nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:09:49 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote:

The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as
equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not
exclusive to the gay population.
You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is
so abundant, I won't even go there.

Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with
plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a
family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from
the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express
themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately
express themselves.

Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved
"down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered,
and straight.....
Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh?
.
I'm not ASSUMING anything.

You weren't forced to be there.
It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in
PUBLIC. They didn't.

It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at
the museums.... it was WRONG.

I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE.

It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle
or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it.
Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is
dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could
reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing
club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you
take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm
headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine.....

The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a
direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as
possible.
OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash,
studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for
traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off
licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to
watch, now is it?

So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a
kid?

Yeah...... thought so......
You make a damn good point. The gay trash is hurting the cause of all
gays. You shouldn't have to explain to an eight-year old the 'show off
licky-licky' of two adults on a sidewalk in DC.

Hopefully, the folks in DC will get to vote on the gay marriage
proposal and put it where it belongs. Maybe that'll spread the word to
the gay 'licky-licky' folks that their mores aren't welcome on the
mall, or anywhere out of their bedrooms.
--



Sort of like white trash hurting the cause of all whites?



Yeeeeouch! You just pinned the tail on herring.

On Jan 12, 8:32*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/01/2010 5:53 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

A parent has a choice to home-school, given certain requirements. Children
don't typically have a legal voice of their own. They must usually be
represented by an adult. It's in the best interest of society for the
population to be educated. I suppose you disagree with this.

And given how people make excuses, and get away with it. *Might as well
repeal the requirements.

BTW, I think all children should be going physically to a school unless
circumstances are abobiously unavoidable. *Such as a family on an island
manning a lighthouse and the nearest school is 100 miles away.

Chop the squakers hair and march to school...

Such as a family on an island
manning a lighthouse and the nearest school is 100 miles away.

Well, kids in the Outback of Australia take their schooling via
Computer link up.

On Jan 12, 8:33*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:06:08 -0500, Gene



wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:56:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Gene" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:03:04 -0800, jps wrote:

MESQUITE, Texas -

The parents of a 4-year-old boy disciplined for having long hair have
rejected a compromise from a Texas school board that agreed to adjust
its grooming policy.

The impasse means pre-kindergartner Taylor Pugh will remain in
in-school suspension, sitting alone with a teacher's aide in a
library. He has been sequestered from classmates at Floyd Elementary
School in Mesquite, a Dallas suburb, since late November.

After a closed-door meeting Monday, the Mesquite school board decided
the boy could wear his hair in tight braids but keep it no longer than
his ears. But his parents say the adjustment isn't enough for Taylor,
who wears his hair long, covering his earlobes and shirt collar.

His mother, Elizabeth Taylor, said she'll pull back Taylor's hair in a
ponytail, acknowledging the style will keep him suspended.

According to the district dress code, boys' hair must be kept out of
the eyes and cannot extend below the bottom of earlobes or over the
collar of a dress shirt. Fads in hairstyles "designed to attract
attention to the individual or to disrupt the orderly conduct of the
classroom or campus is not permitted," the policy states.

The district is known for standing tough on its dress code. Last year,
a seventh-grader was sent home for wearing black skinny pants. His
parents chose to home-school him.

On its Web site, the district says its code is in place because
"students who dress and groom themselves neatly, and in an acceptable
and appropriate manner, are more likely to become constructive members
of the society in which we live."

Taylor said her fight is not over. She and her husband are considering
taking the district to court or appealing to the State Board of
Education.

"I know that there are a whole set of steps we can take," she said.

God forbid individualism. *That's too American for Texas.

I'm sure that kid's long hair is preventing all of the other 4 year
olds from learning..... but, then..... it becomes all to obvious when
education is tossed in deference to indoctrination....

That's right! Another example - gay marriage preventing hetero couples from
enjoying their relationships!

Biggest problem with gay.... well most anything.... is that it is so
IN-YOUR-FACE.

