wrote in message
...
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:44:34 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:18:37 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:27:13 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:26:13 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:g1qkr51t3cethj9ors8i13pi6c6ct439an@4ax. com...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:39:30 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:tgokr5pr5l0djg34dhn4dk0o0b00tcte57@4a x.com...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:44:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:0efkr5l95sp6j27i85tereovp1j6f475fd@ 4ax.com...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:53:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:1r8kr59f60mu7738pe9rr08jti1eq5i5j ...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:49:23 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:4lsjr5ls622tmhospv8kkd9buvfb1uj ...
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:57:49 -0700, jps
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:55:43 -0400, bpuharic

wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:19:46 -0700, jps
wrote:


Maybe the world's young people are finally getting the
message.

CAPE TOWN, South Africa - South Africa's far-right leader
Eugene
Terreblanche who campaigned for a separate white homeland
was
murdered
on Saturday on his farm, the SAPA news agency reported.

he should have moved to texas. they would have made him
governor.

Too late for him now, fortunately.

The cruel irony is that Progressivism is so...malevolent.


For the uneducated and the fearful. I agree.

Your statement tends towards ambiguity. Is it that "for the
uneducated and the fearful" there is a cruel irony in
Progressivism's
malevolence, or is it that Progressivism holds its malevolence
for
the
uneducated and the fearful, or is it that for the uneducated
and
the
fearful there is a purported misconception that Progressivism
is
malevolent?

(I wonder does Progressivism stand up for the uneducated and
fearful,
and hold the same as equals in solidarity?)


You're a troll. You make sounds like you're educated, but I
suspect
it's
self-taught. Nothing wrong with that, but the pretending
otherwise
is
a
bit
deceitful. Is that clear enough?

Too, I make no pretense. My note was completely serious and
necessary.


Sure. Whatever. Best of luck to you figuring it out.

You're dishonest.


Sure. Whatever. Do you feel better now?

If you're not going to be honest in your conversation, I'll ask you
not to respond to any of my posts. Enjoy.


Whew... touch a nerve huh? Well, too bad. I think I'll respond to
whatever I
please. If you don't like it, feel free not to read them.

Clearly a Libertarian in theory rather than practice. A real
Libertarian would never attempt to control another's behavior.

There you go. You've found me out. I've adroitly manipulated Miss De
Plume such that she'll respond to my every posting, as infrequent as
they are, in order to skirt your filter. I should say that the effort
was nearly adroit, since you've uncovered my nefarious plot. Why am I
cursed with such keen opponents?


Because you're a bozo?

Insurance Jesus completely misses the point, as usual.

It appears as though JPS didn't catch my sardonic drift. But, that
happens.


Maybe you should consider not drifting. Start paddling and you'll get
somewhere.

--
Nom=de=Plume

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:52:27 -0500, Jim wrote:

wrote:


You don't know what you're about. My statement about Beck's treatment
of the subject was based on Jim's synopsis, giving Jim the benefit of
the doubt in the accuracy of his summary, as any 'cogent' reader could
have assessed. You need to troll elsewhere.

My synopsis was accurate.
And your judgment that deplum is trolling is also correct.
Your last sentence is opinion.
The trolls and spoofers aren't so easily stopped.
Can't even say I encourage your attempts on that score, as it is a
futile pastime, and generally just adds to the din, besides ending up
with a chinese food affliction to the mind.
But I must say that you and Canuck57 certainly raise the level of
discourse beyond that seen in the Harry and Loogy mutual butt-sniffing
dialogs, or the similar deplum/TopBass saga.
It's your call of course.

Jim - Just trying to make sense of it all myself.

The Usenet world and I know that she's trolling. I make the
occasional comment, and she makes daily sweeps through the NG taking
potshots, often desultory and incoherent, across the spectrum for who
knows what purpose. I enjoy a good debate. I don't enjoy nonsense.
It's as though its a competition for who can submit the most acerbic
nonsense between JPS, De Plume, and Harry. What's amusing in this,
though, is that they all seem to think they're the creme de la creme
of thinkers, and this in the face of the constant enfilade of informal
fallacies they employ in almost every note. Too, De Plume engaged me
in this thread and she calls me a troll? How ironic.


Whoooo ... suddenly the "intellectual" giant decides he speaks for all of
Usenet. Wow. I take it back. You're not a troll. You're just another idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:16:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:44:34 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:18:37 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:27:13 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:26:13 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:g1qkr51t3cethj9ors8i13pi6c6ct439an@4ax .com...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:39:30 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:tgokr5pr5l0djg34dhn4dk0o0b00tcte57@4 ax.com...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:44:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:0efkr5l95sp6j27i85tereovp1j6f475fd @4ax.com...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:53:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:1r8kr59f60mu7738pe9rr08jti1eq5i5 ...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:49:23 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:4lsjr5ls622tmhospv8kkd9buvfb1u ...
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:57:49 -0700, jps
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:55:43 -0400, bpuharic

wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:19:46 -0700, jps
wrote:


Maybe the world's young people are finally getting the
message.

