Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Jim Jim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 655
Default By the way...

Jack wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and Nuckles
and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course.


Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's
just pointless to argue with an idiot.

If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd
stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1
million that would help the children of the people that died in the
towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and
understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames.


I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families.
If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and
say it instead of whining about their "feelings."
****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song.
Or was that Dolly Parton?
You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war.

Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying.



  #32   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,578
Default By the way...


"Jim" wrote in message
...
Jack wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and
Nuckles
and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course.


Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's
just pointless to argue with an idiot.

If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd
stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1
million that would help the children of the people that died in the
towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and
understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames.


I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families.
If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and
say it instead of whining about their "feelings."
****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song.
Or was that Dolly Parton?
You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war.

Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying.




So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that seems
unlikely.


  #33   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Jim Jim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 655
Default By the way...

nom=de=plume wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Jack wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and
Nuckles
and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of
course.

Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's
just pointless to argue with an idiot.

If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd
stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1
million that would help the children of the people that died in the
towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and
understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames.


I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families.
If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and
say it instead of whining about their "feelings."
****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song.
Or was that Dolly Parton?
You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war.

Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying.




So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that
seems unlikely.


Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me.
It's wingnut stuff. Sometimes I use their lingo.
What I said goes for the poster named Jack too.
Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut
weaseling lies.
He can take his pick.
Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings"
only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American
Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it.
Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or
anybody else's? They didn't cause 9/11.
Some of them were first responders.
Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them.
Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad.
No ****ing better than AQ.
And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares
about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st
Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as "feelings."
He's another one too cowardly to talk straight.
I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on.

Jim - Nope. I'm not a Muslim. Don't like that religion at all.
But I am an American. And I see trash all over the place.





  #34   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,005
Default By the way...

On Aug 17, 10:33*pm, Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Jack wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and
Nuckles
and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of
course.


Liar!! *I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. *It's
just pointless to argue with an idiot.


If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd
stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1
million that would help the children of the people that died in the
towers. *That would help to build a bridge of peace and
understanding. *Instead, they want to fan the flames.


I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families.
If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and
say it instead of whining about their "feelings."
****ing lib crybabies. *Sound like a Barbara Streisand song.
Or was that Dolly Parton?
You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war.


Jim - Crybabies **** me off. *Worse than the pols that get them crying.


So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that
seems unlikely.


Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me.
It's wingnut stuff. *Sometimes I use their lingo.
What I said goes for the poster named Jack too.
Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut
weaseling lies.
He can take his pick.
Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings"
only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American
Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it.
Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or
anybody else's? *They didn't cause 9/11.
Some of them were first responders.
Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them.
Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad.
No ****ing better than AQ.
And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares
about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st
Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as "feelings."
He's another one too cowardly to talk straight.
I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on.

Jim - Nope. *I'm not a Muslim. *Don't like that religion at all.
But I am an American. *And I see trash all over the place.


Wow. What a crybaby Jim is.

Jack - Wondering why Jim whines here.

  #35   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,578
Default By the way...


"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Jack wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and
Nuckles
and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of
course.

Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's
just pointless to argue with an idiot.

If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd
stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1
million that would help the children of the people that died in the
towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and
understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames.


I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families.
If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and
say it instead of whining about their "feelings."
****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song.
Or was that Dolly Parton?
You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war.

Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying.




So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that
seems unlikely.


Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me.
It's wingnut stuff. Sometimes I use their lingo.
What I said goes for the poster named Jack too.
Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut
weaseling lies.
He can take his pick.
Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings"
only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American
Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it.
Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or
anybody else's? They didn't cause 9/11.
Some of them were first responders.
Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them.
Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad.
No ****ing better than AQ.
And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares
about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st
Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as "feelings."
He's another one too cowardly to talk straight.
I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on.

Jim - Nope. I'm not a Muslim. Don't like that religion at all.
But I am an American. And I see trash all over the place.


For someone for whom the "terms" don't mean anything, you should consider
not using them. They don't help make your case. What they do is to make you
sound like you need to rant. When you refer to "weaseling" Obama, you align
yourself with nutcases.





  #36   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,578
Default By the way...


"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 17, 10:33 pm, Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Jack wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and
Nuckles
and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of
course.


Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here.
It's
just pointless to argue with an idiot.


If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others,
they'd
stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about
$1
million that would help the children of the people that died in the
towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and
understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames.


