be
demonstraighted that guns are removed from those that would harm us,
which includes governemnt, mafia and common criminals. Taking guns from
honest good people is simply making them sheep for abuse.

Canuck57 wrote:
On 03/01/2010 2:30 PM, Harry wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 03/01/2010 9:13 AM, Harry wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Gun owners and the NRA may not be on same page

Hard to know who to root for and who to hiss when you run across a
stand-off between notorious Republican strategist Frank Luntz and
the
scare-mongering behemoth otherwise known as the National Rifle
Association.

This round, let's listen to Luntz:

Mr. Luntz queried 832 gun owners, including 401 card-carrying
N.R.A.
members, in a survey commissioned by Mayors Against Illegal Guns,
the
alliance of hundreds of executives seeking stronger gun laws. In
flat
rebuttal of N.R.A. propaganda, the findings showed that 69
percent of
N.R.A. members supported closing the notorious gun-show loophole
that
invites laissez-faire arms dealing outside registration
requirements.

Even more members, 82 percent, favored banning gun purchases to
suspects on terrorist watch lists who are now free to arm. And 69
percent disagreed with Congressionally imposed rules against
sharing
federal gun-trace information with state and local police agencies.

So ... a majority of gun owners want the gun-show loophole closed,
favor restrictions on banned gun purchases and think it's a good
idea
to have gun information shared between agencies. Makes you wonder
how
reasonable their views would be if they weren't being pumped up by
propaganda and warned to lock and load every election by the rich
gun
lobby.

Posted by SusanG at Kos.
A reasonable person might assume that the NRA is owned & run by the
gun manufacturers.
Any responsible gun owner shouldn't object to stringent regulations
to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, unstable or violent
people etc.


We have fairly stringent regs in Maryland. We have the federal
"instant check," of course, but we also have a state police check and
a 10-day waiting period for the purchase of handguns. It should also
apply to long guns, but it doesn't.

All this is made moot, though, by the fact that anyone, even someone
from out of state, can buy rifles and pistols at gun shows in
Virginia without any checks, thanks to the so-called gun show
loophole. And anyone includes retards like JustHate and psychos like
Froggy.


That is darn scary...... the whole USA should be under Federal Gun
Laws.... no cherry picking for the most lax laws.


Not likely to happen in a country where gun nutzis put their firearms
ahead of anything else in their lives, including the welfare of their
families.

I once read an article that 41% or so of the deaths from firearms in
the home were accidental.

Does that mean 59% protected life and property?

It probably means most of the rest were murders.

Who gives a damn if a house thief, rapist, murder maniac, child
molester, bar fighter, mafia, drug dealer/pusher, peeping toms, purse
snatchers or terrorist dies?

In fact, think of how much it saves society in legal and incarseration
costs and no repeat offenses? Maybe make it legal to shoot those in the
act of a violent and wilful crime!

Since most misuses of guns is criminal, and many are criminal killing
criminal, I want to know how many innocents get saved by having and not
having guns before supporting no guns. If not having guns for honest
people is because of drug killing drive by killing of a dope dealer,
wrong reason.

I will support removing guns from honest people when it can be
demonstraighted that guns are removed from those that would harm us,
which includes governemnt, mafia and common criminals. Taking guns from
honest good people is simply making them sheep for abuse.


If you have firearms, they probably should be removed from your
household. Your first two paragraphs indicate you are crazy. You have no
understanding of the rule of law, either.

Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
news
Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Gun owners and the NRA may not be on same page

Hard to know who to root for and who to hiss when you run across a
stand-off between notorious Republican strategist Frank Luntz and the
scare-mongering behemoth otherwise known as the National Rifle
Association.

This round, let's listen to Luntz:

Mr. Luntz queried 832 gun owners, including 401 card-carrying N.R.A.
members, in a survey commissioned by Mayors Against Illegal Guns, the
alliance of hundreds of executives seeking stronger gun laws. In flat
rebuttal of N.R.A. propaganda, the findings showed that 69 percent of
N.R.A. members supported closing the notorious gun-show loophole that
invites laissez-faire arms dealing outside registration requirements.

Even more members, 82 percent, favored banning gun purchases to
suspects on terrorist watch lists who are now free to arm. And 69
percent disagreed with Congressionally imposed rules against sharing
federal gun-trace information with state and local police agencies.

So ... a majority of gun owners want the gun-show loophole closed,
favor restrictions on banned gun purchases and think it's a good idea
to have gun information shared between agencies. Makes you wonder how
reasonable their views would be if they weren't being pumped up by
propaganda and warned to lock and load every election by the rich gun
lobby.

Posted by SusanG at Kos.
A reasonable person might assume that the NRA is owned & run by the gun
manufacturers.
Any responsible gun owner shouldn't object to stringent regulations to
keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, unstable or violent people
etc.


Dammit Don. Are you trying to disarm me?


Yes...you & the entire Dopey Army...... for the sake of American children
everywhere.
I believe while you were away, flajim revealed himself (by accident) as
one of the ID spoofers. He was caught, then he went into denial.

Apparently at the same time, his wife left him for...a cucumber.


There was no doubt that he was one of the cheap imitations.
The other one (ones) could be Looneytunes, Jackoff, Ditzy Dan....or even
Waylon Smithers.
Do you think The Freak is still fooled by them?


It's funny to see how you've been taken in.

Harry wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 03/01/2010 9:13 AM, Harry wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Gun owners and the NRA may not be on same page

Hard to know who to root for and who to hiss when you run across a
stand-off between notorious Republican strategist Frank Luntz and
the
scare-mongering behemoth otherwise known as the National Rifle
Association.

