Another boating hazard
 

On 5/8/10 11:59 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 11:31 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:





On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:

That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.

I would guess the answer is in your own statement up there,
DumFochLoogy. Who says the calls were made without identification? I
didn't say that. Who says the offices of well-known criminal defense
lawyers don't have "connections" with court clerks, magistrates, and
"wants and warrants" desks? I didn't say that. One of your many problems
is that your world of real-life knowledge is...limited, as is your
intellect.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just how the **** do you show proper credentials over the phone,
moron???? BTW, when you first tried this lie, I called the
jurisdiction in question and asked. You are a ****ing liar.


Sure, loogyfocher...*You* believe you.


--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Another boating hazard
 

In article ,
says...
Funny how you have "stalked" yourself by providing the information to
others.

I indirectly got you to out yourself as an employee, ok you claim to be
a contractor, at Ullico. BTW, did you ever disgorge your illictly gotten
profits from WorldCom, like the rest of the Ullico executives were
compelled to do?

You outed your self to others as to your location in Calvert County
Maryland.

If you live in Maryland it is very easy to find out about the onwer of
each and every piece of property.

Y'all keep trying, Boatless Bert.

BTW, I was never on the board or a senior officer at ULLICO, so
therefore I was not a shareholder in that corporation. I'll leave it to
your birdbrain abilities to figure out the rest.


How did you manage to get in on the stock options deal to make a bundle
on WorldCom? You know the money that enabled you to buy the 36'
Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat?

Another boating hazard
 

In article ,
says...




Y'all keep trying, Boatless Bert.

BTW, I was never on the board or a senior officer at ULLICO, so
therefore I was not a shareholder in that corporation. I'll leave it to
your birdbrain abilities to figure out the rest.



Weren't you a public relations representative or some such? How long did
you manage to hang on to that job?



He didn't have it long after the NRLB, SEC and other government
regulatory agencies came snooping around. I wonder if Harry's departure
was due to an agreement not to prosecute to do making known false
statements? Or, was Harry just a lousy PR guy.

Another boating hazard
 

In article ,
says...

On 5/8/10 11:50 AM, BAR wrote:
In articledbWdnRZtu_lHHnjWnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...

On 5/8/10 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:



That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.


I would guess the answer is in your own statement up there,
DumFochLoogy. Who says the calls were made without identification? I

Whatever happend to Jim from Ohio?

didn't say that. Who says the offices of well-known criminal defense
lawyers don't have "connections" with court clerks, magistrates, and
"wants and warrants" desks? I didn't say that. One of your many problems
is that your world of real-life knowledge is...limited, as is your
intellect.

What's the matter pussy boy, you can't stand up for yourself?





Boatless Bert...yawn. Why are you not out golfing with your "planning
his next surgery" buddy, John "The Racist" Herring?

I played one round of golf with John H about two years ago.

I have no idea what John H is or is not doing this month.

Racism is the domain of the Democrats.

Another boating hazard
 

On 5/8/10 12:59 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...




Y'all keep trying, Boatless Bert.

BTW, I was never on the board or a senior officer at ULLICO, so
therefore I was not a shareholder in that corporation. I'll leave it to
your birdbrain abilities to figure out the rest.



Weren't you a public relations representative or some such? How long did
you manage to hang on to that job?



He didn't have it long after the NRLB, SEC and other government
regulatory agencies came snooping around.

Wrong again, Boatless Bert.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Another boating hazard
 

In article ,
says...

On 5/8/10 11:41 AM, moose wrote:
On 5/8/2010 11:34 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/8/10 11:32 AM, moose wrote:
On 5/8/2010 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:



That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another
name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.

A lot of data is in the public record. You could learn a lot about Harry
if you knew where to look. A lot of it is archived here on rec.boats.
Name, address, phone numbers, so called wife's real name. Some of it is
in Calvert County records, but not under Harry's name. Some of it can be
goggled. Can't seem to find any public records in Georgia though.


Stalking again, flajim?

Just stating some facts.
Would you mind telling us which state and city your marriage license and
certificate were issued in. We'd like to give you opportunity to prove
that you are married and to whom.