CAPE TOWN, South Africa - South Africa's far-right leader
Eugene
Terreblanche who campaigned for a separate white homeland
was
murdered
on Saturday on his farm, the SAPA news agency reported.

he should have moved to texas. they would have made him
governor.

Too late for him now, fortunately.

The cruel irony is that Progressivism is so...malevolent.


For the uneducated and the fearful. I agree.

Your statement tends towards ambiguity. Is it that "for the
uneducated and the fearful" there is a cruel irony in
Progressivism's
malevolence, or is it that Progressivism holds its malevolence
for
the
uneducated and the fearful, or is it that for the uneducated
and
the
fearful there is a purported misconception that Progressivism
is
malevolent?

(I wonder does Progressivism stand up for the uneducated and
fearful,
and hold the same as equals in solidarity?)


You're a troll. You make sounds like you're educated, but I
suspect
it's
self-taught. Nothing wrong with that, but the pretending
otherwise
is
a
bit
deceitful. Is that clear enough?

Too, I make no pretense. My note was completely serious and
necessary.


Sure. Whatever. Best of luck to you figuring it out.

You're dishonest.


Sure. Whatever. Do you feel better now?

If you're not going to be honest in your conversation, I'll ask you
not to respond to any of my posts. Enjoy.


Whew... touch a nerve huh? Well, too bad. I think I'll respond to
whatever I
please. If you don't like it, feel free not to read them.

Clearly a Libertarian in theory rather than practice. A real
Libertarian would never attempt to control another's behavior.

There you go. You've found me out. I've adroitly manipulated Miss De
Plume such that she'll respond to my every posting, as infrequent as
they are, in order to skirt your filter. I should say that the effort
was nearly adroit, since you've uncovered my nefarious plot. Why am I
cursed with such keen opponents?


Because you're a bozo?

Insurance Jesus completely misses the point, as usual.

It appears as though JPS didn't catch my sardonic drift. But, that
happens.


Maybe you should consider not drifting. Start paddling and you'll get
somewhere.

Methinks Jesus of Insurance has his head stuck in a drift.

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:17:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:52:27 -0500, Jim wrote:

wrote:


You don't know what you're about. My statement about Beck's treatment
of the subject was based on Jim's synopsis, giving Jim the benefit of
the doubt in the accuracy of his summary, as any 'cogent' reader could
have assessed. You need to troll elsewhere.

My synopsis was accurate.
And your judgment that deplum is trolling is also correct.
Your last sentence is opinion.
The trolls and spoofers aren't so easily stopped.
Can't even say I encourage your attempts on that score, as it is a
futile pastime, and generally just adds to the din, besides ending up
with a chinese food affliction to the mind.
But I must say that you and Canuck57 certainly raise the level of
discourse beyond that seen in the Harry and Loogy mutual butt-sniffing
dialogs, or the similar deplum/TopBass saga.
It's your call of course.

Jim - Just trying to make sense of it all myself.

The Usenet world and I know that she's trolling. I make the
occasional comment, and she makes daily sweeps through the NG taking
potshots, often desultory and incoherent, across the spectrum for who
knows what purpose. I enjoy a good debate. I don't enjoy nonsense.
It's as though its a competition for who can submit the most acerbic
nonsense between JPS, De Plume, and Harry. What's amusing in this,
though, is that they all seem to think they're the creme de la creme
of thinkers, and this in the face of the constant enfilade of informal
fallacies they employ in almost every note. Too, De Plume engaged me
in this thread and she calls me a troll? How ironic.


Whoooo ... suddenly the "intellectual" giant decides he speaks for all of
Usenet. Wow. I take it back. You're not a troll. You're just another idiot.

Wow, Jesus of Insurance thinks we're the crem de la crem. My
intellect is tingling.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:16:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:44:34 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:18:37 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:27:13 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:26:13 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:g1qkr51t3cethj9ors8i13pi6c6ct439an@4a x.com...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:39:30 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:tgokr5pr5l0djg34dhn4dk0o0b00tcte57@ 4ax.com...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:44:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:0efkr5l95sp6j27i85tereovp1j6f475f ...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:53:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:1r8kr59f60mu7738pe9rr08jti1eq5i ...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:49:23 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:4lsjr5ls622tmhospv8kkd9buvfb1 ...
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:57:49 -0700, jps

wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:55:43 -0400, bpuharic

wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:19:46 -0700, jps

wrote:


Maybe the world's young people are finally getting the
message.

