On 4/25/10 1:35 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleEeadnTZTnLWn70nWnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...
Please explain how I am a racist, since I do not have racist thoughts or
make derogatory comments about those whose "race" differs from mine and,
in fact, am happy to associate with people of good will, no matter how
good or bad a tan they have.

As long as their political beliefs are acceptable to you?


Try reading for content, stupid. I don't give a damn about skin color.
Hell, in my younger, single days, I gladly dated women of a variety of
skin colors, and had and still have close friends and associates of the
same variety. Hell, my wife is about as pale a "whitey" as you can be,
with her Irish and Nordic ancestry, mixed in with about 1/8th Cherokee.
Me, I just have enough of a European based ancestry to be a typical mutt.

As I have said before your words about race do not agree 99% of the
time.


I have no idea what that means.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:50:51 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/04/2010 9:13 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 08:55:47 -0600,
wrote:

more right wing bull****. i'm a scientist and go with the evidence.
the GINI coefficient is a measure of how equally income is distributed
among economic groups

guess which, of 26 countries, has the worst GINI coefficient

you right whiners. you have your bull**** mythology. and that's all
you need.

Tell me, besides the slums where you live, have you ever lived outside
of the county/state/USA??? Or did the 5 days in Mexico Holiday Inn make
you an international expert?

notice how he doesn't address the issue? notice how, instead of
dealing with objective facts, he ****es his diaper when shown he's
wrong?

yes, i grew up in the slums. and i worked my way through college WITH
THE HELP OF GOVT GRANTS for tutition.

i'm proud to admit my dad was a steelworker. i'm proud of labor
unions. i'm proud of being middle class

you? you make ALL of these a punching bag for your elitist right wing
theology that favors ONLY the rich.


I am sure I can come up with all sorts of bull**** stats to say anything
I want. I looked at the GINI coefficient thing once an all I saw was
bull****. So what about the disparity...that has nothing to do with
happyness and wealth.

uh huh. it's bull****. why?

well...because it doesnt fit his right wing mythology.


But I am game to do GINI. The three largest economies in the world, US,
India and China are both mid-pack in their ratings.

well, no. that's BEFORE taxes. look at it AFTER taxes

christ you cant even read a freakin' CHART!!

Canada with 0.5% of the worlds population and the 2nd largest country in
the world, you don't see it as a top of the line for immigration. We
let in what the US rejects.

hey genius. guess how many americans have overseas roots?


Canada, not as many "rich" as they move offshore to escape the punative
taxes. Taking their wealth with them. Most people in Canada go to work
and don't give a ****, low motivation.

oh. i didn't realize you hated the CANADIAN middle class, too!!


I would rather look at a crime and weather maps to look for where to
live. Hell, I could have stayed in low GINI coefcient Norway if I
wanted, better coefficient than Canada even. But it was a suffocating,
frozen wasteland and people didn't have the money to enjoy life.

oh, yes. and in the US, after 30 years of right wing bull****, and 10
years with NO pay increases, americans had to BORROW just to feed
their families.

and you? you HATE the middle class


But GINI be your model as you are motivated by envy and greed of other
peoples wealth.

ROFLMAO!! i can see it now. if he lived in mexico he'd be justifying
the rich, there, too.

he can't conceive of a situation where the rich are EVER evil. or
steal from teh middle class

in his right wing mind, facts are useless. mythology is all that
matters

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:02:46 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


So what is your pick? Inherited? Lotto? Why cannot bpuharic and
others get off their lazy asses and get a piece of the pie? What really
limits them other than their letharic hopeless attitude?

me and 100,000,000 other americans. social mobility in the US is the
lowest of any industrialized country.

to the right wing, this is proof of god's existence. the poor DESERVE
to be poor. the rich got that way because they worked hard and would
NEVER steal from teh middle class

more right wing bull****

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:08:18 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/04/2010 9:00 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 08:46:17 -0600,
wrote:


Need that "free" health care paid for by other peoples money... LOL.

we already pay for other people. ever been in the medical field?

no. i thought not.

We do and we shouldn't. I say this as if they can't manage their own
lives, perhaps they should be humble enough to let someone take them in
like lost sheep. Maybe learn something. That is if someone wants them.

what's funny is how much evidence he ignores.

-when it's pointed out the US is the least redistributionist country
in the western world (by the GINI coefficient) he says he's doing fine
so 100,000,000 americans must be lazy
-when it's pointed out there's less social mobility in the US, he says
the right wing doesn't admit this because the right wing would be
wrong if that were true.
-when it's pointed out socialized medicine is better than america's
free market system, he says that's not true because no one gets rich
from socilized medicine.

he lives in a right wing bubble where 100,000,000 hard working
americans deserve slavery so a few people can be rich.


