On 8/13/10 11:39 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 13, 10:28 am, wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:05:49 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:





On Aug 13, 12:23 am, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:11:22 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact
that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest
factor in the deficit

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036

Umm, NO. The CBPP? The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the
liberal crackpot organization? Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna
try...

got any data of your own?

oh. you dont

figures

"As such, despite what the Left and their media minions have been
claiming, 82 percent of the Bush tax cuts benefited the poor, middle-
class, and upper-middle class in this country. "

WTF??

uh...which has NOTHING to do with the FACT the bush tax cuts raped the
economy and caused our MASSIVE deficits

I was adressing your false statement about the Bush tax cuts being for
the rich, idiot.


and the biggest benefit to the bush tax cuts went to the wealthy

http://www.factcheck.org/here_we_go_...rates_tax.html

a 50K couple with no kids got a 1.5% tax cut. a million dollar guy got
3.8%

so your right wing bull**** is just another pile of steaming fresh
manure

Sorry, that was left wing data that debunks your old link.

To learn more about why the tax cut was a minot player in the deficit
go to:

http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ...119 9046.html

It's just one of many articles that debunks your liberal lies.


The WSJ is just another product in the Faux News stable, and therefore
everything it prints that isn't plain business results is bull****
right-wing propaganda.

You didn't know that, jackoff?

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

On Aug 13, 11:41*am, Harry wrote:
On 8/13/10 11:39 AM, Jack wrote:





On Aug 13, 10:28 am, *wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:05:49 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 13, 12:23 am, *wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:11:22 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact
that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest
factor in the deficit

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036

Umm, NO. *The CBPP? *The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the
liberal crackpot organization? *Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna
try...

got any data of your own?

oh. you dont

figures

"As such, despite what the Left and their media minions have been
claiming, 82 percent of the Bush tax cuts benefited the poor, middle-
class, and upper-middle class in this country. "

WTF??

uh...which has NOTHING to do with the FACT the bush tax cuts raped the
economy and caused our MASSIVE deficits

I was adressing your false statement about the Bush tax cuts being for
the rich, idiot.

and the biggest benefit to the bush tax cuts went to the wealthy

http://www.factcheck.org/here_we_go_...rates_tax.html

a 50K couple with no kids got a 1.5% tax cut. a million dollar guy got
3.8%

so your right wing bull**** is just another pile of steaming fresh
manure

Sorry, that was left wing data that debunks your old link.

To learn more about why the tax cut was a minot player in the deficit
go to:

http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ...48704738404575...

It's just one of many articles that debunks your liberal lies.

The WSJ is just another product in the Faux News stable, and therefore
everything it prints that isn't plain business results is bull****
right-wing propaganda.


Everything you write is a product of your many lies, and is therefore
tainted. No one beleives you, or cares.

You didn't know that, harold?

On 8/13/10 1:08 PM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 13, 11:41 am, wrote:
On 8/13/10 11:39 AM, Jack wrote:





On Aug 13, 10:28 am, wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:05:49 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 13, 12:23 am, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:11:22 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact
that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest
factor in the deficit

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036

Umm, NO. The CBPP? The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the
liberal crackpot organization? Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna
try...

got any data of your own?

oh. you dont

figures

"As such, despite what the Left and their media minions have been
claiming, 82 percent of the Bush tax cuts benefited the poor, middle-
class, and upper-middle class in this country. "

WTF??

uh...which has NOTHING to do with the FACT the bush tax cuts raped the
economy and caused our MASSIVE deficits

I was adressing your false statement about the Bush tax cuts being for
the rich, idiot.

and the biggest benefit to the bush tax cuts went to the wealthy

http://www.factcheck.org/here_we_go_...rates_tax.html

a 50K couple with no kids got a 1.5% tax cut. a million dollar guy got
3.8%

so your right wing bull**** is just another pile of steaming fresh
manure

Sorry, that was left wing data that debunks your old link.

To learn more about why the tax cut was a minot player in the deficit
go to:

http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ...48704738404575...

It's just one of many articles that debunks your liberal lies.

The WSJ is just another product in the Faux News stable, and therefore
everything it prints that isn't plain business results is bull****
right-wing propaganda.


Everything you write is a product of your many lies, and is therefore
tainted. No one beleives you, or cares.

You didn't know that, harold?

Poor delusional jackoff. I'm not looking for "belief" from racist
right-wing retards like you, fella.


--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

On Aug 13, 1:33*pm, Harry wrote:
On 8/13/10 1:08 PM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 13, 11:41 am, *wrote:
On 8/13/10 11:39 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 13, 10:28 am, * *wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:05:49 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 13, 12:23 am, * *wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:11:22 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact
that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest
factor in the deficit

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036

Umm, NO. *The CBPP? *The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the
liberal crackpot organization? *Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna
try...

got any data of your own?

oh. you dont

figures

"As such, despite what the Left and their media minions have been
claiming, 82 percent of the Bush tax cuts benefited the poor, middle-
class, and upper-middle class in this country. "

WTF??

uh...which has NOTHING to do with the FACT the bush tax cuts raped the
economy and caused our MASSIVE deficits

I was adressing your false statement about the Bush tax cuts being for
the rich, idiot.

and the biggest benefit to the bush tax cuts went to the wealthy

http://www.factcheck.org/here_we_go_...rates_tax.html

a 50K couple with no kids got a 1.5% tax cut. a million dollar guy got
3.8%

so your right wing bull**** is just another pile of steaming fresh
manure

Sorry, that was left wing data that debunks your old link.

To learn more about why the tax cut was a minot player in the deficit
go to:

http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ...48704738404575....

It's just one of many articles that debunks your liberal lies.

The WSJ is just another product in the Faux News stable, and therefore
everything it prints that isn't plain business results is bull****
right-wing propaganda.

Everything you write is a product of your many lies, and is therefore
tainted. *No one beleives you, or cares.

You didn't know that, harold?

Poor delusional jackoff. I'm not looking for "belief" from racist
right-wing retards like you, fella.

Keep heaping on that praise, harold. I love it... anything that
bothers you is OK in my book.