Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and Nuckles and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course. Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's just pointless to argue with an idiot. If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1 million that would help the children of the people that died in the towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames. I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families. If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and say it instead of whining about their "feelings." ****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song. Or was that Dolly Parton? You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war. Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying. |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim" wrote in message ... Jack wrote: On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and Nuckles and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course. Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's just pointless to argue with an idiot. If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1 million that would help the children of the people that died in the towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames. I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families. If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and say it instead of whining about their "feelings." ****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song. Or was that Dolly Parton? You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war. Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying. So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that seems unlikely. |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... Jack wrote: On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and Nuckles and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course. Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's just pointless to argue with an idiot. If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1 million that would help the children of the people that died in the towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames. I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families. If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and say it instead of whining about their "feelings." ****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song. Or was that Dolly Parton? You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war. Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying. So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that seems unlikely. Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me. It's wingnut stuff. Sometimes I use their lingo. What I said goes for the poster named Jack too. Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut weaseling lies. He can take his pick. Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings" only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it. Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or anybody else's? They didn't cause 9/11. Some of them were first responders. Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them. Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad. No ****ing better than AQ. And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as "feelings." He's another one too cowardly to talk straight. I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on. Jim - Nope. I'm not a Muslim. Don't like that religion at all. But I am an American. And I see trash all over the place. |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 17, 10:33*pm, Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Jack wrote: On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and Nuckles and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course. Liar!! *I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. *It's just pointless to argue with an idiot. If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1 million that would help the children of the people that died in the towers. *That would help to build a bridge of peace and understanding. *Instead, they want to fan the flames. I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families. If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and say it instead of whining about their "feelings." ****ing lib crybabies. *Sound like a Barbara Streisand song. Or was that Dolly Parton? You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war. Jim - Crybabies **** me off. *Worse than the pols that get them crying. So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that seems unlikely. Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me. It's wingnut stuff. *Sometimes I use their lingo. What I said goes for the poster named Jack too. Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut weaseling lies. He can take his pick. Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings" only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it. Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or anybody else's? *They didn't cause 9/11. Some of them were first responders. Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them. Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad. No ****ing better than AQ. And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as "feelings." He's another one too cowardly to talk straight. I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on. Jim - Nope. *I'm not a Muslim. *Don't like that religion at all. But I am an American. *And I see trash all over the place. Wow. What a crybaby Jim is. Jack - Wondering why Jim whines here. |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Jack wrote: On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and Nuckles and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course. Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's just pointless to argue with an idiot. If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1 million that would help the children of the people that died in the towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames. I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families. If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and say it instead of whining about their "feelings." ****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song. Or was that Dolly Parton? You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war. Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying. So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that seems unlikely. Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me. It's wingnut stuff. Sometimes I use their lingo. What I said goes for the poster named Jack too. Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut weaseling lies. He can take his pick. Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings" only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it. Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or anybody else's? They didn't cause 9/11. Some of them were first responders. Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them. Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad. No ****ing better than AQ. And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as "feelings." He's another one too cowardly to talk straight. I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on. Jim - Nope. I'm not a Muslim. Don't like that religion at all. But I am an American. And I see trash all over the place. For someone for whom the "terms" don't mean anything, you should consider not using them. They don't help make your case. What they do is to make you sound like you need to rant. When you refer to "weaseling" Obama, you align yourself with nutcases. |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack" wrote in message ... On Aug 17, 10:33 pm, Jim wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Jack wrote: On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and Nuckles and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course. Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's just pointless to argue with an idiot. If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1 million that would help the children of the people that died in the towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames. I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families. If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and say it instead of whining about their "feelings." ****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song. Or was that Dolly Parton? You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war. Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying. So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that seems unlikely. Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me. It's wingnut stuff. Sometimes I use their lingo. What I said goes for the poster named Jack too. Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut weaseling lies. He can take his pick. Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings" only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it. Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or anybody else's? They didn't cause 9/11. Some of them were first responders. Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them. Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad. No ****ing better than AQ. And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as "feelings." He's another one too cowardly to talk straight. I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on. Jim - Nope. I'm not a Muslim. Don't like that religion at all. But I am an American. And I see trash all over the place. Wow. What a crybaby Jim is. Jack - Wondering why Jim whines here. Wow. He's more of a man that you! |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:33:35 -0500, Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Jack wrote: On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and Nuckles and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course. Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's just pointless to argue with an idiot. If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1 million that would help the children of the people that died in the towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames. I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families. If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and say it instead of whining about their "feelings." ****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song. Or was that Dolly Parton? You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war. Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying. So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that seems unlikely. Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me. It's wingnut stuff. Sometimes I use their lingo. What I said goes for the poster named Jack too. Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut weaseling lies. He can take his pick. Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings" only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it. Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or anybody else's? They didn't cause 9/11. Some of them were first responders. Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them. Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad. No ****ing better than AQ. And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as "feelings." He's another one too cowardly to talk straight. I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on. Jim - Nope. I'm not a Muslim. Don't like that religion at all. But I am an American. And I see trash all over the place. I agree. The feds should have no involvement in what the Muslims build or don't build, as long as the appropriate zoning laws, etc, are met. They should be treated no differently, by the government, than any other religious organization that wanted to build a structure on the site. However, folks should also have the right to bitch and demonstrate about it, which they are doing. Of course, we don't see much of that in the liberal media which panders, along with our President, to the Muslims - radical or otherwise. I don't recall seeing any mention of this demonstration. http://www.lookingattheleft.com/2010...-zero-part-ii/ Of course, it could have been on the news while I was boating. Who knows? -- John H |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
Jack wrote: On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and Nuckles and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course. Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's just pointless to argue with an idiot. If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1 million that would help the children of the people that died in the towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames. I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families. If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and say it instead of whining about their "feelings." ****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song. Or was that Dolly Parton? You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war. Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying. Your game is fun I guess but sometimes you miss the point. The point here is that Imam is a terrorist sympathizer and is building this Mosk with the help of the Saudi's who did 911, and the placement is meant to only show power and stick a finger in the eye of America... Period... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... Your game is fun I guess but sometimes you miss the point. The point here is that Imam is a terrorist sympathizer and is building this *Mosk* with the help of the Saudi's who did 911, and the placement is meant to only show power and stick a finger in the eye of America... Period... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! "Mosk", is it? |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Jack wrote: On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and Nuckles and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of course. Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's just pointless to argue with an idiot. If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1 million that would help the children of the people that died in the towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames. I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families. If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and say it instead of whining about their "feelings." ****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song. Or was that Dolly Parton? You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war. Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying. So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that seems unlikely. Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me. It's wingnut stuff. Sometimes I use their lingo. What I said goes for the poster named Jack too. Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut weaseling lies. He can take his pick. Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings" only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it. Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or anybody else's? They didn't cause 9/11. Some of them were first responders. Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them. Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad. No ****ing better than AQ. And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as "feelings." He's another one too cowardly to talk straight. I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on. Jim - Nope. I'm not a Muslim. Don't like that religion at all. But I am an American. And I see trash all over the place. We are not the same as AQ, you are full of ****... We will eventually accept the ****ing power house mosk, because we are Americans and we won't cut anybodys generals apart or cut off anybodys head in the process. The Imam there is a terrorist sympathizer, just another satan worshiper... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|