....but why couldn't the Democrats agree on it? It obviously had some
major flaws that even the Democrats couldn't support.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/he...html?th&emc=th

So....what to do....better blame the Republicans.

Hee hee. What a friggin' joke.
--

Proud member of the angry mob.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.

"John H" wrote in message
...
...but why couldn't the Democrats agree on it? It obviously had some
major flaws that even the Democrats couldn't support.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/he...html?th&emc=th

So....what to do....better blame the Republicans.

Hee hee. What a friggin' joke.
--

Proud member of the angry mob.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.


Yes, you're a joke.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Bruce" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...

...but why couldn't the Democrats agree on it? It obviously had some
major flaws that even the Democrats couldn't support.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/he...html?th&emc=th

So....what to do....better blame the Republicans.

Hee hee. What a friggin' joke.
--

Proud member of the angry mob.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.


Yes, you're a joke.


Lame response. Are you unable to debate the topic?


I'm giving you some deference, since you're unable to think...

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Jan 30, 10:37*pm, Bruce wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John *wrote in message
.. .

...but why couldn't the Democrats agree on it? It obviously had some
major flaws that even the Democrats couldn't support.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/he...html?th&emc=th

So....what to do....better blame the Republicans.

Hee hee. What a friggin' joke.
--

Proud member of the angry mob.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.

Yes, you're a joke.

Lame response. *Are you unable to debate the topic?

That was redundant. When it comes to plume-la-ditz, every response is
lame. Almost average.

On 1/31/10 1:30 PM, Jack wrote:
On Jan 30, 10:37 pm, wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...

...but why couldn't the Democrats agree on it? It obviously had some
major flaws that even the Democrats couldn't support.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/he...html?th&emc=th

So....what to do....better blame the Republicans.

Hee hee. What a friggin' joke.
--

Proud member of the angry mob.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.

Yes, you're a joke.

Lame response. Are you unable to debate the topic?

That was redundant. When it comes to plume-la-ditz, every response is
lame. Almost average.


Pot. Kettle. Black. Except, of course, you're way below average, JackOff.

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

"John wrote in message
...


...but why couldn't the Democrats agree on it? It obviously had some
major flaws that even the Democrats couldn't support.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/he...html?th&emc=th

So....what to do....better blame the Republicans.

Hee hee. What a friggin' joke.
--

Proud member of the angry mob.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.


Yes, you're a joke.



Lame response. Are you unable to debate the topic?


I'm giving you some deference, since you're unable to think...


Another lame response. Care to try again? This is the bonus round -
real responses get two points!

On 1/31/10 9:29 PM, Bruce wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...

...but why couldn't the Democrats agree on it? It obviously had some
major flaws that even the Democrats couldn't support.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/he...html?th&emc=th


So....what to do....better blame the Republicans.

Hee hee. What a friggin' joke.
--

Proud member of the angry mob.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.

Yes, you're a joke.


Lame response. Are you unable to debate the topic?

I'm giving you some deference, since you're unable to think...

Another lame response. Care to try again? This is the bonus round - real
responses get two points!




Two points? You're not worth two cents.

Harry wrote:
On 1/31/10 9:29 PM, Bruce wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...

...but why couldn't the Democrats agree on it? It obviously had some
major flaws that even the Democrats couldn't support.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/he...html?th&emc=th



So....what to do....better blame the Republicans.

Hee hee. What a friggin' joke.
--

Proud member of the angry mob.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.

Yes, you're a joke.


Lame response. Are you unable to debate the topic?

I'm giving you some deference, since you're unable to think...

Another lame response. Care to try again? This is the bonus round - real
responses get two points!




Two points? You're not worth two cents.
Damn. From you, Harry, that means...zilch. It actually makes me feel
even better!