CAPE TOWN, South Africa - South Africa's far-right
leader
Eugene
Terreblanche who campaigned for a separate white
homeland
was
murdered
on Saturday on his farm, the SAPA news agency reported.

he should have moved to texas. they would have made him
governor.

Too late for him now, fortunately.

The cruel irony is that Progressivism is so...malevolent.


For the uneducated and the fearful. I agree.

Your statement tends towards ambiguity. Is it that "for the
uneducated and the fearful" there is a cruel irony in
Progressivism's
malevolence, or is it that Progressivism holds its
malevolence
for
the
uneducated and the fearful, or is it that for the uneducated
and
the
fearful there is a purported misconception that
Progressivism
is
malevolent?

(I wonder does Progressivism stand up for the uneducated and
fearful,
and hold the same as equals in solidarity?)


You're a troll. You make sounds like you're educated, but I
suspect
it's
self-taught. Nothing wrong with that, but the pretending
otherwise
is
a
bit
deceitful. Is that clear enough?

Too, I make no pretense. My note was completely serious and
necessary.


Sure. Whatever. Best of luck to you figuring it out.

You're dishonest.


Sure. Whatever. Do you feel better now?

If you're not going to be honest in your conversation, I'll ask
you
not to respond to any of my posts. Enjoy.


Whew... touch a nerve huh? Well, too bad. I think I'll respond to
whatever I
please. If you don't like it, feel free not to read them.

Clearly a Libertarian in theory rather than practice. A real
Libertarian would never attempt to control another's behavior.

There you go. You've found me out. I've adroitly manipulated Miss
De
Plume such that she'll respond to my every posting, as infrequent as
they are, in order to skirt your filter. I should say that the
effort
was nearly adroit, since you've uncovered my nefarious plot. Why am
I
cursed with such keen opponents?


Because you're a bozo?

Insurance Jesus completely misses the point, as usual.

It appears as though JPS didn't catch my sardonic drift. But, that
happens.


Maybe you should consider not drifting. Start paddling and you'll get
somewhere.

Methinks Jesus of Insurance has his head stuck in a drift.


A snore drift? lol

--
Nom=de=Plume

wrote:


The Usenet world and I know that she's trolling. I make the
occasional comment, and she makes daily sweeps through the NG taking
potshots, often desultory and incoherent, across the spectrum for who
knows what purpose. I enjoy a good debate. I don't enjoy nonsense.
It's as though its a competition for who can submit the most acerbic
nonsense between JPS, De Plume, and Harry. What's amusing in this,
though, is that they all seem to think they're the creme de la creme
of thinkers, and this in the face of the constant enfilade of informal
fallacies they employ in almost every note. Too, De Plume engaged me
in this thread and she calls me a troll? How ironic.

Yes, you've explained that reality very well.
Please continue reading this piece from Monty Python and the Holy Grail,
and my following comments.

ARTHUR: Now look here, my good man--
FRENCH GUARD: I don't wanna talk to you no more, you empty headed
animal food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! You mother
was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!
GALAHAD: Is there someone else up there we could talk to?
FRENCH GUARD: No, now go away or I shall taunt you a second time-a!
[sniff]
ARTHUR: Now, this is your last chance. I've been more than reasonable.
FRENCH GUARD: (Fetchez la vache.)
OTHER FRENCH GUARD: Quoi?
FRENCH GUARD: (Fetchez la vache!) [mooo]
ARTHUR: If you do not agree to my commands, then I shall--
[twong] [mooooooo] Jesus Christ!
KNIGHTS: Christ! [thud] Ah! Ohh!
ARTHUR: Right! Charge!
KNIGHTS: Charge! [mayhem]
FRENCH GUARD: Hey, this one is for your mother! There you go.
[mayhem]
FRENCH GUARD: And this one's for your dad!
ARTHUR: Run away!
KNIGHTS: Run away!

