On Jan 13, 2:16*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"RGrew176" wrote in message

...



'Harry[_2_ Wrote:
;774817']What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make
such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven
help you.

Come on... he said something in a clumsy way that's probably got some truth
to it. He's got a long history of civil rights.

I think what Clinton said (about serving coffee) was much more
mean-spirited, and he should have known better.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But what Clinton said wasn't racist. He said it meaning that Obama
didn't have the experience that others had.

Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 13, 2:16 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"RGrew176" wrote in message

...



'Harry[_2_ Wrote:
;774817']What ever happened after his terrible remarks?
Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make
such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven
help you.
Come on... he said something in a clumsy way that's probably got some truth
to it. He's got a long history of civil rights.

I think what Clinton said (about serving coffee) was much more
mean-spirited, and he should have known better.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But what Clinton said wasn't racist. He said it meaning that Obama
didn't have the experience that others had.

Nah. If it was a racist remark, Harry would be all over it like stink on
****. It was a mere slip of the tongue.

On Jan 13, 3:59*pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 13, 2:16 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"RGrew176" wrote in message

...

'Harry[_2_ Wrote:
;774817']What ever happened after his terrible remarks?
Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make
such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven
help you.
Come on... he said something in a clumsy way that's probably got some truth
to it. He's got a long history of civil rights.

I think what Clinton said (about serving coffee) was much more
mean-spirited, and he should have known better.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But what Clinton said wasn't racist. He said it meaning that Obama
didn't have the experience that others had.

Nah. If it was a racist remark, Harry would be all over it like stink on
****. It was a mere slip of the tongue.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Nah, like some on the right, Harry only sees one narrow left side of
anything.

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Jan 13, 2:16 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"RGrew176" wrote in message

...



'Harry[_2_ Wrote:
;774817']What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make
such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven
help you.

Come on... he said something in a clumsy way that's probably got some
truth
to it. He's got a long history of civil rights.

I think what Clinton said (about serving coffee) was much more
mean-spirited, and he should have known better.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But what Clinton said wasn't racist. He said it meaning that Obama
didn't have the experience that others had.


I didn't say it was racist, although it has those overtones. I was
mean-spirited, which is not out of order for him.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:46:30 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:22:34 -0500, Harry
wrote:

What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

To be fair and balanced? A LOT more than what happened to Rush
Limbaugh with his "Barack The Magic Negro" song..... To be fair and
balanced, that is.....

To be even further fair and balanced you can castigate the LA Times for
originating "Barak the Magic Negro"

Mitch McConnell was smart enough not to engage in this.... he knows,
historically, this is a lose-lose proposition for the Republicans. How
smart are you?

I guess it is ok for Democrats to be racists, in the name of fairness
and balance. They, the Democrats, are the party of slavery, the KKK,
segregation and other atrocious actions and activities against the non-
whites.

One slip by Reid and you're ready for the cross burning but a lifetime
of Trent Lott's purposeful hatred is the best the Republicans have for
comaprison?