....Sarah:

Palin 'Would Be Willing' to Take On Obama in 2012

Sarah Palin has President Obama in her sights, telling FoxNews.com she
"would be willing" to challenge him in the 2012 presidential race.

Sarah Palin has President Obama in her sights, telling FoxNews.com she
"would be willing" to challenge him in the 2012 presidential race.

The former Alaska governor, in an interview Saturday on the sidelines of
the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville, said Obama's "lack of
experience" has held him back his first year in office and that she
would put her credentials up against his any day.

"I would be willing to if I believe that it's right for the country,"
Palin said when asked if she would run for president in 2012.

--Faux News


Sarah Palin has "credentials"? As a mayor of a city smaller than any
congressional district, and as a failed governor who quit halfway
through her term?

What credentials? She has no foreign policy experience and in fact has
proven over and again she knows nothing, absolutely nothing, about
foreign policy.

Go, Sarah, go! Run. Get your party's nomination. Please...do it!

Harry wrote:
...Sarah:

Palin 'Would Be Willing' to Take On Obama in 2012

Sarah Palin has President Obama in her sights, telling FoxNews.com she
"would be willing" to challenge him in the 2012 presidential race.

Sarah Palin has President Obama in her sights, telling FoxNews.com she
"would be willing" to challenge him in the 2012 presidential race.

The former Alaska governor, in an interview Saturday on the sidelines of
the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville, said Obama's "lack of
experience" has held him back his first year in office and that she
would put her credentials up against his any day.

"I would be willing to if I believe that it's right for the country,"
Palin said when asked if she would run for president in 2012.

--Faux News


Sarah Palin has "credentials"? As a mayor of a city smaller than any
congressional district, and as a failed governor who quit halfway
through her term?

What credentials? She has no foreign policy experience and in fact has
proven over and again she knows nothing, absolutely nothing, about
foreign policy.

Go, Sarah, go! Run. Get your party's nomination. Please...do it!

The repubs could put up Rosie O'Donnell and beat Obama. I hope he runs.

Harry wrote:

(Anti-American commie crap snipped)

Go, Sarah, go! Run. Get your party's nomination. Please...do it!

You don't get it numnutz.
It's going to be about her platform, and the platform of the Republican
Party. We want an end to the insanity.

1. Tax cuts for the wealthy, who are the engines of prosperity via the
proven "Trickle Down' effect. This is most important for success.

2. An end to profligate spending on entitlements. To wit,
a. Cut Social Security spending.
b. Cut Medicare spending.
c. Cut Medicaid spending.
d. Cut Food Stamp spending.
e. Cut Foreign Aid.

3. An end to chaining down the power of the capitalist system.
a. Remove the regulatory constraints on Wall Street.
b. Enact Federal legislation forbidding the states to levy undue taxes
and environmental strangulation imposed on business by the states.
c. Provide tax incentives for oil and gas companies to increase
exploration of natural energy sources.
d. Provide tax incentives to the nuclear power industry.

3. Make clear that the religious morals upon which we are founded are
not voluntary.
a. Repeal Roe vs Wade.
b. Require some form of religious instruction in all public schools.

4. National security is paramount.
a. With the budget savings from entitlement reductions, increase the
defense budget so that our military is ready to invade Iran if
diplomatic efforts toward peace don't work.
b. Amend the Constitution to disqualify illegal aliens from enjoying the
rights allowed citizens of The United States of America.

This is a partial list. I could go on and on.

Once our actual platform is put before the American people, it will be
the end of the commie Dem infestation we now suffer.

On 07/02/2010 8:35 AM, Harry wrote:
...Sarah:

Palin 'Would Be Willing' to Take On Obama in 2012

Hope she does.

Sarah Palin has President Obama in her sights, telling FoxNews.com she
"would be willing" to challenge him in the 2012 presidential race.

I am sure she does.

Sarah Palin has President Obama in her sights, telling FoxNews.com she
"would be willing" to challenge him in the 2012 presidential race.


The former Alaska governor, in an interview Saturday on the sidelines of
the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville, said Obama's "lack of
experience" has held him back his first year in office and that she
would put her credentials up against his any day.

I am not sure it is lack of experience, although he was fast tracked
from a local jive hype type to the presidency in record speed.

"I would be willing to if I believe that it's right for the country,"
Palin said when asked if she would run for president in 2012.

Can't be worse.

Sarah Palin has "credentials"? As a mayor of a city smaller than any
congressional district, and as a failed governor who quit halfway
through her term?

Fresh face, not as much in the pocket baggage. I suspect Washingtn DC
FEARS someone like Palin coming into office. She is too inclinded to
tell it as it is, and that would upset quite a few porkers in DC.

What credentials? She has no foreign policy experience and in fact has
proven over and again she knows nothing, absolutely nothing, about
foreign policy.

Maybe Washington should worry more about the economic problems at home,
the corruption war at home and a little less about what some Islamic
idiot is doing on the other side of the world.

Go, Sarah, go! Run. Get your party's nomination. Please...do it!

Hope so. Really comes down to how many sexist biggots are out there and
how much corruption organizations will spend to smear her. Which should
be a hit towards why you should consider voting for her. Want
government to change? Don't vote for the big media manipulation trick,
vote for who the corrupt insiders are afraid of.