I wouldn't, as a hetero, expect to display my sexuality like this in
public. I don't need to see this, my kids don't need to see this, and
my grand kids don't need to see this. Frankly, it gets MUCH worse than
this.... whips, chains, leashes, Corinthian leather.... fine.... keep
it to yourself...
http://tinyurl.com/yrohxb

Sorry, can't transmit mindbleach through the net.....

The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as
equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not
exclusive to the gay population.

Take Mrs. Herring for example. *She's clearly into masochism, she
probably just doesn't dress up.

.....but Herring does. Maybe he was a Fan of Hoover.... That guy was a
real " Queen".

On Jan 12, 9:58*pm, Harry wrote:
I am Tosk wrote:

* When I home schooled my daughter for two years

Holy schitt...are no qualifications necessary to home school someone?

--
Where others have hearts, right-wingers carry tumors of rotten principles..

Well, Ingerfool had to stand OUTside the fence at the School. He isn't
allowed on the grounds due to his affliction with spending weekends in
a Tent with young girls.

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:44:05 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:35:51 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote:

The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as
equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not
exclusive to the gay population.

You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is
so abundant, I won't even go there.

Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with
plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a
family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from
the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express
themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately
express themselves.

Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved
"down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered,
and straight.....

Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh?
.
I'm not ASSUMING anything.

You weren't forced to be there.

It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in
PUBLIC. They didn't.

It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at
the museums.... it was WRONG.

I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE.

It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle
or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it.

Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is
dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could
reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing
club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you
take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm
headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine.....

What was happening went right over your 8 year old's head. You could
have swept it aside in a moments notice by telling your kid that they
were play acting and just having silly fun. Your kid would have
thought nothing more of it.

My wife managed the campaign of an openly gay state rep in California
several years ago and both our pre-10 year olds marched in the local
parade next to drag queens and transvestites. We've chosen to expose
them to all sorts of people and not seed fearful complexes (like
yours).

They also go to school with African Americans, 16 different flavors of
Asians, Indians, Arabs, North Africans, etc., etc.

They're completely normal kids with a broader range of understanding
and empathy because of it. I'm sure you'd like them, even if you
can't appreciate the leanings of their father.

What's astonishing to me is that you find gays a more frightening
influence than guns.

I guess inanimate things are easier for you to deal with.

Hello? Gene? You there Gene?

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:55:59 -0500, Harry
wrote:

mgg wrote:
"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote:

The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as
equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not
exclusive to the gay population.
You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is
so abundant, I won't even go there.

Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with
plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a
family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from
the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express
themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately
express themselves.

Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved
"down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered,
and straight.....
Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh?
.
I'm not ASSUMING anything.

You weren't forced to be there.
It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in
PUBLIC. They didn't.

It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at
the museums.... it was WRONG.

I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE.

It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle
or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it.
Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is
dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could
reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing
club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you
take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm
headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine.....

The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a
direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as
possible.
OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash,
studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for
traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off
licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to
watch, now is it?

So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a
kid?

Yeah...... thought so......


That's why we don't take our kids to San Francisco. harry seems to like it
there though. ;-)

--Mike



Indeed, Mikey, I'm not ambivalent or nervous about my heterosexuality,
and I'm not put off or made nervous by "gays." Gays are part of every
vibrant community, whereas closed-minded homophobes like you are not.

My wife and I love San Francisco. It is a beautiful city, with great
architecture, old and new; livable neighborhoods everywhere, terrific
restaurants, great meeting places, interesting shops, museums, whatever.
Like every big city, it has its problems, but as tourists they don't
impact us very much.

We've seen gay couples in San Franciso, just as we've seen them in New
York, DC, LA, New Orleans, Miami, and even at...Disney World. A few act
a bit strangely in public, but most do not. So what?

I think my oldest kid was about five when we took our first family
vacation to California. We saw some gay couples then...and explained
that some women date women and some men date men. No biggie.

