Rick Santorum would very much like to be president. For the past few
years, he has been diligently appearing at the sorts of conservative
events—the Values Voters Summit, the Conservative Political Action
Conference—where aspiring Republican candidates are expected to show
up. But before he starts printing "Santorum 2012" bumper stickers,
there's one issue the former GOP senator and his strategists need to
address. You see, Santorum has what you might call a Google problem.
For voters who decide to look him up online, one of the top three
search results is usually the site SpreadingSantorum.com, which
explains that Santorum's last name is a sexual neologism for "the
frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the
byproduct of anal sex."

Santorum's problem got its start back in 2003, when the then-senator
from Pennsylvania compared homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia,
saying the "definition of marriage" has never included "man on child,
man on dog, or whatever the case may be." The ensuing controversy
prompted syndicated sex columnist Dan Savage, who's gay, to start a
contest, soliciting reader suggestions for slang terms to "memorialize
the scandal." The winner came up with the "frothy mixture" idea,
Savage launched a website, and a meme was born. Even though mainstream
news outlets would never link to it, Savage's site rose in the Google
rankings, thanks in part to bloggers who posted Santorum-related news
on the site or linked to it from their blogs. Eventually it eclipsed
Santorum's own campaign site in search results; some observers even
suggested it may have contributed to Santorum's crushing 18-point
defeat in his 2006 campaign against Bob Casey.

Savage says his site hasn't been updated for years, yet it remains
entrenched in the Google rankings. Not even Santorum's ascent as a Fox
News contributor or his early campaign swings through the key primary
states of Iowa and New Hampshire have managed to bury it. With Google
results like this, what's an aspiring presidential candidate to do?

I wanted to ask Santorum whether he had a strategy for scrubbing his
Web presence, but he didn't return my calls. So instead, I asked a few
experts. "This is an unusual problem," says Michael Fertik, CEO of
ReputationDefender, which specializes in helping individuals maintain
a positive Web presence. "It's devastating. This is one of the more
creative and salient Google issues I've ever seen."

Fertik, who points out that he is not a supporter of the former
senator, notes that more than anything, Santorum needs to act quickly.
Once the campaign starts to make headlines again, an increase in
search traffic will likely help maintain Savage's high spot in the
rankings: "It's going to be very hard to move."

To at least make a dent, Santorum could try a concerted push to
generate links to his domain on prominent sites and blogs, ginning its
Google ranking; Mark Skidmore, an expert in search-engine marketing at
the online strategy firm Blue State Digital, says Santorum should also
consider buying paid search results for his name. He says the Obama
campaign successfully used this strategy to help bury sites that
claimed Obama was a Muslim or not an American citizen. But like
Fertik, Skidmore thinks Santorum faces an uphill battle, in part
because Savage's site has been up for so long—with more than 13,000
inbound links, compared with only 5,000 for Santorum's own site,
America's Foundation. "He's staring at a very big deficit," Skidmore
observes.

That deficit might grow even bigger soon. "I've sort of been in denial
about the fact that Rick Santorum is going to run for president,"
Savage says. "But now I'm going to have to sic my flying monkeys on
him"—in other words, mobilize bloggers to start posting and linking to
his site again.

Savage has not forgiven Santorum for his seven-year-old comments:
"Rick would have prevented me and my partner from being able to adopt
my son," he points out. But Savage does have a deal for the
politician. "If Rick Santorum wants to make a $5 million donation to
[the gay marriage group] Freedom to Marry, I will take it down.
Interest starts accruing now." Santorum may want to consider Savage's
offer. Otherwise, he's kinda screwed.

On 9/7/10 7:11 PM, jps wrote:


Rick Santorum would very much like to be president. For the past few
years, he has been diligently appearing at the sorts of conservative
events—the Values Voters Summit, the Conservative Political Action
Conference—where aspiring Republican candidates are expected to show
up. But before he starts printing "Santorum 2012" bumper stickers,
there's one issue the former GOP senator and his strategists need to
address. You see, Santorum has what you might call a Google problem.
For voters who decide to look him up online, one of the top three
search results is usually the site SpreadingSantorum.com, which
explains that Santorum's last name is a sexual neologism for "the
frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the
byproduct of anal sex."