I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families.
If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out
and
say it instead of whining about their "feelings."
****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song.
Or was that Dolly Parton?
You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war.


Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them
crying.


So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that
seems unlikely.


Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me.
It's wingnut stuff. Sometimes I use their lingo.
What I said goes for the poster named Jack too.
Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut
weaseling lies.
He can take his pick.
Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings"
only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American
Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it.
Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or
anybody else's? They didn't cause 9/11.
Some of them were first responders.
Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them.
Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad.
No ****ing better than AQ.
And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares
about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st
Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as
"feelings."
He's another one too cowardly to talk straight.
I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on.

Jim - Nope. I'm not a Muslim. Don't like that religion at all.
But I am an American. And I see trash all over the place.


Wow. What a crybaby Jim is.

Jack - Wondering why Jim whines here.


Wow. He's more of a man that you!


  #37   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default By the way...

On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:33:35 -0500, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Jack wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and
Nuckles
and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of
course.

Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's
just pointless to argue with an idiot.

If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd
stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1
million that would help the children of the people that died in the
towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and
understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames.


I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families.
If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and
say it instead of whining about their "feelings."
****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song.
Or was that Dolly Parton?
You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war.

Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying.




So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that
seems unlikely.


Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me.
It's wingnut stuff. Sometimes I use their lingo.
What I said goes for the poster named Jack too.
Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut
weaseling lies.
He can take his pick.
Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings"
only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American
Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it.
Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or
anybody else's? They didn't cause 9/11.
Some of them were first responders.
Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them.
Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad.
No ****ing better than AQ.
And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares
about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st
Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as "feelings."
He's another one too cowardly to talk straight.
I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on.

Jim - Nope. I'm not a Muslim. Don't like that religion at all.
But I am an American. And I see trash all over the place.





I agree. The feds should have no involvement in what the Muslims build or don't
build, as long as the appropriate zoning laws, etc, are met. They should be
treated no differently, by the government, than any other religious organization
that wanted to build a structure on the site.

However, folks should also have the right to bitch and demonstrate about it,
which they are doing. Of course, we don't see much of that in the liberal media
which panders, along with our President, to the Muslims - radical or otherwise.
I don't recall seeing any mention of this demonstration.

http://www.lookingattheleft.com/2010...-zero-part-ii/

Of course, it could have been on the news while I was boating. Who knows?


--

John H
  #38   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,921
Default By the way...

In article , says...

Jack wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and Nuckles
and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course.


Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's
just pointless to argue with an idiot.

If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd
stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1
million that would help the children of the people that died in the
towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and
understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames.


I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families.
If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and
say it instead of whining about their "feelings."
****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song.
Or was that Dolly Parton?
You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war.

Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying.


Your game is fun I guess but sometimes you miss the point. The point
here is that Imam is a terrorist sympathizer and is building this Mosk
with the help of the Saudi's who did 911, and the placement is meant to
only show power and stick a finger in the eye of America... Period...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!
  #39   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,865
Default By the way...



"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...

Your game is fun I guess but sometimes you miss the point. The point
here is that Imam is a terrorist sympathizer and is building this *Mosk*
with the help of the Saudi's who did 911, and the placement is meant to
only show power and stick a finger in the eye of America... Period...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!


"Mosk", is it?

  #40   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,921
Default By the way...

In article , says...

nom=de=plume wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Jack wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and
Nuckles
and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of
course.

Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's
just pointless to argue with an idiot.

If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd
stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1
million that would help the children of the people that died in the
towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and
understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames.


I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families.
If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and
say it instead of whining about their "feelings."
****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song.
Or was that Dolly Parton?
You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war.

Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying.




So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that
seems unlikely.


Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me.
It's wingnut stuff. Sometimes I use their lingo.
What I said goes for the poster named Jack too.
Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut
weaseling lies.
He can take his pick.
Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings"
only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American
Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it.
Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or
anybody else's? They didn't cause 9/11.
Some of them were first responders.
Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them.
Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad.
No ****ing better than AQ.
And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares
about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st
Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as "feelings."
He's another one too cowardly to talk straight.
I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on.

Jim - Nope. I'm not a Muslim. Don't like that religion at all.
But I am an American. And I see trash all over the place.


We are not the same as AQ, you are full of ****... We will eventually
accept the ****ing power house mosk, because we are Americans and we
won't cut anybodys generals apart or cut off anybodys head in the
process.

The Imam there is a terrorist sympathizer, just another satan
worshiper...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017