You mentioned you send your kids to Catholic schools. Now *that* might
be a major concern, what with all the pedophilia running rampant in
those places, eh?


I hope San Francisco's reputation helps keep these close-minded idiots
at a distance. Better for the city, its culture and its fans.

His kids are likely far more worldly than he.

jps wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:55:59 -0500, Harry
wrote:

mgg wrote:
"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote:

The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as
equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not
exclusive to the gay population.
You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is
so abundant, I won't even go there.

Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with
plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a
family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from
the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express
themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately
express themselves.

Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved
"down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered,
and straight.....
Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh?
.
I'm not ASSUMING anything.

You weren't forced to be there.
It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in
PUBLIC. They didn't.

It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at
the museums.... it was WRONG.

I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE.

It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle
or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it.
Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is
dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could
reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing
club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you
take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm
headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine.....
The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a
direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as
possible.
OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash,
studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for
traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off
licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to
watch, now is it?

So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a
kid?

Yeah...... thought so......

That's why we don't take our kids to San Francisco. harry seems to like it
there though. ;-)

--Mike


Indeed, Mikey, I'm not ambivalent or nervous about my heterosexuality,
and I'm not put off or made nervous by "gays." Gays are part of every
vibrant community, whereas closed-minded homophobes like you are not.

My wife and I love San Francisco. It is a beautiful city, with great
architecture, old and new; livable neighborhoods everywhere, terrific
restaurants, great meeting places, interesting shops, museums, whatever.
Like every big city, it has its problems, but as tourists they don't
impact us very much.

We've seen gay couples in San Franciso, just as we've seen them in New
York, DC, LA, New Orleans, Miami, and even at...Disney World. A few act
a bit strangely in public, but most do not. So what?

I think my oldest kid was about five when we took our first family
vacation to California. We saw some gay couples then...and explained
that some women date women and some men date men. No biggie.

You mentioned you send your kids to Catholic schools. Now *that* might
be a major concern, what with all the pedophilia running rampant in
those places, eh?


I hope San Francisco's reputation helps keep these close-minded idiots
at a distance. Better for the city, its culture and its fans.

His kids are likely far more worldly than he.

Another nice attribute of SF: the downtown streets are full of people at
night, even weeknights, with all manner of folks shopping, dining, going
to clubs, whatever.

We've got two trips to California scheduled this year so far... :)

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:03:04 -0800, jps wrote:


MESQUITE, Texas —

The parents of a 4-year-old boy disciplined for having long hair have
rejected a compromise from a Texas school board that agreed to adjust
its grooming policy.


this is the same state that murdered cameron todd willingham, then,
when a commission was about to investigate, the governor fired the
commission.

texas politics as usual

Harry wrote:
mgg wrote:
"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:48:32 -0600, wrote:

I have to wonder if you intimidate and mock Christian students in your
charge. My kid had a teacher like that a few years ago, used to really
crush one of her friends pretty bad for being religious. Right in front
of the other kids, it was bad...

Our kids go to a private Catholic school for just that reason. The PC
of public schools is out of control. I want my kids to be proud of
their religion, and get a top notch education to boot. The public
schools around here, just plain suck.

--Mike


How do you explain the pedophiliac priests? Are you proud of that aspect
of your religion, too?

Wow, can i volunteer to help the kiddies?

"Don White" wrote in message
news
Harry wrote:
mgg wrote:
"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:48:32 -0600, wrote:

I have to wonder if you intimidate and mock Christian students in your
charge. My kid had a teacher like that a few years ago, used to really
crush one of her friends pretty bad for being religious. Right in front
of the other kids, it was bad...

Our kids go to a private Catholic school for just that reason. The PC of
public schools is out of control. I want my kids to be proud of their
religion, and get a top notch education to boot. The public schools
around here, just plain suck.

--Mike


How do you explain the pedophiliac priests? Are you proud of that aspect
of your religion, too?

Wow, can i volunteer to help the kiddies?

Now this must be Dan Kruger doing the spoofing.