Santorum's problem got its start back in 2003, when the then-senator
from Pennsylvania compared homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia,
saying the "definition of marriage" has never included "man on child,
man on dog, or whatever the case may be." The ensuing controversy
prompted syndicated sex columnist Dan Savage, who's gay, to start a
contest, soliciting reader suggestions for slang terms to "memorialize
the scandal." The winner came up with the "frothy mixture" idea,
Savage launched a website, and a meme was born. Even though mainstream
news outlets would never link to it, Savage's site rose in the Google
rankings, thanks in part to bloggers who posted Santorum-related news
on the site or linked to it from their blogs. Eventually it eclipsed
Santorum's own campaign site in search results; some observers even
suggested it may have contributed to Santorum's crushing 18-point
defeat in his 2006 campaign against Bob Casey.

Savage says his site hasn't been updated for years, yet it remains
entrenched in the Google rankings. Not even Santorum's ascent as a Fox
News contributor or his early campaign swings through the key primary
states of Iowa and New Hampshire have managed to bury it. With Google
results like this, what's an aspiring presidential candidate to do?

I wanted to ask Santorum whether he had a strategy for scrubbing his
Web presence, but he didn't return my calls. So instead, I asked a few
experts. "This is an unusual problem," says Michael Fertik, CEO of
ReputationDefender, which specializes in helping individuals maintain
a positive Web presence. "It's devastating. This is one of the more
creative and salient Google issues I've ever seen."

Fertik, who points out that he is not a supporter of the former
senator, notes that more than anything, Santorum needs to act quickly.
Once the campaign starts to make headlines again, an increase in
search traffic will likely help maintain Savage's high spot in the
rankings: "It's going to be very hard to move."

To at least make a dent, Santorum could try a concerted push to
generate links to his domain on prominent sites and blogs, ginning its
Google ranking; Mark Skidmore, an expert in search-engine marketing at
the online strategy firm Blue State Digital, says Santorum should also
consider buying paid search results for his name. He says the Obama
campaign successfully used this strategy to help bury sites that
claimed Obama was a Muslim or not an American citizen. But like
Fertik, Skidmore thinks Santorum faces an uphill battle, in part
because Savage's site has been up for so long—with more than 13,000
inbound links, compared with only 5,000 for Santorum's own site,
America's Foundation. "He's staring at a very big deficit," Skidmore
observes.

That deficit might grow even bigger soon. "I've sort of been in denial
about the fact that Rick Santorum is going to run for president,"
Savage says. "But now I'm going to have to sic my flying monkeys on
him"—in other words, mobilize bloggers to start posting and linking to
his site again.

Savage has not forgiven Santorum for his seven-year-old comments:
"Rick would have prevented me and my partner from being able to adopt
my son," he points out. But Savage does have a deal for the
politician. "If Rick Santorum wants to make a $5 million donation to
[the gay marriage group] Freedom to Marry, I will take it down.
Interest starts accruing now." Santorum may want to consider Savage's
offer. Otherwise, he's kinda screwed.


Unfortunately, the GOP and its teabagger party has seen fit to nominate
a bunch of candidates whose views on many matters are not so difference
from Santorum's.

"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
...
On 9/7/10 7:11 PM, jps wrote:


Rick Santorum would very much like to be president. For the past few
years, he has been diligently appearing at the sorts of conservative
events—the Values Voters Summit, the Conservative Political Action
Conference—where aspiring Republican candidates are expected to show
up. But before he starts printing "Santorum 2012" bumper stickers,
there's one issue the former GOP senator and his strategists need to
address. You see, Santorum has what you might call a Google problem.
For voters who decide to look him up online, one of the top three
search results is usually the site SpreadingSantorum.com, which
explains that Santorum's last name is a sexual neologism for "the
frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the
byproduct of anal sex."

