Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/11/10 8:46 AM, John H wrote:
On Jul 10, 7:52 pm, Harry wrote: ...it is out to **** us all...forever... General George Casey, the Chief of Staff of the Army, said today the United States could face another "decade or so" of persistent conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan. In two months, the U.S. will have been at war in Afghanistan for nine years. - - - These whores will do anything to stay in uniform. Harry, it's not August yet, but I'm going to give you an early reply to one of your posts. Your comment about General Casey's remarks was about the most stupid, ****ing thing you've said in years. Now I know some folks will argue about it was *really* the *most* stupid thing you've said, but they're wrong. It was. Generals do not keep wars going. Politicians keep wars going. Obama could have had us out of both Iraq and Afghanistan well over a year ago. *Obama* is making the choice of keeping us there. General Casey is noting that it could take another decade or so to accomplish what the friggin' politician, to wit: Obama, wants to accomplish. Since Obama has his head up his ass and doesn't have any idea of his goals over there, your grandchildren could well end up there. If things change in your family, you might even hear about it. Pray for a Republican president. She'll probably either **** or get off the pot with regard to Afghanistan. Remember the Iraq surge that 'wouldn't work' but did? OK, see you again in September...unless you do some *really* stupid again. Wow...herring thinks I give a damn whether he responds directly to one of my posts. That's some ego working over there in herringville. The posit is that the "officer corps" will do anything it can to stay in uniform, including prolonging war. Without a heavy-duty war to keep themselves busy, the officer corps will shrink, and so should the amount of dollars wasted on the "military-industrial" complex. The last presidents we had who knew anything real about "modern" war and the military from the highest levels were Eisenhower and to a lesser degree, George H.W. Bush. There is nothing worth accomplishing in Afghanistan. If Obama thinks otherwise, it is because his "military advisers" told him there was. The Iraqi surge merely postponed the inevitable. Iraq will fall apart once we pull out. Either that, or it will be ruled by a right-winger with close ties to some ayatollah. The military establishment will **** us over every time. If it didn't, half of its officers would be mustered out to become substitute teachers. |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry " wrote in message m... On 7/11/10 8:46 AM, John H wrote: On Jul 10, 7:52 pm, Harry wrote: ...it is out to **** us all...forever... General George Casey, the Chief of Staff of the Army, said today the United States could face another "decade or so" of persistent conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan. In two months, the U.S. will have been at war in Afghanistan for nine years. - - - These whores will do anything to stay in uniform. Harry, it's not August yet, but I'm going to give you an early reply to one of your posts. Your comment about General Casey's remarks was about the most stupid, ****ing thing you've said in years. Now I know some folks will argue about it was *really* the *most* stupid thing you've said, but they're wrong. It was. Generals do not keep wars going. Politicians keep wars going. Obama could have had us out of both Iraq and Afghanistan well over a year ago. *Obama* is making the choice of keeping us there. General Casey is noting that it could take another decade or so to accomplish what the friggin' politician, to wit: Obama, wants to accomplish. Since Obama has his head up his ass and doesn't have any idea of his goals over there, your grandchildren could well end up there. If things change in your family, you might even hear about it. Pray for a Republican president. She'll probably either **** or get off the pot with regard to Afghanistan. Remember the Iraq surge that 'wouldn't work' but did? OK, see you again in September...unless you do some *really* stupid again. Wow...herring thinks I give a damn whether he responds directly to one of my posts. That's some ego working over there in herringville. The posit is that the "officer corps" will do anything it can to stay in uniform, including prolonging war. Without a heavy-duty war to keep themselves busy, the officer corps will shrink, and so should the amount of dollars wasted on the "military-industrial" complex. The last presidents we had who knew anything real about "modern" war and the military from the highest levels were Eisenhower and to a lesser degree, George H.W. Bush. There is nothing worth accomplishing in Afghanistan. If Obama thinks otherwise, it is because his "military advisers" told him there was. The Iraqi surge merely postponed the inevitable. Iraq will fall apart once we pull out. Either that, or it will be ruled by a right-winger with close ties to some ayatollah. The military establishment will **** us over every time. If it didn't, half of its officers would be mustered out to become substitute