Maslow had it right, we are all needy and greedy. And it is a decay of
the system when taxes can be used to prop up the lazy and corporations
for the name of "socialism". Want socialism, move to Cuba.

where's sociialism? where? if there's socialism in the US, show it to
me. right now the US govt owns precisely 0.8% of the economy.

you are full of right wing bull**** lies. not a single thing you say
is true and it's easily refuted with objective facts.


Trick is, want a piece of the pie, work for it. Big difference between
hand outs and hand ups. Beggars want handouts.

bull**** right wing cliches. you don't think. you spout.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:09:22 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



Yep, and life is too short to waste on envy of others and money arguments.

if canuck had his way, we'd still be part of the british empire

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:14:44 -0400, hk
wrote:





You spend most of your time here expressing your envy of others and in
"money arguments."

AND he bitches about people who think for themselves, and want a
better life for their children. he says the rich are the only ones who
matter.


You have no boat, right? Do you have a car? You claim to be wealthy...so
what's your house look like? How many dress suits do you own that you've
bought in the last couple of years? How much do you pay for your suits?

he's too busy looking in the mirror and doing whatever it is he does
to make himself feel like he's the most important guy around

hk wrote:
On 4/25/10 1:09 PM, Canuck57 wrote:


Yep, and life is too short to waste on envy of others and money
arguments.



You spend most of your time here expressing your envy of others and in
"money arguments."

My guess is that you don't have two nickels to rub together, that you
are scared ****less about what happens when your job ends, and that you
are expressing nothing more here than bravado.

You have no boat, right? Do you have a car? You claim to be wealthy...so
what's your house look like? How many dress suits do you own that you've
bought in the last couple of years? How much do you pay for your suits?


Typical Krause bull****. Get an honest guy like Canuck talking, then
slam him when he contradicts himself.
This BS never ends. Because Krause sees in black and white, and most
others see the entire spectrum of light.
So Canuck uses "money" as an obvious symbol for explaining all of all
the other cultural problems, and Krause slams him for talking about
money all the time.
Canuck, you should stay away from this guy.
He's bad news, and will distort whatever you say.
Same with bpharuc, and defumes. Name callers.

Jim - Just friendly advice.

In article ,
says...

On 4/25/10 1:35 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleEeadnTZTnLWn70nWnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...
Please explain how I am a racist, since I do not have racist thoughts or
make derogatory comments about those whose "race" differs from mine and,
in fact, am happy to associate with people of good will, no matter how
good or bad a tan they have.

As long as their political beliefs are acceptable to you?


Try reading for content, stupid. I don't give a damn about skin color.
Hell, in my younger, single days, I gladly dated women of a variety of
skin colors, and had and still have close friends and associates of the
same variety. Hell, my wife is about as pale a "whitey" as you can be,
with her Irish and Nordic ancestry, mixed in with about 1/8th Cherokee.
Me, I just have enough of a European based ancestry to be a typical mutt.

As I have said before your words about race do not agree 99% of the
time.


I have no idea what that means.

Race is a central issue in your life and is prominent in your writings
here. You always speak in terms of race. Dr. Martin Luther King would
chastise your for you inability to get beyond the skin color of your
fellow man and not see the content of his character.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:03:30 -0400, BAR wrote:



Race is a central issue in your life and is prominent in your writings
here. You always speak in terms of race. Dr. Martin Luther King would
chastise your for you inability to get beyond the skin color of your
fellow man and not see the content of his character.

ROFLMAO!! why did dr king give speeches?

because he was fighting racism. guess you kinda forgot that, didn't
you?

funny, how the oppressors are always willing to tell us the oppression
doesn't exist anymore. just like the bishops who say we should all
listen to the catholic church because they've handled the abuse issue.

On 4/25/10 2:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:03:30 -0400, wrote:



Race is a central issue in your life and is prominent in your writings
here. You always speak in terms of race. Dr. Martin Luther King would
chastise your for you inability to get beyond the skin color of your
fellow man and not see the content of his character.

ROFLMAO!! why did dr king give speeches?

because he was fighting racism. guess you kinda forgot that, didn't
you?

funny, how the oppressors are always willing to tell us the oppression
doesn't exist anymore. just like the bishops who say we should all
listen to the catholic church because they've handled the abuse issue.


Racism is an important component of the GOP these days, along with its
subgroups, the teabaggers and the militias. It is always worthy of
mention, to rub the rights' face in its racism.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.