Santorum's problem got its start back in 2003, when the then-senator
from Pennsylvania compared homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia,
saying the "definition of marriage" has never included "man on child,
man on dog, or whatever the case may be." The ensuing controversy
prompted syndicated sex columnist Dan Savage, who's gay, to start a
contest, soliciting reader suggestions for slang terms to "memorialize
the scandal." The winner came up with the "frothy mixture" idea,
Savage launched a website, and a meme was born. Even though mainstream
news outlets would never link to it, Savage's site rose in the Google
rankings, thanks in part to bloggers who posted Santorum-related news
on the site or linked to it from their blogs. Eventually it eclipsed
Santorum's own campaign site in search results; some observers even
suggested it may have contributed to Santorum's crushing 18-point
defeat in his 2006 campaign against Bob Casey.

Savage says his site hasn't been updated for years, yet it remains
entrenched in the Google rankings. Not even Santorum's ascent as a Fox
News contributor or his early campaign swings through the key primary
states of Iowa and New Hampshire have managed to bury it. With Google
results like this, what's an aspiring presidential candidate to do?

I wanted to ask Santorum whether he had a strategy for scrubbing his
Web presence, but he didn't return my calls. So instead, I asked a few
experts. "This is an unusual problem," says Michael Fertik, CEO of
ReputationDefender, which specializes in helping individuals maintain
a positive Web presence. "It's devastating. This is one of the more
creative and salient Google issues I've ever seen."

Fertik, who points out that he is not a supporter of the former
senator, notes that more than anything, Santorum needs to act quickly.
Once the campaign starts to make headlines again, an increase in
search traffic will likely help maintain Savage's high spot in the
rankings: "It's going to be very hard to move."

To at least make a dent, Santorum could try a concerted push to
generate links to his domain on prominent sites and blogs, ginning its
Google ranking; Mark Skidmore, an expert in search-engine marketing at
the online strategy firm Blue State Digital, says Santorum should also
consider buying paid search results for his name. He says the Obama
campaign successfully used this strategy to help bury sites that
claimed Obama was a Muslim or not an American citizen. But like
Fertik, Skidmore thinks Santorum faces an uphill battle, in part
because Savage's site has been up for so long—with more than 13,000
inbound links, compared with only 5,000 for Santorum's own site,
America's Foundation. "He's staring at a very big deficit," Skidmore
observes.

That deficit might grow even bigger soon. "I've sort of been in denial
about the fact that Rick Santorum is going to run for president,"
Savage says. "But now I'm going to have to sic my flying monkeys on
him"—in other words, mobilize bloggers to start posting and linking to
his site again.

Savage has not forgiven Santorum for his seven-year-old comments:
"Rick would have prevented me and my partner from being able to adopt
my son," he points out. But Savage does have a deal for the
politician. "If Rick Santorum wants to make a $5 million donation to
[the gay marriage group] Freedom to Marry, I will take it down.
Interest starts accruing now." Santorum may want to consider Savage's
offer. Otherwise, he's kinda screwed.


Unfortunately, the GOP and its teabagger party has seen fit to nominate a
bunch of candidates whose views on many matters are not so difference from
Santorum's.

What's also disturbing is that many actually believe the same people who
trashed the US at home and abroad are now going to fix it with the same
policies.

On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:11:06 -0700, jps wrote:



Rick Santorum would very much like to be president.

PA is a seriously ****ed up state. santorum is so far right wing he
makes ronald reagan look like a commie AND we are about to elect the
3rd most right wing legislator since 1995 to the US senate.

"jps" wrote in message
...


Rick Santorum would very much like to be president.

Who cares?

On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
...
On 9/7/10 7:11 PM, jps wrote:


Rick Santorum would very much like to be president. For the past few
years, he has been diligently appearing at the sorts of conservative
events—the Values Voters Summit, the Conservative Political Action
Conference—where aspiring Republican candidates are expected to show
up. But before he starts printing "Santorum 2012" bumper stickers,
there's one issue the former GOP senator and his strategists need to
address. You see, Santorum has what you might call a Google problem.
For voters who decide to look him up online, one of the top three
search results is usually the site SpreadingSantorum.com, which
explains that Santorum's last name is a sexual neologism for "the
frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the
byproduct of anal sex."

