By the way...
 

On 8/19/10 6:37 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:08:31 -0400, Someone wrote:

On 8/18/10 5:02 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:29:54 -0500, wrote:

John H wrote:


I agree. The feds should have no involvement in what the Muslims build or don't
build, as long as the appropriate zoning laws, etc, are met. They should be
treated no differently, by the government, than any other religious organization
that wanted to build a structure on the site.

However, folks should also have the right to bitch and demonstrate about it,
which they are doing. Of course, we don't see much of that in the liberal media
which panders, along with our President, to the Muslims - radical or otherwise.
I don't recall seeing any mention of this demonstration.

http://www.lookingattheleft.com/2010...-zero-part-ii/

Of course, it could have been on the news while I was boating. Who knows?


Anybody can bitch all they want.
I've seen them all over the news on all channels.
The libs are spouting the same nonsense about "feelings" that the cons
are.
Also seen many lying about the Imam head of the mosque.
The guy was picked by Bush to run around the world with Karen Hughes
telling ragheads that "America is Good" and has been working with the
FBI for years to track terrorists.
Common sense says he's an national security asset.
Looks to me like the protesters are plain anti-Muslim, libs and all.
That's their right. I just don't care much for liars.
If they want jihad or a new round of Crusades, they should advocate for
that.
Not whine about "feelings."
But maybe they want jihad or Crusades.
That's the natural outcome of telling American Muslims to take their
mosque to the back of the bus.
Hope their fighting skills can back up their big mouths.
None of them exactly strike me as Knights Templar.
I say outlaw Islam, or change the constitution, or shut up.
Whatever they do, they'll have to deal with the likes of me posting on
usenet. So there.

Jim - Staking my ground in rec.boats. Seems safe enough.


I agree again. People are allowed to bitch all they want. I personally don't
think the building of the mosque at that location is going to smooth the
feelings of the American people.

You seem to think the Imam head of the mosque is a great guy. What Bush did is
beside the point. I think he's an asshole, regardless of how well the FBI and he
get along.

But, that's just my opinion. Probably has as much or more foundation than yours.
I do like your idea of outlawing Islam, especially the 'outer edge' versions.
Sometimes we agree. Most of the time I just think you're somewhat verbose. But
that's OK. You've got the right.

John H - nothing cute to add.


Herring wants to repeal the first amendment.
Is he also in favor of outlawing "outer edge" christianity?
Republicans...they work overtime to repeal the Constitution and Bill of
Rights.


Participants in any religion advocating and performing practices which violate
human rights, like hanging homosexuals or defacing (literally) women, should be
jailed - thus inhibiting the practice of their religion.

If you think that's asking for the repeal of the first amendment, then your head
is firmly planted where the sun doesn't shine.

That's twice in August. You should be very grateful, Harry.


"I do like your idea of outlawing Islam..."

That would require repealing or ignoring the first amendment, JohnnyBoy.

By the way...
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Aug 18, 4:08 pm, Someone Else wrote:
On 8/18/10 5:02 PM, John H wrote:



On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:29:54 -0500, wrote:

John H wrote:

I agree. The feds should have no involvement in what the Muslims build
or don't
build, as long as the appropriate zoning laws, etc, are met. They
should be
treated no differently, by the government, than any other religious
organization
that wanted to build a structure on the site.

However, folks should also have the right to bitch and demonstrate
about it,
which they are doing. Of course, we don't see much of that in the
liberal media
which panders, along with our President, to the Muslims - radical or
otherwise.
I don't recall seeing any mention of this demonstration.

http://www.lookingattheleft.com/2010...-at-ground-zer...

Of course, it could have been on the news while I was boating. Who
knows?

Anybody can bitch all they want.
I've seen them all over the news on all channels.
The libs are spouting the same nonsense about "feelings" that the cons
are.
Also seen many lying about the Imam head of the mosque.
The guy was picked by Bush to run around the world with Karen Hughes
telling ragheads that "America is Good" and has been working with the
FBI for years to track terrorists.
Common sense says he's an national security asset.
Looks to me like the protesters are plain anti-Muslim, libs and all.
That's their right. I just don't care much for liars.
If they want jihad or a new round of Crusades, they should advocate for
that.
Not whine about "feelings."
But maybe they want jihad or Crusades.
That's the natural outcome of telling American Muslims to take their
mosque to the back of the bus.
Hope their fighting skills can back up their big mouths.
None of them exactly strike me as Knights Templar.
I say outlaw Islam, or change the constitution, or shut up.
Whatever they do, they'll have to deal with the likes of me posting on
usenet. So there.

Jim - Staking my ground in rec.boats. Seems safe enough.

I agree again. People are allowed to bitch all they want. I personally
don't
think the building of the mosque at that location is going to smooth the
feelings of the American people.

You seem to think the Imam head of the mosque is a great guy. What Bush
did is
beside the point. I think he's an asshole, regardless of how well the
FBI and he
get along.

But, that's just my opinion. Probably has as much or more foundation
than yours.
I do like your idea of outlawing Islam, especially the 'outer edge'
versions.
Sometimes we agree. Most of the time I just think you're somewhat
verbose. But
that's OK. You've got the right.

John H - nothing cute to add.

Herring wants to repeal the first amendment.
Is he also in favor of outlawing "outer edge" christianity?
Republicans...they work overtime to repeal the Constitution and Bill of
Rights.