It is clear that rec.boats has its Arthur, Knights, and French riffraff.
If you haven't seen the film, what happens at the (twong) is that the
French catapult a cow at Arthur and the English knights.
The French are a nasty and nefarious lot, and know not the meaning of
shame, or the proper use of a cow.
You are an Arthur, and sometimes a Knight, as are Scotty, Tom, John,
Dan, Steve, myself and the others here who are clear thinking gentlemen.
Our roles change, but out gentle and thinking matter remains constant.
The French riffraff are the deplums, Harrys, Don's, Loogys, jps's, etc.
The usual suspects.
They stick out like sore thumbs on a concert pianist, or - more
appropriate here - big ears on little elves.
Analogies such as this are sometimes useful to use in the explicative
form, and conducive to usenet.
Unfortunately, the French riffraff here are to manners and intellect
what Don Rickles is to humor; crude, mean-spirited, and obscene.
And that is the format they present here.
Short and mean insults. No real thought behind them.
A most disturbing waste of wit that could be better used to form
coherent argument.
Very similar to Beavis and Butthead, which I'm sure is the favorite TV
program for many of them.
Nothing for it really, and they must be dealt with in the polite but
dismissive manner we more noble are accustomed to using in such situations.
The Monty Python piece I've used as a means to roughly limn the parties
involved here fails in the end, where it ends in "Run Away!"
We are real American champions, not Brits of the dark ages.
We do not run away from adversity.

Jim - (This is my uncle's reply - he wanted to comment.)

On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:52:42 -0500, Jim wrote:

wrote:


The Usenet world and I know that she's trolling. I make the
occasional comment, and she makes daily sweeps through the NG taking
potshots, often desultory and incoherent, across the spectrum for who
knows what purpose. I enjoy a good debate. I don't enjoy nonsense.
It's as though its a competition for who can submit the most acerbic
nonsense between JPS, De Plume, and Harry. What's amusing in this,
though, is that they all seem to think they're the creme de la creme
of thinkers, and this in the face of the constant enfilade of informal
fallacies they employ in almost every note. Too, De Plume engaged me
in this thread and she calls me a troll? How ironic.

Yes, you've explained that reality very well.
Please continue reading this piece from Monty Python and the Holy Grail,
and my following comments.

ARTHUR: Now look here, my good man--
FRENCH GUARD: I don't wanna talk to you no more, you empty headed
animal food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! You mother
was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!
GALAHAD: Is there someone else up there we could talk to?
FRENCH GUARD: No, now go away or I shall taunt you a second time-a!
[sniff]
ARTHUR: Now, this is your last chance. I've been more than reasonable.
FRENCH GUARD: (Fetchez la vache.)
OTHER FRENCH GUARD: Quoi?
FRENCH GUARD: (Fetchez la vache!) [mooo]
ARTHUR: If you do not agree to my commands, then I shall--
[twong] [mooooooo] Jesus Christ!
KNIGHTS: Christ! [thud] Ah! Ohh!
ARTHUR: Right! Charge!
KNIGHTS: Charge! [mayhem]
FRENCH GUARD: Hey, this one is for your mother! There you go.
[mayhem]
FRENCH GUARD: And this one's for your dad!
ARTHUR: Run away!
KNIGHTS: Run away!

It is clear that rec.boats has its Arthur, Knights, and French riffraff.
If you haven't seen the film, what happens at the (twong) is that the
French catapult a cow at Arthur and the English knights.
The French are a nasty and nefarious lot, and know not the meaning of
shame, or the proper use of a cow.
You are an Arthur, and sometimes a Knight, as are Scotty, Tom, John,
Dan, Steve, myself and the others here who are clear thinking gentlemen.
Our roles change, but out gentle and thinking matter remains constant.
The French riffraff are the deplums, Harrys, Don's, Loogys, jps's, etc.
The usual suspects.
They stick out like sore thumbs on a concert pianist, or - more
appropriate here - big ears on little elves.
Analogies such as this are sometimes useful to use in the explicative
form, and conducive to usenet.
Unfortunately, the French riffraff here are to manners and intellect
what Don Rickles is to humor; crude, mean-spirited, and obscene.
And that is the format they present here.
Short and mean insults. No real thought behind them.
A most disturbing waste of wit that could be better used to form
coherent argument.
Very similar to Beavis and Butthead, which I'm sure is the favorite TV
program for many of them.
Nothing for it really, and they must be dealt with in the polite but
dismissive manner we more noble are accustomed to using in such situations.
The Monty Python piece I've used as a means to roughly limn the parties
involved here fails in the end, where it ends in "Run Away!"
We are real American champions, not Brits of the dark ages.
We do not run away from adversity.

Jim - (This is my uncle's reply - he wanted to comment.)

Yikes. Righties aren't allowed to use the humor of the left.

Shame on you!

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:26:40 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:57:49 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:55:43 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:19:46 -0700, jps wrote:


Maybe the world's young people are finally getting the message.

CAPE TOWN, South Africa — South Africa's far-right leader Eugene
Terreblanche who campaigned for a separate white homeland was murdered
on Saturday on his farm, the SAPA news agency reported.

he should have moved to texas. they would have made him governor.

Too late for him now, fortunately.

The cruel irony is that Progressivism is so...malevolent.

tell it to MLK. seems the right killed him because he wanted rights.