teachers. Pity the students...especially if they belong to a minority... eh Johnny! |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry ?" wrote in message m... On 7/11/10 8:46 AM, John H wrote: On Jul 10, 7:52 pm, Harry wrote: ...it is out to **** us all...forever... General George Casey, the Chief of Staff of the Army, said today the United States could face another "decade or so" of persistent conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan. In two months, the U.S. will have been at war in Afghanistan for nine years. - - - These whores will do anything to stay in uniform. Harry, it's not August yet, but I'm going to give you an early reply to one of your posts. Your comment about General Casey's remarks was about the most stupid, ****ing thing you've said in years. Now I know some folks will argue about it was *really* the *most* stupid thing you've said, but they're wrong. It was. Generals do not keep wars going. Politicians keep wars going. Obama could have had us out of both Iraq and Afghanistan well over a year ago. *Obama* is making the choice of keeping us there. General Casey is noting that it could take another decade or so to accomplish what the friggin' politician, to wit: Obama, wants to accomplish. Since Obama has his head up his ass and doesn't have any idea of his goals over there, your grandchildren could well end up there. If things change in your family, you might even hear about it. Pray for a Republican president. She'll probably either **** or get off the pot with regard to Afghanistan. Remember the Iraq surge that 'wouldn't work' but did? OK, see you again in September...unless you do some *really* stupid again. Wow...herring thinks I give a damn whether he responds directly to one of my posts. That's some ego working over there in herringville. The posit is that the "officer corps" will do anything it can to stay in uniform, including prolonging war. Without a heavy-duty war to keep themselves busy, the officer corps will shrink, and so should the amount of dollars wasted on the "military-industrial" complex. The last presidents we had who knew anything real about "modern" war and the military from the highest levels were Eisenhower and to a lesser degree, George H.W. Bush. There is nothing worth accomplishing in Afghanistan. If Obama thinks otherwise, it is because his "military advisers" told him there was. The Iraqi surge merely postponed the inevitable. Iraq will fall apart once we pull out. Either that, or it will be ruled by a right-winger with close ties to some ayatollah. The military establishment will **** us over every time. If it didn't, half of its officers would be mustered out to become substitute teachers. According to an eye witness, Obama has very little interest in being advised on military affairs. Obama does what he damn well pleases. He gives the orders. He da man. He your man, Howard the coward. |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/07/2010 9:32 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:11:26 -0400, "Harold'" wrote: "Harry wrote in message ... ...it is out to **** us all...forever... General George Casey, the Chief of Staff of the Army, said today the United States could face another "decade or so" of persistent conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan. In two months, the U.S. will have been at war in Afghanistan for nine years. - - - These whores will do anything to stay in uniform. Last time I checked O'Bama was the whore in charge. you pro terrorism? You can want our people out of there and not be pro-terrorism. So far this war is getting close to two times as long as WW II and no sight of peace. Which means we are not winning. And it is probably due to the fact that we in the west will not face up to what we are really fighting. We are not fighting an army but a cult of fascism and hate engrained right into families. If we can't extinguish the cult, the problem will persist. The enemy is islam itself. -- Government: We have Liberals (academic idealists), NDP (dreaming socialists) and Conservative (lawyer scum) but where is the middle class (common sense)? |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/07/2010 8:31 PM, lil abner wrote:
Harry ? wrote: ...it is out to **** us all...forever... General George Casey, the Chief of Staff of the Army, said today the United States could face another "decade or so" of persistent conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan. In two months, the U.S. will have been at war in Afghanistan for nine years,. - - - These whores will do anything to stay in uniform. So? Should we surrender and convert to Islam or what, because the fight is too long for your liking? Are you doing the fighting??? Just like the Drug addicts, Hippies and fifth columnist did to Viet Nam, Cambodia and the whole of Southeast Asia. How many millions, of lives did Congress's surrender, cost those people. Your mantra why win when we can surrender? America';s proper place is crawling on its belly begging the Muslims to leave us alone??? Whinny ass, hide behind Mama's apron bunch of socialists! As much as we hate war and don't want any of us to die, it ain't gonna happen. Like the Bible says