On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:49:29 -0500, Harry
wrote:




The repubs could put up Rosie O'Donnell and beat Obama. I hope he runs.

probably true. the american public at this point is running on
mythology.

and the GOP is the party of grimm

On 07/02/2010 10:18 AM, Jim wrote:
Harry wrote:

(Anti-American commie crap snipped)

Go, Sarah, go! Run. Get your party's nomination. Please...do it!

You don't get it numnutz.
It's going to be about her platform, and the platform of the Republican
Party. We want an end to the insanity.

1. Tax cuts for the wealthy, who are the engines of prosperity via the
proven "Trickle Down' effect. This is most important for success.

2. An end to profligate spending on entitlements. To wit,
a. Cut Social Security spending.
b. Cut Medicare spending.
c. Cut Medicaid spending.
d. Cut Food Stamp spending.
e. Cut Foreign Aid.

3. An end to chaining down the power of the capitalist system.
a. Remove the regulatory constraints on Wall Street.
b. Enact Federal legislation forbidding the states to levy undue taxes
and environmental strangulation imposed on business by the states.
c. Provide tax incentives for oil and gas companies to increase
exploration of natural energy sources.
d. Provide tax incentives to the nuclear power industry.

3. Make clear that the religious morals upon which we are founded are
not voluntary.
a. Repeal Roe vs Wade.
b. Require some form of religious instruction in all public schools.

4. National security is paramount.
a. With the budget savings from entitlement reductions, increase the
defense budget so that our military is ready to invade Iran if
diplomatic efforts toward peace don't work.
b. Amend the Constitution to disqualify illegal aliens from enjoying the
rights allowed citizens of The United States of America.

This is a partial list. I could go on and on.

Once our actual platform is put before the American people, it will be
the end of the commie Dem infestation we now suffer.

Given Obama's debt spending, there is no doubt cuts are coming. Debt is
now structural to the federal government. Structural being a fancy term
that no one alive today, even a newborn, will ever see the federal debt
paid off.

Federal government is overspending at such a rate that even if they
doubled the federal income tax rate, they could still not balance the
budget.

That rate of overspend guarantees major problems down the road. These
are not Americans, they selfish greedy basterds morgaging our childrens
future today for big spending corruption. Obama is destroying the USA.

On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:18:35 -0600, Jim wrote:

Harry wrote:

(Anti-American commie crap snipped)

Go, Sarah, go! Run. Get your party's nomination. Please...do it!

You don't get it numnutz.
It's going to be about her platform, and the platform of the Republican
Party. We want an end to the insanity.

1. Tax cuts for the wealthy, who are the engines of prosperity via the
proven "Trickle Down' effect. This is most important for success.

some people actually believe this.

more proof that mythology is driving the american body politic


Once our actual platform is put before the American people, it will be
the end of the commie Dem infestation we now suffer.

what's pathetic is that this stuff is actually what the GOP believes

On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:51:48 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:



Sarah Palin has "credentials"? As a mayor of a city smaller than any
congressional district, and as a failed governor who quit halfway
through her term?

Fresh face, not as much in the pocket baggage. I suspect Washingtn DC
FEARS someone like Palin coming into office. She is too inclinded to
tell it as it is, and that would upset quite a few porkers in DC.

ROFLMAO!! she's porker in chief and she's going to tell it like it
is???


HAHAHAHAHA!!!



What credentials? She has no foreign policy experience and in fact has
proven over and again she knows nothing, absolutely nothing, about
foreign policy.

Maybe Washington should worry more about the economic problems at home,
the corruption war at home and a little less about what some Islamic
idiot is doing on the other side of the world.

ever been to NY? i have.

bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:18:35 -0600, Jim wrote:

Harry wrote:

(Anti-American commie crap snipped)
Go, Sarah, go! Run. Get your party's nomination. Please...do it!

You don't get it numnutz.
It's going to be about her platform, and the platform of the Republican
Party. We want an end to the insanity.

1. Tax cuts for the wealthy, who are the engines of prosperity via the
proven "Trickle Down' effect. This is most important for success.

some people actually believe this.

more proof that mythology is driving the american body politic

Once our actual platform is put before the American people, it will be
the end of the commie Dem infestation we now suffer.

what's pathetic is that this stuff is actually what the GOP believes


Didn't expect you to understand it.
I see you cut out most of the logical platform points.
Typical kill the messenger mentality.
Say, you wouldn't happen to be a union thug, would you?
Figures.

On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:09:22 -0600, Jim wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:18:35 -0600, Jim wrote:

Harry wrote:

(Anti-American commie crap snipped)
Go, Sarah, go! Run. Get your party's nomination. Please...do it!

You don't get it numnutz.
It's going to be about her platform, and the platform of the Republican
Party. We want an end to the insanity.

1. Tax cuts for the wealthy, who are the engines of prosperity via the
proven "Trickle Down' effect. This is most important for success.

some people actually believe this.

more proof that mythology is driving the american body politic

Once our actual platform is put before the American people, it will be
the end of the commie Dem infestation we now suffer.

what's pathetic is that this stuff is actually what the GOP believes


Didn't expect you to understand it.
I see you cut out most of the logical platform points.

what's logical about myths? they're for children.


Typical kill the messenger mentality.
Say, you wouldn't happen to be a union thug, would you?
Figures.

i love it. smaller govt by expanding govt control of morals

oh well. no one ever said the right wing was logical.