Ireland.

Figures you had to go off shore and buy a bride. I'll bet she married
you figuring that you would have a stroke and die sooner rather than
later.

Another boating hazard
 

On 5/8/10 12:56 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
Funny how you have "stalked" yourself by providing the information to
others.

I indirectly got you to out yourself as an employee, ok you claim to be
a contractor, at Ullico. BTW, did you ever disgorge your illictly gotten
profits from WorldCom, like the rest of the Ullico executives were
compelled to do?

You outed your self to others as to your location in Calvert County
Maryland.

If you live in Maryland it is very easy to find out about the onwer of
each and every piece of property.

Y'all keep trying, Boatless Bert.

BTW, I was never on the board or a senior officer at ULLICO, so
therefore I was not a shareholder in that corporation. I'll leave it to
your birdbrain abilities to figure out the rest.


How did you manage to get in on the stock options deal to make a bundle
on WorldCom? You know the money that enabled you to buy the 36'
Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat?



Why would you think I would give you any specific info, Boatless Bert,
other than saying that all the transactions were completely above board
and had nothing to do with ULLICO or any related organization?


--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Another boating hazard
 

On 5/8/10 1:07 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleJdKdnZc0w68kFHjWnZ2dnUVZ_oAAAAAA@earthlink .com,
says...

On 5/8/10 11:41 AM, moose wrote:
On 5/8/2010 11:34 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/8/10 11:32 AM, moose wrote:
On 5/8/2010 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:



That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another
name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.

A lot of data is in the public record. You could learn a lot about Harry
if you knew where to look. A lot of it is archived here on rec.boats.
Name, address, phone numbers, so called wife's real name. Some of it is
in Calvert County records, but not under Harry's name. Some of it can be
goggled. Can't seem to find any public records in Georgia though.


Stalking again, flajim?

Just stating some facts.
Would you mind telling us which state and city your marriage license and
certificate were issued in. We'd like to give you opportunity to prove
that you are married and to whom.

Ireland.

Figures you had to go off shore and buy a bride. I'll bet she married
you figuring that you would have a stroke and die sooner rather than
later.

Yet another example of your simple-minded stupidity, Boatless Bert. I
neither said nor implied she was not a native-born, U.S. citizen. Also,
the ceremony was not in Ireland...I just tossed that out. But it was in
a "foreign" country.



--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Another boating hazard
 

In article ,
says...

Figures you had to go off shore and buy a bride. I'll bet she married
you figuring that you would have a stroke and die sooner rather than
later.

Yet another example of your simple-minded stupidity, Boatless Bert. I
neither said nor implied she was not a native-born, U.S. citizen. Also,
the ceremony was not in Ireland...I just tossed that out. But it was in
a "foreign" country.

Nice try Harry. You bought a bride from Ireland. You couldn't con a
woman from the US into marrying you after your first failed marriage.
That female grape-vine must have put the word out on you. Or, you
picture was up in the post offices.

Another boating hazard
 

On 5/8/10 1:26 PM, BAR wrote:
In article17GdnT_q5tyqAHjWnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...

Figures you had to go off shore and buy a bride. I'll bet she married
you figuring that you would have a stroke and die sooner rather than
later.

Yet another example of your simple-minded stupidity, Boatless Bert. I
neither said nor implied she was not a native-born, U.S. citizen. Also,
the ceremony was not in Ireland...I just tossed that out. But it was in
a "foreign" country.

Nice try Harry. You bought a bride from Ireland. You couldn't con a
woman from the US into marrying you after your first failed marriage.
That female grape-vine must have put the word out on you. Or, you
picture was up in the post offices.




You poor dumb little ****...no wonder you joined the marines instead of
going to college. You were too stupid to get into NOVA but the marines
were glad to get you.

Sorry, Boatless Bert. My wife has Irish-German-Scotch ancestry, along
with Cherokee ancestry. She was born right here in the United States of
Amerika. As were her mother and father, and dozens of their predecessors.

As dumb as you are, you must have your wife wipe your ass, because it
seems unlikely you could do it yourself.


--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.