This round, let's listen to Luntz:

Mr. Luntz queried 832 gun owners, including 401 card-carrying N.R.A.
members, in a survey commissioned by Mayors Against Illegal Guns,
the
alliance of hundreds of executives seeking stronger gun laws. In
flat
rebuttal of N.R.A. propaganda, the findings showed that 69
percent of
N.R.A. members supported closing the notorious gun-show loophole
that
invites laissez-faire arms dealing outside registration
requirements.

Even more members, 82 percent, favored banning gun purchases to
suspects on terrorist watch lists who are now free to arm. And 69
percent disagreed with Congressionally imposed rules against sharing
federal gun-trace information with state and local police agencies.

So ... a majority of gun owners want the gun-show loophole closed,
favor restrictions on banned gun purchases and think it's a good
idea
to have gun information shared between agencies. Makes you wonder
how
reasonable their views would be if they weren't being pumped up by
propaganda and warned to lock and load every election by the rich
gun
lobby.

Posted by SusanG at Kos.
A reasonable person might assume that the NRA is owned & run by the
gun manufacturers.
Any responsible gun owner shouldn't object to stringent regulations
to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, unstable or violent
people etc.


We have fairly stringent regs in Maryland. We have the federal
"instant check," of course, but we also have a state police check and
a 10-day waiting period for the purchase of handguns. It should also
apply to long guns, but it doesn't.

All this is made moot, though, by the fact that anyone, even someone
from out of state, can buy rifles and pistols at gun shows in
Virginia without any checks, thanks to the so-called gun show
loophole. And anyone includes retards like JustHate and psychos like
Froggy.


That is darn scary...... the whole USA should be under Federal Gun
Laws.... no cherry picking for the most lax laws.


Not likely to happen in a country where gun nutzis put their firearms
ahead of anything else in their lives, including the welfare of their
families.

I once read an article that 41% or so of the deaths from firearms in
the home were accidental.

Does that mean 59% protected life and property?

It probably means most of the rest were murders.

Come on give me some applause. Didn't you notice how quickly I figured
it out?

On 03/01/2010 3:46 PM, Harry wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 03/01/2010 2:30 PM, Harry wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 03/01/2010 9:13 AM, Harry wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Gun owners and the NRA may not be on same page

Hard to know who to root for and who to hiss when you run across a
stand-off between notorious Republican strategist Frank Luntz and
the
scare-mongering behemoth otherwise known as the National Rifle
Association.

This round, let's listen to Luntz:

Mr. Luntz queried 832 gun owners, including 401 card-carrying
N.R.A.
members, in a survey commissioned by Mayors Against Illegal Guns,
the
alliance of hundreds of executives seeking stronger gun laws. In
flat
rebuttal of N.R.A. propaganda, the findings showed that 69
percent of
N.R.A. members supported closing the notorious gun-show loophole
that
invites laissez-faire arms dealing outside registration
requirements.

Even more members, 82 percent, favored banning gun purchases to
suspects on terrorist watch lists who are now free to arm. And 69
percent disagreed with Congressionally imposed rules against
sharing
federal gun-trace information with state and local police
agencies.

So ... a majority of gun owners want the gun-show loophole closed,
favor restrictions on banned gun purchases and think it's a good
idea
to have gun information shared between agencies. Makes you wonder
how
reasonable their views would be if they weren't being pumped up by
propaganda and warned to lock and load every election by the rich
gun
lobby.

Posted by SusanG at Kos.
A reasonable person might assume that the NRA is owned & run by the
gun manufacturers.
Any responsible gun owner shouldn't object to stringent regulations
to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, unstable or violent
people etc.


We have fairly stringent regs in Maryland. We have the federal
"instant check," of course, but we also have a state police check
and
a 10-day waiting period for the purchase of handguns. It should also
apply to long guns, but it doesn't.

All this is made moot, though, by the fact that anyone, even someone
from out of state, can buy rifles and pistols at gun shows in
Virginia without any checks, thanks to the so-called gun show
loophole. And anyone includes retards like JustHate and psychos like
Froggy.


That is darn scary...... the whole USA should be under Federal Gun
Laws.... no cherry picking for the most lax laws.


Not likely to happen in a country where gun nutzis put their firearms
ahead of anything else in their lives, including the welfare of their
families.

I once read an article that 41% or so of the deaths from firearms in
the home were accidental.

Does that mean 59% protected life and property?

It probably means most of the rest were murders.

Who gives a damn if a house thief, rapist, murder maniac, child
molester, bar fighter, mafia, drug dealer/pusher, peeping toms, purse
snatchers or terrorist dies?

In fact, think of how much it saves society in legal and incarseration
costs and no repeat offenses? Maybe make it legal to shoot those in
the act of a violent and wilful crime!

Since most misuses of guns is criminal, and many are criminal killing
criminal, I want to know how many innocents get saved by having and
not having guns before supporting no guns. If not having guns for
honest people is because of drug killing drive by killing of a dope
dealer, wrong reason.

I will support removing guns from honest people when it can be
demonstraighted that guns are removed from those that would harm us,
which includes governemnt, mafia and common criminals. Taking guns
from honest good people is simply making them sheep for abuse.


If you have firearms, they probably should be removed from your
household. Your first two paragraphs indicate you are crazy. You have no
understanding of the rule of law, either.

Tell your wife, if you have one, you will stand by an do nothing while
she is raped then killed in her own home because you wouldn't load up
and cower behind the couch.

I go by a moral code you would not understand.