On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:25:30 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:46:29 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:28:37 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
m...
On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:54:28 -0500, Jim wrote:

wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:57:49 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:55:43 -0400, bpuharic
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:19:46 -0700, jps wrote:

Maybe the world's young people are finally getting the message.

CAPE TOWN, South Africa - South Africa's far-right leader Eugene
Terreblanche who campaigned for a separate white homeland was
murdered
on Saturday on his farm, the SAPA news agency reported.
he should have moved to texas. they would have made him governor.
Too late for him now, fortunately.

The cruel irony is that Progressivism is so...malevolent.

You've hit on the key that most here won't understand.
Glenn Beck has done an in-depth analysis of Progressivism.
He has laid out its evils in detail, using film, music and
the simple but effective blackboard.
Logically mapping the progress of this insanity known as
"Progressivism," he has shown it for what it it.
Evil.
Not the innocent "political movement" portrayed in "scholarly" books and
encyclopedias.
Those depictions are done by "progressives" and are deceptive and
self-serving, which is part and parcel of progressive evil.
The hallmark characteristic of any evil is its ability to disguise its
malevolence in the mask of benevolence and fairness.
Some of us - you, me, my sister and Glenn at minimum - can see through
the mask.
Too bad usenet is not conducive to use of the blackboard, but alas, it
is not. And fat chance of getting the libs to watch Glenn, a kind and
benevolent man who has been unjustifiably pilloried by the main stream
media in an attempt to minimize the audience he can speak the truth to.

Jim - Glenn Beck fan.


I have no doubt that Beck has given the subject a thorough treatment.

Now that's extremely funny. And, I think you're serious.

I don't watch television, and subsequently I don't watch Beck. My
observation (and obviously you're aware of the same hypocrisy) is
based on the malicious contempt that JPS, and others who adhere to the
Progressive ideaology, display for other human beings, especially
those that they deem to be politically opposed. As far as I'm
concerned Progressivism, as its displayed by its representatives in
this group, is to be scorned.

Then, you go on to contradict yourself... you don't watch TV/Beck, but you
have no doubt....

You are quite the (pseudo) intellectual!

You don't know what you're about. My statement about Beck's treatment
of the subject was based on Jim's synopsis, giving Jim the benefit of
the doubt in the accuracy of his summary, as any 'cogent' reader could
have assessed. You need to troll elsewhere.


Because Jim deserves, as one can easily observe, the benefit of the doubt.
Right. You're the troll. Or, perhaps more accurately, a shill for Beck/Rush.

I think I'll stay right here for now.

Jesus of Insurance doesn't know that Jim isn't Jim but just a parody.
But that's plenty good enough for him, 'cause parodies fit right into
JoI's view of reality. Good, righteous Christians pretend all the
time.

I'm sure it's good for the insurance business.

The question of Jim's sincerity or identity is irrelevant.

On Apr 5, 5:39*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:44:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:53:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
m...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:49:23 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:4lsjr5ls622tmhospv8kkd9buvfb1ujni8@4ax. com...
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:57:49 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:55:43 -0400, bpuharic
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:19:46 -0700, jps wrote:

Maybe the world's young people are finally getting the message.

CAPE TOWN, South Africa - South Africa's far-right leader Eugene
Terreblanche who campaigned for a separate white homeland was
murdered
on Saturday on his farm, the SAPA news agency reported.

he should have moved to texas. they would have made him governor..

Too late for him now, fortunately.

The cruel irony is that Progressivism is so...malevolent.

For the uneducated and the fearful. I agree.

Your statement tends towards ambiguity. *Is it that "for the
uneducated and the fearful" there is a cruel irony in Progressivism's
malevolence, or is it that Progressivism holds its malevolence for the
uneducated and the fearful, or is it that for the uneducated and the
fearful there is a purported misconception that Progressivism is
malevolent?

