Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to alt.appalachian,misc.rural,rec.boats,alt.great-lakes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/1/2010 5:45 PM, Billy wrote:
In , wrote: wrote in message ... In , wrote: "lil wrote in message ... http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op...fidential/envi orn mental-protection-agency-considering-a-ban-on-lead-ammunition-101492439.h tml Backdoor attempt by anti-gunners to restrict firearms rights. Death by a million cuts methodology. There are alternatives to lead in ammunition, but it raises the cost substantially. Common sense is needed with this issue. The common sense of not polluting the environment, or the common sense that the EPA won't mess with the NRA in an election year? the common sense that expended lead ammunition is not hazardous waste. That expended lead ammunition is not hazardous waste isn't common sense, it's wrong. If you don't live in a hunting area, or have a waterway that passes through a hunting area, or if you don't live near a firing range, the bill would have little impact on your health. On the other hand if you take game in an area that has been used for hunting, you may be bringing home lead in the game that you eat. Carbon dioxide and water form carbonic acid, which is enough to make lead mobile. You have a right to your opinion, but not your facts. http://www.belleville.k12.wi.us/bhs/...dpollution.htm http://www.epa.gov/lead/ http://www.ewg.org/reports/poisonouspastime http://www.princeton.edu/~rmizzo/firingrange.htm Lead is all through our soils. There are old lead silver mines mined by Indians scattered all across many sections of the Country. Traces of it are every where. You cannot get rid of lead, in the environment. Lead shot on heavily hunted water ways where Ducks sift the bottom for snails is one thing. It has been addressed. Banning ordinary lead rifle and handgun bullets is another. It is purely a thinly disguised ploy of the victim disarmament bunch. The mentality of this group is turning automobiles into appliances that no one wants to ride in or can afford. They will nibble the edges of every agenda until they do away with or make it so unaffordable or so regulated that Americans cannot obtain them. |
#12
![]()
posted to alt.appalachian,misc.rural,rec.boats,alt.great-lakes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , lil abner
wrote: On 9/1/2010 5:45 PM, Billy wrote: In , wrote: wrote in message ... In , wrote: "lil wrote in message ... http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op...nfidential/env i orn mental-protection-agency-considering-a-ban-on-lead-ammunition-101492439. h tml Backdoor attempt by anti-gunners to restrict firearms rights. Death by a million cuts methodology. There are alternatives to lead in ammunition, but it raises the cost substantially. Common sense is needed with this issue. The common sense of not polluting the environment, or the common sense that the EPA won't mess with the NRA in an election year? the common sense that expended lead ammunition is not hazardous waste. That expended lead ammunition is not hazardous waste isn't common sense, it's wrong. If you don't live in a hunting area, or have a waterway that passes through a hunting area, or if you don't live near a firing range, the bill would have little impact on your health. On the other hand if you take game in an area that has been used for hunting, you may be bringing home lead in the game that you eat. Carbon dioxide and water form carbonic acid, which is enough to make lead mobile. You have a right to your opinion, but not your facts. http://www.belleville.k12.wi.us/bhs/...dpollution.htm http://www.epa.gov/lead/ http://www.ewg.org/reports/poisonouspastime http://www.princeton.edu/~rmizzo/firingrange.htm Lead is all through our soils. There are old lead silver mines mined by Indians scattered all across many sections of the Country. Traces of it are every where. You cannot get rid of lead, in the environment. Lead shot on heavily hunted water ways where Ducks sift the bottom for snails is one thing. It has been addressed. Banning ordinary lead rifle and handgun bullets is another. It is purely a thinly disguised ploy of the victim disarmament bunch. The mentality of this group is turning automobiles into appliances that no one wants to ride in or can afford. They will nibble the edges of every agenda until they do away with or make it so unaffordable or so regulated that Americans cannot obtain them. I said it may not be an immediate problem to you, depending on where you live, but lead is bad news to small children at low levels. It may be a small problem to you, but it will be a problem to some one. I'm just sayin', be aware. -- - Billy "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. http://www.democracynow.org/2010/7/2/maude http://english.aljazeera.net/video/m...515308172.html |
#13
![]()
posted to alt.appalachian,misc.rural,rec.boats,alt.great-lakes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Wallace" wrote: "Billy" wrote in message ... In article , "NapalmHeart" wrote: "lil abner" wrote in message ... http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op...fidential/envi orn mental-protection-agency-considering-a-ban-on-lead-ammunition-101492439.h tml Backdoor attempt by anti-gunners to restrict firearms rights. Death by a million cuts methodology. There are alternatives to lead in ammunition, but it raises the cost substantially. Common sense is needed with this issue. The common sense of not polluting the environment, or the common sense that the EPA won't mess with the NRA in an election year? the common sense that expended lead ammunition is not hazardous waste. Apparently it is. |
#14
![]()
posted to alt.appalachian,misc.rural,rec.boats,alt.great-lakes
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Moorman" wrote in message ... In article , "Wallace" wrote: "Billy" wrote in message ... In article , "NapalmHeart" wrote: "lil abner" wrote in message ... http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op...fidential/envi orn mental-protection-agency-considering-a-ban-on-lead-ammunition-101492439.h tml Backdoor attempt by anti-gunners to restrict firearms rights. Death by a million cuts methodology. There are alternatives to lead in ammunition, but it raises the cost substantially. Common sense is needed with this issue. The common sense of not polluting the environment, or the common sense that the EPA won't mess with the NRA in an election year? the common sense that expended lead ammunition is not hazardous waste. Apparently it is. But not at the quantity that is being injected. By example the level of lead from most industrial applications (coal slag being but one) is far in excess than ammunition lead in the continental USA. IF EPA was working on logic and not political agenda coal slag by itself would be much more attention. Not sure but working from memory coal slag has been getting little or NONE for near 10 years. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Environmental groups | Cruising | |||
Environmental Question | ASA |