Santorum's problem got its start back in 2003, when the then-senator
from Pennsylvania compared homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia,
saying the "definition of marriage" has never included "man on child,
man on dog, or whatever the case may be." The ensuing controversy
prompted syndicated sex columnist Dan Savage, who's gay, to start a
contest, soliciting reader suggestions for slang terms to "memorialize
the scandal." The winner came up with the "frothy mixture" idea,
Savage launched a website, and a meme was born. Even though mainstream
news outlets would never link to it, Savage's site rose in the Google
rankings, thanks in part to bloggers who posted Santorum-related news
on the site or linked to it from their blogs. Eventually it eclipsed
Santorum's own campaign site in search results; some observers even
suggested it may have contributed to Santorum's crushing 18-point
defeat in his 2006 campaign against Bob Casey.

Savage says his site hasn't been updated for years, yet it remains
entrenched in the Google rankings. Not even Santorum's ascent as a Fox
News contributor or his early campaign swings through the key primary
states of Iowa and New Hampshire have managed to bury it. With Google
results like this, what's an aspiring presidential candidate to do?

I wanted to ask Santorum whether he had a strategy for scrubbing his
Web presence, but he didn't return my calls. So instead, I asked a few
experts. "This is an unusual problem," says Michael Fertik, CEO of
ReputationDefender, which specializes in helping individuals maintain
a positive Web presence. "It's devastating. This is one of the more
creative and salient Google issues I've ever seen."

Fertik, who points out that he is not a supporter of the former
senator, notes that more than anything, Santorum needs to act quickly.
Once the campaign starts to make headlines again, an increase in
search traffic will likely help maintain Savage's high spot in the
rankings: "It's going to be very hard to move."

To at least make a dent, Santorum could try a concerted push to
generate links to his domain on prominent sites and blogs, ginning its
Google ranking; Mark Skidmore, an expert in search-engine marketing at
the online strategy firm Blue State Digital, says Santorum should also
consider buying paid search results for his name. He says the Obama
campaign successfully used this strategy to help bury sites that
claimed Obama was a Muslim or not an American citizen. But like
Fertik, Skidmore thinks Santorum faces an uphill battle, in part
because Savage's site has been up for so long—with more than 13,000
inbound links, compared with only 5,000 for Santorum's own site,
America's Foundation. "He's staring at a very big deficit," Skidmore
observes.

That deficit might grow even bigger soon. "I've sort of been in denial
about the fact that Rick Santorum is going to run for president,"
Savage says. "But now I'm going to have to sic my flying monkeys on
him"—in other words, mobilize bloggers to start posting and linking to
his site again.

Savage has not forgiven Santorum for his seven-year-old comments:
"Rick would have prevented me and my partner from being able to adopt
my son," he points out. But Savage does have a deal for the
politician. "If Rick Santorum wants to make a $5 million donation to
[the gay marriage group] Freedom to Marry, I will take it down.
Interest starts accruing now." Santorum may want to consider Savage's
offer. Otherwise, he's kinda screwed.


Unfortunately, the GOP and its teabagger party has seen fit to nominate a
bunch of candidates whose views on many matters are not so difference from
Santorum's.

What's also disturbing is that many actually believe the same people who
trashed the US at home and abroad are now going to fix it with the same
policies.

Proof of rampant stupidity among the American populace. That the
teaparty continues to gain momentum while a church in Florida decides
to burn Korans all while the Republican leadership sits silent.

The Borowitz report from this morning was spot on.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
...
On 9/7/10 7:11 PM, jps wrote:


Rick Santorum would very much like to be president. For the past few
years, he has been diligently appearing at the sorts of conservative
events-the Values Voters Summit, the Conservative Political Action
Conference-where aspiring Republican candidates are expected to show
up. But before he starts printing "Santorum 2012" bumper stickers,
there's one issue the former GOP senator and his strategists need to
address. You see, Santorum has what you might call a Google problem.
For voters who decide to look him up online, one of the top three
search results is usually the site SpreadingSantorum.com, which
explains that Santorum's last name is a sexual neologism for "the
frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the
byproduct of anal sex."