(I wonder does Progressivism stand up for the uneducated and fearful,
and hold the same as equals in solidarity?)

You're a troll. You make sounds like you're educated, but I suspect it's
self-taught. Nothing wrong with that, but the pretending otherwise is a
bit
deceitful. Is that clear enough?

Too, I make no pretense. *My note was completely serious and
necessary.

Sure. Whatever. Best of luck to you figuring it out.

You're dishonest.

Sure. Whatever. Do you feel better now?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Declaring yourself now victorious in your own mind, shall you now
start singing "tip toe through the tulips," D'Plume?

On Apr 5, 10:46*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:28:37 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:54:28 -0500, Jim wrote:

wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:57:49 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:55:43 -0400, bpuharic
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:19:46 -0700, jps wrote:

Maybe the world's young people are finally getting the message.

CAPE TOWN, South Africa - South Africa's far-right leader Eugene
Terreblanche who campaigned for a separate white homeland was
murdered
on Saturday on his farm, the SAPA news agency reported.
he should have moved to texas. they would have made him governor.
Too late for him now, fortunately.

The cruel irony is that Progressivism is so...malevolent.

You've hit on the key that most here won't understand.
Glenn Beck has done an in-depth analysis of Progressivism.
He has laid out its evils in detail, using film, music and
the simple but effective blackboard.
Logically mapping the progress of this insanity known as
"Progressivism," he has shown it for what it it.
Evil.
Not the innocent "political movement" portrayed in "scholarly" books and
encyclopedias.
Those depictions are done by "progressives" and are deceptive and
self-serving, which is part and parcel of progressive evil.
The hallmark characteristic of any evil is its ability to disguise its
malevolence in the mask of benevolence and fairness.
Some of us - you, me, my sister and Glenn at minimum - can see through
the mask.
Too bad usenet is not conducive to use of the blackboard, but alas, it
is not. *And fat chance of getting the libs to watch Glenn, a kind and
benevolent man who has been unjustifiably pilloried by the main stream
media in an attempt to minimize the audience he can speak the truth to.

Jim - Glenn Beck fan.

I have no doubt that Beck has given the subject a thorough treatment.

Now that's extremely funny. And, I think you're serious.

I don't watch television, and subsequently I don't watch Beck. *My
observation (and obviously you're aware of the same hypocrisy) is
based on the malicious contempt that JPS, and others who adhere to the
Progressive ideaology, display for other human beings, especially
those that they deem to be politically opposed. *As far as I'm
concerned Progressivism, as its displayed by its representatives in
this group, is to be scorned.

Then, you go on to contradict yourself... you don't watch TV/Beck, but you
have no doubt....

You are quite the (pseudo) intellectual!

You don't know what you're about. *My statement about Beck's treatment
of the subject was based on Jim's synopsis, giving Jim the benefit of
the doubt in the accuracy of his summary, as any 'cogent' reader could
have assessed. *You need to troll elsewhere.

Because Jim deserves, as one can easily observe, the benefit of the doubt..
Right. You're the troll. Or, perhaps more accurately, a shill for Beck/Rush.

I think I'll stay right here for now.

--
Nom=de=Plume

And who are you the shill for, D'Plume?

On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:59:48 -0500, wrote:
snipped for brevity

He's big on werds. I have contempt for selfish skanks who believe
that society need not include a social compact, apart from dog eat
dog.

This person has contempt for a creature of his own making. I
suspect, though, with good foundation, that this allusion may be to
cryptic for either JPS or Miss De Plume.

I can't resist the compulsion to correct this. This should read
"...too cryptic..."

On 4/6/10 8:53 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:59:48 -0500, wrote:
snipped for brevity

He's big on werds. I have contempt for selfish skanks who believe
that society need not include a social compact, apart from dog eat
dog.

This person has contempt for a creature of his own making. I
suspect, though, with good foundation, that this allusion may be to
cryptic for either JPS or Miss De Plume.

