Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack" wrote in message ... On Aug 16, 3:19 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Aug 16, 10:43 am, Harry wrote: ...for the asshat conservatives who are so upset by the plans to build a mosque a few blocks from the site of the 9-11 attacks in New York City... One wonders if they are aware of the fact or care that after 9-11, a mosque was built and dedicated inside the Pentagon, the Washington, D.C.'s 9-11 attack site. Oh...and I sort of recall that the Marines were at least partially responsible for its construction and dedication there. Any asshats here who want to complain about the mosque at the Pentagon's ground zero? Nope... because there is no mosque in the Pentagon. "Think Progress argues that there's a mosque "inside" the Pentagon and cites a Salon essay by Justin Elliot as the source, a post titled, "Why did no one object to the 'Pentagon mosque'?" The only problem is that there is no "mosque" at the Pentagon. Elliot cites Navy imam Chaplain Abuhena Saifulislam in an attempt to smear conservatives as unhinged hypocrites, and then Elliot got picked up by Daily Kos and then finally back over to Think Progress." It's another left-wingnut circle jerk lie. There is no Pentagon mosque, liar. D'oh. But, those strip clubs near GZ are ok with you. Oh and the "other" mosque just four blocks away isn't ok either. They've only been there 40 years. Keep on with your right-wing bs. It makes you look so smart! Notice how I haven't said how I feel about the proposed mosque. I only commented on harry's posting of liberal wingnut lies he called "fact". Now, don't you feel really stupid? Oh wait... that's normal for you. ~jerk~ So, you think the mosque is ok. Cool. FYI, I corrected your post. |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:26:22 -0400, Harry ? wrote:
Conservatives *are* unhinged hypocrites. And there are muslims praying at the pentagon, formally, at least once a week. it's ironic that, a few years ago, a right wing theocrat, dinesh d'sousza, wrote an article advocating muslims and right wing xtians should join forces to kill gays. now right wingers want to put muslims in concentration camps. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 16, 5:17*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Aug 16, 3:19 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message .... On Aug 16, 10:43 am, Harry wrote: ...for the asshat conservatives who are so upset by the plans to build a mosque a few blocks from the site of the 9-11 attacks in New York City... One wonders if they are aware of the fact or care that after 9-11, a mosque was built and dedicated inside the Pentagon, the Washington, D.C.'s 9-11 attack site. Oh...and I sort of recall that the Marines were at least partially responsible for its construction and dedication there. Any asshats here who want to complain about the mosque at the Pentagon's ground zero? Nope... because there is no mosque in the Pentagon. "Think Progress argues that there's a mosque "inside" the Pentagon and cites a Salon essay by Justin Elliot as the source, a post titled, "Why did no one object to the 'Pentagon mosque'?" The only problem is that there is no "mosque" at the Pentagon. Elliot cites Navy imam Chaplain Abuhena Saifulislam in an attempt to smear conservatives as unhinged hypocrites, and then Elliot got picked up by Daily Kos and then finally back over to Think Progress." It's another left-wingnut circle jerk lie. *There is no Pentagon mosque, liar. D'oh. But, those strip clubs near GZ are ok with you. Oh and the "other" mosque just four blocks away isn't ok either. They've only been there 40 years. Keep on with your right-wing bs. It makes you look so smart! Notice how I haven't said how I feel about the proposed mosque. *I only commented on harry's posting of liberal wingnut lies he called "fact". Now, don't you feel really stupid? *Oh wait... that's normal for you. ~jerk~ So, you think the mosque is ok. Cool. FYI, I corrected your post. I don't think BO has a legal right to stop the construction. I do think he should have the fortitude to ask that it not be built. And I think the Islamic org that wants to build it should have the sensitivity, decency, and respect to not build it there. So while I'm not "OK" with it, if they build it, it's more damning of them than anything else. Thanks for fixing my post. You're right; you *are* a jerk. ~snerk~ |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack" wrote in message ... On Aug 16, 5:17 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Aug 16, 3:19 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Aug 16, 10:43 am, Harry wrote: ...for the asshat conservatives who are so upset by the plans to build a mosque a few blocks from the site of the 9-11 attacks in New York City... One wonders if they are aware of the fact or care that after 9-11, a mosque was built and dedicated inside the Pentagon, the Washington, D.C.'s 9-11 attack site. Oh...and I sort of recall that the Marines were at least partially responsible for its construction and dedication there. Any asshats here who want to complain about the mosque at the Pentagon's ground zero? Nope... because there is no mosque in the Pentagon. "Think Progress argues that there's a mosque "inside" the Pentagon and cites a Salon essay by Justin Elliot as the source, a post titled, "Why did no one object to the 'Pentagon mosque'?" The only problem is that there is no "mosque" at the Pentagon. Elliot cites Navy imam Chaplain Abuhena Saifulislam in an attempt to smear conservatives as unhinged hypocrites, and then Elliot got picked up by Daily Kos and then finally back over to Think Progress." It's another left-wingnut circle jerk lie. There is no Pentagon mosque, liar. D'oh. But, those strip clubs near GZ are ok with you. Oh and the "other" mosque just four blocks away isn't ok either. They've only been there 40 years. Keep on with your right-wing bs. It makes you look so smart! Notice how I haven't said how I feel about the proposed mosque. I only commented on harry's posting of liberal wingnut lies he called "fact". Now, don't you feel really stupid? Oh wait... that's normal for you. ~jerk~ So, you think the mosque is ok. Cool. FYI, I corrected your post. I don't think BO has a legal right to stop the construction. I do think he should have the fortitude to ask that it not be built. And I think the Islamic org that wants to build it should have the sensitivity, decency, and respect to not build it there. So while I'm not "OK" with it, if they build it, it's more damning of them than anything else. Thanks for fixing my post. You're right; you *are* a jerk. ~snerk~ Why should it not be built? Should they stop praying there (they've been doing that a while)? Should they move out of the one two blocks further away (they've been there 40 years)? How far away from GZ is ok with you? 10 blocks? 