Jim wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:30:36 -0500, John H
wrote:

On 1/8/2010 3:41 PM, John H wrote:
I still haven't gotten an answer from a liberal explaining why it's OK
to bomb folks running on the ground in Pakistan, but we have to give a
'fair trial with lawyers and a jury' to terrorists who try to kill us.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=9510257


Of course, since I have all the moderates and liberals filtered, I
don't see their replies, except for loogy, and everyone knows he is
as much of an idiotic asshole as I am.

I figured that was the best you could do.

He's about out of snappy remarks. It's not like the old days when he was
more entertaining and a little edgey.

The ID spoofing has nothing to do with snappy remarks. If it were, you
and your co-ID spoofers on the right would have been disqualified in the
first round.

Harry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:00:46 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
I still haven't gotten an answer from a liberal explaining why it's OK
to bomb folks running on the ground in Pakistan, but we have to give a
'fair trial with lawyers and a jury' to terrorists who try to kill us.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=9510257



Perhaps because the "folks" running on the ground in Pakistan are in a
foreign territory, are engaged in military campaigns against us, are
considered the enemy, etc.; whereas, the people who are arrested in
the US
are entitled to Due Process and the Rule of Law. Perhaps because
things like
Due Process and the Rule of Law separate us from the thugs that send
terrorists here.

Perhaps you need a refresher course about our country and our
principles.
Welcome back Em. Hope your holidays were all you had hoped for.

As you already know, Herring doesn't need a refresher course. He
doesn't want to live in a country with due process.

He's more aligned with our own J, the insurance salesman. We should
live according to the bible and regional counsels, like the KKK. That
way we'd be on an even footing with Afghanistan and not bound by the
rules of western civilization. Libertarian rule.


It would have been even better if it hadn't been a "working" vacation.
I got a lot of great contacts, solidified/resolved some distribution
issues, and I even brought back some samples for selling in the
US/Canada. The latter should be interesting, since all of my business
starts with clothes shipped from here.

I feel sad about John. He seems very fearful... he and a couple of
others. He also apparently tried a scam with the green energy stuff.
But, you'll notice how complicated it got after I called his bluff. I
said I'd pay in advance after I had proof he would actually sign up
for it, but even with lots of compromise on my part, he didn't do
diddly. I still haven't even gotten an email from him, so as far as I
know it was just a plain out-and-out scam.



Welcome back. In your absence, John and Frogwatch have been competing
head to head for the Michelle Bachmann Nuttier than a Fruitcake Award.
SW Tom apparently admitted he has been spoofing my id here, and flajim
(jim) slipped up and made it apparent he was, too. Apparently some users
here decide payback was in order after all the weeks of right-wing ID
spoofing and began spoofing the spoofers and the real losers, like John
Herring. SW Tom left in one of his usual huffs. Herring is going rip****
over being spoofed.

I should give you a poke in the nose or a felt up as well, you rude bitch.

On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:00:46 -0800, nom=de=plume wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
I still haven't gotten an answer from a liberal explaining why it's OK
to bomb folks running on the ground in Pakistan, but we have to give a
'fair trial with lawyers and a jury' to terrorists who try to kill us.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=9510257




Perhaps because the "folks" running on the ground in Pakistan are in a
foreign territory, are engaged in military campaigns against us, are
considered the enemy, etc.; whereas, the people who are arrested in the
US are entitled to Due Process and the Rule populationof Law. Perhaps
because things like Due Process and the Rule of Law separate us from the
thugs that send terrorists here.

Perhaps you need a refresher course about our country and our
principles.

Have you ever considered that we are the invaders of a foreign country
that never attacked us and therefore we are the terrorist *in fact*.

The fight was *not* brought to us by Pakistan or Afghanistan. We are on
their soil. OBL is a Saudi national. Most of the high jackers on the
flights of 911 were Saudi nationals.

Were are the bombs and troops for Saudi Arabia that is unable to control
their terrorist Bedouins.

If our economy wasn't crushed and sold down the Chang Jiang River perhaps
our young men could get employment other than turn to the military. Some
day they will start a war and no one will show up to play soldier.

John is just a thumb sucking dumb-ass looking to make a thread he can't
support. He plays with nose pickers that are proud of the nasty habit.
Look for smarter people to joust with. Have a great day and it is good to
see you back.

cupcake wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:00:46 -0800, nom=de=plume wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...

I still haven't gotten an answer from a liberal explaining why it's OK
to bomb folks running on the ground in Pakistan, but we have to give a
'fair trial with lawyers and a jury' to terrorists who try to kill us.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=9510257




Perhaps because the "folks" running on the ground in Pakistan are in a
foreign territory, are engaged in military campaigns against us, are
considered the enemy, etc.; whereas, the people who are arrested in the
US are entitled to Due Process and the Rule populationof Law. Perhaps
because things like Due Process and the Rule of Law separate us from the
thugs that send terrorists here.

Perhaps you need a refresher course about our country and our
principles.


Have you ever considered that we are the invaders of a foreign country
that never attacked us and therefore we are the terrorist *in fact*.

The fight was *not* brought to us by Pakistan or Afghanistan. We are on
their soil. OBL is a Saudi national. Most of the high jackers on the
flights of 911 were Saudi nationals.



Good argument, except we in this instance was the Bush Family and last
I heard they("W" and Senior") are Republican's.