I can't resist the compulsion to correct this. This should read
"...too cryptic..."


I don't know why I opened this post of yours, since I usually just skip
over them, but...you so remind me of this fella, jpj...


http://tinyurl.com/l62hpc

On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:57:22 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/6/10 8:53 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:59:48 -0500, wrote:
snipped for brevity

He's big on werds. I have contempt for selfish skanks who believe
that society need not include a social compact, apart from dog eat
dog.

This person has contempt for a creature of his own making. I
suspect, though, with good foundation, that this allusion may be to
cryptic for either JPS or Miss De Plume.

I can't resist the compulsion to correct this. This should read
"...too cryptic..."


I don't know why I opened this post of yours, since I usually just skip
over them, but...you so remind me of this fella, jpj...


http://tinyurl.com/l62hpc


Odd. You remind me of Miletus.

On 4/6/10 9:21 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:57:22 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/6/10 8:53 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:59:48 -0500, wrote:
snipped for brevity

He's big on werds. I have contempt for selfish skanks who believe
that society need not include a social compact, apart from dog eat
dog.

This person has contempt for a creature of his own making. I
suspect, though, with good foundation, that this allusion may be to
cryptic for either JPS or Miss De Plume.

I can't resist the compulsion to correct this. This should read
"...too cryptic..."


I don't know why I opened this post of yours, since I usually just skip
over them, but...you so remind me of this fella, jpj...


http://tinyurl.com/l62hpc


Odd. You remind me of Miletus.


Thus proving the validity of the cartoon.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:23:22 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/6/10 9:21 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:57:22 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/6/10 8:53 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:59:48 -0500, wrote:
snipped for brevity

He's big on werds. I have contempt for selfish skanks who believe
that society need not include a social compact, apart from dog eat
dog.

This person has contempt for a creature of his own making. I
suspect, though, with good foundation, that this allusion may be to
cryptic for either JPS or Miss De Plume.

I can't resist the compulsion to correct this. This should read
"...too cryptic..."


I don't know why I opened this post of yours, since I usually just skip
over them, but...you so remind me of this fella, jpj...


http://tinyurl.com/l62hpc


Odd. You remind me of Miletus.


Thus proving the validity of the cartoon.

It's more likely that the reference escapes you.

On 4/6/10 9:28 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:23:22 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/6/10 9:21 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:57:22 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/6/10 8:53 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:59:48 -0500, wrote:
snipped for brevity

He's big on werds. I have contempt for selfish skanks who believe
that society need not include a social compact, apart from dog eat
dog.

This person has contempt for a creature of his own making. I
suspect, though, with good foundation, that this allusion may be to
cryptic for either JPS or Miss De Plume.

I can't resist the compulsion to correct this. This should read
"...too cryptic..."


I don't know why I opened this post of yours, since I usually just skip
over them, but...you so remind me of this fella, jpj...


http://tinyurl.com/l62hpc


Odd. You remind me of Miletus.


Thus proving the validity of the cartoon.

It's more likely that the reference escapes you.


Without googling, I know several references for Miletus.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:33:28 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/6/10 9:28 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:23:22 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/6/10 9:21 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:57:22 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/6/10 8:53 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:59:48 -0500, wrote:
snipped for brevity

He's big on werds. I have contempt for selfish skanks who believe
that society need not include a social compact, apart from dog eat
dog.

This person has contempt for a creature of his own making. I
suspect, though, with good foundation, that this allusion may be to
cryptic for either JPS or Miss De Plume.

I can't resist the compulsion to correct this. This should read
"...too cryptic..."


I don't know why I opened this post of yours, since I usually just skip
over them, but...you so remind me of this fella, jpj...


http://tinyurl.com/l62hpc


Odd. You remind me of Miletus.


Thus proving the validity of the cartoon.

It's more likely that the reference escapes you.


Without googling, I know several references for Miletus.

That's too generic of an answer.