100 blocks? How about 1000 miles away? Keep thinking with your Rush/Palin brain. It's amusing. As though the building of cultural center is sooo important that it eclipses the Republican's crimes against the people of this country. You're the one who signed your stupid post with snerk. You're the imbecile and jerk. |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry wrote:
....for the asshat conservatives who are so upset by the plans to build a mosque a few blocks from the site of the 9-11 attacks in New York City... One wonders if they are aware of the fact or care that after 9-11, a mosque was built and dedicated inside the Pentagon, the Washington, D.C.'s 9-11 attack site. Oh...and I sort of recall that the Marines were at least partially responsible for its construction and dedication there. Any asshats here who want to complain about the mosque at the Pentagon's ground zero? Ferris? Ferris Bueller? SW Tom? Harry Reid is seeing the light.... Reid against plan to build mosque near ground zero http://my.earthlink.net/article/pho?guid=20100816/8aab82b3-42b6-4433-b339-12aecad80667&article_path=/article/top&article_guid=20100816/8aab82b3-42b6-4433-b339-12aecad80667 The site of a proposed mosque on Park Place is seen in lower Manhattan in New York, Monday, Aug. 16, 2010. PHILIP ELLIOTT From Associated Press August 16, 2010 4:36 PM EDT WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate's top Democrat on Monday came out against plans to build a mosque near the site of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, moving away from President Barack Obama on the controversial election-year issue. Locked in a tight race, Nevada Sen. Harry Reid became the highest profile Democrat to respond to Obama, who last week backed the right for the developers to build a mosque near ground zero. Since his comments Friday, the Democratic president and his aides have worked to explain the statement, which drew criticism from Republicans and Democrats alike. "The First Amendment protects freedom of religion," said Jim Manley, a Reid spokesman. "Senator Reid respects that, but thinks that the mosque should be built some place else." Critics have said the location of the mosque is insensitive because the terrorists who struck were Islamic extremists. The plans call for a $100 million Islamic center two blocks from where almost 3,000 people perished when hijacked jetliners slammed into the World Trade Center towers on Sept. 11, 2001. Reid is in a close campaign for re-election. A spokesman for Republican Sharron Angle, Reid's opponent, said Muslims have the right to worship anywhere, but Obama's support for construction of the mosque at ground zero "ignored the wishes of the American people, this time at the expense of victims of 9/11 and their families." Spokesman Jarrod Agen argued that the families consider the mosque at the World Trade Center site to be an "affront to the memories of their loved ones." He called on Reid to respond to Obama's comments. On Friday, Obama used an annual dinner at the White House celebrating the Islamic holy month of Ramadan to weigh in on a controversy that grabbed New York and the nation. "As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country," Obama said. "That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances," he said. While insisting that the place where the twin towers once stood was indeed "hallowed ground," Obama said that the proper way to honor it was to apply American values at the nearby property. In days since, White House aides have worked to dampen the political power behind the president's words. "I can't speak to the politics of what the Republicans are doing," deputy press secretary Bill Burton told reporters traveling with Obama to Wisconsin on Monday. But he said Obama "felt it was his obligation as president to address this." |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 16, 6:28*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Aug 16, 5:17 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message .... On Aug 16, 3:19 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Aug 16, 10:43 am, Harry wrote: ...for the asshat conservatives who are so upset by the plans to build a mosque a few blocks from the site of the 9-11 attacks in New York City... One wonders if they are aware of the fact or care that after 9-11, a mosque was built and dedicated inside the Pentagon, the Washington, D.C.'s 9-11 attack site. Oh...and I sort of recall that the Marines were at least partially responsible for its construction and dedication there. Any asshats here who want to complain about the mosque at the Pentagon's ground zero? Nope... because there is no mosque in the Pentagon. "Think Progress argues that there's a mosque "inside" the Pentagon and cites a Salon essay by Justin Elliot as the source, a post titled, "Why did no one object to the 'Pentagon mosque'?" The only problem is that there is no "mosque" at the Pentagon. Elliot cites Navy imam Chaplain Abuhena Saifulislam in an attempt to smear conservatives as unhinged hypocrites, and then Elliot got picked up by Daily Kos and then finally back over to Think Progress." It's another left-wingnut circle jerk lie. *There is no Pentagon mosque, liar. D'oh. But, those strip clubs near GZ are ok with you. Oh and the "other" mosque just