Santorum's problem got its start back in 2003, when the then-senator
from Pennsylvania compared homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia,
saying the "definition of marriage" has never included "man on child,
man on dog, or whatever the case may be." The ensuing controversy
prompted syndicated sex columnist Dan Savage, who's gay, to start a
contest, soliciting reader suggestions for slang terms to "memorialize
the scandal." The winner came up with the "frothy mixture" idea,
Savage launched a website, and a meme was born. Even though mainstream
news outlets would never link to it, Savage's site rose in the Google
rankings, thanks in part to bloggers who posted Santorum-related news
on the site or linked to it from their blogs. Eventually it eclipsed
Santorum's own campaign site in search results; some observers even
suggested it may have contributed to Santorum's crushing 18-point
defeat in his 2006 campaign against Bob Casey.

Savage says his site hasn't been updated for years, yet it remains
entrenched in the Google rankings. Not even Santorum's ascent as a Fox
News contributor or his early campaign swings through the key primary
states of Iowa and New Hampshire have managed to bury it. With Google
results like this, what's an aspiring presidential candidate to do?

I wanted to ask Santorum whether he had a strategy for scrubbing his
Web presence, but he didn't return my calls. So instead, I asked a few
experts. "This is an unusual problem," says Michael Fertik, CEO of
ReputationDefender, which specializes in helping individuals maintain
a positive Web presence. "It's devastating. This is one of the more
creative and salient Google issues I've ever seen."

Fertik, who points out that he is not a supporter of the former
senator, notes that more than anything, Santorum needs to act quickly.
Once the campaign starts to make headlines again, an increase in
search traffic will likely help maintain Savage's high spot in the
rankings: "It's going to be very hard to move."

To at least make a dent, Santorum could try a concerted push to
generate links to his domain on prominent sites and blogs, ginning its
Google ranking; Mark Skidmore, an expert in search-engine marketing at
the online strategy firm Blue State Digital, says Santorum should also
consider buying paid search results for his name. He says the Obama
campaign successfully used this strategy to help bury sites that
claimed Obama was a Muslim or not an American citizen. But like
Fertik, Skidmore thinks Santorum faces an uphill battle, in part
because Savage's site has been up for so long-with more than 13,000
inbound links, compared with only 5,000 for Santorum's own site,
America's Foundation. "He's staring at a very big deficit," Skidmore
observes.

That deficit might grow even bigger soon. "I've sort of been in denial
about the fact that Rick Santorum is going to run for president,"
Savage says. "But now I'm going to have to sic my flying monkeys on
him"-in other words, mobilize bloggers to start posting and linking to
his site again.

Savage has not forgiven Santorum for his seven-year-old comments:
"Rick would have prevented me and my partner from being able to adopt
my son," he points out. But Savage does have a deal for the
politician. "If Rick Santorum wants to make a $5 million donation to
[the gay marriage group] Freedom to Marry, I will take it down.
Interest starts accruing now." Santorum may want to consider Savage's
offer. Otherwise, he's kinda screwed.


Unfortunately, the GOP and its teabagger party has seen fit to nominate
a
bunch of candidates whose views on many matters are not so difference
from
Santorum's.

What's also disturbing is that many actually believe the same people who
trashed the US at home and abroad are now going to fix it with the same
policies.

Proof of rampant stupidity among the American populace. That the
teaparty continues to gain momentum while a church in Florida decides
to burn Korans all while the Republican leadership sits silent.

The Borowitz report from this morning was spot on.

At the moment, I'm very pessimistic about the voting public. I'm hoping it's
a fleeting moment.

"Harry ¿" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...


Rick Santorum would very much like to be president.

Who cares?



Obviously you don't... which is sad.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:40:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
...
On 9/7/10 7:11 PM, jps wrote:


Rick Santorum would very much like to be president. For the past few
years, he has been diligently appearing at the sorts of conservative
events-the Values Voters Summit, the Conservative Political Action
Conference-where aspiring Republican candidates are expected to show
up. But before he starts printing "Santorum 2012" bumper stickers,
there's one issue the former GOP senator and his strategists need to
address. You see, Santorum has what you might call a Google problem.
For voters who decide to look him up online, one of the top three
search results is usually the site SpreadingSantorum.com, which
explains that Santorum's last name is a sexual neologism for "the
frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the
byproduct of anal sex."