there will be wars and rumors of wars til the end of time. Wishing the Hitlers, Stalins, Mao's, and Muhammad's, of the world will go away don't work. Agreed. But to make them go away you have to do what it takes. Policing them isn't going to work, the war will be going on for millenia as it does not work. The answer is massive sterilization and execution of islam radicals. Make them take polygraphs, execute supporters and RFID the rest. Treat them like rabid cattle and thin the herd of the diseased ones. This especially includes the cult leaders. -- Government: We have Liberals (academic idealists), NDP (dreaming socialists) and Conservative (lawyer scum) but where is the middle class (common sense)? |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 00:41:17 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:32:27 -0400, bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:11:26 -0400, "Harold'" wrote: These whores will do anything to stay in uniform. Last time I checked O'Bama was the whore in charge. you pro terrorism? Afghanistan has very little to do with terrorism. There may be less than 100 al queda in Afghanistan and we are spending about 100 million dollars a year each to try to kill them. how many al qaida do you need to launch a terrorist attack? how many taliban sympathizers in govt do you need to provide a base (look up the translation of 'al qaida)? This is a stupid way to waste our grand kid's money at a time when the country is in so much fiscal trouble. what would be more stupid is to allow another 9/11 Al queda has moved out. we have even less chance of securing the borders there than we do here. If we'd have said "Hey Mr. Taliban, if you hear some loud noises around Tora Bora, don't worry about it, just us coming in to "get some" for 9/11. Just letting you know so that you stay out of the line of fire." And then seriously going after that scum instead of going after the sitting government and half assing the assaullt on al queda when they were all in a cluster, we would be much better off than we are today. You don't have to beknowledgeable in military history to know that taking over a country is the easy part- holding a country is much harder, just ask anyone that has played the game "Risk". To me, taking over Afghanistan made as much sense as the rumors of that big weather changing machine tha USAF is supposed to have causing the Haiti earthquakes so that the US could take over the country. Who the hell in his or her right mind would want either country? |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The 100 in Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9/11. In case you haven't heard. Bin Laden's gang is supposed to be in Pakistan and he has been there since Tora Bora, about a trillion dollars and over a thousand coalition lives ago. And by driving them over the border instead of dealing with them when we had the chance, we've caused the destabilization of Pakistan by causing regional and ethnic rifts. Pakistan is a nuclear armed country and those nukes could end up in the hands of a government or faction that is controlled by or actually is al queda and/or taliban. That last round of White House ass clowns did us no favors, looking like the current group of ass clowns isn't going to fix things. We have hitched our hopes to a corrupt government in a country famous for grinding up super powers, somehow thinking everything will work out for us. We love throwing stones at other peoples corruption, but what about our own? Lobbyist, corporate sponsership of our politicians thru campaign contributions (remainders of which BELONG to the candidate after that particular election) and free media coverage all for sake of buying access and influence are legalized by the scum taking the payoffs. |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:34:59 -0400, "mmc" wrote:
"bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 00:41:17 -0400, wrote: This is a stupid way to waste our grand kid's money at a time when the country is in so much fiscal trouble. what would be more stupid is to allow another 9/11 Al queda has moved out. we have even less chance of securing the borders there than we do here. which is OK. we win the war if we prevent the taliban from taking power. If we'd have said "Hey Mr. Taliban, if you hear some loud noises around Tora Bora, don't worry about it, just us coming in to "get some" for 9/11. Just letting you know so that you stay out of the line of fire." on 9/11 there was no functional difference between AQ and the taliban. now there is. i have no objections at all to negotiating with elements of the taliban...as long as they keep their noses clean And then seriously going after that scum instead of going after the sitting government and half assing the assaullt on al queda when they were all in a cluster, we would be much better off than we are today. yep. bush screwed the pooch by trying to fight the war on the cheap. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Woman proves gun effective | General | |||
OT Michael Moore proves he is the sicko | ASA | |||
Google proves MacGregor 26 is flimsy | ASA | |||
Ellen proves the Good Captain Correct! | ASA |