DP_Diddly

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H" wrote in message
...
I still haven't gotten an answer from a liberal explaining why it's OK
to bomb folks running on the ground in Pakistan, but we have to give a
'fair trial with lawyers and a jury' to terrorists who try to kill us.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=9510257




Perhaps because the "folks" running on the ground in Pakistan are in a
foreign territory, are engaged in military campaigns against us, are
considered the enemy, etc.; whereas, the people who are arrested in the
US are entitled to Due Process and the Rule of Law. Perhaps because
things like Due Process and the Rule of Law separate us from the thugs
that send terrorists here.

Perhaps you need a refresher course about our country and our principles.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Johnny spent his career as an army officer...he has no idea about American
principles or culture.

If he did, I would be shocked if what you say is true. US military officers
swear to defend the Constitution.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H" wrote in message
...
I still haven't gotten an answer from a liberal explaining why it's OK
to bomb folks running on the ground in Pakistan, but we have to give a
'fair trial with lawyers and a jury' to terrorists who try to kill us.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=9510257



Perhaps because the "folks" running on the ground in Pakistan are in a
foreign territory, are engaged in military campaigns against us, are
considered the enemy, etc.; whereas, the people who are arrested in the
US are entitled to Due Process and the Rule of Law. Perhaps because
things like Due Process and the Rule of Law separate us from the thugs
that send terrorists here.

Perhaps you need a refresher course about our country and our principles.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Johnny spent his career as an army officer...he has no idea about American
principles or culture.

If he did, I would be shocked if what you say is true. US military officers
swear to defend the Constitution.


Be shocked.

"cupcake" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:00:46 -0800, nom=de=plume wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
I still haven't gotten an answer from a liberal explaining why it's OK
to bomb folks running on the ground in Pakistan, but we have to give a
'fair trial with lawyers and a jury' to terrorists who try to kill us.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=9510257




Perhaps because the "folks" running on the ground in Pakistan are in a
foreign territory, are engaged in military campaigns against us, are
considered the enemy, etc.; whereas, the people who are arrested in the
US are entitled to Due Process and the Rule populationof Law. Perhaps
because things like Due Process and the Rule of Law separate us from the
thugs that send terrorists here.

Perhaps you need a refresher course about our country and our
principles.

Have you ever considered that we are the invaders of a foreign country
that never attacked us and therefore we are the terrorist *in fact*.

If you're talking about Iraq, I agree. The leadership in Afganistan,
however, supported bin laden.

The fight was *not* brought to us by Pakistan or Afghanistan. We are on
their soil. OBL is a Saudi national. Most of the high jackers on the
flights of 911 were Saudi nationals.

The Saudi's admittedly did little pre-9/11 to deal with his crowd, but they
did boot him out and revoke his citizenship, I believe well in advance of
the attacks.


Were are the bombs and troops for Saudi Arabia that is unable to control
their terrorist Bedouins.

Unable to control and unwilling to control are two diff things. At first,
they were unwilling. Now they're willing and mostly do.

If our economy wasn't crushed and sold down the Chang Jiang River perhaps
our young men could get employment other than turn to the military. Some
day they will start a war and no one will show up to play soldier.

Someday the military will have to hold a bakesale to pay for yet another
fighter jet we don't really need.

John is just a thumb sucking dumb-ass looking to make a thread he can't
support. He plays with nose pickers that are proud of the nasty habit.
Look for smarter people to joust with. Have a great day and it is good to
see you back.

A bit harsh, but despite the allure of France, it's good to be home.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Jan 8, 5:30*pm, John H wrote:
On 1/8/2010 3:41 PM, John H wrote:

I still haven't gotten an answer from a liberal explaining why it's OK
to bomb folks running on the ground in Pakistan, but we have to give a
'fair trial with lawyers and a jury' to terrorists who try to kill us.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=9510257

Of course, since I have all the moderates and liberals filtered, I don't
see their replies, except for loogy, and everyone knows he is as much of
an idiotic asshole as I am.

Oh, and to be sure, Loogy displays much more intelligence than the
rest of the liberals hereabouts.

On 1/8/2010 6:12 PM, Jim wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:30:36 -0500, John H
wrote:

On 1/8/2010 3:41 PM, John H wrote:
I still haven't gotten an answer from a liberal explaining why it's OK
to bomb folks running on the ground in Pakistan, but we have to give a
'fair trial with lawyers and a jury' to terrorists who try to kill us.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=9510257


Of course, since I have all the moderates and liberals filtered, I
don't see their replies, except for loogy, and everyone knows he is
as much of an idiotic asshole as I am.

I figured that was the best you could do.

He's about out of snappy remarks. It's not like the old days when he was
more entertaining and a little edgey.


Let's be real here. Neither you nor I have ever posted a "snappy remark"
in rec.boats.

John H wrote:
On Jan 8, 5:30 pm, John H wrote:
On 1/8/2010 3:41 PM, John H wrote:

I still haven't gotten an answer from a liberal explaining why it's OK
to bomb folks running on the ground in Pakistan, but we have to give a
'fair trial with lawyers and a jury' to terrorists who try to kill us.
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=9510257
Of course, since I have all the moderates and liberals filtered, I don't
see their replies, except for loogy, and everyone knows he is as much of
an idiotic asshole as I am.

Oh, and to be sure, Loogy displays much more intelligence than the
rest of the liberals hereabouts.


Someone is ID spoofing herring...what a giggle.