Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know that the ancient engines recommended using a quart of 30 weight
engine oil to gallons of gas, which was primitive, then with 2-cycle oils the recommended mix ratio went from 24 to 50 to one, Now the synthetics are going up to 100:1 ratios and for a modern 2 cycle I think that's OK, but I'm not sure about the designs of the 70's. My brother is an Amzoil dealer and he things it's the greatest thing since malted milk, and I like synthetic 2 cycle oil, but I'm wondering about the recommended mix ratio. personally I think 100:1 is a bit thin. Anyone have any thoughts? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/23/10 8:55 AM, Tim wrote:
I know that the ancient engines recommended using a quart of 30 weight engine oil to gallons of gas, which was primitive, then with 2-cycle oils the recommended mix ratio went from 24 to 50 to one, Now the synthetics are going up to 100:1 ratios and for a modern 2 cycle I think that's OK, but I'm not sure about the designs of the 70's. My brother is an Amzoil dealer and he things it's the greatest thing since malted milk, and I like synthetic 2 cycle oil, but I'm wondering about the recommended mix ratio. personally I think 100:1 is a bit thin. Anyone have any thoughts? Yeah...use a half a pint of the old-fashioned oil to a gallon of gas, just like we used to do. It worked just fine, smelled great, and left a trail of smoke you could follow to get home. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:55:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: My brother is an Amzoil dealer and he things it's the greatest thing since malted milk, and I like synthetic 2 cycle oil, but I'm wondering about the recommended mix ratio. personally I think 100:1 is a bit thin. Anyone have any thoughts? Yes. If you get it wrong on the light side, you're going to lose an engine. Wrong the other way you'll just use a bit more oil and change plugs more often. Seems like an easy choice to me. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 23, 11:00*am, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:55:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My brother is an Amzoil dealer and he things it's the greatest thing since malted milk, and I like synthetic 2 cycle oil, but I'm wondering about the recommended mix ratio. personally I think 100:1 is a bit thin. Anyone have any thoughts? Yes. *If you get it wrong on the light side, you're going to lose an engine. * Wrong the other way you'll just use a bit more oil and change plugs more often. *Seems like an easy choice to me. Yep. I think that 100:1 is a bit extreme unless you're gambling with a $79.00 weed eater. I'm trying to figure out the 'just right' mixture. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:55:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My brother is an Amzoil dealer and he things it's the greatest thing since malted milk, and I like synthetic 2 cycle oil, but I'm wondering about the recommended mix ratio. personally I think 100:1 is a bit thin. Anyone have any thoughts? Yes. If you get it wrong on the light side, you're going to lose an engine. Wrong the other way you'll just use a bit more oil and change plugs more often. Seems like an easy choice to me. I agree. IIRC the VRO systems (90s) varied the mix from 25- 100:1. Maybe it was 50-100:1. I use 50:1 in both of mine and they do get gummy if I do a lot of trolling but it's worth the assurance that my mix isn't going to cause harm. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 23, 11:20*am, "mmc" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:55:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My brother is an Amzoil dealer and he things it's the greatest thing since malted milk, and I like synthetic 2 cycle oil, but I'm wondering about the recommended mix ratio. personally I think 100:1 is a bit thin. Anyone have any thoughts? Yes. *If you get it wrong on the light side, you're going to lose an engine. * Wrong the other way you'll just use a bit more oil and change plugs more often. *Seems like an easy choice to me. I agree. IIRC the VRO systems (90s) varied the mix from 25- 100:1. Maybe it was 50-100:1. I use 50:1 in both of mine and they do get gummy if I do a lot of trolling but it's worth the assurance that my mix isn't going to cause harm. Fortunately, this isnt' a VRO engine and if it was I'd disconnect that really quick. I've had friends that have found out that it wasn't trustworthy.neither was the alarm. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 23, 8:55*am, Tim wrote:
I know that the ancient engines recommended using a quart of 30 weight engine oil to gallons of gas, which was primitive, then with 2-cycle oils the recommended mix ratio went from 24 to 50 to one, Now the synthetics are going up to 100:1 ratios and for a modern 2 cycle I think that's OK, but I'm not sure about the designs of the 70's. My brother is an Amzoil dealer and he things it's the greatest thing since malted milk, and I like synthetic 2 cycle oil, but I'm wondering about the recommended mix ratio. personally I think 100:1 is a bit thin. Anyone have any thoughts? It's snake oil! There are thousands of tests out there that will show that regular 2 stroke oil and Amsoil is the same when it comes to engine wear and tear. Your engine isn't 100:1 ratio by the way. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 23, 12:04*pm, Tim wrote:
On Apr 23, 11:00*am, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:55:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My brother is an Amzoil dealer and he things it's the greatest thing since malted milk, and I like synthetic 2 cycle oil, but I'm wondering about the recommended mix ratio. personally I think 100:1 is a bit thin. Anyone have any thoughts? Yes. *If you get it wrong on the light side, you're going to lose an engine. * Wrong the other way you'll just use a bit more oil and change plugs more often. *Seems like an easy choice to me. Yep. I think that 100:1 is a bit extreme unless you're gambling with a $79.00 weed eater. I'm trying to figure out the 'just right' mixture. 50:1 |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 23, 12:40*pm, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:55*am, Tim wrote: I know that the ancient engines recommended using a quart of 30 weight engine oil to gallons of gas, which was primitive, then with 2-cycle oils the recommended mix ratio went from 24 to 50 to one, Now the synthetics are going up to 100:1 ratios and for a modern 2 cycle I think that's OK, but I'm not sure about the designs of the 70's. My brother is an Amzoil dealer and he things it's the greatest thing since malted milk, and I like synthetic 2 cycle oil, but I'm wondering about the recommended mix ratio. personally I think 100:1 is a bit thin. Anyone have any thoughts? It's snake oil! There are thousands of tests out there that will show that regular 2 stroke oil and Amsoil is the same when it comes to engine wear and tear. Your engine isn't 100:1 ratio by the way. Well, 50:1 is the accepted norm, and I know the lubrication qualities of modern 2 cycle oils are good, and both petroleum and synthetic oils are probably compatable in that aspect, but what I was looking for in the synthetic is less smoke, ash build up and goo on cold spark plugs. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What 2 cycle oil to use in 115 hp v-4 Evinrude | General | |||
Help me ID this Evinrude, 2-cycle or 4-cycle? | General | |||
Outboards - 2 vs 4 Cycle | General | |||
Merc's New BIG Four Cycle OB... | General | |||
2 cycle oil | Cruising |