On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:05:41 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:03:41 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:42:46 -0400, wrote:


yeah go figure. for 30 years the right told us to trust wall street.
they told us that even social security should be turned over to wall
street.

remember that little horror story that george bush tried to p ush?

how'd it work out?

Over 30 years? It worked out great.

for whom? the middle class that didn't get a raise in this time? that
has to shop at wal mart to make ends meet?

yeah. worked out great for wal mart

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,

You have your panties in a wad over a 2 year correction that has
recovered most of what it lost. If you were selective in your holding
you are doing quite a bit better than you were 5 years ago.

wow. i'm 55 now. i can retire at 70 instead of 65

great

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,


Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,


Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression


Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his depression.

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,


Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression


Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his depression.



Two years?? I guess April really means January in gibberish.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Apr 28, 12:16*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message

...





"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,

Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression

Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. *Is now his depression.

Two years?? I guess April really means January in gibberish.

--
Nom=de=Plume

To you, D'Plume, it probably does.

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Apr 28, 12:16 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message

...





"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,

Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression

Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his depression.

Two years?? I guess April really means January in gibberish.

--
Nom=de=Plume

To you, D'Plume, it probably does.


You're just as much an idiot if you think Obama has been president for two
years. Well, back to ignoring your posts...

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:01:43 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,


Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression


Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his depression.

the cause wasn't his; the cure is

and it's working

On 4/28/10 6:17 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:01:43 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400, wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,


Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression


Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his depression.

the cause wasn't his; the cure is

and it's working



You're dealing with "McKee Think" here, which is, of course, the
opposite of think. Obama inherited an economy that was being flushed
down the crapper with tremendous force. It took Herculean efforts to
first slow that decline, which Obama seems to have done, and now we can
concentrate on trying to reverse some of the effects of the Great Bush
Recession. This is going to take years.

The Bush-GOP legacy...a near depression, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, a
drop in U.S. prestige around the world, the aftermath of Katrina, a
severely divided nation, and, of course, attacks on civil liberties.

Thanks, Dubya.



--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Bill McKee wrote:
"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.
thanks to obama,

Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000
if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression


Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his depression.

More like 4 years if you count the campaigning.
That has an effect on things too.
And don't forget he was in the Dem controlled Senate.

Jim - Don't expect a lib to be able to count.

On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:41:50 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/28/10 6:17 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:01:43 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


the cause wasn't his; the cure is

and it's working



You're dealing with "McKee Think" here, which is, of course, the
opposite of think. Obama inherited an economy that was being flushed
down the crapper with tremendous force. It took Herculean efforts to
first slow that decline, which Obama seems to have done, and now we can
concentrate on trying to reverse some of the effects of the Great Bush
Recession. This is going to take years.

The Bush-GOP legacy...a near depression, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, a
drop in U.S. prestige around the world, the aftermath of Katrina, a
severely divided nation, and, of course, attacks on civil liberties.

Thanks, Dubya.

yep. and 60% of americans blame bush. they're not fooled. only the far
right is:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the...democrats.html