I can't see the conflict you have, Herr Krause. I believe you would
like to outlaw Christianity all together.


He doesn't object to radical Christians Like Wright and Obama. Go figure.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

By the way...
 

In article ,
says...

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Aug 18, 4:08 pm, Someone Else wrote:
On 8/18/10 5:02 PM, John H wrote:



On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:29:54 -0500, wrote:

John H wrote:

I agree. The feds should have no involvement in what the Muslims build
or don't
build, as long as the appropriate zoning laws, etc, are met. They
should be
treated no differently, by the government, than any other religious
organization
that wanted to build a structure on the site.

However, folks should also have the right to bitch and demonstrate
about it,
which they are doing. Of course, we don't see much of that in the
liberal media
which panders, along with our President, to the Muslims - radical or
otherwise.
I don't recall seeing any mention of this demonstration.

http://www.lookingattheleft.com/2010...-at-ground-zer...

Of course, it could have been on the news while I was boating. Who
knows?

Anybody can bitch all they want.
I've seen them all over the news on all channels.
The libs are spouting the same nonsense about "feelings" that the cons
are.
Also seen many lying about the Imam head of the mosque.
The guy was picked by Bush to run around the world with Karen Hughes
telling ragheads that "America is Good" and has been working with the
FBI for years to track terrorists.
Common sense says he's an national security asset.
Looks to me like the protesters are plain anti-Muslim, libs and all.
That's their right. I just don't care much for liars.
If they want jihad or a new round of Crusades, they should advocate for
that.
Not whine about "feelings."
But maybe they want jihad or Crusades.
That's the natural outcome of telling American Muslims to take their
mosque to the back of the bus.
Hope their fighting skills can back up their big mouths.
None of them exactly strike me as Knights Templar.
I say outlaw Islam, or change the constitution, or shut up.
Whatever they do, they'll have to deal with the likes of me posting on
usenet. So there.

Jim - Staking my ground in rec.boats. Seems safe enough.

I agree again. People are allowed to bitch all they want. I personally
don't
think the building of the mosque at that location is going to smooth the
feelings of the American people.

You seem to think the Imam head of the mosque is a great guy. What Bush
did is
beside the point. I think he's an asshole, regardless of how well the
FBI and he
get along.

But, that's just my opinion. Probably has as much or more foundation
than yours.
I do like your idea of outlawing Islam, especially the 'outer edge'
versions.
Sometimes we agree. Most of the time I just think you're somewhat
verbose. But
that's OK. You've got the right.

John H - nothing cute to add.

Herring wants to repeal the first amendment.
Is he also in favor of outlawing "outer edge" christianity?
Republicans...they work overtime to repeal the Constitution and Bill of
Rights.

I can't see the conflict you have, Herr Krause. I believe you would
like to outlaw Christianity all together.


He doesn't object to radical Christians Like Wright and Obama. Go figure.

Why can't you dumfochs understand? If I don't believe in it, if I don't
own it, it is nothing but trash.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

By the way...
 

In article ,
says...

On 8/18/10 5:02 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:29:54 -0500, wrote:

John H wrote:


I agree. The feds should have no involvement in what the Muslims build or don't
build, as long as the appropriate zoning laws, etc, are met. They should be
treated no differently, by the government, than any other religious organization
that wanted to build a structure on the site.

However, folks should also have the right to bitch and demonstrate about it,
which they are doing. Of course, we don't see much of that in the liberal media
which panders, along with our President, to the Muslims - radical or otherwise.
I don't recall seeing any mention of this demonstration.

http://www.lookingattheleft.com/2010...-zero-part-ii/

Of course, it could have been on the news while I was boating. Who knows?


Anybody can bitch all they want.
I've seen them all over the news on all channels.
The libs are spouting the same nonsense about "feelings" that the cons
are.
Also seen many lying about the Imam head of the mosque.
The guy was picked by Bush to run around the world with Karen Hughes
telling ragheads that "America is Good" and has been working with the
FBI for years to track terrorists.
Common sense says he's an national security asset.
Looks to me like the protesters are plain anti-Muslim, libs and all.
That's their right. I just don't care much for liars.
If they want jihad or a new round of Crusades, they should advocate for
that.
Not whine about "feelings."
But maybe they want jihad or Crusades.
That's the natural outcome of telling American Muslims to take their
mosque to the back of the bus.
Hope their fighting skills can back up their big mouths.
None of them exactly strike me as Knights Templar.
I say outlaw Islam, or change the constitution, or shut up.
Whatever they do, they'll have to deal with the likes of me posting on
usenet. So there.

Jim - Staking my ground in rec.boats. Seems safe enough.


I agree again. People are allowed to bitch all they want. I personally don't
think the building of the mosque at that location is going to smooth the
feelings of the American people.

You seem to think the Imam head of the mosque is a great guy. What Bush did is
beside the point. I think he's an asshole, regardless of how well the FBI and he
get along.

But, that's just my opinion. Probably has as much or more foundation than yours.
I do like your idea of outlawing Islam, especially the 'outer edge' versions.
Sometimes we agree. Most of the time I just think you're somewhat verbose. But
that's OK. You've got the right.

John H - nothing cute to add.


Herring wants to repeal the first amendment.
Is he also in favor of outlawing "outer edge" christianity?
Republicans...they work overtime to repeal the Constitution and Bill of
Rights.

Nothing to do with the constitution Harry, it's not against the law to
outlaw a criminal terrorist organization...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!