four blocks away isn't ok either. They've only been there 40 years. Keep on with your right-wing bs. It makes you look so smart! Notice how I haven't said how I feel about the proposed mosque. *I only commented on harry's posting of liberal wingnut lies he called "fact". Now, don't you feel really stupid? *Oh wait... that's normal for you. ~jerk~ So, you think the mosque is ok. Cool. FYI, I corrected your post. I don't think BO has a legal right to stop the construction. *I do think he should have the fortitude to ask that it not be built. *And I think the Islamic org that wants to build it should have the sensitivity, decency, and respect to not build it there. *So while I'm not "OK" with it, if they build it, it's more damning of them than anything else. Thanks for fixing my post. *You're right; you *are* a jerk. *~snerk~ You're the one who signed your stupid post with snerk. I'm the imbecile and jerk. There, I fixed it for *you*. Now, buh-bye. |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/16/10 7:19 PM, Jack wrote:
You're the one who signed your stupid post with snerk. I'm the imbecile and jerk. There, I fixed it for *you*. Now, buh-bye. What a snarky little asshole you are, jackoff... -- I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows. If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID. |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Harry ?" wrote in message
m... On 8/16/10 7:19 PM, Jack wrote: You're the one who signed your stupid post with snerk. I'm the imbecile and jerk. There, I fixed it for *you*. Now, buh-bye. What a snarky little asshole you are, jackoff... -- I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows. If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID. I admire your chivalry but you still aren't going to make it with me. I like my men young and well muscled. I'm pretty sure you are neither. |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry " wrote in message m... On 8/16/10 7:19 PM, Jack wrote: You're the one who signed your stupid post with snerk. I'm the imbecile and jerk. There, I fixed it for *you*. Now, buh-bye. What a snarky little asshole you are, jackoff... -- I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows. If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID. You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and Nuckles and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course. |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry" wrote in message ... Harry wrote: ....for the asshat conservatives who are so upset by the plans to build a mosque a few blocks from the site of the 9-11 attacks in New York City... One wonders if they are aware of the fact or care that after 9-11, a mosque was built and dedicated inside the Pentagon, the Washington, D.C.'s 9-11 attack site. Oh...and I sort of recall that the Marines were at least partially responsible for its construction and dedication there. Any asshats here who want to complain about the mosque at the Pentagon's ground zero? Ferris? Ferris Bueller? SW Tom? Harry Reid is seeing the light.... Reid against plan to build mosque near ground zero http://my.earthlink.net/article/pho?guid=20100816/8aab82b3-42b6-4433-b339-12aecad80667&article_path=/article/top&article_guid=20100816/8aab82b3-42b6-4433-b339-12aecad80667 The site of a proposed mosque on Park Place is seen in lower Manhattan in New York, Monday, Aug. 16, 2010. PHILIP ELLIOTT From Associated Press August 16, 2010 4:36 PM EDT WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate's top Democrat on Monday came out against plans to build a mosque near the site of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, moving away from President Barack Obama on the controversial election-year issue. Locked in a tight race, Nevada Sen. Harry Reid became the highest profile Democrat to respond to Obama, who last week backed the right for the developers to build a mosque near ground zero. Since his comments Friday, the Democratic president and his aides have worked to explain the statement, which drew criticism from Republicans and Democrats alike. "The First Amendment protects freedom of religion," said Jim Manley, a Reid spokesman. "Senator Reid respects that, but thinks that the mosque should be built some place else." Critics have said the location of the mosque is insensitive because the terrorists who struck were Islamic extremists. The plans call for a $100 million Islamic center two blocks from where almost 3,000 people perished when hijacked jetliners slammed into the World Trade Center towers on Sept. 11, 2001. Reid is in a close campaign for re-election. A spokesman for Republican Sharron Angle, Reid's opponent, said Muslims have the right to worship anywhere, but Obama's support for construction of the mosque at ground zero "ignored the wishes of the American people, this time at the expense of victims of 9/11 and their families." Spokesman Jarrod Agen argued that the families consider the mosque at the World Trade Center site to be an "affront to the memories of their loved ones." He called on Reid to respond to Obama's comments. On Friday, Obama used an annual dinner at the White House celebrating the Islamic holy month of Ramadan to weigh in on a controversy that grabbed New York and the nation. "As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country," Obama said. "That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances," he said. While insisting that the place where the twin towers once stood was indeed "hallowed ground," Obama said that the proper way to honor it was to apply American values at the nearby property. In days since, White House aides have worked to dampen the political power behind the president's words. "I can't speak to the politics of what the Republicans are doing," deputy press secretary Bill Burton told reporters traveling with Obama to Wisconsin on Monday. But he said Obama "felt it was his obligation as president to address this." And, it's your obligation as class clown to continue to make a moron out of yourself. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|