Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves. William E. Boetchker |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/16/10 10:15 AM, Jack wrote:
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves. William E. Boetchker In other words, whatever serves the rich is...right. Right? Bull****. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Secular Humorist" wrote in message ...
On 9/16/10 10:15 AM, Jack wrote: You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves. William E. Boetchker In other words, whatever serves the rich is...right. Right? Bull****. Harry Krause calling all of those points bull****. Who would have guessed. BTW You, or should I say your wife, would be considered rich by most of the Obama supporters. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:55:29 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote: On 9/16/10 11:40 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... "Secular wrote in message ... On 9/16/10 10:15 AM, Jack wrote: You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves. William E. Boetchker In other words, whatever serves the rich is...right. Right? Bull****. Harry Krause calling all of those points bull****. Who would have guessed. BTW You, or should I say your wife, would be considered rich by most of the Obama supporters. That's nothing, Harry would be considered "smart" by most of the Obama supporters too! LOL!!! Certainly smarter than you are. Tosk and Jackoff, a gold mine if stupidity were gold. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:58:48 -0400, "mmc" wrote:
"I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... "Secular Humorist" wrote in message ... On 9/16/10 10:15 AM, Jack wrote: You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves. William E. Boetchker In other words, whatever serves the rich is...right. Right? Bull****. Harry Krause calling all of those points bull****. Who would have guessed. BTW You, or should I say your wife, would be considered rich by most of the Obama supporters. That's nothing, Harry would be considered "smart" by most of the Obama supporters too! LOL!!! -- A "Teanderthal" is a person who doesn't understand what the Tea Party is and who they represent. Blind obedience is a great trait in a dog but not so much in a voter. From either party. Tea party, what a joke. By supporting that loon in Delaware, they just sealed the balance of the next Senate with Democrats retaining a majority. By what measure does that make any sense? Teabaggers are voluntarily retarded, which is an insult to those with natural challenges, like The Freak. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack" wrote in message ... You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves. William E. Boetchker You sure are good at making no sense. If you're going to make a political statement, have at it. This is just nonsense. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Quote of the day... | General | |||
Quote of the day: | General | |||
Quote of the Day: | General | |||
Quote of the Day | General |