Santorum's problem got its start back in 2003, when the then-senator
from Pennsylvania compared homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia,
saying the "definition of marriage" has never included "man on child,
man on dog, or whatever the case may be." The ensuing controversy
prompted syndicated sex columnist Dan Savage, who's gay, to start a
contest, soliciting reader suggestions for slang terms to "memorialize
the scandal." The winner came up with the "frothy mixture" idea,
Savage launched a website, and a meme was born. Even though mainstream
news outlets would never link to it, Savage's site rose in the Google
rankings, thanks in part to bloggers who posted Santorum-related news
on the site or linked to it from their blogs. Eventually it eclipsed
Santorum's own campaign site in search results; some observers even
suggested it may have contributed to Santorum's crushing 18-point
defeat in his 2006 campaign against Bob Casey.

Savage says his site hasn't been updated for years, yet it remains
entrenched in the Google rankings. Not even Santorum's ascent as a Fox
News contributor or his early campaign swings through the key primary
states of Iowa and New Hampshire have managed to bury it. With Google
results like this, what's an aspiring presidential candidate to do?

I wanted to ask Santorum whether he had a strategy for scrubbing his
Web presence, but he didn't return my calls. So instead, I asked a few
experts. "This is an unusual problem," says Michael Fertik, CEO of
ReputationDefender, which specializes in helping individuals maintain
a positive Web presence. "It's devastating. This is one of the more
creative and salient Google issues I've ever seen."

Fertik, who points out that he is not a supporter of the former
senator, notes that more than anything, Santorum needs to act quickly.
Once the campaign starts to make headlines again, an increase in
search traffic will likely help maintain Savage's high spot in the
rankings: "It's going to be very hard to move."

To at least make a dent, Santorum could try a concerted push to
generate links to his domain on prominent sites and blogs, ginning its
Google ranking; Mark Skidmore, an expert in search-engine marketing at
the online strategy firm Blue State Digital, says Santorum should also
consider buying paid search results for his name. He says the Obama
campaign successfully used this strategy to help bury sites that
claimed Obama was a Muslim or not an American citizen. But like
Fertik, Skidmore thinks Santorum faces an uphill battle, in part
because Savage's site has been up for so long-with more than 13,000
inbound links, compared with only 5,000 for Santorum's own site,
America's Foundation. "He's staring at a very big deficit," Skidmore
observes.

That deficit might grow even bigger soon. "I've sort of been in denial
about the fact that Rick Santorum is going to run for president,"
Savage says. "But now I'm going to have to sic my flying monkeys on
him"-in other words, mobilize bloggers to start posting and linking to
his site again.

Savage has not forgiven Santorum for his seven-year-old comments:
"Rick would have prevented me and my partner from being able to adopt
my son," he points out. But Savage does have a deal for the
politician. "If Rick Santorum wants to make a $5 million donation to
[the gay marriage group] Freedom to Marry, I will take it down.
Interest starts accruing now." Santorum may want to consider Savage's
offer. Otherwise, he's kinda screwed.


Unfortunately, the GOP and its teabagger party has seen fit to nominate
a
bunch of candidates whose views on many matters are not so difference
from
Santorum's.

What's also disturbing is that many actually believe the same people who
trashed the US at home and abroad are now going to fix it with the same
policies.

Proof of rampant stupidity among the American populace. That the
teaparty continues to gain momentum while a church in Florida decides
to burn Korans all while the Republican leadership sits silent.

The Borowitz report from this morning was spot on.


What does your cock sucking buddy have to do with the koran burning stunt?

Unfortunately, the GOP and its teabagger party has (sic) seen fit to nominate
a bunch of candidates whose views on many matters are not so difference (sic)
from Santorum's.-

Hey Old Timer, been down on the creek taking pictures lately?